Jan
02

I’m Sorry Bankers, But You Really Do Deserve It… So, Merry Christmas!

 

Well, I want the bankers reading this to know that I was somewhat hesitant to post the videos below.  It’s not really my sort of thing.  Not because they are attacking the big name banks, lord knows I’ve done more than my share of that… but because they’re just… oh, I don’t know… they’re too broadly targeted… or maybe because they’re too cheery.  I’m not really sure.  I certainly don’t have any beef with any of the folks that work at some Chase Bank branch, and I don’t really like the idea of making those bank employees feel persecuted or somehow unsafe… or that they are hated, because they are not… at least not by me.

However, the people that wrote and performed the adaptations of our Christmas classics deserve to be recognized, and millions of others who are suffering as a result of the foreclosure crisis deserve to know they are not alone.

You know, two years ago I was invited to speak at a conference put on by the American Bar Association for bank lawyers… it was held in Park City, Utah… and I was on a panel with Tom Pahl from the FTC.  I enjoyed going after Tom a bit and he was a good sport about the whole thing… but watching these videos caused me to recall what I said to the 200+ bank attorneys as I wrapped up my talk about the foreclosure crisis.

I said that in my view, the pendulum was swinging too far to their side… that they may feel like they’ve taken an early lead, and that they are safe in their position… but, that it was a deceptive feeling… a false sense of security, if you will.  I pointed out that historically, divides such as the one being deepened and widened at that time, between the distressed homeowners and their mortgage servicers… well, they just never end well.

I said that at the end of battles like the one that was obviously shaping up between bankers and homeowners, they shoot the Romanovs and then we all wonder what happened to Anastasia, a reference to the murders of Czar Nicholas II and his family during the Bolshevic Revolution in Russia back in 1917.  (I know… you knew that.  I was just being clear for those who might not have known.)

At the time, I thought my audience understood my point, but today… two years later… I’m not sure they did.  I was trying to say that there are certain points beyond which things don’t snap back… like if you pull an elastic band far enough, it loses its elasticity forever.  Or like an argument between two family members that just went too far and destroyed a family forever.  I think many would say that we have already past that point as far as the bankers are concerned, and I think to some degree that’s probably true… it’s certainly close to being irrevocable damage, if it isn’t already.

And I wonder if Secretary Geithner, Fed Chair Bernanke and the bankers realize that passing that point doesn’t mean that bankers win… it means we all lose, but make no mistake… it means that they lose a lot more than we ever could.  Maybe they don’t see it.  I guess they do not.

Anyway… here we go… Christmas Caroling for the Banksters…

Mandelman out.

 

Dec
31

MY DOERS DID IT AGAIN! But it’s not over yet. (And Holly Says Thank You!)

 

 YOU DID GOOD! 

Okay, DOERS… you’ve DONE IT again… but it’s not over yet, so if you’re one of the DOERS that hasn’t DONE anything yet, WE NEED YOU NOW!

I don’t usually do this, but with Holly’s permission, I’ve posted the three emails I received from her today.  I get a lot of very flattering emails from homeowners across the country, and I appreciate them all very much… but I don’t post them because it just seems weird and icky to do so… like, “look at how great I am.”  (Yuck.)

But, I’m posting Holly’s emails today for three reasons:

  1. Because it’s not just about me… it’s about my DOERS too, and you DOERS deserve to feel like I do when I get an email like the ones you’ll read below.  I couldn’t DO it, without YOU.
  2. Because not enough people have sent me an email to say they are a DOER… we NEED MORE… many more. So, I’m hoping by reading what Holly said and seeing the results DOERS get, more of my readers will become DOERS by sending an email to: mandelman@mac.com.  And DOERS… I need you to help recruit DOERS too!)
  3. Because not enough DOERS have sent an email to John Stumpf at Wells Fargo as a result of the article I posted on Friday morning, and it’s a little disappointing.  I’m going to try to send everyone an email later to ask them to be the DOER they promised to be, but I assume the reason they haven’t sent their email is because they haven’t read my article yet.

So, if you’re already a DOER, but haven’t subscribed to Mandelman Matters please DO it now: SUBSCRIBE.  That way, you’ll get an email with each new article and if it’s a DOER ALERT, you’ll receive it that day.

I need DOERS to DO BOTH… SUBSCRIBE and send me your email.  The reason is that the SUBSCRIBE tab is through Feedburner, it sends an automatic email with each new article.  The emails you send me I’m putting in a private database of DOERS, so that when I need to tell DOERS about something but I don’t want everyone who reads Mandelman Matters to know… I’ll email everyone from that database.  Get it?  Cool.

So THANK YOU to all of my DOERS that did it… I just LOVE  the way you DO what you DO!  You DO it so well… BUT IT’S NOT OVER YET… It’s close though… you’ll see.

HERE’S THE 1ST EMAIL HOLLY SENT ME,

I READ IT EARLY THIS MORNING…

Mr. Andelman,

Thank you again for the great article. I cried through the entire thing. That someone would be so kind and do something for myself and my children to this magnitude is just heartwarming to me.

You know I didn’t mention this to you but it was the first time in 20 years that I did not go home to Erie with my family for Christmas. My children were really upset about it but with the eviction and house being in foreclosure I couldn’t take them there. My entire family was so disappointed because for my mom and dad their daughter and grandchildren weren’t there and for my brother and sister their sister and nieces and nephews were not there either.

Instead, I spent Christmas trying to pack everything up and do as much research as I could to stop the foreclosure from going through. I feel like I let my entire family down. Now though it was worth it because I got to you. I found someone who cared enough to stay up all night writing and trying to help me. It was a Christmas present I never expected. An early birthday gift (tomorrow is my birthday). I found hope.

Tonight an executive from Wells Fargo called me with her boss and Paula in her office. I wrote John Stumpf and the others today after reading your article. I let them have it. I told them I was going to fight til the end.

She said John Stumpf read my e mail and she wanted to talk to me about it. So, by the end of the conversation, she is calling the attorneys office and telling them that they are no longer doing an eviction or an inspection of the property.

They are going to let us live there until they can look into modifying our loan or something else to help make it affordable. She is putting this in writing and over nighting it to me. 

She also said that if they can not find a program that she would be the one contacting me and letting me know that we will be evicted. She said they want to work to see if they can work something out but she of course could not guarantee anything. She kept telling me how sorry she was that we had an eviction hanging over our head at Christmas time.

I also went down to the court house and got some documents and had them notarized. One is confusing to me as it was dated March 10, 2011 that the assignment transferred from Flick mortgage to Wells Fargo on that day. That isn’t true at all. Wells Fargo said it transferred title in 2007.

I am reading your blog and reading comments from your readers. The girl Beth something that called me to night said she is now the only point of contact for me and that she has escalated everything.

I will keep you posted on what happens,

Holly Niemic

AND HERE’S THE 2ND EMAIL FROM HOLLY TODAY…

Dear Mr. Andelman,

So, because of your article and your DOER’S my children may be able to stay in the only home they have known.

Another thing I didn’t tell  you is my daughter came home from PA where she was in college because she could not concentrate on school when all this was going on. She called me every day crying where are we going to live. Where are Kipper, miller and Sasha going to live (our dogs)?

I told her I don’t know. I’m going to fight to keep our home but other then that I don’t know. I will work ten jobs if I have to to put a roof over your head but she just wanted her home, her room and her life back. she wanted something stable as her parents are separated. She is now on cloud nine and filled with the same hope that I have thanks to you.

I honestly believe that we have won. I know it is all because of you! Thank you so much from the bottom of my heart. I will continue to do everything I need to do and then when my home is our home again without any banks coming after me I will help someone else that needs help. I now know where to go at the court house, I am learning so much that I will pass the knowledge on and I will point them to your blog and try to help them as much as I can.

I will also continue to be one of your DOERS. I will follow you forever.

Thank you so much for helping my children. You can not imagine how in awe I am at you and how much I appreciate everything.

I will keep you posted on what happens,

Holly Niemic


AND HERE’S HER 3RD EMAIL TODAY…

Mr. Andelman,

Yes, You can print anything I ever send you. If it helps just one person then it is so worth it to me.

I just recieved a letter by UPS from Beth Dorsett, Vice President, Office of Executive Complaints. It says that the subject property does not currently have a scheduled eviction date and that she will work with me in order to determine which workout options are available for the loan. 

She will also contact the attorney’s office to advise them of our intent to review the loan for retention options. ( I have been asking them to do this since before the Sheriff sale, but each department said they couldn’t do it and of course never did it).

She also gave me her personal cell phone number last night and her phone number at work which is (800) 853-8516  extension 40586.

I got that letter because of you! You are winning this not just for my children, myself but for everyone facing foreclosure. I have even had more people contact me who are offering advise and telling me not to give up hope.

Now I will never give up hope. You made me believe that there are truly good people out there who think of others and really not only thinks of them but does for them without even knowing them. That is so amazing to me.

All your DOERS, they have been so supportive. Like I said I am one of your DOERS for life now. I will have always lived my life helping others and now others are helping me. it is so touching I’m crying again.

Thank you once again and I will keep you posted on what Wells Fargo is doing.

I don’t know you but God knows I love you! 

Holly Niemic

###

SO, WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR?  IF YOU HAVEN’T DONE IT, DO IT NOW! AND BECOME A REGISTERED DOER TODAY BY SENDING AN EMAIL TO MANDELMAN@MAC.COM.

AND SUBSCRIBE TO MANDELMAN MATTERS HERE

Mandelman out.

Dec
31

GUEST POST: Debtor Education Course: Are Joe and Sally to Blame? By Attorney Russ DeMott

Russell A. DeMott is a bankruptcy and foreclosure defense attorney in South Carolina… and a regular reader of Mandelman Matters.  He graduated from the University of South Carolina School of Law in 1993 and was a staff editor and the research editor for The South Carolina Law Review.

Immediately following law school, Russ clerked for the Honorable Harry A. Beach, Circuit Court Judge in Allegan, Michigan.

For the next ten years, Russ practiced in Michigan in the areas of bankruptcy law, family law, criminal defense, and general litigation, but as the years went on, Russ focused more and more on bankruptcy law.  In 2005, Russ moved back to South Carolina to settle in the Charleston area.

In his spare time, Russ writes for his bankruptcy blog, The Charleston Bankruptcy Blog, and for Bankruptcy Law Network, a national bankruptcy blog.  Russ enjoys explaining bankruptcy concepts in plain English to lay people… like me… and he’s good at it too.

Russ truly likes helping people with financial struggles. “I view my practice as a way to level the playing field between ordinary citizens—the voters—and Corporate America—the vote buyers. I’m unapologetically on the side of the little guy.”  And you know how much I like that, right?

Today, Russ files Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy, as well as with out-of-court solutions like negotiating with creditors, and he takes on the banksters in foreclosure defense matters.

Below is an article by Russ and he’s working on his next Guest Post, coming in a couple of weeks. Look for it, it’s going to be about a very important issue that I haven’t seen discussed elsewhere.

~~~

The debtor education course. It’s the second course required by the Bankruptcy Code–the ticket out of bankruptcyat least if the debtor wants his discharge.

I confess I’ve always wondered what my clients thought of the course. Calling it a “course” is a bit much.  It only takes an hour or two, and there’s not much you can accomplish in that amount of time.  It’s more like a session.

I’ve had clients experience some really severe hardships–failed businesses, strange and unexpected medical problems, domestic problems, job losses, huge medical debts, just to name a few. So I’ve wondered if clients find the debtor education course, well, patronizing and insulting.  I’ve asked a few of them, and some do.

I got an email from a client recently who’d gone through three job losses in a short period of time, as well as some domestic relations craziness mixed in for good measure.  Her email about the debtor education course is–with her permission–reproduced below.  She writes:

“I have attached the last page displayed for that awful two hours of required federal course on bankruptcy. Obviously, it is intended as a cruel and unusual punishment in return for the act of declaring bankruptcy. There was nothing in it that was something I did not know. It is obviously intended for idiots who have never attend school, earned a penny, had a job, opened a checking account, heard of the financial market, held insurance of any kind, or made any other type of financial transaction on the face of the earth.

Perhaps those who demand these courses should take into account that some people declare bankruptcy not because they are financial idiots, but because they met unexpected financial demands. I do not believe there are courses which can be created to cover those instances – divorce, child custody, unexpected, unplanned major medical expenses.  I have met their stupid requirement.”

But you must see people who have been irresponsible with credit!

Yes, I have–and plenty.  But they all know that when they walk through my door.  This reminds me of my childhood friend and his dog, “Peanut.”  It was one of those little “wiener dogs,” a Dachshund.  When Peanut occasionally had “an accident” on the carpet in the basement, my friend’s mother would rub the little dog’s nose in it and yell at the dog.  This is the mental picture I get when I think of the debtor education requirement.  The Bankruptcy Code basically says, “you just messed on the rug you stupid little dog, and now you can pay to take a course so we can rub your nose in it.”

And there’s another side to the “irresponsible debtor” argument

The system focuses on the debtor.  Should the debtor be in a Chapter 13 instead of a Chapter 7?  Is the debtor hiding assets?  Are the debtor’s assets valued accurately? Fair enough. But just once I’d like a panel trustee or someone from the U.S. Trustee’s office jump up at a First Meeting and yell, “Why on earth did these credit card companies lend $90,000 to this couple earning only $50,000 a year?”  I’m sure they think it, but it would be fun to hear it–just once.     

Who’s got the MBA here anyway?

It’s ironic that the bankruptcy system expects Joe and Sally–many times with no college or financial education–to be so financially responsible when it’s perfectly content to have nincompoops running our financial institutions.  Folks with MBAs can destroy companies like Washington Mutual, Wachovia (bought by Wells Fargo to avert destruction), Merrill Lynch (bought by Bank of America on the eve of destruction back in 2008 and as the CEO bought an $87,000 area rug for his office), Lehman Brothers, AIG (if not for the bail out it received), and Bank of America (perhaps?–think Countrywide.)

The fact of the matter is that over the last 100 years, the Joe and Sallys of America haven’t done anything to cause depressions or recessions; it’s been the MBAs of the world who manipulate stock markets, commit fraud–think Enron or Worldcom–or otherwise wreak economic trouble. Read a book or two about the Great Depression if you have any doubts about this.  (Check out what National City Bank was up to back then!)  Now, as then, the blame for the mess we’re in can be laid at the feet of Wall Street.

There’s a perverse twist here

The perversity is that we’re regulating Joe and Sally with “bankruptcy reform” and things like the debtor education course but giving Wall Street and corporate America a pass.  And it happened at about the same time.  Our “bankruptcy reform” (which, by anyone’s account was an attempt to increase regulation on ordinary Americans) occurred between 1998 and 2005.  At the same time, in 1999, Congress repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1934, the act which separated commercial banking from investment banking–the kind of banking where securities are underwritten and issued.  Congress also decided to leave the derivatives market unregulated, which led to the AIG mess and near financial Armageddon at the end of 2008.

The MBAs and corporate America–those with “financial education”–saw to it that the regulations put in place in 1930s during the Great Depression were swept aside. As financial regulation of Main Streetincreased, financial regulation of Wall Street decreased. (Watch “The Go Go 90s”to learn about how this happened.)

Maybe someone else’s nose should be rubbed in the mess for a change?

###

This article first appeared on the Bankruptcy Law Network.

Dec
30

DOER ALERT: Wells Fargo Bank… How could you do this to a mother of four?

 

 

“Integrity is not a commodity. It’s the most rare and precious of personal attributes. It is the core of a person’s — and a company’s — reputation.”

John Stumpf, Chairman and CEO, Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

Doug and Holly built their home in Raleigh, North Carolina back in 1994.  It’s the only home their four children… ages 12, 13, 15 and 18… have ever known.  For something like 18 years, they never missed a mortgage payment.  I spoke with Holly for a couple hours last night… she’s simply as nice a person as I can imagine exists.

 

In 2009, the recession hit Doug’s business pretty hard… but no surprise there right?  He certainly was far from alone.  And I would think that Wells Fargo should at least somewhat understand that situation.  After all, the federal government’s taxpayer funded bailout that year sent $38.6 billion Wells Fargo’s way, isn’t that right Mr. Stumpf?  No matter.

 

Holly wrote to me yesterday… her message began by saying:

 

“Time is of the essence. I am writing to you today for your help.”

 

Here’s how her message ended:

 

“We really need to be out of our house today but Freddie mac put it out in the public that we have until January 3, 2011.  I asked Wells Fargo and their attorney to put that in writing but they wouldn’t. They just agreed to it.

However, I am afraid that they will send the sheriff out today to lock us out of our home. We have not moved yet as we are still under review.  Can you help us by pointing us in the right direction?  We are so desperate.”

 

I’m going to tell you their story in a moment.  But, first I want to point something out to Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf and the folks at Wells Fargo.

 

Holly asked you and the bank’s attorneys at Brock & Scott, if her family should expect to be evicted today or whether they had until the 3rd of January and you agreed that it would not be until January.  You wouldn’t give her anything in writing, but that shouldn’t be necessary… you agreed.

 

But you see, Mr. Stumpf, as Wells Fargo’s CEO, at least one point should not be lost on you… she doesn’t TRUST you… she can’t trust you, and I don’t blame her.

 

She doesn’t believe your bank even when it comes to something like whether she and her four children will be evicted today or next week.  Just before New Years’ Day or right after.  She can’t trust your bank to answer a question like that and she has damn good reason… it’s because you and your bank have been proven to be entirely untrustworthy on so many occasions that she’d rather trust a convicted felon off the street than someone from Wells Fargo Bank.

 

And so would I, Mr. Stumpf, so would I.  And the same will go for her four children… someday.

 

Mr. Stumpf, you were one of the 100 highest paid CEOs in the country last year, with almost $19 million in total compensation.  That seems like a lot considering we don’t seem to be able to trust you to answer a question like the one Holly asked, does it not, sir?

 

Holly and her husband separated in August of 2009.  I didn’t ask why, it’s none of my business, but I could tell that they were very loving and caring parents because she explained how they’ve alternated staying in the home with the kids, 4 days on, 3 days off.  They didn’t want their marital problems to disrupt the lives of their children, so she stays at an apartment and he sleeps at his office.

 

Perhaps it was their financial difficulties that put too much strain on their marriage, it certainly couldn’t have helped.  Doug’s business was coming back slowly but in October of 2010, Doug couldn’t make the mortgage payment for the first time in over 16 years.  He didn’t tell his wife, I’m sure I know why… he couldn’t.  Like I would have done, he probably devoted all of his time to work so he could catch up as soon as possible.

 

Holly received a letter from Wells Fargo in February of 2011.  It said their home was in foreclosure.  She called the bank immediately to make payment arrangements that would bring loan up to date right away, but the bank wouldn’t talk to her.  She learned that she was not on the loan, she was just on the Deed of Trust.

 

She went to see Doug at his office, and the two of them called the bank on speakerphone to arrange to make up the back payments.  Holly had $12,000 in her IRA, and she owned a second home that had equity of roughly $60,000.  And wouldn’t you know it, that mortgage was with Wells Fargo too, and she had never missed a payment.

 

But, Wells Fargo said they couldn’t accept payments at that time, the couple would have to contact the bank’s foreclosure attorneys at the law firm of Brock & Scott.

 

SIDEBAR: I’m no banker, but I hear about this sort of thing happening all the time.  Why the hell can’t banks accept a payment… ever?  And don’t bother telling me there’s a rule or a law, because banks treat either like a speed bump when it suits them, that much is clear.  When a homeowner tries to make a payment, figure out how to accept it and get them back on track as quickly as possible.

 

Doug ended up asking Wells Fargo about a loan modification.  There were delays on Wells Fargo’s end, according to Brock & Scott, so for the purposes of our story, let’s fast forward.

 

On October 7, 2011, Doug received a letter from a Wells Fargo Preservation Specialist, Katerina Williams.  The letter said that all Doug had to do was have all of the required documents submitted to Wells by October 22, 2011 and he would be reviewed for a loan modification or some other program offered by the bank.

 

Here’s what the letter of October 7th said:

 

“As your mortgage servicer we want to help you stay in your home.  If you do not qualify for a loan modification, we will work with you to explore other options available to help you keep your home.”

 

Doug submitted and Wells Fargo confirmed receipt of all required documents by October 19th, three days before the deadline of October 22nd.  (Holly has the fax receipts showing the date.)

 

So, the bank immediately started doing what Katerina Williams said the bank would do… they began reviewing Doug and Holly’s file for a loan modification?  No, I’m afraid they didn’t do that.

 

What Wells Fargo did do was sell their home at a Sheriff’s Sale on October 21, 2011… a day BEFORE THE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS.

 

I can only imagine the feelings of panic Holly and Doug were experiencing as they made call after call to their Wells Fargo Preservation Specialist who “wanted to help them stay in their home.”  They had been told that there would be no sale assuming everything was submitted by the 22nd.  But, now Katerina couldn’t be reached.

 

I’m sure she was busy.  Perhaps friends had unexpectedly come in from out of town, or maybe she had a dentist appointment… that lasted for the next two months.  What?  It could happen.

 

Holly and Doug were finally able to reach the woman’s supervisor who said all she could do is submit their file for review after the sale because no one had bid on it and so it ended up going back to Freddie Mac.

 

So, the supervisor did exactly what she said she’d do and submitted the couple’s file for review?  No, I’m afraid not… once again.

 

Next thing the couple knew two letters arrived from the foreclosure attorneys at Brock & Scott.  One was an eviction letter, which said they had 10 days to get out of the home they had built in 1994 and for which they had paid without incident for 16 plus years.  The other was a cash-for-keys letter that said they could stay in their home until December 29, 2011.

 

They checked and were told that if they left the home it would be considered abandoned and any review of their situation would be over.  So, with no other choices apparent, they chose the cash-for-keys offer, hoping the extra time would allow them to fight the foreclosure and allow them to get an answer to their case, still supposedly under review.

 

The couple wrote to Wells Fargo, to Freddie Mac, and to Brock & Scott asking that the eviction date be postponed as their review was still pending. Not even one person even responded.

 

Out of desperation, Holly sent an email to the bank’s CEO, John Stumpf.  (Oh good… that’s you John.  Here’s your chance to help your customer stay in her home.  For almost $19 million a year, I’m thinking you can at least make sure the nonsense stops, right John?)

 

Holly and Doug heard from Paula Kingery, who said that Mr. Stumpf had forwarded Holly’s email and that she was now on the case.  And what a relief that must have been.  The bank’s CEO had taken action, and thank the good Lord for that.

 

Today is the 30th of December… and still no response from anyone, even though Holly has called, faxed and emailed too many times to count them anymore.  The couple assumes that their originally assigned Preservation Specialist, Katerina Williams, must be dead, as they have been unable to reach her via phone, fax or email since before the date of the Sheriff’s Sale.

 

Here’s the situation in Holly’s own words, as I could not improve on them no matter how I might have tried…

 

“Paula Kingry called me last night to let me know that she has a phone call in to the lead investigator on our case to see if they can do anything to lift the eviction date. I don’t understand how they don’t know if they can do that and how they can ask us to leave our home when we are still under review. We were told that if we leave we will give up our rights to that review, but if we stay I’m scared that the Sheriff will forcibly remove my four children, and me… and any belongings in the home will be forfeited.”

 

That’s very nice John Stumpf… very nice indeed.  Have you ever felt like that?  Have you ever felt afraid that the Sheriff would soon be coming to forcibly evict you and your four children from somewhere?  Probably not, would be my guess.

 

By the way, I should have asked earlier… are you having a nice holiday, Mr. Stumpf?

 

I only ask because Holly’s living through her own personal hell because of your bank, Mr. Stumpf.  You foreclosed on their home illegally… and if it wasn’t technically illegal because your industry’s lobbyists have made it so, I don’t care one bit… it was WRONG.  And I am going to assume you know the difference between RIGHT and WRONG.

 

Your bank sold Doug and Holly’s home the day before the submission deadline for the paperwork required to apply for a loan modification.  Then your people told the couple that they were in review to see if the sale can be rescinded… and never called, nor could anyone involved be reached again.

 

Mr. Stumpf… I want you to know that I take absolutely no pleasure in any of this.  It is now 5:29 AM, and I’ve been up all night writing this article for Doug and Holly because I care about them.  I have a family and I could be doing other things, not the least of which is sleeping… if only Wells Fargo were able to treat its customers like anything above the way a state penitentiary treats its inmates.

 

You see… I’ve been writing about the financial and foreclosure crises for just over three years now… I’ve written over 600 articles on the subject.  Your bank, meanwhile, has not gotten any better at this whole loan modification thing during that time.  How is that even possible, Mr. Stumpf?  How can you not be any better at this after three years of doing it every day?

 

It seems, for example, that you still can’t answer the phone with any consistency.  What’s the problem?  Is it all those buttons?

 

Here’s what you were supposed to do in this situation, and trust me… although it may seem presumptuous, I feel safe speaking for EVERYONE in America…

 

As Holly has informed your people, she’s prepared to make the payments to prevent the loss of her home.  In fact, she tried to do just that on several occasions.  She has more than $10,000 in her IRA, and she owns another home on which Wells Fargo has the mortgage… it’s current, by the way… and there’s approximately $50,000 in equity.  She’ll sell it and use that money to pay for her home, if that’s what is required.

 

Also, she’s working, earning $4-5,000 a month on her own.  Doug’s insurance agency business is also doing better, and he’ll likely make close to $100,000 this year.  They remain separated, but he still supports the family.  Plus, they only have 10 years left on their loan.  If Wells could extend the term to a 30-year loan, there would be no problem making the payments as they always have.

 

I imagine that there could be some issues because she’s not on the loan, and only appears on the Deed of Trust, but they’re not divorced… and regardless, those are the sort of issues that a bank is supposed to help their customers with… what the bank is not supposed to do is screw around for months, lie, stop responding to calls, and then sell someone’s home the day before the bank told them to submit the paperwork required to apply for a loan modification.

 

In fact, I had a woman in Tennessee that I had to write about a couple of months ago… same problem, but Bank of America figured it out and got her mortgage modified… after I wrote about them too, of course.  (And if you’re not already familiar with me, feel free to ask Brian Moynihan about me, he’ll fill you in, I’m quite sure.)

 

Doug and Holly were excellent customers of your bank for over 16 years, and then they hit a rough patch.  They needed the bank’s help… some guidance to get them through difficult times.  You had a chance to earn the trust of a customer for life… (and the good news is you still do… but as Holly said in her message to me: Time is of the essence.)

 

Here’s an excerpt of what Mr. Stumpf wrote about his company’s Vision & Values

 

“Our progress has not been perfect. We learn just as much from failure (perhaps more) as we do from success. Companies are made up of human beings who make mistakes. When we make them we admit them, learn from them, then we keep moving forward with even more understanding, guided by the same values toward the same vision.”

 

I like the sound of that, Mr. Stumpf.

 

Here’s what Holly said at the very end of our conversation:

 

“We went to the courthouse yesterday Dec 28, 2011 to file a TRO but they didn’t have forms there for us and we weren’t sure how to do it, but they told us we had to have a attorney file them. We are having a very difficult time finding an attorney here in Raleigh, NC on such short notice. I have called a few but they can’t help and am waiting for phone calls to be returned from others.”

 

You see, the thing is… I DO KNOW LAWYERS IN NORTH CAROLINA, lots of them, actually, and one in particular… a good friend… Max Gardner.  And I’m going to have to call Max later today and find out what can be done through the courts to stop you from sending the Sheriff to Holly’s to throw her children into the street.  I don’t want to, mind you… especially since you could so easily correct this.

 

See, and I’d like to think that what I’ve written here would be enough… but I fear it won’t be.  So, if you’ll excuse me for just a moment… I’m going to introduce you to some friends of mine…  Mandelman out.

 ~~~~

Ahem… Excuse me…Are there any DOERS in the house?

 

CALLING ALL DOERS!

 ~~~~

Doug & Holly Niemic

Raleigh, NC

Loan Number: 0157248618

 ~~~~

And look what I found… a whole list of Email addresses for Wells Fargo execs, but let’s start with letting Mr. John Stumpf know how littler we think of this situation his bank has created.  Let’s let him know we’re here and we’re paying attention… and that there are quite a few of us.

 

Chairman of the Board, President, CEO: John.G.Stumpf@wellsfargo.com

~~~~ 

John Stumpf (415) 396-7018
john.g.stumpf@wellsfargo.com
CEO: John G. Stumpf
420 Montgomery St.
San Francisco, CA 94163
1-866-878-5865

~~~

Sharon Cecil, Assistant to Both
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
sharon.cecil@wellsfargo.com

~~~

Todd M. Boothroyd
Senior Counsel, Real Estate Division
Todd.M.Boothroyd@wellsfargo.com

~~~

**** Kovacevich (415) 396-4927
kovacedm@wellsfargo.com

~~~

John Stumpf (415) 396-7018
john.g.stumpf@wellsfargo.com
CEO: John G. Stumpf
420 Montgomery St.
San Francisco, CA 94163
1-866-878-5865

~~~

Mark Oman (515) 324-2035
mark.oman@wellsfargo.com

~~~

Cara Heiden (515) 213-4040
cara.heiden@wellsfargo.com
Executive number for members to use to escalate the mod process 1-800-853-8516.
Executive Communications
MAC X2302-02J 800 S. Jordan Creek Parkway
West Des Moines, IA 50266
515-324-3130
&
515-324-2872

~~~

Denise Erickson
Executive Mortgage Specialist, Office of the President, WF Home Mortgage
MAC X2302-019
1 Home Campus
Des Moines, IA 50328
denise.erickson@wellsfargo.com
1-515-324-2610 

~~~

Cara K. Heiden, CEO
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
cara.k.heiden@wellsfargo.com

~~~

Mary Coffin, Vice President
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
mary.coffin@wellsfargo.com

~~~

And a few more… just in case… 

Executive Vice President, General Counsel: James.M.Strother@wellsfargo.com

Executive Vice President, Controller: Richard.D.Levy@wellsfargo.com

Senior Executive Vice President – Wholesale Banking: David.A.Hoyt@wellsfargo.com

Senior Executive Vice President David.M.Carroll@wellsfargo.com

Senior Executive Vice President: patricia.r.callahan@wellsfargo.com

Senior Executive Vice President, CIO: kevin.a.rhein@wellsfargo.com

Senior EVP, Community Banking: Carrie.L.Tolstedt@wellsfargo.com

Senior Executive Vice President: AVID.MODJTABAI@wellsfargo.com

The Board of Directors, Wells Fargo Bank: BoardCommunications@wellsfargo.com

Dec
30

OhioFraudclosure Blog Warns… Fannie & Freddie Eviction Moratorium Ends January 3rd

 

 

I’m actually quite proud to be able to say that I’ve inspired a few people around the country to help homeowners.  Two lawyers have written to me to say that they’ve come out of retirement to help defend homeowners in court, for example.   OhioFraudclosure is a blog written by Marco, who, at least partially, has been inspired by Mandelman Matters… he’s a very nice, caring, and dedicated person who started a blog to help homeowners… and it’s not an easy thing to do, as I know… so, I’ve tried to help if I can, and he’s always willing to help me as well.

Marco was sort of peripherally involved in the Occupy Foreclosure movement that launched on December 6, 2011.  He had contacted a homeowner he knew was about to be evicted to see if he would want the Occupy folks to occupy his home in an attempt to delay the eviction.  The homeowner declined, saying that his wife was recovering from being in a car accident.  I interviewed Marco in the second half of my Front Line News podcast, if you’re interested in hearing him explain what happened… he actually DID stop the eviction that was attempted… it’s one heck of a story, actually.

 

 

So, below is a video that Marco just put together.  It’s dramatic… disturbing even.  And okay, the music is a tad over the top.  It includes footage of the sheriff coming to evict a family, obviously without notice… or at least without adequate notice.  Marco put the video together to let people know that the Fannie and Freddie annual-moratorium-for-the-holidays is ending on January 3rd.

And for the rest of the story, please click on over and check out Marco on OhioFraudclosure… he’s very complementary about Mandelman Matters.

Thank you, Marco.

Mandelman out.

 

A land once filled with promises…Where the American Dream was a family’s home,
has now become the land of broken promises and shattered dreams.
Sounds of children crying ….haunt parents ….who find it hard to sleep…
Everyone……waiting…. for the next knock or pounding….on the front door.

Communities are being destroyed, as families disappear into the night.
This will leave heavy scars on the very fabric of our nation.
These wounds are so deep…it will take a generation…or two….to heal.
3,000 ….EVICTIONS…. EVERY SINGLE DAY of the YEAR.
Maybe not today, or tomorrow, but ……THEY ARE COMING
They come……often with little or no warning.

Fannie and Freddie stopped foreclosing for the holidays, but only for a brief moment,
They did not stop…..out of the goodness of their hearts.
They paused, so no one witnesses THE HORRORS OF THEIR ACTS AT CHRISTMAS.
The powers that be ….wouldn’t want the world to see…..this sheer terror
January 3rd is coming and the daily mass evictions need to be ramped back up….again

THEY ARE COMING

Dec
29

ALJAZEERA… The year’s top story is not getting coverage…

 

 

This is the time of year for those in the media to opine as to which story from the year past was the most important.  Writing for ALJAZEERA, Danny Schechter’s end-of-year piece makes several important points about how much of the mainstream media seemingly continues to pretend that the financial and foreclosure crises aren’t happening.  He begins with the following…

This year’s top story is not getting coverage

New York, NY - As every media critic learns, the worst sin of our press is not its blatant biases, or crimes of commission, but rather the pervasive patterns of omission; what’s left out!

Already, with two weeks to go, the Associated Press has crossed the finish line with the top choice of the newspapers it serves. Perhaps in the outdated spirit of Mark Twain’s famous dictum that: “There are only two forces that can carry light to all corners of the globe – only two – the sun in the heavens and the Associated Press on earth”, their pick for story of the year is the killing of Osama bin Laden.

He goes on to acknowledge that on the progressive side of the street, this past year was an “ALL OCCUPY ALL THE TIME.” year, but that stories about Michael Jackson’s doctor, or the Kardashian wedding and break-up, are the “daily scandal that is there to titillate and drive up ratings.”

But, then Danny brings up what’s on all of our minds, Wall Street and the conspicuous absence of prosecutions and “perp walks.”

It has yet to happen and most media outlets are not focussing on why. I am referring to the lack of any real investigation of Wall Street crimes, and the indictments of wrongdoers. I am talking about “perp walks” by guilty Wall Street CEOs on their way to joining Bernie Madoff in some institute of incarceration.

Lack of investigative oversight

This is not a call for revenge, but for justice. The reason: the barely exposed chain of criminality that started in some salon of securitisation and then rippled across the world, bringing down countries and economies. It has its origins in Wall Street, where three industries colluded as a cabal to sell fraudulent subprime loans and then transfer fees and foreclosures from poor and middle class Americans to themselves.

Where is the examination of the pillars of our “FIRE” economy – Finance, Insurance and Real Estate. They became the interconnected cogs in a leverage machine to enrich themselves while plundering the rest of us.

So far, this story affecting so many millions has not really crashed through in the 1 per cent media machine with a few exceptions here and there.

And then… and this is where it really gets good, in my humble opinion… he tells people where they need to look to get the story that should be considered the year’s top story.

If you want to find out about this story of the year and years past, in all of its disgusting detail, you can’t just trust major media. You have to read Matt Taibbi in Rolling Stone, a music magazine, or blogs like Mandelman on Ml-implode.com, Naked Capitalism, Credit Writedowns, ZeroHedge, ProPublica, or Amped Status.com, to cite a few.

TV show host Dylan Ratigan has been a lonely voice on MSNBC while academics like former bank regulator William Black and former Bank economist Michael Hudson speak out frequently on the criminal environment that Wall Street has wrought in alternative outlets.

Journalists like Robert Scheer, Greg Palast and Chris Hedges write regularly on issues that from time to time make it into the columns of New York writers like Paul Krugman, Getrchen Morgensen, Frank Norris and James Stewart. All these opinion pieces rarely lead to follow-ups in the news section.

Was I too subtle there?  Did you happen to notice who’s blog was mentioned above?  Like, Woohoo! right?  Okay, just making sure…

Danny’s article goes on to discuss some very important issues, such as identifying those that are apparently, “Too Big to Question,” writing…

Just as many outlets did not warn us about the coming market meltdown, most are not warning us today about what will happen if the depression we are already sinking into deepens.

 And he bring in some news that I found to be nothing less than chilling…
Already, a European economic think-tank called LEAP, with a history of credible projections, warns soberly, “Already insolvent (the US) will become ungovernable bringing about, for Americans and those who depend on the United States, violent and destructive economic, financial, monetary, geopolitical and social shocks.”

Does anyone really believe that our political leaders in both parties know what to do? Along with the Fed, they have been pumping trillions into the economy to mostly no avail. The promised recovery has yet to show its head.

Danny closes his piece by discussing the fact that “what matters most is covered least.” And you can… and should… read the ALJAZEERA story by Danny Schechter in its entirety… HERE

Mandelman out.

 

Dec
29

ALJAZEERA… The year’s top story is not getting coverage…

 

 

This is the time of year for those in the media to opine as to which story from the year past was the most important.  Writing for ALJAZEERA, Danny Schechter’s end-of-year piece makes several important points about how much of the mainstream media seemingly continues to pretend that the financial and foreclosure crises aren’t happening.  He begins with the following…

This year’s top story is not getting coverage

New York, NY - As every media critic learns, the worst sin of our press is not its blatant biases, or crimes of commission, but rather the pervasive patterns of omission; what’s left out!

Already, with two weeks to go, the Associated Press has crossed the finish line with the top choice of the newspapers it serves. Perhaps in the outdated spirit of Mark Twain’s famous dictum that: “There are only two forces that can carry light to all corners of the globe – only two – the sun in the heavens and the Associated Press on earth”, their pick for story of the year is the killing of Osama bin Laden.

He goes on to acknowledge that on the progressive side of the street, this past year was an “ALL OCCUPY ALL THE TIME.” year, but that stories about Michael Jackson’s doctor, or the Kardashian wedding and break-up, are the “daily scandal that is there to titillate and drive up ratings.”

But, then Danny brings up what’s on all of our minds, Wall Street and the conspicuous absence of prosecutions and “perp walks.”

It has yet to happen and most media outlets are not focussing on why. I am referring to the lack of any real investigation of Wall Street crimes, and the indictments of wrongdoers. I am talking about “perp walks” by guilty Wall Street CEOs on their way to joining Bernie Madoff in some institute of incarceration.

Lack of investigative oversight

This is not a call for revenge, but for justice. The reason: the barely exposed chain of criminality that started in some salon of securitisation and then rippled across the world, bringing down countries and economies. It has its origins in Wall Street, where three industries colluded as a cabal to sell fraudulent subprime loans and then transfer fees and foreclosures from poor and middle class Americans to themselves.

Where is the examination of the pillars of our “FIRE” economy – Finance, Insurance and Real Estate. They became the interconnected cogs in a leverage machine to enrich themselves while plundering the rest of us.

So far, this story affecting so many millions has not really crashed through in the 1 per cent media machine with a few exceptions here and there.

And then… and this is where it really gets good, in my humble opinion… he tells people where they need to look to get the story that should be considered the year’s top story.

If you want to find out about this story of the year and years past, in all of its disgusting detail, you can’t just trust major media. You have to read Matt Taibbi in Rolling Stone, a music magazine, or blogs like Mandelman on Ml-implode.com, Naked Capitalism, Credit Writedowns, ZeroHedge, ProPublica, or Amped Status.com, to cite a few.

TV show host Dylan Ratigan has been a lonely voice on MSNBC while academics like former bank regulator William Black and former Bank economist Michael Hudson speak out frequently on the criminal environment that Wall Street has wrought in alternative outlets.

Journalists like Robert Scheer, Greg Palast and Chris Hedges write regularly on issues that from time to time make it into the columns of New York writers like Paul Krugman, Getrchen Morgensen, Frank Norris and James Stewart. All these opinion pieces rarely lead to follow-ups in the news section.

Was I too subtle there?  Did you happen to notice who’s blog was mentioned above?  Like, Woohoo! right?  Okay, just making sure…

Danny’s article goes on to discuss some very important issues, such as identifying those that are apparently, “Too Big to Question,” writing…

Just as many outlets did not warn us about the coming market meltdown, most are not warning us today about what will happen if the depression we are already sinking into deepens.

 And he bring in some news that I found to be nothing less than chilling…
Already, a European economic think-tank called LEAP, with a history of credible projections, warns soberly, “Already insolvent (the US) will become ungovernable bringing about, for Americans and those who depend on the United States, violent and destructive economic, financial, monetary, geopolitical and social shocks.”

Does anyone really believe that our political leaders in both parties know what to do? Along with the Fed, they have been pumping trillions into the economy to mostly no avail. The promised recovery has yet to show its head.

Danny closes his piece by discussing the fact that “what matters most is covered least.” And you can… and should… read the ALJAZEERA story by Danny Schechter in its entirety… HERE

Mandelman out.

 

Dec
27

Should State AGs Settle with Bankers? Ohio’s Former AG Marc Dann Weighs In… A Mandelman Matters Podcast

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the negotiations between remaining state attorneys general and the big banks over issues related to the foreclosure practices employed by the banks’ mortgage servicing operations, are nearing an end.  According to the WSJ, $19 billion settlement is near… in fact, the Journal makes it sound imminent, although the paper does concede that delays could result from no agreement as to who should be appointed to monitor the agreement.

Let me guess… the bankers want appoint Jon Corzine as the monitor, while the state AGs are proposing a banker whose ponzi scheme or insider trading scandal hasn’t yet made headlines.  Gee, I can’t wait to see how this turns out.  Don’t you wish the negotiations were on C-SPAN?

(It has been reported that Sheila Bair’s name came up for potential monitors, but she turned down the job saying she has other commitments.  It’s really still only a rumor at this point, but I’ve been told that those commitments include a standing Thursday morning with a nail salon and a pilates class.)

I want to be very clear about something here… this entire thing is just astonishingly stupid, and what’s most amazing is that there are functioning adults involved… I mean adults that can do things for themselves… like tie their own shoes, cross streets at the crosswalk… things like that.  I’ll tell you why this is the case in a minute… and it’s not my opinion… it’s the fact of the matter.

I decided that the best person to ask about what’s going on with these positively inane negotiations would be a former State Attorney General, so I called Ohio’s former AG, Marc Dann.  Marc knows these people, he understands the process, and he’s heard some of the inside scoop, so you don’t want to miss this Mandelman Matters Podcast… I promise you that.  (Scroll down and you’ll find the PLAY button.)

But meanwhile… let me just say a couple of things about what’s going on here… and correct the facts that the WSJ got wrong… or embellished… embroidered… or just were misleading about.

First of all, the WSJ refers to the negotiations as “months-long.”  That’s a true statement, but it sure is a funny way to phrase a time period that’s just one month shy of lasting ONE YEAR.  It’s like describing the amount of time that elapses between my birthdays as having been “months-long.”  In point of fact, HousingWire reported the following on January 26th, 2011

“Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller told more than 200 homeowners and consumer advocates in a meeting Tuesday that the investigation into foreclosure practices at major lenders is drawing to a close, and that negotiations will begin soon.

Major lenders froze foreclosures in October when employees were found to be signing affidavits en masse and without a proper review of the files as required by law in some sates. Miller and the other 50 state AGs along with seven federal regulators launched an investigation into what is now known as the robo-signing scandal.”

Secondly, the WSJ refers to the settlement as relating to “alleged foreclosure improprieties,” and it’s the sort of description that took me back to the Fall of 2006, when evidence of Republican Congressman Mark Foley’s attempts to molest several under age boys working as White House Pages was made public by ABC News.   Lest you forget, Foley was the staunchly anti-gay legislator who, as it turned out, was a sexual predator who hunted young boys.

On October 5th, ABC News reported  that in 2002, Foley e-mailed one 17 year-old male page with an invitation to stay at the congressman’s home in exchange for oral sex… the page declined the offer. The same report also stated that Foley e-mailed another under age male page requesting a photograph of his erect penis.  Another former page reported that he had seen sexually explicit e-mails sent by Foley to “three or four” other pages from that same class.  Foley’s office ultimately confirmed that Foley had in fact sent the messages, before he slinked off to rehab.

And then, on one of the Sunday morning shows I watched Newt Gingrich and White House spokesman Tony Snow describe Foley’s conduct as being nothing more than naughty e-mails,” which is a lot like the WSJ referring to the banks’ “alleged foreclosure improprieties.”

Alleged?  There’s nothing alleged about AT LEAST hundreds of thousands of fraudulent affidavits, forgeries of Linda Green’s name, among dozens of others.  For heaven’s sake, the whistleblower in Nevada recently committed suicide… or something… after blowing the whistle on Lender Processing Services as a robo-signing Mecca, if you will.

Additionally, the State of Nevada passed a new law that makes it a felony and threatens to hold individuals criminally liable for making false representations concerning real estate title. Under the new law, individuals are also subject to civil penalties of $5,000 for each violation.  And what happened as a result?  Well, for one thing, foreclosure filings fell by roughly 80% in month one following the new law’s passage.

And do I even need to talk about the Registers of Deeds, like Jeff Thigpen of North Carolina, and John O’Brian of Massachusetts?  But, the bank-friendly folks at the WSJ, want us to think of the banks being forced to pay out $19 billion because of “alleged foreclosure improprieties.” Hardly seems fair, right?  I wonder if the bank PR team masquerading as journalists over at the WSJ understands that were they to have done what the banks did, just a couple of times, they’d be in jail right now.

And yet, the WSJ story does it over and over again… here’s the second reference, found in the article’s third paragraph:

“The talks center on the banks’ use of “robo-signing,” in which employees approved legal documents without proper review, and other questionable foreclosure practices.”

The only thing questionable surrounding this discussion, is the way the WSJ reporters apparently view massive fraud and the rampant use of forgeries when kicking people out of their homes… after lying to them about their intent to modify their mortgage payments.

Thirdly, the WSJ story goes on to explain that without California’s AG, Kamala Harris, participating in the deal, the settlement amount is to be $19 billion… with Harris’ going along with the flagrant whitewash, it would have been $25 billion.  The Journal says the  amount is to fund…

“The dollar value of the deal would include the value of principal write-downs, interest-rate reductions and other benefits to homeowners as well as cash penalties.”

All that for $19 billion, huh?  Wow… somewhere there must be a sale on principal reductions and cash penalties, because $19 billion on my calculator doesn’t go very far in that regard.  In California alone, there are more than 2 million people in foreclosure, and if we gave them all a principal reduction using the $19 billion settlement, they’d each get $9500.  Of course, that wouldn’t leave any funds to cover the interest rate reductions, cash penalties, or “other benefits,” unless by “other benefits,” they mean that the homeowners will be deemed “eligible for HAMP,” or something that costs about the same amount.  Nor does it leave even a nickel for anyone in the other 49 states.

In case it’s not yet seeming “STUPID” enough to you…

Fourth, here’s how the WSJ describes the expectations of the administration and the bankers involved in the negotiations…

“Administration officials have viewed the foreclosure settlement as a chance to break the foreclosure logjam, increase the number of reductions in loan principal and provide other assistance to homeowners. Banks, meanwhile, would like to reassure investors and put questions related to foreclosure practices behind them.”

Really?  Who in the Obama Administration specifically has been viewing the proposed $19 billion settlement that way?  I’m serious… I want to know who.  Names… name names, because obviously they are entirely innumerate, and I’d be happy to get a math tutor over there right away at my own expense.  Seriously… I’m happy to do it… just tell me which member of the president’s cabinet didn’t finish 5th grade math, and I’ll take care of it right away.

Fifth, the WSJ story wraps up by explaining that the “negotiators are still are ironing out details to determine what additional legal claims prosecutors could bring once a deal is signed. Under the proposal, banks would be released from legal claims tied to servicing delinquent mortgages as well as certain mortgage-origination practices, but government officials still would be able to pursue claims related to the packaging of mortgages into securities.”

And then the WSJ closes its story of how a settlement between the bakers and state AGs is essentially imminent with the following sentence:

“Even if a deal in principle is reached, the formal announcement of the agreement could be delayed until January. Once a deal is agreed to, it is likely to take a month or two for the legal language to be finalized, people familiar with the discussions said.”

Well, alrighty then… in other words, there’s no deal anytime soon, and in fact there may never be one.  Is that what you were trying to get at, WSJ reporters, Ruth Simon, Nick Timiraos, and Dan Fitzpatrick?  And, three of you were needed to write this bank brochure of an article?  Why?  Was it that one of you started it, but soon found that you needed the fingers and toes of the other two to handle the math?  No, wait… it can’t be that because you guys didn’t do any math.  Ooops, my bad.

Okay, so is it STUPID enough for you yet?

Now, click the PLAY button below and listen to Ohio’s former Attorney General, Marc Dann, as he provides us with a window into the negotiations between the remaining AGs and the banksters.

Mandelman out.

###

If after listening to this podcast, you feel that you want to voice your views n this sham of a settlement proposal, as Marc Dann suggests would have an impact, click HERE to link to the home page of the National Association of Attorneys General.  You’ll see a map of the U.S. on the home page… just scroll over the little boxes and you’ll get your state AG’s contact information.  Come on DOERS… DO IT!  Stop the madness.

Dec
26

GUEST POST: Bob Cratchit Speaks Out on Christmas Foreclosure Freezes, Rated ‘PG-13’

Cratchit here…

Well, it’s ‘that’ time of the year once again… the Christmas holidays.  For most people, in addition to being the celebration of the birth of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, it’s also a time to spend with loved ones… our family members and close friends… a time to share in the spirit of giving and to remember all of the goodness that exists in the world.

Today, I’m the owner of my own business, Cratchit Vacation Travel, so every year I take a whole week off at Christmastime.  Of course, not everyone can do that, and it wasn’t always that way for me either, as you may recall.

When I was working for my Uncle Ebenezer Scrooge, many years ago, he never would have allowed that.  In fact, back then, my uncle was positively famous for hating Christmas and mostly because people didn’t go to work on that day.  “Christmas… bah humbug,” he used to say.  It sounds funny now, but back then it used to give me terrible fits and shakes when he would rail on about how he hated this time of the year.

Lucky for me, in Uncle’s later years everything changed for him as far as Christmas was concerned.  It was the craziest thing… one Christmas Eve he changed 180 degrees and he never went back to hating Christmas for the rest of his life.  Christmas actually became his favorite day of the year, if you can believe that.  It was like someone put something in his drinking water.  One Christmas Eve he went to bed a crotchety old man saying “Bah humbug,” and the next morning you wouldn’t have recognized him.  He was jumping all around, telling everybody Merry Christmas, and even showed up at our house with the biggest Christmas Goose I’d ever seen.

From that day forward, Uncle Ebenezer used to say that Christmas was the one day each year when nothing else should matter but spending time with loved ones… and he always did just that, and especially with little Tim, who wasn’t doing at all well back then, until Uncle Ebenezer came by that Christmas morning.  I always believed that if he hadn’t come that day, we might have lost Tiny Tim one day. When Uncle passed away a few years ago, it was hardest on Tim, I think, and I know he misses his Uncle Ebenezer most on Christmas Day.

Christmas is also the time when the bankers get to show off their magnanimous natures by announcing that they will delay foreclosures, trustee sales, and evictions of homeowners until after New Years’ Day.  They’ve been doing it every year, ever since the foreclosure crisis started a few years’ back, so I wasn’t the least bit surprised this year when, on December 3rd, Les Christie, a staff writer at CNN/Money.com wrote:

“Several of the big mortgage players are playing Santa Claus again this year, saying they will not evict borrowers in default during the two weeks surrounding Christmas.  Freddie Mac (FMCC) and Fannie Mae (FNMA), the two government-controlled mortgage giants, are freezing all foreclosure evictions on mortgage loans they own or back from Dec. 20th through Jan.3rd.”

And Christie’s story also quoted Anthony Renzi, Executive Vice President of single-family portfolio management at Freddie Mac, as saying:

“If the property is occupied, our foreclosure attorneys will suspend the eviction to provide a greater measure of certainty to families during the holidays.”

And a spokesman for Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), by the name of Rick Simon, was also quoted in the story saying, said that the bank would still observe its usual holiday policy.

“Bank of America’s practice in recent years is to hold off on foreclosure sales or evictions from late December through New Year’s Day…”

And Christie also reported that Wells Fargo’s (WFC, Fortune 500) holiday (foreclosure) freeze will run the same two week period as Fannie’s and Freddie’s.

Playing Santa Claus my ass!  That’s what I have to say about that.  Those bankers wouldn’t know how to play Santa Claus if you fattened them up, stuck them in a red suit, and made them grow white beards.  Hell, I’d bet you that even if you made a banker look like Santa Claus, he’d probably walk around saying “HO, HO, HOmeless!”

Christie referred to the banker’s holiday foreclosure freezes as being a “temporary reprieve” for homeowners but personally, I think it’s a big crock of crap.  It’s not a “reprieve” for the poor homeowners losing homes… no, sir… it’s a reprieve for the bankers, so that everyone won’t see how they’re kicking people out of their homes during the holidays, when they should be modifying those loans in order to help people stay in their homes.

See, if the bankers kept on foreclosing through the holidays, that would make a fine news story for the folks at CNN and MSNBC, and they might send a camera crew to cover a few Christmas Eve evictions just for the drama and the tragedy of it all.  You know how those people love to film train wrecks, it’s like they say, “if it bleeds, it leads.”

So, the bankers realized that those news crews might just start talking with some of those homeowners being forced from their homes on a day like that, and those people would then have a chance to tell the rest of the country how they’ve been treated by their banks… how they should have gotten a loan modification but were denied… and without anyone even telling them why.

And that wouldn’t look so good for those bankers who are really a lot like my Uncle Scrooge used to be… before that one Christmas Eve when he totally changed forever.

If you want to know the truth, I don’t think the banks should be allowed to stop foreclosing and evicting for the holidays… we should pass a law that forces them to keep doing what they do every other day of the year… right through Christmas.

I’d bet you that if we did have such a law on the books, you’d see a whole lot of loan modifications being granted in December, I’ll tell you that.

Bankers playing Santa by not foreclosing and evicting people for a few weeks around Christmas… what a bunch of shit that is… it’s like when a foreign dignitary is coming to London, and they move all the homeless people living in the streets a few blocks away from the parade route, so they can pretend they’re not there.  Or, when you watch those newsreels of Adolf Hitler playing with his dog and smiling at the kiddies… yeah, right… like you’re supposed to say… what a nice guy he appears to be.

And just whom do they think they’re fooling?  How do you think the people feel… the ones that are losing their homes right after the holidays… do you think they’re able to enjoy the holiday knowing that this will be the last Christmas they get to spend in their family home?  I’d bet some don’t even decorate or even celebrate… how could you with something like that hanging over their heads.  And what do you suppose they tell their children when they tuck them in to wait for Santa to come?  It breaks my heart to think about people losing homes unnecessarily at any time of the year, but no time is worse than Christmastime for something like that to happen.

It would be one thing if there was no option, or if they really couldn’t afford to stay there, but if you read the news lately, you know that’s not the case for hundreds of thousands of folks.  In fact, attorney Diane Thompson, who works for National Consumer Law Center has testified recently that she’s represented hundreds of homeowners who were being foreclosed on that weren’t even in default!

And did you read Mandelman’s column yesterday about Bank of America, Chase and others breaking into people’s homes and stealing their belongings, including that woman’s husband’s ashes.  The article was funny in some ways, that Mandelman always makes me laugh, but in other ways that article made me want to scream.

Look, we now should all know that many, if not most, of the people losing their homes are only losing thembecause the servicer is involved.  It’s the servicers that are saying they won’t modify the loans and proceeding with the foreclosures.  And that’s because the servicers make the most money when they service a delinquent loan for a while… and then foreclose on the homeowner.

It’s true… Professor Levitin from Georgetown University recently explained all that while he was testifying in congress.  Want to know something else?  I just learned that Citibank gets 25% of the trial payments if the loan ends up in foreclosure!  Can you believe that?  I don’t know about the other banks, but I’d be willing to take a guess that what’s good for the gander is good for the other ganders too.

And servicers are the ones that have the LEAST to do with the loans in the first place.  They don’t own the loans, they only service them… and they get one quarter of one percent to service a prime loan, half a percent to service a prime loan… but one and one quarter percent for servicing a delinquent loan.  So, you add on all the junk fees for foreclosing onto that and you’ll see why that guy that used to work at Chase… the one that Mandelman interviewed a few months back when he wrote that article, Inside Chase and the Perfect Foreclosure”, said that Chase was in the foreclosure business, not the modification business.

So, think about it… we’ve got the servicers… the companies that have the least interest in the loans in the first place, and make the most by foreclosing on loans, deciding on whether someone should get a loan modification?  What kind of stupid and uniformed idea is that?

I wish Obama would have told us that when they announced the plan back in February of 2009.  Instead we had to spend a whole year trying to figure out why it was that everyone who called their bank directly to get their loan modified was being treated like shit before being foreclosed on and evicted, without ever even knowing why.  The hysterical thing is how the servicers lied all the time, blaming it on the borrowers, saying it was their fault for not getting their paperwork in right or on time.  That was all a bunch of B.S.

You know how we know that now, right?  Because Treasury just reported that more than half of the people turned down for HAMP ended up getting their loan modified by a servicer anyway, but using some sort of in-house program.  But, guess what… a lawyer recently told me that he compared a HAMP modification to an in-house version from Well Fargo, and the in-house version was going to cost the homeowner roughly $180,000 more over the life of the loan, even though they looked similar on the surface.  See… that’s exactly the kind of crap my Uncle Ebenezer used to pull before he changed, that one Christmas Eve.

Yep, the only people losing money and more are the homeowners and the investors that own the loans.  The servicers are making a bloody fortune, and the banks are getting off easy too.  I say it’s time we all should write to our elected representatives and tell them we’re wise to this game and we want the servicers taken out of the middle as far as loan modification decisions are concerned.

And that there should be no more stopping foreclosures and evictions at Christmastime… because bankers aren’t playing Santa, they’re harming people, causing them to have the worst Christmas ever as they sit and think what’s going to happen when the holidays are over.

I hope all those people that are being delayed for the holiday, get every sale date postponed for as long as they can.  File bankruptcy… that’ll stop the sale date.  Or hire a lawyer and ask him or her how to fight the bankers as long as possible.  Maybe something will change… it sure can’t remain like this forever.

Well, Christmas Eve is almost here so I’ve got to run.  I want to get to sleep early tonight, because last night I had the worst night’s sleep ever.  You wouldn’t believe it, but I had the strangest dream about my Uncle Ebenezer and he was with his old partner, Jacob Marley, who I hadn’t thought about in years.

Well, they both appeared in my dream and they were rattling chains and howling in the most hair raising tones… and they kept yelling out these names that I wasn’t familiar with over and over… and they were dancing about chanting that they were going to visit this group of people this year, AND EVERY YEAR on Christmas Eve.

They were saying… Oooooo… Lloyd Blankfein… every year for as long as it takes…Oooooo… Kenny Lewis… every year for as long as it takes… Oooooo… Vikram Pandit… every year for as long as it takes… Oooooo… John Mack… every year for as long as it takes… Oooooo… John Stumpf….. every year for as long as it takes…Ooooo… Jamie Dimon… every year for as long as it takes… and were others mentioned too… and they went on and on… over and over.  I awoke in a cold sweat, shaking like a leaf in high winds.

I have no idea what they were talking about, and it was probably just the Chinese food I had for dinner, but it scared the living daylights out of me, and I was afraid to even try to sleep after that.

So, Merry Christmas to everyone, and thank you to Mandelman for allowing me to guest post on Mandelman Matters… it’s by far my favorite blog, right behind Yves Smith’s and Matt Tiabbi’s of course, but we don’t have to tell Mandelman that… he’s sensitive this time of year.

And, God bless us… everyone.

~~~~~~

Bob Cratchit

President & CEO

CRATCHIT VACATION TRAVEL, INC.

“Taking you places you never dreamed you’d go.”

Dec
24

HO, HO, HOmeless… A Sobering View of the Crisis Affecting Us All

Originally posted in December of 2009… how tragic is that?  Read it and you’ll see why.

MartinNiche4-600

HO, HO, HOmeless!

The Real Story Behind the Crisis

We Still Don’t Want to Understand.

A 46 year-old single mother lies awake as night threatens to turn to morning.  She wonders how she’ll make it through even one more day.  She can’t cry… anymore.  Can’t look into the eyes of her two young children, age 7 & 9.  For a fleeting moment she wonders if her sister, 3,000 miles away, should take the kids, for a while anyway.  She pushes that thought from her mind, reaches for her prescription on the nightstand, swallows two without water, and rolls onto her side.  She’s a Registered Nurse; she knows sleep will soon come.

~~~~~

A father of three stands in the shadows made by the tree in the front yard of his home of 14 years.  It’s 2:30 AM.  He’s wearing a tee shirt and boxer shorts. The wind is audible and cold.  His eyes fixate on the flower box he built his first year as a homeowner.  His stare moves to the driveway… his driveway… and remembers pitching underhand to his youngest son.  He had thought they would live in this house forever.  He absent-mindedly scratches his chest with the barrel of the .38 Smith & Wesson Super he’s holding in his hand.  He wonders if insurance policies pay off after suicide.

~~~~~

An older couple, returning from a trip to the grocery store, pulls into their driveway.  They’ve been married for 38 years; bought the house in ‘72.  He opens the back door of the sedan and reaches in for the bags.  She admonishes him not to do so.  The doctor said not to lift anything heavy… might tear his stitches.  They walk inside together, close the door; neither speaks.  There is paperwork taped to the front door.  It says they’ll have to be moving soon.

~~~~~

A young child listens to her father talking on the phone as he makes her breakfast.  His voice doesn’t sound normal to her ear.  He sounds nervous… he’s being very polite. Like when he’s talking to the men at church.  He hangs up and even though she didn’t ask, he tells her everything is fine.  But the child doesn’t think so.  She looks at him.  Thinks he’s crying.  She wants to help.  He wipes his eyes.  He says cutting an onion made them water.

~~~~~

A mother is on the phone first thing one morning.  She reads my column on-line.  She calls to tell me that her son, 41 years old, hung himself in the basement of his home last night.  She found him yesterday morning.  He had been laid off and out of work for nine months. He tried to convince his bank to modify his mortgage since then.  Went through his savings.  Started spending hers. Her voice shakes.  “Now,” she says, “the bank will finally get what they’ve wanted all along… his house.”

~~~~~

Happy Holidays everybody…

This has been a very hard article for me to write.  It’s been hard for me this year during the holidays.  I want to be happy.  I want to make this holiday season even more wonderful than the last, for my daughter, my wife and my family.  But it’s just harder this year.  Harder to forget everything else that’s going on around me.

The foreclosure crisis that began in mid-2006 continues to destroy the wealth of American consumers and the financial strength of our nation’s banking institutions.  And, although it pains me to say it, the end is still nowhere in sight.

It now seems likely that, before the crisis is over, not just millions, but tens of millions of Americans will have lost their homes to foreclosure, and thousands of banks will have shuttered their doors for good.  The scars will be deep and we will be a nation forever changed.

In 2007, the number of foreclosures filed hit 1.3 million, a 79% increase over 2006.  In 2008, that number had risen to 2.3 million, an 81% increase over 2007.  It appears that this year we’ll have something in the neighborhood of 3.9 million foreclosure notices sent out homeowners, if not more.  And next year, absent some unexpectedly competent response from government, is all but certain to be even worse.

As of August 2008, 9.2% of all U.S. mortgages were either seriously delinquent or already in foreclosure.  Today, that number is 14.7%.  Forecasts predict a staggering 14-17 million foreclosures over the next five years, depending on their source.  And, according to Bloomberg, mortgages of $1 million plus are now defaulting at twice the national rate, so there’s no question that the water level is rising.

Meanwhile, unemployment… the real unemployment, known as U6… has reached 17.5%.  In October of this year alone, our country lost another 558,000 jobs, and most of those in manufacturing and other areas that may never return.  In Detroit, according to the city’s Mayor, the actual unemployment rate is fast approaching 50%.

By now it should be abundantly clear that foreclosures breed foreclosures and that the problems are spreading state by state.  And it should be equally clear that our nation’s economy cannot begin to recover until the free fall in the housing market, and the resulting foreclosures, have been brought to an end.

Perhaps you’re among those only interested in blindly optimistic thoughts, and if so, there’s certainly no shortage of those.  Now that our government has run out of things to actually do, and since they’ve run out of money with which to paper over problems, as this year draws to a close it seems they simply would like us to believe the worst is over.  That recovery is right around the proverbial corner.  Few do, though, at least not in earnest.  It’s like Ben Bernanke keeps saying in so many words, the recession is over, damn it… probably… I think… sort of… it’s a jobless recovery… yeah, that’s the ticket… a jobless and homeless recovery.

I’ve come to understand many things about this housing led, increasingly complex economic crisis as I’ve written more than 200 articles on related subject matter over the last year.  I now believe in every fiber of my being that we will remain incapable of finding meaningful solutions until we as a nation come to understand the problems we’re facing and why we’re facing them.  And in this regard we have a very long way to go.

We still don’t know… and maybe some of us don’t want to know.

I have never in my life seen anything like what’s happening in this country today.  I’m not just talking about the severity of the crisis; I’m talking about the amount of misinformation and utter confusion about its proximate cause.  It is truly stunning to behold.  I can barely get through a week without bumping into another armchair economist who’s got lots of opinions on AIG, but has no idea what a Credit Default Swap is, let alone how one works, or why they were sold or purchased in the first place.

It’s uncomfortable to be around, frankly.  When did we become a nation filled with people who feel the need to hold a view on everything?  A few weeks ago I wrote a piece in favor of judicial loan modifications… you know, bankruptcy reform… the “cram down,” if you must.  Quite a few people wrote in to say they disagreed with my position, every one of them based their argument on the identical position: “It will raise borrowing costs in the future for everyone.”

It’s a ridiculous presumption, you should realize.  The “cram down” bill that recently was once again killed by the banking industry has no significant measurable potential to raise borrowing costs in the future.  For one thing, it would only apply to loans on the books at the time of its passage, so no future loans would be affected.  And for another, it only applies to those filing bankruptcy, a statistical probability that investors already price into their models.  And for a third, when a judge writes down a mortgage to the market value, that judge isn’t costing the investor a nickel… which is why it’s called the “market value”.

The funny thing about judicial loan modifications is that we clearly need them badly at the moment, as we watch another 14-17 million homes fall into foreclosure, so some miniscule, incalculable, potential threat hardly seems a good enough reason to kill the amendment within hours.  And many of the people who hold onto views in opposition to changing the bankruptcy code, would all unquestionably benefit from such a common sense approach.  But, regardless… no one changes his or her view on much of anything these days.  I suppose only two factors result in real learning: age and pain.  We don’t have the time to wait for age to do it, but stand by, because the pain will be increasing each month that passes, so maybe there’s still hope as that pain increases.

As it stands, all we’re left with in terms of a plan to stop the free fall in the housing market, is… well… we don’t really have a plan to stop the free fall in the housing market, now do we?  Even if Obama’s loan modification program was working, which it is not, it’s not designed to stop the foreclosure crisis.  Remember, it’s only designed to help “responsible” homeowners, if there’s still such a thing.

My intention is that this article doesn’t beat around the bush, so I want to go directly at the question of why we don’t have a plan to stop the foreclosure crisis.  What is it that prevents our adoption of policies that would lead to our economic recovery?

We don’t have a plan for two reasons, and both are political as opposed to economic.  What I mean by that is that we could fix the problems we’re facing, but a lot of people won’t like what we need to do.  In other words, if we could just get over ourselves, we’d all be much better off.

Okay, so here goes:

1. Stopping the Foreclosure Crisis

In terms of fixing the housing market and stopping the foreclosure crisis, we’re going to have to write down the seriously underwater mortgages to their market value, and we can’t do that because politically it’s potential suicide.

There are still many people that view the homeowners losing their homes to foreclosure today as being “irresponsible,” and who could possibly want to bail irresponsible homeowners out of their underwater mortgages?

What people fail to realize is that the mortgages that are seriously underwater need to be… and will be… written down to their market value.  The only question is the mechanism we use to write them down.  If we continue to use foreclosure as the mechanism, then we’re going to be in for a lot of pain, as we take down everyone else’s home value at the same time.

As a country, however, we don’t want to write down mortgages, in fact we barely want to modify them, because we’ve still got a sizable percentage of our population that blames homeowners for the economic collapse and therefore believes they must be punished.  And by punishing them through foreclosure, we will punish everyone else as well.

The problem with this kind of thinking, besides it being untrue, is that it prevents our elected officials from looking at real solutions to the problem.  Eventually, people will change their views on this issue, but it may take several years for the pain to become intense enough and sufficiently widespread, before people are willing to look at the situation differently.

Until then, we’ll keep foreclosing, and those foreclosures will continue to drive housing prices down… which will in turn create more foreclosures.

2. Fix the Banks and the Credit Markets

In terms of fixing our insolvent financial institutions, the only plan with the potential to succeed, short of nationalization, of course, is to buy the toxic assets off of the bank balance sheets at 100% of their face value… something that’s simply not politically palatable.  We could pay some amount less than full face value but that would only leave giant holes in the balance sheets of banks and we’d have to pony up the difference anyway.

It looks to me like Geithner’s plan is to keep the banks propped up with federal slush money, provided under one wonky acronym or another, and the suspension of all accounting rules that would give away their insolvency… until the banks can earn enough by lending to Treasury and charging us exorbitant fees.  There’s a bit more to it than that, but those are the important points.

I’m not the only one who sees this plan not working.  Geithner isn’t just forecasting economic recovery in 2010… he’s depending on it.  When it doesn’t happen, he’s going to act surprised, I’m sure, but he’ll be acting because he knows now that he’s taking a huge risk.

The “toxic assets” that are still clogging up bank balance sheets aren’t getting any less toxic on their own.  In fact, the more homes that are lost to foreclosure, the more toxic they’ll become.  So far, we’ve papered over the problems, but that only fixes the problems in the short run.  Remember, if the banks believed their balance sheets today… they’d be lending.

Let’s look at today’s conventional wisdom pertaining to the economic meltdown:

1. It’s the fault of sub-prime borrowers…

No, it’s not.  Today’s crisis isn’t a sub-prime crisis, and never was a sub-prime crisis.  From the beginning, sub-prime and prime loans defaulted at the same proportional rate.  That’s not to say that there weren’t more sub-prime foreclosures than there were sub-prime foreclosures… there were.  But proportionate to prime loans, the problem was never a “sub-prime” problem.

2. It’s unemployment that’s causing foreclosures…

No, it’s not.  Unemployment and other life events don’t cause foreclosures.  Look at the spikes in unemployment that followed the dot-com crash that began in April of 2000.  Unemployment in places like Northern California and Massachusetts skyrocketed, as did mortgage delinquencies, but foreclosures remained low.  Why?  Because in flat or slightly appreciating real estate markets, when people get in financial trouble or lose their jobs, they sell their homes, they don’t start losing them to foreclosure en masse.

3. Borrowing too much and not properly qualifying for loans caused the crisis…

I’m sorry, but no.  Roughly 54% of the foreclosures are prime loans for which people did qualify, and as far as borrowing too much, well… it’s just beside the point.   In light of where things are today, it would seem that any borrowing was over-borrowing.  And when you look at the leverage employed by Wall Street firms, which was in some cases up to 100:1, the whole idea that homeowners could have caused the economic meltdown of this country becomes preposterous.

Think about the 40:1 leverage at Lehman Bros.  On one hand, you’ve got a homeowner taking out a 100,000 mortgage, and on the other you’ve got Lehman Bros. borrowing $4 million based on that mortgage.  In terms of de-leveraging, which is the problem… the $100,000 mortgage or the $4,000,000 in leverage.  And, by the way, while we’re talking about it… who was it that thought that housing prices would go up forever?

None of this is to say that lending standards weren’t far too lax, that more sub-prime borrowers didn’t initially lose their homes than others, or that today’s unemployment rate isn’t contributing to the number of loans in default.  All are true, but none are the proximate cause of the crisis we face today.

The Birth of a Crisis… and the Crises that Followed

First of all, we’re not having a crisis; we’re having multiple crises.  The foreclosure crisis is one.  The credit crisis is another.

We could go back many years to begin such a discussion, but I don’t see the point.  Many say that the Glass Steagall Act should not have been repealed.  At the moment, however, I don’t care one way or the other whether it should or shouldn’t.  I’m sure some combination of experts and political types will figure that out soon enough, and resolving the issue today won’t change anything tomorrow morning.

For the moment, I’m only interested in what happened in July of 2006, on a day when housing prices dropped by 30% or more… although we didn’t all realize it at the time.

Declining real estate values are what cause foreclosures, and on a day in July of 2006, a number of pension funds realized that the AAA bonds they were holding were not in fact AAA… and they dumped them in a hurry.  They might have been AA… they might have been junk… no one could be sure.  All investors needed to know is that they were not AAA, as they had been rated by the ratings agencies, Standard & Poors, Moody’s or Fitch, and that was enough for them to know that they didn’t want to hold them in their portfolios any longer than they had to… and the bond market froze solid.  Money stopped moving.  And wherever the mortgages were at that moment, that’s where they would stay.

Banks, like IndyMac, who had $40 billion in mortgages on their books that they had planned to sell to Wall Street, now had real problems.  Banks don’t have any money they can loan out for 30 years.  They originate mortgages, but then they sell them to recoup their cash… or at least that’s what they did prior to the day the bond market froze solid.  Now, unable to sell their mortgages, banks immediately began hoarding cash.  Lending dried up within days.  And all of a sudden, what had been a market plush with mortgage cash, was now dry as a bone.

At the same time, there was another force in play… interest rates had been rising.  In fact, by the summer of 2006, the Fed had increased interest rates 17 times in a row.  Those with adjustable rate mortgages had already started to default, and sales had already started to slow appreciably.

Now, however, since essentially no one could get a mortgage, no one could buy a house… and prices had nowhere to go but down.  As they dropped, refinancing became impossible, and foreclosures were the only option.  The crises had begun.

Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson saw the problem as being limited to the sub-prime market and believed it would be contained there, but he failed to take into account what had really happened.  The credit markets had been broken.  Banks didn’t trust each other.  And as housing prices fell, and more loans defaulted as a result, the bonds were downgraded, and Bear Stearns was the first to go.  Paulson wanted to act at that point, but the now Democrat controlled Congress told him not to come to Congress unless he could assure the legislators that “a crisis was at the door”.

There are always a certain number of homeowners that need to sell their homes each year for a variety of reasons, both personal and career related, and when housing prices are declining rapidly, many of those sales inevitably become foreclosures.  The bubble was deflating fast and the loans that were the worst of the bunch went first.  But as prices fell, people who had over-extended themselves, and everyone else for that matter, stopped spending, and it was only a matter of time before unemployment would start to rise.  It was the beginnings of the downward spiral that continues today, albeit at a slightly slower pace than was experienced at its beginning.

The response by our government has been to pump trillions of dollars into our financial institutions in order to prevent their insolvency and make investors whole, but as long as the flood of foreclosures continues unabated, economic recovery cannot occur and we will all increasingly suffer as a result.  Hank Paulson tried to buy some of the toxic assets off of the bank balance sheets using the now infamous TARP funds, but the banks needed him to pay face value, not some discounted amount, and that would not have been politically palatable.

Even with the evidence of our deepening problems all around us, there is still a significant percentage of our population that is preventing our politicians from taking the steps necessary to stop preventable foreclosures and start the economy back on the road to prosperity.  Those that make up this group, in large part, gained their inadequate understanding of what’s transpired since 2006 from government and banking lobby inspired sound bites.  And even more importantly, their views haven’t changed over the last couple of years, even though almost everything else has.

The bottom-line is that this group continues to blame the borrower… the homeowner… as opposed to the commercial and investment banks, and if you’d like, the government regulatory agencies that stood idly by as Rome burned.

It’s a bleak picture, and sadly it is also one whose duration could be easily be reduced significantly if we as a nation shared a common understanding of how our crisis began and what must be done to stop its continuing spread.  That’s right… I have seen the enemy and it is us.

President Obama, however, now places the blame for the recession on “the irresponsibility of large financial institutions on Wall Street that gambled on risky loans and complex financial products, seeking short-term profits and big bonuses with little regard for long-term consequences.”  He and others are trying to get us to change our view of what happened so he can do something about it, but we continue to resist… we continue to hold onto our desire to punish our neighbors for buying too much.  It appears that we’d rather go down with the ship then reduce the principal on our neighbor’s mortgage.

In Conclusion…

Look… I realize that there’s more to the crisis than I’ve described here.  I realize that the bonds I’m referring to were insured by AIG’s credit default swaps, which were unregulated and resulted in a systemic risk to our financial system.  I know that AIG went under because of collateral calls that came along with the downgrading of the bonds it was insuring.

I realize that the process of securitization played a major role in how banks viewed mortgages, and why they were underwritten so poorly.  I realize that Wall Street’s CDOs, collateralized debt obligations, and other derivatives were, if not instruments of destruction, then something in that neighborhood.  And most recently, I’ve come to realize that the investment banks like Goldman Sachs, that packaged these deceptively risky investments and sold them to investors all over the world, bet against their success without disclosing their positions to investors or anyone else.

Yes, I realize that what I’ve described here is a dramatic oversimplification of a very complex situation, and I plan to write more about each aspect of the crisis in simple terms in the hopes that more people will become comfortable with what is now part of our history, and as a result tell their elected representatives that they are not to do whatever the banking lobby wants them to do.

But for the purpose of this article, none of that matters.  For the purpose of this article, I only wanted to say in no uncertain terms:

A. It wasn’t the borrowers that caused this crisis.  Did some people buy too much house?  Sure, some did.  Did some act irresponsibly?  Sure, to varying degree some did.  But today’s foreclosure crisis won’t abate as long as many cling to the belief that they should somehow sit in judgment as to who was irresponsible and who was just caught up in the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, a task that will be increasingly difficult as each day passes.

B. Water is wet, the sky is blue, children want candy, and people want houses and money.  Some knew what they were doing and some didn’t.  So what?  No one entrusted individual people to make sure our banking system was safe and well managed.  We trusted the banks and they, of one variety or another, let us down.

C. We would be experiencing a similar meltdown regardless of whether we had a real estate bubble.  As long as some group’s actions were going to destroy the secondary mortgage or credit markets, then house prices were going to fall and fall fast.  And that’s what causes foreclosures: declining home values.

D. Our government mischaracterized its cause in the beginning.  Or, in other words… it was never a “sub-prime” borrower crisis.  We know that now.  If you still think it was a sub-prime crisis, caused by those high-risk loans… well, it’s time to take another look at the data.  Your views are wrong.

And to the homeowners who feel ashamed… who have suffered the indignity of losing a home in silence… this wasn’t your fault.  You didn’t break the bond market and send housing prices into a free fall.  You didn’t fail to address the problem, or fall asleep at the switch as a regulator.  You didn’t securitize every payment stream in the country, or leverage untold billions of investments or create untold trillions in synthetic derivatives.  It wasn’t your belief that real estate would continue to go up that caused the problem, it was Wall Street’s belief that it would continue to do so that brought the financial markets to the brink of destruction.

All you did was buy a house you thought you could afford.  Now it’s worth half of what you paid for it… or it will be worth half soon.  No one saw THAT coming.  No one.

So, don’t be ashamed and afraid to speak about what happened here.  Your neighbor may seem to know what he’s talking about, but he more than likely doesn’t know any more than he heard on television or read in some Newsweek article.  Besides, he’s going to be drowning soon enough anyway.  The economic situation we’re in as this New Year begins doesn’t discriminate… everyone will feel its powerful bite as this year continues to see our economy spiral downward.

Unless you’re a banker, of course.  In which case… stop judging others, you jackass.  You want to have a debate someone about how it was borrowers who caused the meltdown, or pick on someone for being an irresponsible… have the debate with me… pick on me.  Go ahead… it’s easy… I’m at mandelman@mac.com.  And I respond to even the most idiotic of opinions.  Bring it.

In fact, next week I’ll be in Park City, Utah, debating this very issue with a bunch of lawyers that represent bankers at a conference of the American Bar Association.  I’ll let you know how it goes, but I think you have some idea already.

For everyone else reading this… let’s stop the madness and tell our politicians we want solutions for the homeowners in trouble, not punishment.  Because at this point, we’re only punishing ourselves… because it’s the right thing to do… because we smarter now and see the situation more clearly… because there, but for the grace of God, go us all.

~~~

(P.S. If anyone wants sources for any of the data presented, just email me and I’ll send you the links.  It’s the holidays and I didn’t feel like writing a term paper, but I’ve got plenty of sources for everything I’ve written.)

And, as always, the illustration of Santa coming down the chimney into a foreclosed home was brilliantly interpreted and then drawn by Richard Taylor.

Dec
23

FRONT LINE NEWS, A Mandelman Matters Podcast – December 23, 2011

FIRST UP…

A favorable ruling from Florida’s Supreme Court in the Pino Case… what does it potentially mean to homeowners across the country and the foreclosure mill attorneys hored by the banks to pursue the many thousands of foreclosures that happen each day in this country.  Florida foreclosure defense attorney, Matt Weidner and Lisa Epstein of ForeclosureHamlet.com join me to explain the significance of the decision.

SECOND STORY…

A popular blogger, Marco, from OhioFraudclosure.com, went over and above the call of duty when, on Occupy Wall Street’s first foreclosure recognition day, he managed to stop a homeowner from being evicted.  Marco joins me from Ohio, so you’ll hear the whole story straight from the horse’s mouth, so to speak.

This is Mandelman Matters, Front Line News… this is the first edition of the podcast I’ll be producing when I’m too lazy to write about it, but think you should hear about it.  Just click the PLAY button below and in just 30 minutes you’ll get the details from the experts that know the significance that lies behind the headlines and the sound bites.

Mandelman out.

Dec
21

‘Twas the Night Before Christmas – 2011

Well, it’s officially the “holiday season,” and that means it’s time once again to look back at the year that’s ending, so we can see exactly what we never want to have to think about again.

A lot happened in 2011… the shooting of Rep. Giffords… Wisconsin’s unions and teachers take over the capitol… gay marriage gets the nod… Arab Spring… Japan get walloped by tsunami and earthquake, then fallout from nuclear plant threatens to export killer cloud… Osama gets taken out… terror in Norway… Obama still born in Hawaii… Qaddafi finally gone… Casey Anthony… MJ’s doctor convicted of manslaughter… the GOP’s position of Just Saying NO, except to bankers… Summers gone, Geithner inexplicably still there… US economy in shambles… 10th anniversary of 9-11… Penn State does Catholic Church impersonation… Mitt in first place… Obama clearly not in control…

All in all, I’d say this past year was… awful.  But, I’m sorry to say, this next year will be significantly worse, so buckle your seatbelt.

But enough about that… it’s the holidays, and that means no worrying about next year… yet.

And, since it is the holidays, it’s also time for my annual year-in-review-in-rhyme, read to the famous holiday poem, ‘Twas the Night Before Christmas. I started writing my ‘Twas the Night year-in-review in 2007, or at least that’s the year I started keeping them, and they’ve been increasingly popular each year.  In fact, ‘Twas the Night was my very first blog post on MSNBC’s Newsvine, which was my very first blog.

Read it… or, I’ll read it to you…

This year, the written version is the December issue of The Niche Report magazine, center spread by the way.  But click play below, and you be able to listen to it as part of a very Special Holiday Podcast.  So, come on… get into that holiday spirit starting right now… join me for ‘Twas the Night Before Christmas – 2011.

Mandelman out.

###

‘Twas the Night Before Christmas… 2011

~~~

‘Twas the night before Christmas, 2011.

And I realized this poem began life in ’07.

This past year was bad, all the growth curves did flatten,

So I mixed up a pitcher and poured my Manhattan.

~~~

First the shooting, of AZ’s representative,

As beginnings go, this one felt rather tentative.

Wisconsin’s unions and teachers, they’re more than just talkers,

Senators fled, said the idea was Scott Walker’s.

~~~

Obama had upheld the ban on gay marriage,

Causing many supporters to malign and disparage.

Did the lawsuits cause Barack to reverse and agree?

Or did he just watch this past season of Glee?

~~~

Three billion saw Prince Willy, wed Mary Kate,

And it looked like $3 billion, would be billed to the state.

She seemed like a girl who’d soon have her prince trained,

Her dress wasn’t the only thing, that looked so restrained.

~~~

Then Egypt exploded over wealth distribution,

Tens of thousands in streets, ready for revolution.

“Arab Spring,” it was called, among them not one quitter,

It was the first time a regime was overthrown using Twitter.

~~~

But, Egypt was just, one link in a chain,

Because Tunisia and Libya, and which other? Bahrain?

Yes, thousands of people had now seen the light,

The beacon of freedom, which now shone so bright.

~~~

And right out of nowhere, came the death of Osama,

We smiled when the credit was heaped on Obama.

Did G. Bush get mad ‘cause the credit got switched,

Dubya said, “Heck no, the win goes to who pitched.”

~~~

And over in Norway, terror attacks came as twins,

I understand how it ended, but not how it begins.

And all the world mourning for religion’s guns,

Had brought darkness to, the land of midnight suns.

~~~

Then while I sat eating some rye with pastrami,

I saw Japan hit by a giant tsunami.

The footage, it made any movie look phony

And I resigned to buy Kodak, if I couldn’t get Sony.

~~~

And just when it looked like they should build an ark,

The concern changed to would people glow in the dark.

Fukushima made leaving one’s home not allowed,

We feared wind would bring us a radioactive cloud.

~~~

And throughout the year, although it was annoying,

It was Obama’s birth cert, with which we were toying.

But born in Hawaii, is what we discovered,

And Trump is a nutcase, that we also uncovered.

~~~

Casey Anthony got off, and few thought it was groovy,

But I’ll bet she’ll be back in her own Lifetime movie.

We found MJ’s doctor was really a killer

And Michael’s now gone and so heaven got Thriller.

~~~

Then over in Libya, Qaddafi’s done too,

I’m not sure what happened, perhaps a CIA coup?

They say making war was one of old Muammar’s vices,

But what we hated most, was that he raised gas prices.

~~~

And throughout the year, the GOP just said NO,

They would only agree to keep things status quo.

Which was bad for Obama, for hope and for change,

The political landscape went from odd to damn strange.

~~~

With health care behind him and financial reform,

The economy, he realized, was far from the norm.

So he turned to his team, Larry Summers and Geithner,

And asked how come credit was now even tightner.

~~~

Not one idea raised, that would fix unemployment

Obama knew then there would be no enjoyment

And banks denied loan mods, seems they’d rather foreclose

When Tim at Treasury talks, his nose grows and grows.

~~~

Watching homeowners who were all underwater,

Apply for loan mods, was like watching manslaughter.

They cried and they screamed, but their cries were ignored,

Bankers blamed borrowers, which left me totally floored.

~~~

And homeowners in court were treated like louses,

The judges all thought that they wanted free houses.

The stereotype whose idea was Wall Street’s,

Turned struggling homeowners into reckless deadbeats.

~~~

S&P with the meltdown, I can’t help equating,

So why allow them to cut our credit rating?

Then Republicans said the U.S. should default,

Which even made Lieberman exclaim, “Oy gevalt.”

~~~

Barack tried a Hail Mary, and threw up a jobs bill,

But Republicans made sure that it was a clean kill.

But what about spending some billions on school,

The GOP yelled out NO, which was not at all cool.

~~~

We remembered 9-11, on its 10th anniversary

Shows reviewed every detail, it was far more than cursory.

Then Michigan’s straw poll, would the rightwing admit?

That a process of elimination, had left them with Mitt.

~~~

It was time once again, for political season,

With a Republican field, that defied rhyme or reason.

To understand Cain, you need a sentence contextual,

And I assure you I don’t mean to imply something sexual.

~~~

We can’t chance another Texas Gov sympathizer,

‘Cause that’s how we got a community organizer.

I think Perry and Dubya, they’re just too much the same,

Either one in the moment, might forget his own name.

~~~

Penn State was so shocking, so I did some research,

To see if Sandusky was trained by the Catholic Church.

And I know it’s not funny, and I know there’s no reason,

But did some say Paterno should finish the season?

~~~

The GOP’s line up should be like running unopposed,

Bachman plays Palin, her mind completely closed.

With Paul and Gingrich back, it’s hard to keep a straight face.

John Huntsman is “the other Mormon,” and Mitt’s in first place.

~~~

Santorum, Perry, Herman Cain, others past the comma,

There’s no better way to drive voters towards Obama.

The wild card is Europe, what if they default,

It’s our financial system, that they’re going to assault.

~~~

So, with my wife and children in bed and at peace,

I sat by the fire, stressing out over Greece.

I refilled my glass, pulling out all the stops,

Closed my eyes and was dreaming of defaulting swaps.

~~~

Then out on the lawn there arose such clatter,

I sprang to my feet to see what was the matter.

I stared out the window, the glass touching my nose,

It was Santa’s real sleigh, pulled by bank CEOs!

~~~

I yelled Blankfein! now Stumpf, John Mack, and now Dimon!

I didn’t know how long I could keep the names rhymin’.

On Lewis!  on Davis!  on Logue! And on Pandit!

Kelly, Davis, Rohr, Gorman… all my favorite bandits!

~~~

And then there he was, dressed in red suit so fine,

I asked him to stay, but he didn’t have time.

I was hoping his sleigh, that he’d teach me to fly it,

But to the North Pole, he had to get to Occupy it!

~~~

So, I said Merry Christmas, and with a crack of two whips,

Those bankers took off running in their Italian wing tips.

I yelled thank you Santa! It was my final remark,

He called back, “Cherish the spirit born in Zuccotti Park!”

~~~

So, I went straight to bed, and fell asleep quite content,

Knowing Santa was part of the 99 percent.

And I heard him exclaim, as he flew out of sight,

Merry Christmas, Happy Chanukah… God bless and good night.

~~~

HO! HO! HO!  Happy Holidays Everybody!

Martin Andelman

Mandelman Matters

~~~

Here are the preceding years, in case you feel like taking a walk down memory lane.

‘Twas the Night Before Christmas – 2007

‘Twas the Night Before Christmas – 2008

‘Twas the Night Before Christmas – 2009

‘Twas the Night Before Christmas – 2010

Subscribe to Mandelman Matters

Lets Be Friends on Facebook

Dec
21

DOJ Arrests Attorney Mitchell Stein at LAX – A Mass Clusterf#@k

This is a story for the ages… you want crazy, I’ve got crazy.

Remember attorney Mitchell J. Stein?  His law office was shut down along with the the law offices of Kramer & Kaslow.  Stein filed the first lawsuit against Bank of America that came to be know as a “mass joinder,” or multi-plaintiff suit… Ronald v. Bank of America.

When I first called Mitchell Stein to find out what he was up to, I discovered that coincidentally, he went to my high school.  He was two years older than me, so he didn’t remember me, but I did remember him.  And he seemed like a smart trial lawyer who certainly talked like he was dedicated to fighting for the rights of homeowners against the banks.  He said that many of his clients were pro bono and contingency cases, where the homeowners were paying nothing.  I never listed him on my “Trusted Attorneys” tab… because I just didn’t know him long enough… but I did try to keep tabs on him.

Then this past September, I believe, both he and Kramer got shut down by the State Bar and AG, the allegations being that they were “running and capping,” essentially meaning that they were paying non-lawyers sales commissions.  Kramer continues to deny that happened, and I suppose we’ll have to wait to see what evidence is presented at trial to be sure one way or the other.  Stein, on the other hand, not only denied any involvement with Kramer’s marketing, but further said that he had never received any funds from that marketing… and to-date, I haven’t seen any evidence that he did.  So, I was waiting to see how all that came out, as well.

But… never mind all that… in fact, as far as Stein is concerned, it’s pretty much mass-smash… joinder-schmoinder.

Okay, ready for this?  I wasn’t.

Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division announced today that attorney Mitchell J. Stein was arrested on Sunday, December 18, 2011, at Los Angeles International Airport on charges related to his alleged role in a multi-million dollar market manipulation stock fraud scheme.  Stein was arrested for his role as attorney for a South Carolina health care device company, Signalife… now known as Heart Tronics.

Huh?  Say what?

Apparently, an indictment was unsealed yesterday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida charging attorney Mitchell J. Stein, 53, of Hidden Hills, Calif., and Boca Raton, Fla., with one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, three counts of mail fraud, three counts of wire fraud, three counts of securities fraud, three counts of money laundering and one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice.   The indictment also seeks forfeiture of the proceeds of the offenses.

Huh?  Say what?

The indictment alleges that Stein has been engaged in a scheme to pump up the stock price of Signalife Inc. by lying about the company’s sales activity.   Signalife is now known as Heart Tronics.  It was a publicly traded company that purported to sell electronic heart monitoring devices, and according to the indictment, Stein’s wife owned approximately 85 percent of the shares.

According to the indictment Stein and co-conspirators faked purchase orders from fictitious customers and then issued press releases and filed documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that reported the fictitious sales.   They also created the false appearance of sales activity, by shipping products to an individual who would store them even though they had not purchased any products.

The indictment also says that Stein and co-conspirators sold shares of Signalife at inflated prices, hiding the fact that they were doing so by placing shares in purportedly blind trusts.  And not only that but Stein and co-conspirators also allegedly issued additional shares to third parties so that those third parties could sell the shares and remit the proceeds of those sales to Stein and his co-conspirators.

Stein also conspired to obstruct an SEC investigation into Heart Tronics by testifying falsely and directing others to do the same.

If Stein is convicted, he could face up to 20 years in prison on each count of mail fraud, wire fraud, securities fraud, and conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, and up to 10 years on each count of money laundering, and up to five years on the conspiracy to obstruct justice count.  And the SEC announced its filing of a civil enforcement action against Stein and others, the result of their conducting a parallel investigation.

And according to Thompson Reuters, Stein had help… and look who the help was:

“Willie Gault, a former Chicago Bears wide receiver, faces a civil lawsuit by U.S. securities regulators accusing the American football player and several others of engaging in an alleged scheme to inflate the price of stock in a heart-monitoring device company.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said in a complaint filed on Tuesday in federal court in California that the company, known as Heart Tronics, installed both Gault and a former Hollywood executive named J. Rowland Perkins as figureheads of the company to help fuel publicity and pump up investor confidence.”

Okay, so what the heck has been going on here.  I thought Stein was suing banks, but apparently he was actually a lot closer to robbing them?  It’s like finding out that you went to high school with Charles Keating.  Like… OMG.  I mean… OMG!

It’s more than strange to come to such a realization about someone who grew up in your neighborhood, someone in your age group.  Like, what the heck could have led him down the path on which he’s been traveling?  What possesses someone to do such things?

I mean… he seemed like a successful attorney… he’s been practicing law for something like 25 years and hadn’t committed any sort of crimes before… I even met his wife at  California Attorney General’s press conference on mortgage fraud, held maybe six monts ago and she seemed like a lovely woman.  Was it the money?  That would be the easy answer… he did what he did for the money.

But, the thing is… his wife is quite wealthy in her own right.  Her father was a very successful songwriter and music industry executive… I mean, very, very successful.  And Mitch, I’m sure, made a very good living for many years… someone gave me their home address and I looked at it on Google Earth and it looked like the largest home I’ve ever seen… 28,000 square feet.  And Mitch drove a Mercedes the one time I saw him in his car, but it wasn’t a new one, in fact it was maybe 10 years old.  He’s accused of illegally receiving something like $8 million.  Was that enough money to get him to be willing to break all the rules and put his freedom at risk.

Before you answer that, let me give you one more fact… Mitch has a daughter… who I’m told is 6-7 years old.  And he was arrested on Sunday, and Christmas is only days away.  Now, I understand that he was able to post bail… $300,000… so he’ll be home with her for the holidays, but what about next year?  Is he that certain that he’ll prevail?  Is he innocent of all charges, or does he believe he’s innocent of all charges?

I don’t know about about everyone in the world, it should go without saying, but I think most fathers wouldn’t risk leaving their daughters for $8 million… or $800 million, for that matter.  I wouldn’t even want to be kept away from my daughter for a week, let alone face decades in prison.  Not a chance in the world.  The only way I’d risk my life would be to save hers.  No amount of money would be in the running.

Is Mitch that much different than me?  It’s not like we’re from different planets… we grew up in the same neighborhood, for heaven’s sake.

Now, for some inside scoop…

Okay, so although I haven’t been able to reach Mitchell Stein in months, he simply stopped taking my calls after his firm was shut down… I received a call last night from someone who had been in contact with Mitchell Stein since his arrest.  And what he said, especially when combined with other facts, was alarming.

The person said that Mitch seemed to think everything was just fine.  Yes, he had been in jail, but only for one night, and he was none the worse for wear.  Not only that, but he started talking about how the U.N. had “bought” or somehow “approved” of his Heart Tronic device.  He said he had just returned from Ireland when he was arrested, but that everything was otherwise just fine… in fact, the prospects for his Heart Tronics business were quite exciting even.

Here’s a copy of the criminal indictment related to Mitchell Stein’s stock fraud allegations.  Take a look, and you tell me what you think, because I’d say things were a long way from being “fine.”  In fact, I’d say it looks like things have never been worse, and even though I understand that if the allegations are true or even close to true, then a lot of people were hurt financially… it still breaks my heart to think of any father of a 6-7 year-old daughter going away for a long time.

Mitchell Stein Criminal Indictment

But, the person who interacted with Mitch since he bailed out of jail little more than a day ago said that Mitch just kept talking about the U.N. having bought his Heart Tronics device, that according to the Department of Justice, for the most part was always pretty much a complete fraud.

Below you’ll find three links to Heart Tronics documents… press releases, for the most part… sent out recently by Heart Tronics executives… with names that don’t appear anywhere in the indictment.  There’s even one that proudly proclaims that “Heart Tronics to Participate in United Nations Health Initiative,” just as Mitch told my confidential source.

And when my source asked Mitch about being arrested and being in jail, Mitch just said, “oh yes.” How long he was asked… to which Mitch just said, “one day.”  And then he went back to talking about either Heart Tronics or the charges being brought as we speak by the California Attorney General for his alleged participation in Kramer’s alleged marketing scheme.

And, by the way, Phil Kramer is a 30 year, Martindale Hubble ‘A’ rated lawyer with a perfect State Bar record… and teenage boys at home, as well.  If you were to read Kramer’s and Stein’s resumes back to back, you’d have to come away quite impressed.  So, what the heck is going on that these two edned up where they are today.  At least Kramer is scared to death, I’m told.  From what I was told, Stein seems to be barely aware of what’s happening.

I’d be throwing up around the clock were I even in his shoes for a nano-second.  He’s still talking about Heart Tronics.  And he thinks he’s going to defeat the AG’s charges as well.  In fact, I’m told, he’s sure of it.  He’s even connected the two, telling my source that it’s because he sued Bank of America that the DOJ has come after his Heart Tronics company.  Even his wife is accused of being unduly enriched, or something like that.

And in light of all of that, he seems disconnected with reality. I have to tell you, I’ve only known him for maybe six months and only saw him in person on maybe three occasions, but for whatever reason, I’m worried about him.

And here’s another fact that gave me pause… according to published reports, Stein’s most recent message on Twitter, which was posted on the day of his arrest read:

“As long as the roots are not severed, all is well … and all will be well … In the garden.”

Well, okay then.  It’s not in my nature, but as far as this story goes,  all I can say is that I’m at a loss for words…

Mandelman out.

HeartTronics

HeartTronics to Participate in United Nations Health Initiative

HeartTronics Corporate Update

Dec
20

Mandelman on The News Dissector Radio Show with Danny Schechter

Listen to the Podcast of last week’s News Dissector Radio Hour on PRN.fm

Subjects:

Occupy Wall Street and the Foreclosure Crisis.

Captain (Ret.) Ray Lewis of the Philadelphia Police Department

Martin Andelman of the blog, Mandelman Matters

and Laura from Occupy Wall Street

Danny Schechter is an Emmy award winning journalist, television producer and independent filmmaker who also writes, blogs and speaks about media issues.  His latest film is PLUNDER The Crime Of Our Time. He’s also become a friend and I’ve appeared on his weekly radio show a couple of times in the past.  This time, however, I was on with a couple of people that have been in the media spotlight lately as a result of their involvement with Occupy Wall Street, or if you’re hip and in-the-know, OWS.

So… if you’re interested in what I had to say, click the play button below and you’ll be listening to The News Dissector… Danny Schechter… on PRN… the Progressive Radio Network.


Mandelman out.

Dec
20

Foreclosure Fraud North by Northwest with Attorney Shawn Newman, A Mandelman Matters Podcast

Shawn T. Newman of Olympia, Washington is a highly experienced lawyer who fights for the rights of homeowners, among others.  Washington State homeowners should know of him, as should the other foreclosure defense attorneys around the country.  Unquestionably, he’s one of “US.”

Here’s an excerpt from Shawn’s article, Freddie and Fannie’s Mortgage Shell Game, which appeared as a Guest Post on Mandelman Matters:

Chances are Fannie or Freddie “own your mortgage.”  If you are in litigation, you should follow up with targeted discovery requests to the servicer confirming the servicer does not “own” your mortgage.  Moreover, you should inquire and demand any records showing Freddie or Fannie assigned the mortgage to the servicer.  Servicers will point to Freddie or Fannie servicing guidelines which basically provide that the servicer forecloses in its (the servicer’s) own name.  Given a mortgage is an interest in land and the requirement under the statute of frauds that such contracts be in writing, the servicer’s standing to foreclose can be challenged absent some proof that the mortgage was specifically assigned by Freddie or Fannie to the servicer.  Legally, Freddie and Fannie must assign back the note to the servicer.  In fact, Freddie has a specific form 105 to do so.

However, Freddie and Fannie’s guidelines have evolved over time and you may find that there is no such assignment in most cases.   Unless there is a written assignment from the mortgage owner (Freddy or Fannie) to the servicer, the servicer cannot foreclose for the simple reason they are not part of the mortgage contract.   Simply put, only the mortgage owner can foreclose on the mortgage contract.  Moreover, if the assignment of the mortgage is invalid or fraudulent, then there is a “cloud on title” which should be identified by title and mortgage insurers.

Shawn has worked as a Washington State Assistant Attorney General (Education Division), Evergreen State College Legal Counsel, Washington State Senate Staff Counsel (Senate Committee Services) and as a Public Defender.  In his private practice, he represents various individuals, community groups, for profit and non-profit organizations and businesses.

Shawn is currently General Counsel to Saint Martin’s University and has served on the editorial board of the Journal of College and University Law.  He is a member of the Washington State Bar Association, Washington State Trial Lawyers Association and the National Association of College and University Attorneys.  Mr. Newman also serves as Washington State Director for the Initiative and Referendum Institute, based at the University of Southern California.

Shawn is a graduate of Notre Dame Law School and Ohio State University.  While at Notre Dame, he received a fellowship from the White Center for Law and Government and served as the Legislative Research Editor for the Journal of Legislation.

So,  without further delay, turn up your speakers click below and get ready for attorney Shawn Newman and how he sees fraudclosure by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac… on Mandelman Matters Podcast.

Mandelman out.

Dec
16

GUEST POST: Dear Colleagues, by Thomas A. Cox, Esq.

This letter was written today by attorney Thomas Cox of Portland Maine, and posted on several legal listservs.  It was totally unexpected and more than moving.  Tom is the lawyer whose work and depositions of GMAC’s Jeffrey Stephan brought to light what we now know as “robo-signing.”  Tom is a retired banking lawyer who came out of retirement to volunteer to help homeowners save their homes.  He’s an incredible person and an exceptional attorney.  I will never be able to express how much his words did for me today… and I hope they influence you as well.  Because the time for action is now.

Dear Colleagues,

After a lot of reflection this past week, I have realized that I am not doing enough. Neither are you.  This is a plea to every member of this listserv to do more.  You can do significantly more without a great deal of additional effort.  Please follow along with me.

A few years ago, in my “retirement”, I planned to volunteer a few hours a month to help with the Maine Attorneys Saving Homes project. That has morphed into far more than a full time effort that has produced some postive results and attendant notariety.  So, it is easy for me to fall into feelings of self-righteousness about my hard efforts and to see myself as doing the “good work” in the face of the foreclosure efforts of the evil banksters and their foreclosure juggernaut. I have tended to tell myself I am doing all that one lawyer can do to fight the evil empire of the foreclosure industry.

The decision that came out of the Maine Supreme Court last week in FNMA v. Bradbury, 2011 ME 120, is what is causing me to realize that none of us are doing enough.  That Bradbury case was the best shot anywhere in the country at getting a reasonably receptive state supreme court to really do something about stopping the foreclosure fraud that we all encounter on a daily basis.

In that regard, the effort failed. The refusal of the Maine Supreme Court to subject GMAC Mortgage to contempt proceedings for its nationwide six-year binge of foreclosure fraud tells me that my naïve belief that the judicial system would be our salvation was wrong. I already knew that a legislative solution was never going to happen, that the regulators are owned by the financial industry and would offer no meaningful solution, and that the attorneys general were not likely to do anything transformational.  So, knowing now that my placement of faith in the judicial system as the ultimate source of a solution is also gone, I realize that we must pursue other approaches.

According to the Center for Responsible Lending, we are not yet even one half of the way through this foreclosure crisis. Our individual and collective legal efforts during the first half of this crisis have had a barely noticable impact on the foreclosure industry.  If we keep on doing the same thing that we have been doing for the first half of this crisis, we are not going to make enough of a change.  While we need to keep battling in court on behalf of our individual clients, the courts are simply not going to give us a big picture solution.

One of the blogs that I read regularly to keep myself informed is Mandelman Matters.  Martin Andelman quite diplomaticly pierced my feelings of self-righteousness about my efforts recently by pointing out the truths stated in the preceding paragraph.  He explained how our individual and collective legal efforts will not be enough to solve the problem and how, if there is to be a solution, it will come only come through concerted action.

Folks like Jamie Daimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, and Brian Moynihan, CEO of Bank of America, live in rarified worlds that insulate them from seeing the dirty foreclosure industry tactics that their institutions orchestrate and that we and our clients live with every day. They just do not percieve the misery and pain that their banks are inflicting, often unjustifiably, and often callously, on millions of American homeowners and their families.  The do not believe that there is enough of an outcry and negative reaction to their banks’ actions to cause them any concern.  Andelman wants to change that and has some good ideas about how to go about it.

Andelman has been trying to organize concerted responses to the misconduct of the banksters. He knows the industry, because he used to work within it, just as I used to do.  He is smart, articulate and simply has more energy for this battle than almost anyone I know. On top of this, he has got a rapier wit—reading his blog is guaranteed to make you laugh out loud.  Andelman is looking for “DOERS”—people who will respond when he asks readers to take specific actions when he calls for help. What he is asking for does not take much time.  Some of his requests may even sound a bit hokey, but what have we got to lose by trying them since what we have been doing is not working.  Go to this link for an example of the kinds of help that Andelman asks for from us.

Here is what I am going to be doing to help Martin Andelman going forward and what I’m asking each one of you to do:

1. Subscribe to Mandelman Matters and read his blog post without fail;

2. Send Andelmen an email message (he really wants this) and tell him that you will be one of his “doers” and that when he asks for concerted action, you will participate;

3. From here on out, when Martin Andelman asks us to join him in a concerted action, however goofy it may seem do it-that same day (even if it is goofy, it will not hurt you to do it and it will not take much time);

4. Insist that everyone of your foreclosure defense clients  (past and present) who can read and write and who has access to a computer also agree to perform steps 1, 2 and 3 above. That is the least that they can do to reciprocate for the legal assistance that we are giving them, often for free or at reduced rates, and almost never being charged for all that we do for them;

5.  Ask every lawyer and staff member in your organization to follow steps 1-3 above;

6.  Think of who else you know—family members, friends, colleagues and others, who might be willing to help, and ask them to commit to performing steps 1-3 above.

If everyone on this listserv followed these steps, we could bring thousands more people into supporting Andelman’s efforts at really minimal efforts to ourselves.  If you know of better ways to increase the impact of our efforts on behalf of homeowners, I’d love to know what you have in mind.  But absent better ideas, we have nothing to lose and maybe a lot to gain by getting behind Martin Andleman’s efforts. If we fail to do this, we are simply not doing enough.

Thank you for being patient enough with me to consider this.
Tom

Thomas A. Cox, Esq.

P.O. Box 1314

Portland, Maine 04104

(207) 749-6671

Mandelman out.

Dec
16

DOER ALERT – Bank of America Disables a Disabled Vet

PLEASE DO NOT TAKE ACTION BASED ON THIS DOER ALERT…

Mandelman DOERS already took on this challenge and saved this homeowner’s home.

Arlie Matthews’ loan was modified by Bank of America on the same day that my DOERS took action.


Some of the bravest men the U.S. military has ever witnessed are the helicopter pilots and crews who flew during the Viet Nam War.  They seldom flew above 1,500 feet traffic and were essentially always exposed to hostile fire.  Getting shot at or shot down was not something uncommon. One out of every five of these pilots was killed or wounded during the war years.

They were considered “old men” at around 23 years old.

Young men off to war, soon flying million dollar machines at 150 MPH with people trying to kill them at all times.  These are the men who flew directly into machine gun fire repeatedly because it’s what was needed to get the mission done.  They are a very rare breed.

The helicopter provided unprecedented mobility.  Without the helicopter it would have taken three times as many troops to secure the 800-mile border with Cambodia and Laos.  Gunships played the role of both rescue and MEDEVAC ships. Slicks carried troops, supplies, ammo, and the wounded or fallen soldiers.

So as to deny the enemy places to hide in the jungle, they sprayed Agent Orange, which we told them wasn’t harmful.  And they flew no matter the weather… sometimes it meant they didn’t make it home.  With far too many hours without rest there wasn’t much these courageous young men wouldn’t do when duty called.

MEDEVAC helicopters flew nearly 500,000 missions.  For more than 400,000 American soldiers, the average time between being wounded and arriving at a hospital was under an hour, and as a result, less than one percent who survived the first 24 hours died.

The word “Hero” very much does apply to the men who fought by manning their helicopters during the Viet Nam War.  They did their duty with honor and courage.  Approximately 12,000 helicopters saw action in Vietnam, and this country owes those that fought so bravely a debt of enormous gratitude.  They forever will deserve, for they have more than earned, our respect.

Meet Mr. Arlie Matthews from Rancho Cucamonga, California

Arlie was one of the helicopter pilots who served his country during the War in View Nam.  He flew missions all over that country for four straight years.  In 1972, a flight physical detected a heart murmur… and Type II diabetes, caused by exposure to Agent Orange.

In 2002, he had his first open heart surgery.  Three months later he had an echocardiogram and it showed that the valve they had put in was leaking.  They had to re-open his chest and replace it.  Then in 2005, they put in a defibrillator, and his daily routine now includes taking 13 different prescription drugs.

Arlie’s heart condition and diabetes are 100% service connected disabled.  He also suffers from peripheral arterial damage on both side of his body, and neuropathy.

It’s not hard to imagine that Arlie missed a lot of work during those years of health problems, and even though his wife worked for the County of San Bernardino, by 2005 they were falling behind… and a few bills were getting paid late.

Luckily, they had owned their home for many years and since it appraised at that time for $510,000, they decided they’d refinance their loan for $375,000, using the money to pay off all of their debts.  And wasn’t it lucky that even though Arlie had a few late payments, Countrywide was happy to help Arlie into an adjustable rate loan starting at 9.3% APR.

Sure, he knew the rate sounded kind of high, but guess what Countrywide told him.  You can get this one easy… YES!  That’s right.  He could refinance to a lower fixed rate loan once he made maybe a year’s worth of payments on time.  It was now 2006.

In 2007, tragedy struck… Arlie’s wife passed away.  She had developed cancer, tumors in her heart.  Understandably, his daughter didn’t want him to be alone and she and her young children moved in to help take care of him.  They’re all still together living in the house today.  He didn’t say so, but talking to him I could feel how his daughter and her kids were keeping him young and filling the house with much joy.

So, in 2007, he tried to refinance his 9.3% ARM… but wouldn’t you know it… he had thought there was a one-year pre-payment penalty, but come to find out there was a two-year pre-payment penalty, which meant the loan would cost $13,000 to pay off early.  He decided to wait until the following year, which probably wouldn’t have been a big deal if the following year had been any year but… 2008.

He’s been trying to get Bank of America to modify his loan ever since… it will have been 35 months this January.

At one point, a couple of years ago… BofA offered him a trial modification that would have saved him $200 a month, but he said that, with his wife now gone, that wasn’t enough and he wanted to apply for the government program.  His BofA representative said that would be no problem… he could reapply… they were sending him another package to complete and re-submit.

That package was a long time coming, although every time he’d call Bank of America, someone would assure him that it was coming soon.  The BofA people told him how busy they were and that they would get to him as soon as they could.  But, month after month passed and no package arrived… until last July, more than two years since he had first applied to BofA to modify his loan.

Arlie jumped on it, provided everything the bank asked for, and he submitted it to Bank of America by the end of July 2011.  But then, at the beginning of August, there was a substitute trustee, an assignment of the Deed of Trust from MERS to BONY Mellon, and on August 5th… BofA recorded a Notice of Default.  (Wow… that was fast, Arlie must of thought.)

Arlie spent much of his career working in the title insurance industry, so he felt he could handle getting a loan modification, but now he saw that Bank of America was getting ready to foreclose and sell the house.  He called his assigned representative at the bank, Reuben Dunn, who is apparently located in my home town, Fullerton, California… how lucky is that?

Reuben has always said not to worry about that, because Arlie was in the process of applying for a loan modification. Arlie says he has never trusted his assurances, so as the months went by, he called the California Attorney General, who must have done something because he soon got a call from Suzanne at Bank of America, who was calling to talk to him about the bank’s in-house loan modification program.

Arlie was confused, so he asked if this meant that he had been turned down for the government’s HAMP program.  She replied that she had no idea that he had applied in the first place.  He explained that he had been trying for three years.  She said she would talk to her supervisor and get back to him this week… and today is Friday… and surprise, surprise… no call yet from Suzanne at Bank of America.

You see… although Reuben keeps saying that Arlie should not worry about Arlie’s house being sold, Arlie received a Notice of Trustee Sale on December 12, 2011… and it says his house will be sold on the courthouse steps on January 3, 2011.

That’s nice isn’t it?  After 34 months being jerked around, Bank of America sends Arlie a Notice of Trustee Sale right before Christmas, and it says the bank will be auctioning your home right after New Years.  Who does something like that?

Arlie Matthews is in his 70s.  He’s a disabled American veteran, whose disabilities are 100%, meaning that he qualifies for 100% disability payments.  His daughter and her kids have lived with him since 2007, the year he lost his wife.

He can’t move anything himself, he has no idea where he’d live.  He couldn’t afford another four bedroom home, he’s sure, so the move would likely break up their “family.”  I’m sorry, but I just can’t believe ANYONE in this country finds this situation even remotely acceptable.

This is either a horrible mistake, in which case it needs to be fixed and fixed fast… or it’s by design, in which case Bank of America is likely going to end up being sued for “elder abuse,” among other things.  To say nothing of what I’ll write about… hey, I wonder how many other disabled American vets we could get going on this?

SIDEBAR: Excuse me… Bank of America people… it’s me, Mandelman.  Listen, I’m sure you’ll be hearing from quite a few others on this, but I thought I’d just jump in here and mention that you had better not let Arlie’s sale date happen.  Because that would be so wrong for so many reasons, do I need to say anything else about that?

Okay, here’s the deal… someone should DO SOMETHING about this situation.  I personally received an email from Arlie yesterday, and I personally spoke with him for a couple of hours… and although I could never promise him anything… I want to promise him that this is wrong and won’t be allowed to happen, because in the country he fought for… this sort of thing just is not allowed.

Bank of America… stop torturing disabled American veterans, and stop torturing Arlie Matthews and I do mean immediately… and I also mean… or else.  He’s a brave and strong guy, but I know he’s got to be scared to death inside and I hate you for doing that to him… or anyone else for that matter.  He has a daughter and grandchildren.  And it’s Christmas.  And you already had 35 months to torture him…. And that’s enough.

What’s his name… oh yeah… Reuben… in case you’re reading this… I’ll be over to see you later today, since you’re apparently in Fullerton.   We can chat, but please don’t tell me not to worry about the date of Arlee’s trustee sale because I want to see it cancelled… period.  You can get his loan modified in January, if you need more time… but that trustee sale… cancel it now, please.

DOERS… DO IT ONE MORE TIME FOR ARLIE AND EMAIL BANK OF AMERICA’S CEO, BRIAN MOYNIHAN TODAY, OKAY.  We have a scared American hero here… and that’s not how we treat out heroes here, is it?  Tell Bryan how you feel about this, and let’s see if the bank will do the right thing.

Mandelman out.

Arlie Matthews

Rancho Cucamonga, California

Loan #: 118935465

###

Brian Moynihan, President, CEO & Chairman

Bank of America

Email: brian.t.moynihan@bankofamerica.com

Matthew Task, Executive Relations, 
Office of the CEO (At BofA)

Phone: 813-805-4873

Dec
15

Neil Barofsky and American Banker Finally Catch Up to Mandelman Matters

I really don’t care how that headline sounds.  I’m going to make my point regardless, and I think it needs to be made bluntly.  I’m far too angry and way too upset to do anything else.  This is it for me.

I started this blog three years ago for ONE reason: Because the government and banking PR machine was blaming the crisis on “irresponsible borrowers,” and I KNEW then that would prove to be an ultimately destructive thing because, as I wrote back then… when they realize what’s really happened, that it’s not “irresponsible borrowers,” they will have destroyed  the political will to do what’s needed to fix it.  No one was going to support a bailout of the “irresponsible.”

I wrote all of what I’m about to say hundreds of times and in so many ways I couldn’t even count them all.  Recently, I wrote an article titled, “Our future depends on just one thing.”  Abigail Field worked on it with me.  I don’t know… maybe it was 15,000 words.  I was shocked at how many people actually read it… maybe 5,000, which is a lot when you consider how much time it required.

I knew what would come, but I also voted for Barack Obama and I believed that his administration would do something about the foreclosure crisis.  And as I’ve sat and watched this administration’s policies and performance, I have to admit that up until recently, I didn’t know why they were doing the abysmal, seemingly unfeeling and irresponsible job they so obviously have done.  The kind of job that led Neil Barofsky to make the comments he made this week… his comments you’ll read below.

Now, however, I know what’s happened and why it happened.  It happened because the Obama Administration continues to be afraid of being seen as bailing out irresponsible borrowers… quite a coincidence, right?  Actually, not so much.  (Here’s another of my past attempts to explain this situation in writing: “Why Americans Are Allowing the Foreclosure Crisis to Continue.”)

But, you’ve heard what I have to say, so try this on for size and see what you think.  The book, “Confidence Men,” by Ron Suskind, tells the inside story of the first three years of the Obama Administration, based on hundreds of interviews with insiders… including interviews with President Obama himself. It’s not pro or con… it just is.  Jon Stewart interviewed Suskind a couple of months ago… it’s fascinating and I’ve included part one and two of that interview below.  Watch it.  Please.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Exclusive – Ron Suskind Extended Interview Pt. 1
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook
The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Exclusive – Ron Suskind Extended Interview Pt. 2
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook

Is it becoming clear?

I’ve written 600 articles now, and I suppose if I could get anyone to read a few hundred of them it might change their mind… but that would take some time.  This is an election year, as I’ve pointed out many times lately, and we need to shatter the “irresponsible borrower” misperception now if we expect anything to change for the better any time soon.

Last summer, when I returned from a week working with people at the Hawaii legislature, I knew there was only one thing to do… produce an open and shut case in a broadcast quality documentary-style program… and make it entertaining enough that it would go viral on the Internet…. maybe raise a hundred grand and get it on cable television.  Anything else would take too long to influence the number of people that had to be reached.  Nothing is absorbed as fast as high-quality video programming.

I didn’t want to produce a documentary program… I’ve done it many times in my career and it’s a lot of work.  But there was no choice, I’d been trying to get everybody on board for two and a half years at that point, and it was simply taking too long.  And I knew I was probably the only person who could do it.  I spent 20 years in corporate America as a creative director and communications strategist and I know I’m the only person in that world that could do it, because I’ve successfully shattered similarly erroneous views many times.

But… and it’s certainly all my own fault… I just haven’t been able to promote it effectively enough to get others to fund it to any real degree.  And I didn’t want to seek an investor that would want to make it into a money-making proposition and not a viral Internet campaign.

The truth is, I’m not all that comfortable with self-promotion to begin with, and this space is packed with scammers and fast talkers, which makes it that much harder to get people to write checks no matter the purpose.  They don’t know who to trust, and I don’t blame them.  So, I resigned myself to the fact that I would have to fund it myself, and that would mean that it would take a lot longer to get it done… but, it was what it was.

I’ll probably do a book at some point too, but not now because it’s too time consuming and we have an election year in front of us.  If we’re going to succeed at influencing politicians on this key point… this would be the year.  If we fail… it’s over.  What will happen… will just happen… and it will be a tragic failure for me, and an awful period in our nation’s history.

Just last night, I was talking to a homeowner in Pennsylvania and he asked me what was stopping the administration from doing anything effective about the crisis and I said right away, “Oh, it’s Rick Santelli… it’s only one thing… the ‘irresponsible borrower.’  There’s simply NO SUPPORT to help people that the country largely perceives as having been irresponsible borrowers.”  I don’t really know if he believed that I was 100% right…. maybe he thought I was partially right, but not all the way, I really don’t know.

People want it to be more complicated that that.  They don’t want to think of our government as just a bunch of guys making decisions.  People want to imagine that there’s a puppet master pulling strings and that they just aren’t privy to the information.  It’s reassuring to think that way.  Last year, I remember saying about the Obama Administration:

“Tell me there’s a plan… I don’t care if it’s an evil plan… as long as there’s A plan, I’ll be fine.  Because this looks like a bunch of people not knowing what to do and doing at terrible job at whatever they try… and that is scaring me to death.”

I started calling bankers and servicers and those on the other side because I realized that no one was winning, and with so many people losing… someone SHOULD be winning.  But no one was or is… everyone’s losing… we’re literally circling the drain.  Oh, I know… there’s a handful of bankers still getting obnoxious bonuses, and that’s wrong… but in the big scheme of things… it’s nothing really.  In a world where losses are measured in trillions, even a $100 million bonus is a rounding error.

Very quickly I realized two things… that those on the other side of this fight weren’t all that concerned with us one way or the other… and that they had no idea what to do to improve things either.  Our politicians are obviously clueless… they’re not even afraid of people not voting them back into office.  My guess would be that most of the elected representatives in the Hawaii legislature didn’t even view what’s happening as a “crisis.”  And the jackass in Arizona, Harper, think the problem is people walking away that can otherwise afford the payments no problem.

No… we’re not winning.

By the way, it’s not like I’m not used to being right way ahead of everyone else when it comes to things like this… I’ve got a 20-year track record of being exactly that.  But I never wanted to come off like that to people as a homeowner advocate and blogger, and I knew no one knew of my professional career in this world of homeowners and their lawyers.

Now, it just doesn’t matter.  I don’t really care how I “come off.” It is what it is… and I’m not a person capable of deluding myself or others into believing something that’s not true.

Here’s the story from American Banker… it’s short, so I’m posting the whole thing… read it, please.

Barofsky Blasts Treasury, Obama for Housing Mess

Neil Barofsky, the former special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, hammered the Obama Administration and Treasury Department Tuesday night at a panel discussion on the foreclosure crisis, saying fears of a political backlash led to the administration’s tepid response to the housing crisis and refusal to back principal reductions.

Barofsfky, a former assistant U.S. attorney who is now a senior fellow at New York University’s School of Law, said the administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program was “a failure” because the Obama White House feared being labeled as helping “undeserving homeowners.”

Asked if there was any hope for homeowners at risk of foreclosure, Barofsky said: “Um, no.”

The panel was organized by the non-profit news organization ProPublica. The other participants included ProPublica reporter Paul Kiel, Alyssa Katz, editor of Columbia Journalism School’s New York World, and this reporter.

“The crisis is an example of how people lose their faith in government, which has costs that are hard to quantify,” Barofsky said during the two-hour event at the Tenement Museum in New York’s Lower East Side. “Everything that has happened since [Tarp] has been something of a mess.”

When the administration introduced the Hamp program in 2009, Rick Santelli, an editor at CNBC Business News, went on a rant” calling defaulted homeowners “losers” and accusing the government of “promoting bad behavior.” Santelli is credited with sparking (and naming) the Tea Party Movement by suggesting that people opposed to the government form a “Chicago Tea Party.”

Barosky said the White House, out of concern that aiding homeowners would cause a political backlash, quickly backed away from its goal of helping 3 million to 4 million homeowners avoid foreclosure.

There was a fear of “moral hazard,” the idea that homeowners who were not financially strapped would default to get a principal reduction, Barofsky said.

He argued that the $28 billion left in the Tarp program should be used to modify loans, but he faulted the Treasury for never spending the money, calling it a “lost opportunity.”

###

Homeowners, lawyers and fellow bloggers… we ARE NOT winning.  And we won’t win.  I’ve tried to say this numerous times in more politically correct ways, but it obviously needs to be said in less uncertain terms.

The foreclosure crisis is has only affected less than 15 percent of America’s homeowners.  More than 85 percent aren’t having the problem… yet.  Ninety-five percent of homeowners just go through foreclosure without any representation.  And with at least 3,000 homeowners evicted every single day, seven days a week… we get all hip-hop-happy because a literal handful have some very moderate levels of success… we tell ourselves we are gaining on it… but we’re not.

We’re not gaining on it because there is no WE… so, WE can’t be fighting it.  At best we represent a speed bump to the banking industry, and that won’t change for several years when there will be so many more people swept under that there will be societal pain to a degree we’ve never even imagined.

Lawyers… fighting your cases one by one… in your own small universes, without any sort of data being reported… without any sort of association… you’ve had some great cases, but their impact is akin to a Bandaid on a severed limb.  Loan modifications are the only way people are staying in their homes in any number, but the banking industry has turned those helping homeowners get loans modified into something close to drug dealers, as they echo the familiar refrain… “Call your bank directly or call a (bank funded) HUD Counselor.”

And my fellow bloggers… we continue to limp along writing perhaps bravely and perhaps helpfully, but we’re trying to outrun a tsunami in our individual small canoes.  It’s never boring… it’s stimulating even.  But it’s just nowhere near enough.

I’m not saying we should stop what’s going on… in fact, we need to do more… we need about 10,000 more lawyers and that wouldn’t be near enough.  Maybe it’s all we can hope to do as the collection of individuals that we are, but I can’t not call it as it unquestionably is.  And I can’t just sit back, write my articles and pretend that I’m changing the world.


So… here’s the deal… I need to know how many DOERS are out there.

If you’re a DOER I need to hear from you by email.  If you’re a DOER, willing to support a campaign to strategically target and then attack chosen opportunities, I need to hear from you now.  My DOERS have saved three homes in a row by sending emails in a coordinated way.  Raise your hand now and tell me your on board, because I’ll need to be able to reach you to tell us what WE are doing via email, so as not to tip our hand.

We’re going to “OCCUPY,” but in a very different way than OWS… we’re going to OCCUPY without leaving our homes. It’s going to be a game of inches… it’s going to take 3-4 months before we reach the critical mass that moves the proverbial needle.  It’s not just about reading, it’s about doing.  But, we will gain momentum and WE WILL shatter the “irresponsible borrower,” stereotype.

We’ve already proven that we can inspire a bank to take immediate action by sending some number of emails in a coordinated and targeted way.  Imagine when I can write something that results in 1,000 or 10,000… or even 100,000… or maybe someday 1,000,000 people sending a letter and a bag of pretzels to a specific individual’s office.

  • What do you suppose would happen if a senator or a governor were to walk into work one morning and find 30,000 bags of pretzels carrying one message?  And not once, but every month… or more often that that if need be.  Would it make the news?  Damn right it would… and others would join our ranks.
  • Why couldn’t a group like that raise a fund to help with eviction defense for senior citizens or single moms?  Wouldn’t the existence of such a fund also make the news?  Yes it would.
  • Why don’t we have one highly visible site with trusted lawyers listed on it, so no one ends up retaining sub-par legal representation?  Would that be newsworthy?  Yes.  My trusted attorneys tab gets more traffic than 90 percent of my articles each month.
  • Why couldn’t such a group become its own PR machine, publishing viewpoints as part of a strategy, instead of the current passionate but disjointed efforts?  If we can’t get a documentary done, why couldn’t we produce a series of viral vignettes that we all help to distribute to the media, to politicians… to servicers… to other homeowners and that destroy the irresponsible borrowers stereotype?
  • Why couldn’t we have our own bills being proposed in various state legislatures that provides solutions?
  • Why don’t we make better use of headline risk by publishing the stories of injustice that go on each day?
  • And much more…

We’re not wining the way we’re going.  I’m sorry to say it that way, but then again maybe I’m not.  We have to fight as a WE.  I’m not trying to be a king… in fact, I’ve never wanted to be a king.  I want to be a member of a team… but I just don’t see anyone else with any plan to inspire real change.  And yet the banking lobby is well-funded and relentless.

Raise your hand and be counted… and counted on.  Email me at mandelman@mac.com now.

No one helps those who don’t help themselves.  We need to be WE… and now.  Because as long as the country believes that irresponsible borrowers are the problem, nothing will change for borrowers… not enough lawyers will join the fight and as they say… we’ll see you in the soup line.

I need a core group from which we can build.  It shouldn’t be painful, there are many of us.

The country hasn’t changed.  The power of the people remains intact.

WHEN I POST A NEED FOR DOERS ARE YOU COMMITTED READING IT… AND DOING SOMETHING… SENDING AN EMAIL, SENDING A LETTER AND A BAG OF PRETZELS, OR WHATEVER?  LET ME KNOW NOW.

I HAVE A PLAN TO IMPLEMENT A SERIES OF TACTICS DESIGNED TO ATTACK THE IRRESPONSIBLE BORROWERS STEREOTYPE.  ARE YOU WILLING TO HELP FUND THAT INITIATIVE FOR THE NEXT 120 DAYS?  LET ME KNOW.

Any answer is fine… but I do need to know now.

Mandelman out.

Dec
14

Mandelman Speaks at California State Bar’s Annual Discipline Hearings

Here’s what the California State Bar’s announcement said:

The State Bar will hold its annual hearings this month for the public or lawyers to make proposals or offer comments about attorney disciplinary procedures, attorney competency and admissions procedures.  The first hearing will begin at 10 a.m. Dec. 7 in the bar’s San Francisco offices at 180 Howard St. (fourth floor). The Los Angeles hearing is scheduled for 10 a.m. Dec. 13 at 1149 South Hill St. (seventh floor).

So… I appeared before the panel of attorneys to speak about how the State Bar has been handling SB 94 and how I believe the bar should be handling things related to the foreclosure crisis and lawyers representing homeowners who are seeking loan modifications.  On the panel were attorneys Lowell Carruth, Colin Wong, Randall Difuntorum and the new OCTC, Jayne Kim.

Off the record, I was told by the others in attendance that… “I killed it.”

I began by offering some of the most current foreclosure crisis statistics for the State of California, as follows:

  • 1.2  million  foreclosures  statewide  since  2008… the  number  is expected to exceed 2 million  by  the  end  of  2012.
  • California is the hardest  hit  of  ALL  fifty  states, one in every five foreclosures in the US is in California.
  • The 2 million  foreclosures  expected  through  2012  are  estimated  to  cost  homeowners,  property   taxes,  and  local  governments  $650  billion  statewide.
  • Roughly half of  California homeowners with a mortgage owe more on their  mortgages than their  homes are worth.

Then I broke out some Los Angeles’ foreclosure statistics:

  • Foreclosures hurt all homeowners:  In the aggregate, LA  homeowners  will lose at least $80  billion in home value, directly attributable to 200,000 foreclosures 2008-­‐2012.
  • Foreclosures destroy the property tax base: Property tax revenue losses estimated at $481 million in the wake of foreclosure crisis.
  • Foreclosures cost local  governments:  The typical foreclosure costs local governments more  than $19,229 for  increased costs of safety inspections, police and fire calls, and trash removal, and maintenance.    In Los Angeles,  theses costs are estimated to be $1.2 billion.
  • Foreclosures undermine economic recovery and cost jobs: Los Angeles has 79,029  homeowners underwater by  $7.3 billion. If banks wrote down those mortgages, it could mean $780 million into local economy and spur 11,353  jobs.

I spent a little time acknowledging how we all got here, and recognized the thinking behind SB 94… that it was based on what we knew then… and made the overriding point that we owed the people of California a more thoughtful response to the crisis because we know much more today than we did then.

I also explained that the numbers of homeowners in foreclosure, combined with the well-publicized abuses committed by mortgage servicers, combine to make it very clear that we need our lawyers to get through this crisis, and without theose lawyers representing distressed homeowners we are certain to experience a much deeper and longer lasting economic downturn.  I don’t believe there should be any question about that, at this point, and those that disagree either simply lack the knowledge to understand the dynamics involved… or they’re selling something.

Consider that as of today, we have 2,000,000 homeowners in foreclosure.  Forty percent of those have not made a payment on their mortgage in over two years… 70% haven’t made a payment in over a year, making them ineligible for a loan modification if their loan is owned by Fannie or Freddie.

If each homeowner required just ten hours of assistance, that would mean 20,000,000 man hours of assistance time, and assuming 260 workdays per year, and a very efficient process, that’s roughly 12,820 years.  If we had 1,000 people trained and ready to go, we’d work through that number of homeowners in 12.8 years.  Of course, more homeowners would join the ranks during that time, and we don’t have 1,000 trained people assisting homeowners, or any sort of efficient system.

And it’s worth saying that even if we had 10,000 people trained and ready to go, without the efficient system, we’d never even be able to get through that number of homeowners in 1.2 years, and even that would mean an additional 400,000 added to the pool as the original 2,000,000 were being processed.

Now, let’s understand something else about the scale of the problem.  Over the last three years we’ve accomplished nothing, except that we’ve foreclosed on 1.2 million California homes, and allowed housing prices to go into a free fall.  What do you suppose will happen as unemployment continues to increase?  What will happen once interest rates rise?  And at the current pace of home sales, the shadow inventory, which consists of REOs not on the market, is going to be around for a long time… and we’re not just talking about the lower income areas anymore.

For example, according to DrHousingBubble.com, 142 homes in Beverly Hills have the following:

-A notice of default filed

-Scheduled for auction

-Bank owned

Interestingly enough only SIX homes show up on the MLS search when you look for active Beverly Hills foreclosures.

I also spoke to the members of the panel about the need for the State Bar to give more careful consideration to how it can better support the legitimate and ethical attorneys that could provide representation to homeowners in need of assistance, and I informed them that I am about to submit a formal proposal for how this might work to the new Bar president, Jon Streeter.

I have to say that I was encouraged that all of the panel members seemed to be very attentive as I spoke, and I plan to schedule a meeting with Jayne Kim and State Bar CEO, Howard Dunn in the next few weeks to continue discussing ways to improve the current situation.  I think it’s safe to say that it could not get any worse, so I guess I can say that I remain optimistic.

If you’re a California attorney and have any questions or comments, feel free to get in touch by emailing me at mandelman@mac.com.

Mandelman out.

Dec
14

Arizona’s Rep. Jack Harper Says Walk Away and You’ll Pay

Arizona Representative Jack Harper has absolutely stumped the panel, as they say.  If you had asked me what the Arizona legislature might do to make things MUCH worse this coming year, I’m not sure I could have come up with much.  I’m sure I wouldn’t have guessed this development even if given a hundred chances.

Like, what could you do to INCREASE foreclosures in a state where at least 50% of the mortgages are already underwater?  This year, Arizona came in #3 in the nation for declines in property values at 8.1%.  Unemployment is rock solid steady at 9%, assuming you stop counting those no longer looking for a job or those under-employed.  Now, I realize that Nevada is slightly in the lead here, but is Arizona that determined to win the race to the bottom?  Awfully competitive, if you ask me.  You’re already showing up Florida.

Currently, Arizona is a “non-recourse” state, meaning that if a homebuyer walks away from a house that’s underwater, meaning that the amount owed is more than the value of the property, the lender CANNOT recover the difference from the homeowner.

I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP.  YES, I’M BEING SARCASTIC, BUT EVERY SINGLE FACT IS CORRECT.  I’LL BE PROVIDING LINKS AT THE END SO YOU CAN READ IT THE BORING WAY.

The Arizona Bankers Association has been trying to change that for years so banks could go after the homeowners for the amount of the deficiency, and finally they’ve found their boy in Jack Harper.  Inconceivably, Harper says he will introduce a bill that will make Arizona’s homeowners responsible for deficiency judgements after foreclosure.  That could mean, if you owe say $500,000 and your home sells at auction… for say $100,000… like, in 2025 or whatever… now the bank will be able to come after you for the $400,000.

Harper, who by the way is no slouch legislatively speaking… he’s the Chairmoron (is that how you spell that?) of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, has decided that Arizona’s status as a “nonrecourse” state is what’s keeping its real estate market from recovering. He says that people abandoning their homes further depresses the value of nearby homes… and he’s not happy about that.

According to Harper…

“The idea is to keep people from being encouraged to just walk away from their house any time they’re a little bit upside down on their mortgage,” said Harper, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.

Go back and re-read that sentence.  That sentence may very be a once in a lifetime opportunity.  And if it neither makes you feel enraged or sick to your stomach… you have already died inside.

The Arizona Bankers Association has been fighting for years to repeal the current law.  They say that when borrowers default, that means less money available for new loans.  They claim that lenders “get stuck with repossessed homes they cannot sell for enough at auction to recoup their losses,” and they want more than anything to be able to go after the borrowers for the difference.

Just so we’re clear… AND I DO WANT TO BE DAMN CLEAR ABOUT THIS… that is a complete and total LIE.

We should all know by now that our loans were “SECURITIZED,” sold off in complex securities to European banks and state pension plans.  Repossessed homes don’t decrease the amount of money there is for mortgages in Arizona.  The money for mortgages in Arizona NEVER came from Arizona… it never came from the bankers either.  If you meet anyone that believes that, walk away from them immediately, and for God’s sake keep them away from children.  ”They” are the best argument ever for forced sterilization.

Oh, and by the way… essentially ALL of the lending in this country today… and for the last four years… is from the U.S. government… Fannie, Freddie, FHA, VA… that’s it.  If anyone says otherwise, please refer them to me.

NOW FOR THE BEST PART… and Hat-tip to one of my favorite Arizona foreclosure defense attorneys, Beth Findsen…

Arizona’s laws that allow homeowners to walk away from mortgages were part of a legislative deal made in 1971, says Arizona Association of Realtors’ CEO Tom Farley.

Until then, a bank that wanted to foreclose on a home because of nonpayment on a mortgage had to go to court, a lengthy and cumbersome process.

That year, Arizona became a “deed of trust” state. The change, sought by the banks, meant lenders could foreclose on a property simply by giving notice and then taking possession 91 days later.

What the lenders gave up in exchange for that law was the ability to go after the home-loan borrowers, Farley said.

Yes, the bankers wanted Arizona to be a non-recourse state.  They wanted Arizona’s homeowners to be able to walk away and not owe the difference, because they didn’t want to hassle with the whole judicial foreclosure process.  They wanted to be able to foreclose faster.  And since they never lend their own money anyway, who cared…. foreclosing faster was better for them.

Of course, that was when Arizona’s property values were ALWAYS GOING UP in the future.  Hold onto the house and get more for it later.  Now that prices are in a free fall, make the deadbeat homeowners pay… f#@k ‘em!  They haven’t lost EVERYTHING yet.  Some of them still have cars we could repossess and sell off for scrap metal, and just think how that would help the traffic problems in the Valley of the Sun.  And jewelry… I’ve heard some may still have wedding rings and crap like that.

Jack “Jackass” Harper is a special kind of moron, however, as evidenced by his supporting statements.  Are you ready?

From the Arizona Daily Star, Saturday, December 10, 2011…

“Harper, a Republican lawmaker from Surprise, acknowledged that lenders may have ignored normal underwriting standards. But he said that’s not their fault.”

Keep going, if I had to read it so do you…

“The federal government uses the Community Reinvestment Act to intimidate the federally chartered banks,” he said. “They give them goals about how many loans you have to make in underserved, low-income areas. And the banks then start making risky loans to meet the goal.”

I can’t believe I have to do this but please stay with me.

1. The Community Reinvestment Act… OF 1979, by the way… had NOTHING to do with anything in 2008.  It was not a sleeping time bomb waiting for almost 30 years to destroy the planet’s economy.  And it doesn’t have any impact on Spain, Ireland, Italy, Australia… you get the idea, right?

2. If it were something related to the Community Reinvestment Act of 1979, then it would stand to reason that the foreclosures would be mostly in Community Reinvestment Act areas, right?  Is Scottsdale one of those?  I didn’t think so.

3. The Community Reinvestment Act only applies to federally chartered banks… NOT mortgage companies and Wall Street investment banks like New Century, Option One, Ameriquest, First Alliance, Lehman Bros., Bear Stearns, Washington Mutual, World Savings, Downey Savings, and the rest of the sub-prime shitheads that made all of the loans he’s talking about.  And no… it wasn’t Fannie and Freddie either… look it up for yourself if you don’t believe me.

4. The Community Reinvestment Act is about preventing discrimination and “redlining.”  Is Harper suggesting that what we need more of is discrimination and redlining?

I could go on, but my fingertips are already bleeding from pounding on the keyboard I’m going to replace as soon as I post this.

How about some more Harper from the Arizona Star?

He also said he DOES NOT believe that the banks bear some responsibility for the bad loans and should have to absorb some of the losses when borrowers default.

“The banks are taking all the risk and the buyer is taking none, other than what their down payment is,” he said.

Nope, I’m done.  I’ve got nothing else to say.  But, get this…

Harper says he’s willing to compromise and allow the banks to only go after an amount considered “fair market value,” and all I can say is that’s mighty white of him.  So, if you owe $500,000 and you walk away or lose your home to foreclosure… and your house is said to be worth say $250,000… even though God couldn’t sell it for that amount… all they can chase you for is the $250,000.

And just in case some of you are thinking… so what, I’ll just file bankruptcy… think again.  Ever since the new bankruptcy laws of 2005, that’s no easy answer or panacea.  Harper’s new law would make sure that you who already feel like you’ve lost everything… would actually be forced to LOSE LITERALLY EVERYTHING.

The really crazy thing is that Jackass Harper doesn’t even win the prize for elected morons in Arizona.  Besides him, Nancy McLain, and who could forget Carl Seel… the corporate seal, as I like to call him ever since he got his hundred grand principal reduction right before he arrived too late to propose an amendment to help homeowners in foreclosure… but at the federal level there’s Republican Senator Jon Kyl.

On the subject of extending unemployment benefits through this coming year, since there are NO JOBS, and some 25 million Americans hopelessly out of work… Senator Kyl recently claimed that…

“Continuing to pay people unemployment compensation is a disincentive for them to seek new work.”

YEAH!  You are a lazy group out there in Arizona, and if they keep allowing you to collect unemployment, you’ll never get off your butts and look for work.  Hey, don’t look at me, you guys elected him.

IN CONCLUSION…

Well, I will say one thing about this economic crisis… it’s certainly bringing out the CRAZY in some folks.  Like Republicans, for example.  And don’t even think about accusing me of being some kind of loony-left, Democratic partisan hack because not only did I vote for Reagan and the first George Bush, but I voted for Dubya TWICE.  (I also voted for Obama in ‘08, but that only proves that I’m a pragmatist… not a crazy person.  McCain/Palin didn’t even deserve to come in second.)

I used to be a Republican because for some reason I was under the impression that they were pro-business.  They used to be pro-business, didn’t they?  I could have sworn…

Anyway, this past year you might remember that I was the one who broke the story about SB 1259… the bill that vanished into thin air after passing the Republican controlled Arizona State Senate 28-2, courtesy of the inconceivably insensitive and I would say at least brainwashed, if not entirely corrupt, Rep. Nancy McLain.

The whole thing was a big misunderstanding actually… I didn’t realize that Arizona used some other kind of government … I had always assumed the state was using the same kind of democracy thing the rest of the states were, but come to find out, I was wrong.  I’m not sure what they call it, but apparently, in Arizona they let Nancy McLain decide on which bills legislators get to vote.  If Nancy doesn’t like it, Arizona doesn’t get it.  Hey, it’s okay with me, I don’t live there and Democracy’s not exactly winning any awards lately anyway.

One more thing…

A Personal Message to Senator Harper…

Okay, here’s the deal Jack.  I hope this embarrassed you.  What you’re proposing is going to hurt so many people that I cried writing about it.  It is either the product of some highly uneducated thinking, or you are a corrupt piece of crap bought and paid for by banking lobbyists.   For the moment, I choose to believe that you don’t know any better and actually have your state’s best interests at heart.  I’m going to assume that you are misguided or misinformed… that you are not a misanthrope.  (Look it up.)

So, if that’s the case, I want to help.  Get in touch with me confidentially.  No one will ever know.  I’ll help you understand what you are missing, what you should consider if you want to: Stabilize homeprices and stop people from walking away from underwater loans… at no cost to taxpayers.  And, supplement the state budget deficit without raising taxes.

I’ll even help design a graceful and strategic way out of your idiotic statements about the bill you shouldn’t have proposed… I’ll take down my post, and say wonderful things about you… and never tell a living soul you contacted me… ever.  I’ll sign any confidentiality agreement you want.

Or, stay on the track you’re on, in which case I’ll be writing about you constantly.  If anyone ever looks you up on Google, they’ll have to wade through page after page of my articles about your shortcomings… the Internet sucks that way, I know.  Eventually, even your own mother will vote for a Democrat.

Think about it, Jack… Google search is forever, and there’s still time to course correct.  I’m a very reasonable guy… I’m a communications strategist that has worked for some of the largest investment banks on Wall Street and some of the largest corporations on the planet for 20 years.  I’m smart as a whip about these subjects… ask around, you’ll see.

I’ve had a hard year, Jack… trying to change things for the better in this country… you can just imagine, right?  So, I’m cranky and would welcome someone to take out my frustration on in writing.  Don’t let it be you, Jack.  It won’t be any fun at all, my facts are never wrong, and you are the definition of a public figure.  Are you feeling me, Jack… I wouldn’t say any of this if it weren’t that important to stop what you’re doing.

At least sleep on it.  My email is mandelman@mac.com.  I’m here for you, if you’ll just give it a try, I’ll have you running for governor or the U.S senate within 5 years.

Mandelman

Do you think that was too subtle?  I sure hope he comes over from the dark side.  He looks like such a nice young man.  In fact, I printed him out, and I’m putting his 8″x10″ glossy on top of our Christmas tree this year.  God Lord, Arizona… WTF do you have going on over there.

And you know how much I love your state too.  You know what this means, don’t you?  Now, I’m going to have to go to Vegas or New Mexico… come on fix this… I love the Camelback Inn.

Mandelman out.

###

And lest anyone think that I embellished a single fact in this story, I NEVER do that and you can read the straight news for yourself at any of the links below.

Planned Arizona Bill lets Banks Go After Homeowners Who Bail (This is on Beth Findsen’s blog, so please read this one first.)

Arizona Senator Wants to Penalize Those Who Strategically Foreclose

New Bill Could Prohibit Homeowners from Walking Away

State lawmaker wants to restrict mortgage walkaways

Lawmaker wants to change state’s non-recourse status

Dec
14

Arizona’s Rep. Jack Harper Says Walk Away and You’ll Pay

Arizona Representative Jack Harper has absolutely stumped the panel, as they say.  If you had asked me what the Arizona legislature might do to make things MUCH worse this coming year, I’m not sure I could have come up with much.  I’m sure I wouldn’t have guessed this development even if given a hundred chances.

Like, what could you do to INCREASE foreclosures in a state where at least 50% of the mortgages are already underwater?  This year, Arizona came in #3 in the nation for declines in property values at 8.1%.  Unemployment is rock solid steady at 9%, assuming you stop counting those no longer looking for a job or those under-employed.  Now, I realize that Nevada is slightly in the lead here, but is Arizona that determined to win the race to the bottom?  Awfully competitive, if you ask me.  You’re already showing up Florida.

Currently, Arizona is a “non-recourse” state, meaning that if a homebuyer walks away from a house that’s underwater, meaning that the amount owed is more than the value of the property, the lender CANNOT recover the difference from the homeowner.

I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP.  YES, I’M BEING SARCASTIC, BUT EVERY SINGLE FACT IS CORRECT.  I’LL BE PROVIDING LINKS AT THE END SO YOU CAN READ IT THE BORING WAY.

The Arizona Bankers Association has been trying to change that for years so banks could go after the homeowners for the amount of the deficiency, and finally they’ve found their boy in Jack Harper.  Inconceivably, Harper says he will introduce a bill that will make Arizona’s homeowners responsible for deficiency judgements after foreclosure.  That could mean, if you owe say $500,000 and your home sells at auction… for say $100,000… like, in 2025 or whatever… now the bank will be able to come after you for the $400,000.

Harper, who by the way is no slouch legislatively speaking… he’s the Chairmoron (is that how you spell that?) of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, has decided that Arizona’s status as a “nonrecourse” state is what’s keeping its real estate market from recovering. He says that people abandoning their homes further depresses the value of nearby homes… and he’s not happy about that.

According to Harper…

“The idea is to keep people from being encouraged to just walk away from their house any time they’re a little bit upside down on their mortgage,” said Harper, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.

Go back and re-read that sentence.  That sentence may very be a once in a lifetime opportunity.  And if it neither makes you feel enraged or sick to your stomach… you have already died inside.

The Arizona Bankers Association has been fighting for years to repeal the current law.  They say that when borrowers default, that means less money available for new loans.  They claim that lenders “get stuck with repossessed homes they cannot sell for enough at auction to recoup their losses,” and they want more than anything to be able to go after the borrowers for the difference.

Just so we’re clear… AND I DO WANT TO BE DAMN CLEAR ABOUT THIS… that is a complete and total LIE.

We should all know by now that our loans were “SECURITIZED,” sold off in complex securities to European banks and state pension plans.  Repossessed homes don’t decrease the amount of money there is for mortgages in Arizona.  The money for mortgages in Arizona NEVER came from Arizona… it never came from the bankers either.  If you meet anyone that believes that, walk away from them immediately, and for God’s sake keep them away from children.  ”They” are the best argument ever for forced sterilization.

Oh, and by the way… essentially ALL of the lending in this country today… and for the last four years… is from the U.S. government… Fannie, Freddie, FHA, VA… that’s it.  If anyone says otherwise, please refer them to me.

NOW FOR THE BEST PART… and Hat-tip to one of my favorite Arizona foreclosure defense attorneys, Beth Findsen…

Arizona’s laws that allow homeowners to walk away from mortgages were part of a legislative deal made in 1971, says Arizona Association of Realtors’ CEO Tom Farley.

Until then, a bank that wanted to foreclose on a home because of nonpayment on a mortgage had to go to court, a lengthy and cumbersome process.

That year, Arizona became a “deed of trust” state. The change, sought by the banks, meant lenders could foreclose on a property simply by giving notice and then taking possession 91 days later.

What the lenders gave up in exchange for that law was the ability to go after the home-loan borrowers, Farley said.

Yes, the bankers wanted Arizona to be a non-recourse state.  They wanted Arizona’s homeowners to be able to walk away and not owe the difference, because they didn’t want to hassle with the whole judicial foreclosure process.  They wanted to be able to foreclose faster.  And since they never lend their own money anyway, who cared…. foreclosing faster was better for them.

Of course, that was when Arizona’s property values were ALWAYS GOING UP in the future.  Hold onto the house and get more for it later.  Now that prices are in a free fall, make the deadbeat homeowners pay… f#@k ‘em!  They haven’t lost EVERYTHING yet.  Some of them still have cars we could repossess and sell off for scrap metal, and just think how that would help the traffic problems in the Valley of the Sun.  And jewelry… I’ve heard some may still have wedding rings and crap like that.

Jack “Jackass” Harper is a special kind of moron, however, as evidenced by his supporting statements.  Are you ready?

From the Arizona Daily Star, Saturday, December 10, 2011…

“Harper, a Republican lawmaker from Surprise, acknowledged that lenders may have ignored normal underwriting standards. But he said that’s not their fault.”

Keep going, if I had to read it so do you…

“The federal government uses the Community Reinvestment Act to intimidate the federally chartered banks,” he said. “They give them goals about how many loans you have to make in underserved, low-income areas. And the banks then start making risky loans to meet the goal.”

I can’t believe I have to do this but please stay with me.

1. The Community Reinvestment Act… OF 1979, by the way… had NOTHING to do with anything in 2008.  It was not a sleeping time bomb waiting for almost 30 years to destroy the planet’s economy.  And it doesn’t have any impact on Spain, Ireland, Italy, Australia… you get the idea, right?

2. If it were something related to the Community Reinvestment Act of 1979, then it would stand to reason that the foreclosures would be mostly in Community Reinvestment Act areas, right?  Is Scottsdale one of those?  I didn’t think so.

3. The Community Reinvestment Act only applies to federally chartered banks… NOT mortgage companies and Wall Street investment banks like New Century, Option One, Ameriquest, First Alliance, Lehman Bros., Bear Stearns, Washington Mutual, World Savings, Downey Savings, and the rest of the sub-prime shitheads that made all of the loans he’s talking about.  And no… it wasn’t Fannie and Freddie either… look it up for yourself if you don’t believe me.

4. The Community Reinvestment Act is about preventing discrimination and “redlining.”  Is Harper suggesting that what we need more of is discrimination and redlining?

I could go on, but my fingertips are already bleeding from pounding on the keyboard I’m going to replace as soon as I post this.

How about some more Harper from the Arizona Star?

He also said he DOES NOT believe that the banks bear some responsibility for the bad loans and should have to absorb some of the losses when borrowers default.

“The banks are taking all the risk and the buyer is taking none, other than what their down payment is,” he said.

Nope, I’m done.  I’ve got nothing else to say.  But, get this…

Harper says he’s willing to compromise and allow the banks to only go after an amount considered “fair market value,” and all I can say is that’s mighty white of him.  So, if you owe $500,000 and you walk away or lose your home to foreclosure… and your house is said to be worth say $250,000… even though God couldn’t sell it for that amount… all they can chase you for is the $250,000.

And just in case some of you are thinking… so what, I’ll just file bankruptcy… think again.  Ever since the new bankruptcy laws of 2005, that’s no easy answer or panacea.  Harper’s new law would make sure that you who already feel like you’ve lost everything… would actually be forced to LOSE LITERALLY EVERYTHING.

The really crazy thing is that Jackass Harper doesn’t even win the prize for elected morons in Arizona.  Besides him, Nancy McLain, and who could forget Carl Seel… the corporate seal, as I like to call him ever since he got his hundred grand principal reduction right before he arrived too late to propose an amendment to help homeowners in foreclosure… but at the federal level there’s Republican Senator Jon Kyl.

On the subject of extending unemployment benefits through this coming year, since there are NO JOBS, and some 25 million Americans hopelessly out of work… Senator Kyl recently claimed that…

“Continuing to pay people unemployment compensation is a disincentive for them to seek new work.”

YEAH!  You are a lazy group out there in Arizona, and if they keep allowing you to collect unemployment, you’ll never get off your butts and look for work.  Hey, don’t look at me, you guys elected him.

IN CONCLUSION…

Well, I will say one thing about this economic crisis… it’s certainly bringing out the CRAZY in some folks.  Like Republicans, for example.  And don’t even think about accusing me of being some kind of loony-left, Democratic partisan hack because not only did I vote for Reagan and the first George Bush, but I voted for Dubya TWICE.  (I also voted for Obama in ‘08, but that only proves that I’m a pragmatist… not a crazy person.  McCain/Palin didn’t even deserve to come in second.)

I used to be a Republican because for some reason I was under the impression that they were pro-business.  They used to be pro-business, didn’t they?  I could have sworn…

Anyway, this past year you might remember that I was the one who broke the story about SB 1259… the bill that vanished into thin air after passing the Republican controlled Arizona State Senate 28-2, courtesy of the inconceivably insensitive and I would say at least brainwashed, if not entirely corrupt, Rep. Nancy McLain.

The whole thing was a big misunderstanding actually… I didn’t realize that Arizona used some other kind of government … I had always assumed the state was using the same kind of democracy thing the rest of the states were, but come to find out, I was wrong.  I’m not sure what they call it, but apparently, in Arizona they let Nancy McLain decide on which bills legislators get to vote.  If Nancy doesn’t like it, Arizona doesn’t get it.  Hey, it’s okay with me, I don’t live there and Democracy’s not exactly winning any awards lately anyway.

One more thing…

A Personal Message to Senator Harper…

Okay, here’s the deal Jack.  I hope this embarrassed you.  What you’re proposing is going to hurt so many people that I cried writing about it.  It is either the product of some highly uneducated thinking, or you are a corrupt piece of crap bought and paid for by banking lobbyists.   For the moment, I choose to believe that you don’t know any better and actually have your state’s best interests at heart.  I’m going to assume that you are misguided or misinformed… that you are not a misanthrope.  (Look it up.)

So, if that’s the case, I want to help.  Get in touch with me confidentially.  No one will ever know.  I’ll help you understand what you are missing, what you should consider if you want to: Stabilize homeprices and stop people from walking away from underwater loans… at no cost to taxpayers.  And, supplement the state budget deficit without raising taxes.

I’ll even help design a graceful and strategic way out of your idiotic statements about the bill you shouldn’t have proposed… I’ll take down my post, and say wonderful things about you… and never tell a living soul you contacted me… ever.  I’ll sign any confidentiality agreement you want.

Or, stay on the track you’re on, in which case I’ll be writing about you constantly.  If anyone ever looks you up on Google, they’ll have to wade through page after page of my articles about your shortcomings… the Internet sucks that way, I know.  Eventually, even your own mother will vote for a Democrat.

Think about it, Jack… Google search is forever, and there’s still time to course correct.  I’m a very reasonable guy… I’m a communications strategist that has worked for some of the largest investment banks on Wall Street and some of the largest corporations on the planet for 20 years.  I’m smart as a whip about these subjects… ask around, you’ll see.

I’ve had a hard year, Jack… trying to change things for the better in this country… you can just imagine, right?  So, I’m cranky and would welcome someone to take out my frustration on in writing.  Don’t let it be you, Jack.  It won’t be any fun at all, my facts are never wrong, and you are the definition of a public figure.  Are you feeling me, Jack… I wouldn’t say any of this if it weren’t that important to stop what you’re doing.

At least sleep on it.  My email is mandelman@mac.com.  I’m here for you, if you’ll just give it a try, I’ll have you running for governor or the U.S senate within 5 years.

Mandelman

Do you think that was too subtle?  I sure hope he comes over from the dark side.  He looks like such a nice young man.  In fact, I printed him out, and I’m putting his 8″x10″ glossy on top of our Christmas tree this year.  God Lord, Arizona… WTF do you have going on over there.

And you know how much I love your state too.  You know what this means, don’t you?  Now, I’m going to have to go to Vegas or New Mexico… come on fix this… I love the Camelback Inn.

Mandelman out.

###

And lest anyone think that I embellished a single fact in this story, I NEVER do that and you can read the straight news for yourself at any of the links below.

Planned Arizona Bill lets Banks Go After Homeowners Who Bail (This is on Beth Findsen’s blog, so please read this one first.)

Arizona Senator Wants to Penalize Those Who Strategically Foreclose

New Bill Could Prohibit Homeowners from Walking Away

State lawmaker wants to restrict mortgage walkaways

Lawmaker wants to change state’s non-recourse status

Dec
12

GUEST POST: Welcome to Freddie and Fannie’s Mortgage Shell Game, By Shawn T. Newman, J.D.

Did you know that Fannie & Freddie had a policy stating that they didn’t want to receive “notes?”  I didn’t.

Meet a reader of mine, attorney Shawn T. Newman of Olympia, Washington.  An exceptional and highly experienced lawyer who fights for the rights of homeowners, among others.  A professor at both undergrad and graduate levels, and an exceptionally nice person who is both very knowledgable and very easy to talk to.  Washington State homeowners should know of him, as should the other foreclosure defense attorneys around the country.  As he says, he’s not terribly well-connected, so I said I’d would certainly help connect him.  Unquestionably, he’s one of “US.”

As a public sector lawyer, Shawn has worked as a Washington State Assistant Attorney General (Education Division), Evergreen State College Legal Counsel, Washington State Senate Staff Counsel (Senate Committee Services) and as a Public Defender.  In his private practice, he represents various individuals, community groups, for profit and non-profit organizations and businesses.

Shawn is currently General Counsel to Saint Martin’s University and has served on the editorial board of the Journal of College and University Law.  He is a member of the Washington State Bar Association, Washington State Trial Lawyers Association and the National Association of College and University Attorneys.  Mr. Newman also serves as Washington State Director for the Initiative and Referendum Institute, based at the University of Southern California.

Shawn is a graduate of Notre Dame Law School and Ohio State University.  While at Notre Dame, he received a fellowship from the White Center for Law and Government and served as the Legislative Research Editor for the Journal of Legislation.

Shawn’s Guest Post follows, but also be sure to look for him in his upcoming Mandelman Matters Podcast.  And starting today, you can also find his contact information as the latest addition to my Trusted Attorneys tab.  We need a lot more lawyers like Shawn, but I’m sure glad he’s with us and representing Washington State homeowners.

Mandelman out.

That’s Shawn appearing before the Washington State Supreme Court

Welcome to Freddie and Fannie’s Mortgage Shell Game

By Shawn Timothy Newman, J.D.

Adjunct Professor

Saint Martin’s University

In common parlance, a mortgage (or Deed of Trust) includes the underlying loan (promissory note) and the security on that loan (mortgage or Deed of Trust).  This ignores the fact that the note and mortgage (or DOT) are two separate contracts governed by some different laws and legal principals.

As noted in Powell on Real Property, sec. 37.27 [2] (Michael Allan Wolf ed., LexisNexis Matthew Bender 2010)

It must be remembered that the mortgagee has two interests: (1) the debt or obligation which is owned to him, and (2) the security interest in land represented by the mortgage…. In fact, the primary interest is the personalty debt obligation.  The interest in land which is available in case security is necessary because of the debtor’s default is considered as collateral interest.  Much trouble has been caused by mortgagees attempting to transfer only one of these two interests.  Where the mortgagee has “transferred” only the mortgage, the transaction is a nullity and his “assignee,” having received no interest in the underlying debt or obligation, has a worthless piece of paper.

Regarding #1, the debt is the loan contract (i.e. the promissory note).  Promissory notes are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Art. 3 (Negotiable Instruments).   The UCC is a uniform law adopted by every state.  In addition to promissory notes, negotiable instruments include checks.  Like a check, you must negotiate (deliver with proper endorsements) the promissory note to another for that person to claim ownership of the promissory note.  Absent proper negotiation of the note, another party cannot claim ownership.  So, for example, you find a check made payable to someone else and it is not endorsed to you; you cannot cash it because you are not the owner.

Regarding #2, the security on the debt (i.e. mortgage or deed of trust), is a contractual interest in land with the home buyer designated as the mortgagor and the lender/creditor as the mortgagee.  Because a mortgage/DOT is an interest in land, the Statute of Frauds requires such contracts to be in writing and signed to be enforceable.  Any assignment of a mortgage or deed of trust must be in writing and signed to be enforceable.  Agreements that violate the Statute of Frauds are void and unenforceable as contracts.  There are some exceptions to the Statue of Fraud’s writing requirement including an admission in court and under oath “by the party to be charged” that there is a contract (this can be done via discovery).  So, as is the case with most mortgages, they are sold by the originating bank (or mortgage company) to either Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae.  This is known as the “secondary mortgage market” (secondary, since Freddy and Fannie don’t originate the loans but buy them up from the banks and mortgage companies that do).  According to Freddie Mac’s website:

Every day, Freddie Mac provides a continuous flow of funds to mortgage lenders. We do so not by making individual mortgage loans to consumers; instead, we support the U.S. home mortgage market by providing money directly to lenders, ensuring that the system is liquid, stable and affordable.  To fulfill this vital mission, Freddie Mac buys residential mortgages and mortgage-related securities and guarantees mortgages made by lenders. We issue debt securities to the global capital markets to fund the purchase of mortgages and mortgage-related securities we hold as an investor. We also create and sell mortgage-related securities to the capital markets, providing a guarantee to investors on those securities.

Freddie Mac pools the mortgages it purchases from lenders across the country and packages them into securities that can be sold to investors. These investors include the lenders themselves, pension funds, insurance companies, securities dealers, commercial and central banks, and others. Freddie Mac also is one of the largest investors in mortgage-related securities, purchasing and holding in portfolio a portion of our own securities and those issued by others.

http://www.freddiemac.com/corporate/company_profile/our_business/securities.html

If Freddie or Fannie truly “own” your mortgage, they have “legal title” to the property and are the “real party in interest” to foreclose.

However, this brings me to an issue raised by Professor Dale Whitman in his article, “How Negotiability Has Fouled Up the Secondary Mortgage Market, and What To Do About It,” 37 Pepp. L. Rev 738, 757-758 (2010):

While delivery of the note might seem a simple matter of compliance, experience during the past several years has shown that, probably in countless thousands of cases, promissory notes were never delivered to secondary market investors or securitizers, and, in many cases, cannot presently be located at all.  The issue is extremely widespread, and, in many cases, appears to have been the result of a conscious policy on the part of mortgage sellers to retain, rather than transfer, the notes representing the loans they were selling.

This “policy” was created by Freddie and Fannie and clouds who actually has legal title to the property (i.e. mortgagee) and who “owns” the note.

First, as noted above, it is important to understand that a mortgage contract is an interest in land and, as such, must be in writing to be enforceable per the Statute of Frauds (or fall within one of the exceptions such as an admission in court).  Any “sale” or assignment to Freddy or Fannie must also be in writing per the Statute of Frauds.  Some states (like Ohio) require such transfers to be recorded.  If you are challenging a foreclosure action, the mortgagor (borrower) should ascertain if a servicer (loan originator or its successor) has sold the mortgage to Freddy or Fannie.  This can be done on line at either:

https://www.freddiemac.com/corporate/

http://www.fanniemae.com/loanlookup/

Chances are Fannie or Freddie “own your mortgage.”  If you are in litigation, you should follow up with targeted discovery requests to the servicer confirming the servicer does not “own” your mortgage.  Moreover, you should inquire and demand any records showing Freddie or Fannie assigned the mortgage to the servicer.  Servicers will point to Freddie or Fannie servicing guidelines which basically provide that the servicer forecloses in its (the servicer’s) own name.  Given a mortgage is an interest in land and the requirement under the statute of frauds that such contracts be in writing, the servicer’s standing to foreclose can be challenged absent some proof that the mortgage was specifically assigned by Freddie or Fannie to the servicer.  Legally, Freddie and Fannie must assign back the note to the servicer.  In fact, Freddie has a specific form 105 to do so.

See: http://www.allregs.com/tpl/Main.aspx [Sections 66.17 and 66.54].

However, Freddie and Fannie’s guidelines have evolved over time and you may find that there is no such assignment in most cases.   Unless there is a written assignment from the mortgage owner (Freddy or Fannie) to the servicer, the servicer cannot foreclose for the simple reason they are not part of the mortgage contract.   Simply put, only the mortgage owner can foreclose on the mortgage contract.  Moreover, if the assignment of the mortgage is invalid or fraudulent, then there is a “cloud on title” which should be identified by title and mortgage insurers.

Second, according to Powell on Real Property section 37.27 (quoted above),

It must be remembered that the mortgagee has two interests: (1) the debt or obligation which is owed to him, and (2) the security interest in land represented by the mortgage ….  In fact, the primary interest is the personalty debt obligation.  The interest in land which is available in case security is necessary because of the debtor’s default is considered a collateral interest.  Much trouble has been caused by mortgagees attempting to transfer only one of these two interests.  Where the mortgagee has “transferred” only the mortgage, the transaction is a nullity and his “assignee,” having received no interest in the underlying debt or obligation, has a worthless piece of paper.

Given what Professor Whitman describes as a “conscious policy on the part of mortgage sellers to retain, rather than transfer, the notes representing the loans they were selling,” it would appear that any alleged “sale” of the note or mortgage to Freddy and Fannie is a fraud.  By analogy, you cannot cash a check that is not in your possession or that is not made payable to or endorsed to you.  Not only is the sale of the note a sham where there is no delivery and/or endorsement of the underlying loan/note to Freddie or Fannie, if their records (per the website) “show that Freddie Mac is the owner of your mortgage”, then the unity of interest (i.e. loan/note and mortgage/security must be transferred together) is destroyed leaving Freddie and Fannie with nothing.[1]

This begs the question: why would Fannie and Freddy have such a policy given the laws governing mortgage contracts and promissory notes?  Consider the fact that Freddie and Fannie are Government Sponsored Entities [GSEs] albeit private corporations owned by the major banks.  It seems to me that Freddie and Fannie have been hijacked by the major banks and are being used to buy up bad mortgages and then seek a bailout from the taxpayers.[2]

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

###


[1] http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2011/08/17/complaint-knights-of-columbus-v-bank-of-new-york-mellon-did-not-acquire-residential-mortgage-backed-securities-but-instead-acquired-securities-backed-by-nothing-at-all/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ForeclosureFraudByDinsfla+%28FORECLOSURE+FRAUD+%7C+by+DinSFLA%29

[2] Note:  Freddie and Fannie are major stockholders in MERS which has some of the same legal problems regarding delivery and possession of the note.  http://www.mersinc.org/about/shareholders.aspx

Dec
12

The Stalinist Era of Consumer Protection

Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin was a part of The October Revolution in 1917… or the Bolshevik Revolution, if you grew up during the Wonder Years here in the USA.  Following the death of Vladimir Lenin in 1924, he consolidated power, put down competing factions within the Communist Party and was the Premier of the Soviet Union from 1941 to 1953.

Stalin is known for increasing the power and scope of the state’s secret police and intelligence agencies.  After WWII, he became the focus of literature, poetry, music, paintings and film.  He was credited with almost god-like qualities, accepting numerous titles, including Coryphaeus of Science, Father of Nations, Brilliant Genius of Humanity, Great Architect of Communism, Gardener of Human Happiness, and others.  Leon Trotsky criticized Stalin’s “cult of personality,” so in 1940, Stalin had his secret police in Mexico assassinate him.

As the head of the Politburo, he consolidated near-absolute power during the 1930s, orchestrating the Great Purge of the Communist Party, which was justified as an attempt to expel ‘opportunists’ and ‘counter-revolutionary infiltrators’. Many that were targeted by the purge were sent to Gulag labor camps… others were simply executed after NKVD troikas, which amounted to three people who convicted without trial.

According to official Soviet estimates, more than 14 million were sent to the Gulag between 1929 and 1953, with another 7 to 8 million deported and exiled to remote areas of the Soviet Union.  It is estimated that up to 43% of them died of diseases or malnutrition.  But, all of that was only the tip of the iceberg… en total, it is estimated that Stalin was responsible for the deaths of some 60 million people.  The things Stalin did were so horrific they cannot be comprehended… and in fact, he makes the top three of every list of the most evil genocidal murderers I could find online.

So, you can imagine my surprise when on “Meet the Press” yesterday, when Senator Lindsey Graham was asked why Senate Republicans blocked the appointment of Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), he responded by describing the new agency as, “something out of the Stalinist Era.”

Now, it would be easy for me to make fun of this sort of statement… frankly, it’s in my nature to do so… but, I’m going to leave that to John Stewart and the rest of the folks on The Daily Show.  The truth is… this just isn’t funny any more.

The CFPB’s mandate is simply to protect consumers from financial fraud.  The idea for the Bureau originally came from Elizabeth Warren, and after a nasty political fight last year, it was written into the Wall Street financial reform legislation and signed into law.

According to Ron Suskind’s book, “Confidence Men,” however, the banking lobby told Treasury Secretary Geithner in no uncertain terms that they’d allow the Bureau’s creation, as long as Ms. Warren didn’t get to run it.  So, very nicely done there, banker people.  I’m especially glad that I wasted so much time writing articles asking people to show their support for Ms. Warren to their elected representatives.

It’s worth mentioning that the CFPB is about as benign a federal agency as could be imagined… they’ve got it operating under the Federal Reserve, for heaven’s sake.  Last week, the agency proposed a simplified credit card application designed to make costs, risks and terms easier for consumers to understand.  Here’s a copy of that Stalinist… no… I meant, simplified application:

CFPB Proposed Credit Card Applicaiton

Yeppers, after looking at that application, I see exactly what Senator Graham means now.  I mean, maybe that credit card application by itself isn’t the end of the world, but clearly it places us on a slippery slope leading directly to NKVD troikas and tens of millions sent to gulags in… let’s see, where would our version of Siberia be… I don’t know… Alabama?

Now, let us be very clear about what is going on here…

The new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is one component of a bill that has already been signed into law by the President of the United States.  Period.  It is the law of our land.  If someone wants to change it, there is a legislative process in place for that, so by all means, go to town.  The only thing our legislators need concern themselves with is the implementation of our country’s new law. That’s their job, and the American people should be telling their elected representatives to get to work and stop screwing around.

You see, this is why we’re in the mess we’re in today… because we… and I do mean you and me… never seem to demand that this sort of thing stop immediately.  When they did away with our usury laws, the laws limiting the amount of interest that can be charged, we said nothing.  When some tried to pass laws to limit or prevent predatory lending, we hardly said a word about it.

Now, when right in front of our eyes, the banking lobby is pushing to make the only federal agency whose role is to protect consumers entirely toothless, once again we’re failing to make our voices heard.  I know this because if we were making our voices heard, no politicians would dare try to pull this sort of disingenuous crap, especially in an election year.

As it stands, and solely to appease the Republicans/bankers, the agency now reports to the Federal Reserve, which is a far cry from the original intent.

The only group that opposes the CFPB is the banking lobby and the reasons are simple… they want to continue to deceive and mistreat consumers without anyone being able to say a word about it.  They’ve been fighting any and all laws that protect consumers for 30 years now, while we’ve been sleeping… no, I mean… shopping… and this is just more of the same corrupt crap.

The only difference is that today, the Republicans… and yes, I do mean ALL of them, with the exception of those representing the Republic of Maine… are now willing to stand up and let the country see that they are here to do the bidding of the banksters.  They don’t care who gets screwed over by predatory lenders or deceptive financial product offerings.  They’re here to do what Wall Street wants them to do and that’s that.  They don’t care what the law says… bankers said no to the CFPB having any power… and no means no.

Until the CFPB’s director is confirmed, by the way, the bureau cannot use the power it received under the Dodd-Frank law… most notably it cannot regulate mortgage originators and payday lenders.  Mortgage originators and payday lenders… that’s who the Republicans are protecting by blocking all appointees?  Yes.

Currently, the board of regulators for the bureau needs a two-thirds majority to veto decisions. Senator Dean Heller of Nevada has said that the Republicans would oppose confirmation of ANY appointee unless the CFPB is restructured so that a “board of bank regulators is given the power to veto bureau decisions.”  Republicans also want Congress to be able to cut funding to the agency.  In other words, either the bankers are in control, or there will be no CFPB.

“The reason Republicans don’t want to vote for it is we want a board, not one person making all the regulatory decisions, and there’s no oversight under this person; he gets a check from the Federal Reserve.  We want him under the Congress so we can oversee the overseer,” Graham told NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

“This consumer bureau that they want to propose is under the Federal Reserve, no appropriation oversight, no board. It is something out of the Stalinist era,” Graham said.

That’s Mitch’s good side.

This idiotic, dishonest and flagrantly corrupt sentiment was echoed by Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell who apparently said on “Fox News Sunday” that the blocking of Cordray’s appointment came as a result of his party opposing a ‘czar’ with unchecked power.

Mitch, Mitch, Mitch… we can all see what this is… it’s you and yours continuing to do the bidding of the Wall Street bankers… it’s you and yours continuing to block anything designed to help Main Street… it’s you and yours perfectly willing to be the proximate cause of untold pain and suffering for hundreds of millions of people in this country.

And, I probably wouldn’t have connected the dots before, but now that Republican Senator Lindsey Graham mentions it… that does sound somewhat “Stalinist” to me.

How about this for a 2012 slogan… “Go Stalinist.  Vote Republican in 2012!”

Or, what about… “Protecting Consumers is What’s Killing this Country.  Vote for the GOP in 2012!”

No?  Okay, how about… “Bankers Know Best… Vote Republican in 2012!”

Or… “Poor People Need Loan Sharks!  Vote Republican in 2012.”

Still no good?  Sheesh, tough crowd.

I told you this wasn’t funny anymore.

OH, ONE MORE THING…

On December 6, 2011… just a few days ago actually… Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Ranking Member Richard Shelby, Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Johnson, and Majority Leader Harry Reid all received a letter from Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD)… and then they promptly and completely ignored it.  Check it out… it’s worth it.
Congressional Letter in Support of Nomination of Richard Cordray Former AG to Run the CFPB


Mandelman out.

Subscribe to Mandelman Matters

Lets Be Friends on Facebook

Dec
10

Register of Deeds, Jeff Thigpen, Is Not Playing Around – A Mandelman Matters Podcast

Jeff Thigpen is the Register of Deeds for Guilford County in Greensboro, North Carolina.  The way he explains it, he has two primary responsibilities: 1. To protect the chain of title when property changes hands.  2. A fiduciary duty to collect recording fees.  And the fact is that MERS has pretty much blown a hole right through both of those things.

But, you see… Jeff is not your ordinary Register of Deeds.  Like his counterpart John O’Brian in Massachusetts, Jeff takes his job pretty seriously, which makes sense since his job has been around for some 300 years.  And so he put his foot down… right on top of MERS.

According to Jeff…

“For me, the question is clear. Do we want land records in America to be governed by major banking conglomerates on Wall Street or the people and laws of the United States of America?”

For me that’s an easy question to answer because I don’t even want the major banking conglomerates on Wall Street governed by the major banking conglomerates on Wall Street, if you know what I mean.

Well, I caught up with Jeff after receiving a “friend request” from him on Facebook… I recognized the name right away and sent him a note asking him to join me for a podcast… and he said yes, of course.  a Mandelman Matters podcast is THE place to hear and be heard, don’t you know.

And on a serious not, I truly believe that EVERY SINGLE ADULT in America should listen to what Jeff says on this podcast… I mean it… it’s not just about foreclosures… this affects everyone in the country… 300 year old property rights laws.  From talking to Jeff, I now realize what a big deal this mess is as far as robo-signing and MERS goes… we simply cannot allow the banks to gloss over these issues with statements like “sloppy paperwork.”  It’s a whole lot more meaningful that that, as Jeff will very clearly exaplain.

So, please pass it along to other homeowners you know… they need to hear it whether they’re at risk of foreclosure… yet… or not.And her we go… it’s Jeff Thigpen from North Carolina… just click the PLAY button below, turn up your speakers and tell me what you thought when it’s done… I just know you’re going to like it a whole lot.

I have to tell you, I sure did enjoy talking to Jeff… he’s the kind of person we need in government today… and if he ever decides to run for office… I’m volunteering to run his campaign.

Mandelman out.

Subscribe to Mandelman Matters

Lets Be Friends on Facebook

Dec
10

Letter Bomb Sent to Deutsche Bank CEO

Bankers in the U.S. are being warned as a result of confirmed reports that a letter bomb was sent to the CEO of Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt, Germany.  NBC in New York has reported that a warning issued by the NYPD to bank security officials in New York includes the following:

“We have received a report of a confirmed mail (package) explosive device that was addressed and sent to … Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt, Germany. The package was detected by X-ray technology inside the mail room. The package did not detonate.”

The FBI has issued a statement saying that the Bureau is, “working with German authorities to assess the incident in Frankfurt and any potential threat to facilities or people here.” NYPD has increased security around the Deutsche Bank locations in NYC, although the FBI says there have been no specific threats received against banks here in the U.S… yet.

One question comes to mind: Is anyone surprised?

Actually, I am surprised.  I’m surprised that it’s taken until now for this to happen.  I don’t have any idea from where this letter bomb was mailed, or what the motive of the sender was, but I do know that the banks have exhibited a wholesale disregard for regular people in this country, and I imagine elsewhere.  The 99% thing isn’t just a U.S. thing, right?  Right.

For example, the primary criticism of the new Greek government is how bank-friendly they are.  The new Prime Minister is a guy named Papademos, who is a former European Central Bank vice-president.  Imagine our president was Jamie Dimon, and you’ll get the idea.  It would seem that we’re not even close to cornering the oligopoly market.  And let them eat cake produces a predictable outcome, does it not?

Last year, roughly 76% of the unemployed in this country were receiving checks… next year that percentage is going to be roughly 48%.  And participation in food stamps in this country… it’s steadily rising… somewhere between one in seven, and headed towards one in six… in 2005 about 11 million… this coming year over 50 million, give or take.  Look it up for yourself, you’ll see.  But,  I know… some of you are thinking… well, that won’t affect me, I’m not on food stamps.  But that’s not the point.

What’s happening is going to impact EVERYONE, and if you think you’re somehow immune, perhaps you should consider learning more about what happened during the 1930s.  No one came through it unscathed.  And no one that did live through it ever recovered.

Of course, not everyone lived through the 1930s, and not everyone will live through this either.  A few days ago, 38 year-old Rachelle Grimmer shot her two children before turning the gun on herself inside a Laredo, Texas food stamp office.  She had been denied food stamps several times since last July, when she first applied.  The first time they turned her down the Texas Department of Health and Human Services said her application was incomplete, and later they said they weren’t able to reach her… I don’t know… maybe her phone had been turned off because she couldn’t pay the bill.  I’d imagine that’s happening a lot more these days, what do you think?

Intuitively, I think we all know that suicide rate are up, although it’s hard to find published data because no one likes to admit it.  The State of Vermont, however, has compiled and released figures as of November 4, 2011.  The state’s Department of Mental Health, says there has been a 15 percent jump in suicides in the last two years. I wonder why.

I wrote an article in May of 2010… We’re on the Brink of a New Age of Rage… maybe it will seem more relevant today.

Our stimulus spending is over, state budgets are going to be increasingly under pressure, state taxes will rise, services will be cut… unemployment will worsen… our standard of living will come down a few notches… foreclosures will steadily increase… and as we sit here today, we don’t even have anything on the drawing board that MIGHT start to turn things around.

It’s as if we can afford to worry about something else… like whether our neighbors at risk of foreclosure are irresponsible borrowers.  I hope those doing that are enjoying themselves because it’s a damn expensive hobby.

Mandelman out.

Subscribe to Mandelman Matters

Lets Be Friends on Facebook

Dec
07

If Your See This in Your Mailbox, Don’t Throw It Away

The OCC’s Independent Foreclosure Review program has started sending out the program’s Review Forms, which are required to begin the process.  A reader  sent me this photo of what the form looks like when it comes in the mail, so now you’ll know what the envelope looks like… so, be careful not to throw it away.

Mandelman out.

Dec
04

Author Michael Hudson Knows The Monster – A Mandelman Matters Podcast

You can’t fully understand the economic meltdown and foreclosure crisis

without reading this book…

“The Monster,” by Michael Hudson

I’m not kidding about that.  I don’t think it’s possible to fully understand what’s going on today economically… politically… socially… legally… it’s just not possible.  I don’t care what else you’ve read either.  There’s simply not another book related to the meltdown that replaces this one.

Why?  Well, for one thing… it’s the historical perspective Mike Hudson provides.  Wall Street’s sub-prime lending binge of 2003-2006 had it’s roots in the Savings & Loans of the 1970s.  If you don’t understand the linkage there, you need to read this book… and listen to this podcast.

If you’ve wondered how the banking and financial services industry amassed so much political power over the last 30 years… how all the different pieces of litigation came together to create today’s situation, you need to read this book… and listen to this podcast.

Is sub-prime lending a good thing or a bad thing?  How did securitization change the world forever in ways we couldn’t see?  Who were the “sub-prime” lenders, like Ameriquest and First Alliance?  What was it really like to work inside the sub-prime industry?  And how did the sub-prime industry seduce Wall Street, and impact everyone, no matter the credit score?  The history is fascinating and once you understand all of the pieces, you find that not only does everything today makes more sense, but you’ll also see clearly what we’re up against… and what we have to do to push back against the banking lobby.

Did Wall Street’s executives know what they were doing?  Did they see all of this coming?  Whose really was responsible for this economic catastrophe?  Was it the borrowers… was it the loan officers and brokers… or was it the bankers of Wall Street?

Someone online said that only in the last 100 pages does Hudson talk about the years 2003-2007… and that’s true.  But Hudson responds by saying: “If I were writing about WWII, I’d have to start by writing about WWI.  Well, same thing here.”  And I couldn’t agree more.

Even if you were part of the real estate or mortgage industries over the last decade, and you think you already know everything there is to know about what went on and why… you don’t… and you’ll be glued too.

Now, before you go off reading “The Monster,” here’s something you can’t do anywhere else… listen to Michael Hudson not only talk with me about his book, but listen to how he applies his vast knowledge of the subject matter to what’s going on today in our society, our government… and even in our banking industry.

Michael and I became friends over the past year or so… we’ve never met face to face, but we’ve spent hours talking on the phone about various issues of the day… he’s a great writer and a really smart guy, simple as that.  But, because we’ve gotten to know each other, I think you’ll agree that the interview is one that couldn’t be duplicated anywhere.

By the way, Michael’s a staff writer at the Center for Public Integrity, a former reporter for the Wall Street Journal, and he was also an investigator for the Center for Responsible Lending.  He’s also written for the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and Mother Jones.  If there’s one thing he knows about it’s fraud on Wall Street.

I’m telling you… this is a Mandelman Matters Podcast you’re really going to enjoy… in a weird sort of way… I mean, it is disturbing… especially if you’re a homeowner… in fact, I’d say it’s safe to assume that you’ll be outraged more than once.  But, you can’t hide from the facts, and you need to know about how we all ended up in this seemingly unsolvable nightmare.

So, click the big PLAY NOW button below, turn up your speakers,

and get ready for the author of

The Monster,” Michael Hudson,

because this is a Mandelman Matters Podcast…

To order your copy of the book, “The Monster,” simply CLICK HERE!

Mandelman out.

Subscribe to Mandelman Matters

Lets Be Friends on Facebook

Dec
03

Last Minute Discounts on Max Gardner’s Boot Camp!

This never happens.

And it may not be something you can take advantage of… but, if you can, it’ll be more than worth it.

Max Gardner is holding one more Boot Camp this calendar year at his beautiful 160-acre farm in Western North Carolina.  It’s almost sold out, but there are a few seats remaining so he decided to offer them at a discount… and like I said… this never happens.  The catch is, you have to be ready to go this coming week.  It’s four and a half days that will transform your practice… and that you’ll never forget.  I honestly don’t think there’s anything like it that’s available anywhere.

I learned more in the last 5 days than I learned in the last 25 years. It was truly an amazing experience. This will change your career and your life, as you know it. Paula M. Powers

There’s nothing like the four and a half days spent at Max’s farm.  First of all, when you think of a farm… this would have to be considered a five star farm… it’s first class everything all the way.  The accommodations are flawless… the meals are to-die-for… the education is worth its weight in gold… and the intimate interaction with other attorneys and with Max… well, it’s simply priceless.  There’s nothing you could do to benefit your practice that could even compare with Max’s Boot Camp.  So, if you could possibly make it… this is a chance to do it for less than would otherwise be possible… it’s a savings of thousands of dollars!

My time with Max changed the trajectory of my legal career. Nick Wooten

WHEN?

December 8-12, 2011

1/3rd Off…

or… Two-4-One!

(And a FREE iPad to boot! Read more below…)

What I learned listening to and talking with Max for four days will be more helpful to my practice than anything I have ever done. Simply put, Max is a genius. His understanding of and dedication to the practice of representing debtors in bankruptcy court is unsurpassed. Bradford W. Botes

Want to know more?  How’s this…

Max Gardner’s Bankruptcy Boot Camp is an intensive four and one-half day seminar devoted to learning and implementing Max Gardner’s exclusive and copyrighted Bankruptcy Litigation Model (“BLM”). Max has developed the BLM over the past 34, designing and perfecting a system to generate economic benefits for consumer debtors and legal fees for their attorneys from the initial office conference until years past the entry of the discharge order. Max uses every available consumer protection statute in his system, including the FDCPA, TILA, UDAP, FCRA, ECOA, the automatic stay and the discharge injunction. Max’s portfolio of successful and landmark cases provides documented proof that the system works if properly used. The documented success of his Boot Camp graduates proves it can work for you too!

What It Covers

Learn Max’s proven strategies for effective use of electronic discovery, uncovering improper mortgage servicing fees, TILA violations, Qualified Written Requests, Adversary Proceedings, Automatics Stay Violations and much more.

Max files approximately 200 consumer bankruptcy cases per year and is involved in thousands of contested cases and adversary proceedings. The BLM system will show you how one lawyer can successfully manage all of these matters with simple technology that does not incorporate complex and expensive systems. And, as Max has said, “the real value of this practice is not in the number of cases you file but the value of the cases you agree to file.”

Max is a firm believer in technology and the benefits of a “paperless law office.” Max’s approach is to produce more for less while increasing the overall quality of the final product. As a result, part of the training will focus on how Max outsources almost every legal service in his consumer law practice.

Where It Is

The Boot Camp is held at Max’s beautiful and geographically remote 160-acre Lizmere Farm located deep in the South Mountains of Western North Carolina near the small town of Casar. The Farm is surrounded by the First Broad River and by Laurel Mountain, West Mountain and Ben’s Knob. Ben’s Knob is the highest peak in the South Mountain range and dominates the landscape. Lizmere Farm is located about 60 miles northwest of Charlotte, North Carolina and is easily accessible via I-85, I-77, I-40 and I-26. The Farm is an easy 1.5 hour drive from Charlotte-Douglas International Airport, a major US Airrways hub.

All campers are encouraged to arrive before 6:00 p.m. on Thursday for orientation followed by a welcome dinner prepared by Max’s wife, Victoria. The Boot Camp officially begins after breakfast on Friday morning and runs through the close of business on Monday. If they survive, all graduating campers are free to leave Monday night or Tuesday morning.

What You Get

Each camper receives an iPad 2 preloaded with the training documents consisting of forms, letters, pleadings, articles and slides to implement Max’s Bankruptcy Litigation Model.

Most of these valuable documents are also available on our document website in editable Word format. Each graduate will be added to the exclusive and completely private Boot Camp Listserv and will have access to all current and future BLM documents via a state of the art document web site for a period of one year following graduation.

The Boot Camp includes gourmet food prepared on site by Max’s wife, Victoria, and 5-Diamond quality lodging in one of Max’s three classic log homes for the entire four days of intensive training. The Boot Camp includes an open bar after each session with everything from beer to wine to single-malt Scotch. Max claims the Scotch must be “old enough to vote” before he will stock it. Campers must pay for their own travel expenses to the Charlotte-Douglas International Airport but transportation between the farm and airport will be provided on Thursday afternoon and Tuesday morning.

What It Costs

Normally, the registration fee for Max Gardner’s Bankruptcy Boot Camp is $7,999.00. And many Boot Camp graduates have reported that they recouped the registration fee on their first judgment or settlement.  The cost INCLUDES a full year of online training!  But this special last minute offer, which is extremely limited, means that you can attend for 1/3rd off or on a two-4-one basis!

Until I took your seminars, I never realized how much fun it could be kickin’ creditors’ butts! Joe Albanese

If you’re serious about representing homeowners at risk of foreclosure… serious about winning and delivering real value to your clients… and serious about making your practice more profitable… this is an opportunity to do it all at a price you may not see again.  Unfortunately, the foreclosure crisis has only just begun.  Join the A-Team lawyers that have taken the time and made the investment to be trained by the best.

I know… I wish you could have had more notice too, but it is what it is.  Shuffle something around, if you can.  When you represent homeowners at risk of foreclosure, there’s never a great time to be gone for five days, but you can do it if you want to badly enough.  You’ll be back home before you know it… and a whole lot smarter, better connected, and better prepared to face off against the banks.

Mandelman out.

Dec
01

DeMarco of the FHFA… Like when the baby gets a hold of a hammer.


There are two things I feel the need to say.  First, the economics profession sure has lost some points these past couple of years, wouldn’t you say?  Sort of like the intelligence community did during the Bush presidency just a few years back.  It pains me to see the entire economics profession relegated to being “The Pips,” to Barack Obama’s “Gladys,” if you know what I mean.

We’re never even told their names anymore, all we get to know is that when the news is bad, the “economists were surprised by the numbers.”  Not any of the economists that I either know personally, or frequently read, but a nameless and faceless band of economists who seem to forecast so poorly, they couldn’t even get hired as San Diego weathermen.

It’s like, “the number of jobs created last month came in lower than economists expected,” or… “Economists were surprised to learn that home prices have fallen for 70 months in a row, that water is in fact wet, and that the sky is blue.  Until that news was released today, the consensus answers to those three questions was: “really?”… “clean”… and “high.”

Then second thing I feel the ned to say is that while there’s no question but that Democrats do suck… they clearly suck less than anyone even remotely connected with the GOP.  The latest example of this comparative suckiness can be seen in the letter sent this week by 21 members of Congress to Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Acting Director Edward DeMarco that urges him to allow principal reductions on loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The text of the letter states:

“We do not urge that the enterprises reduce principal on mortgages as a kindness to homeowners.”  (Emphasis added.)

The letter, which cites data published by the GSEs themselves stating that 17.7 percent of Fannie borrowers are underwater, as are 19 percent of Freddie’s borrowers, goes on to explain that the representatives support principal reductions because they’ll save taxpayers from further losses, because these borrowers… “are obviously at great risk of eventual default.”

Of course, we are talking about DeMarco here, so I’d ease up on the use of the word “obviously.”  The letter continues…

“The performance of the enterprises’ mortgage modifications leaves much to be desired for homeowners, for the housing market, and for taxpayers.”

This is not even close to the first time that DeMarco has heard this pitch, in fact I covered it in an article several months ago.  But, DeMarco’s response to-date has been that the “short-term” impact to the GSEs is what prevents him from approving the principal reduction idea, which is refreshing, if you ask me.  I mean, if you’re going to be a short-term thinker, I appreciate it that you identify yourself as such.

The representatives, however, are now specifically asking that DeMarco disregard the short-term effects of principal reductions on the GSEs’ balance sheets ans instead consider the much more meaningful long-term positive effects that such reductions would likely have.  The letter also references a study conducted by Amherst Securities that negates the “moral hazard” theory, which idiotically hypothesizes that principal reductions actually encourage homeowners to default.  Sort of like saying that if you’ll reduce the balance of my car loan by a few grand, I’d be willing to let it get repossessed.

George Miller (D-CA), one of the representatives whose signatures appears on the letter signed the letter, says:

“Right now, the FHFA is preventing underwater homeowners with mortgages backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac from receiving balance reductions, even when a principal modification would save the investor – in this case meaning taxpayer – money compared to foreclosure.”

I guess at this point I should state my opinion as to whether I think this letter will have any effect… and the answer is that I think it is likely to be about as effective as crawling under one’s school desk in the event of a nuclear attack.  Hard to believe, but word from inside the Beltway is that the most powerful man in the nation… and President Obama have both been asking DeMarco to green light the principal reductions plan for the GSEs for several months now.   And if Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner can’t get it done, then I’m thinking it can’t be done.  Still, I am glad to see 21 members of Congress writing a letter, because that’s more than I’ve seen them do in months.

So, I’m bringing all of this up because Mr. Edward DeMarco, who is just the “acting” director of the independent federal agency that placed both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship in the fall of 2008, has actually become the single biggest impediment to a course correction in the housing market, by far, in the entire country.  And when you consider the GOP’s position on foreclosures, which is only that they need to happen faster, that’s really saying something.

With a Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Maryland and a B.A. in Economics from the University of Notre Dame… DeMarco’s an “economist.”  Prior to joining FHFA, he was COO at the OFHEO, where he provided policy advice for the FHA, before that he was Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Policy at the SSA, and before that he was the Director of the OFIP at Treasury where he oversaw analyses of public policy issues involving the GSEs… and before that he conducted economic and financial analyses of the GSEs at the GAO where he developed recommendations for improved safety and soundness related to the government’s exposure to the GSEs.

Read that last line again… “he developed recommendations for improved safety and soundness related to the government’s exposure to the GSEs?”  Well, did he now?  Obviously, that was some absolutely crackerjack work right there.  Considering that Fannie and Freddie, so far, have cost us taxpayers about $170 billion in “safety and soundness,” I’d have to say that I sleep better at night knowing that we’ve now got Ed watching out for us at FHFA.

Best I can tell that Ed’s never had a job that wasn’t a TLA (three letter acronym), and to give you a picture of what he looks like… hmmm… well, picture what might happen if Tim Geithner and Peter Orszag had a child… I mean, the man just screams Caucasian.  I’m not saying that to be a racist, I’m saying it because the combination of all of those factors makes me rock solid sure that this guy’s extensive knowledge of real people in this country comes from reading about them in policy reports.

So, even though last year, President Obama and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner started asking Fannie and Freddie to start doing principal reductions for homeowners underwater and at risk of foreclosure, and even though Sec. Geithner testified that he believed there to be a solid economic case for Fannie & Freddie to participate in the principal reduction programs, such as the new HAMP PRA… DeMarco simply said no anyway.  Ed’s stated rationale was that principal reductions, while positive for Fannie and Freddie in the long run, he agreed, would be bad for GSE books in the short run.

This is the sort of thing that makes one long for the ghost of Lyndon Johnson to come back and kick DeMarco in the pants… I mean, telling the president to go fish is one thing, but saying no to the most powerful man in the world?  I don’t think so.

Geithner can snap his fingers and Ben Bernanke starts up the printing presses from the nightstand by his bed.  Even Lord Blankcheck over at Goldman Sachs takes his calls.  And Vikram Pandit over at Citi?  Yeah, well I heard he comes over and rubs Geithner’s feet in the evenings.  I swear… that’s what I heard.

Fannie & Freddie, in my way of thinking shouldn’t even be given a choice. They are both bankrupt… utterly failed mortgage banks.  They’ve already been NATIONALIZED, no matter what they want to call it.  For God’s sake, Fannie Mae stock is trading OTC right next to Blockbuster! And besides, Freddie and Fannie have been GSEs for years… “Government Spending Entities,” so why stop now?

And, since when does Fannie Mae base decisions on whether something is prudent in the short run, or the long run for that matter?  Because that’s certainly what comes to my mind when I think of the word “prudent”… Fannie Mae.

Hey, nice castle, by the way.

Regardless of all of this, DeMarco has not been willing to budge an inch.  It’s interesting… Obama does appoint the head of the FHFA, but apparently he can’t order him to do anything.  I’d look up the reason behind this idiocy, but I don’t want to hurt myself… check with Yves Smith over at Naked Capitalism, I’m sure she knows.  The bottom-line is that DeMarco is legally “independent,” he can’t be fired, and so far refuses to step down, so at this point he’s singlehandedly preventing our government from doing something to stop foreclosures, as if the Republicans alone weren’t enough of an obstacle in this regard.  So… fine… I say, someone have him shot at dawn… and viola!  Problem solved.  I’ll even go pay-per-view, how’s that?

Recently, Mr. DeMarco, in his testimony to congress over the $35 million in bonuses being paid to Fannie and Freddie executives, said that executive compensation at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has been appropriate as well as necessary to prevent taxpayer losses.  This is the kind of logic that’s obviously the product of a beautiful mind.

DeMarco defended the bonuses, saying that without them, there could be an exodus of talent, which could result in taxpayer losses.  And I have just two things to say in response to that:

  • Fannie and Freddie have already cost the American taxpayer roughly $169 BILLION, and estimates are that we’re on our way to a $220 BILLION tab.  Last quarter, they needed something like $13 BILLION alone.  So, whatever talent you’ve got over there… for God’s sake, let them go.  Paying bonuses at the GSEs now is like closing the door after the horses have run out and then opening it back up and shooting the horses that remained inside.
  • I’m absolutely positive that I could have saved the country a fortune here.  I’d bet anything that I could have bankrupted Fannie and Freddie for a lot less than $169 BILLION.  I would have been more than happy to run the two GSEs into the ground for a few hundred million.  Next time, pick up the phone… I’m here to help.

At this point Mr. Ed, a real horse’s behind, is standing right smack in the way of programs that could at least start turning around the housing market and that is making me insane.

On this topic, DeMarco recently told Politico.com:

“Sweeping plans to help homeowners ‘did not meet our responsibilities as conservator. That doesn’t mean principal forgiveness might not be appropriate… but it does not meet our mandate to return Fannie and Freddie to solvency and guard against another taxpayer bailout.”

He also said that the FHFA, “has exercised its responsibilities … to not undertake certain initiatives.”  Did I tell you he was an out of touch policy wonk?  I did?  Okay, just checking.

He was also recently quoted as saying:

“Americans, whatever their political stripe is, whether they are lawmakers or businesspeople or citizens, we all are frustrated.”

No, Ed… you’ve got that wrong.  I’m frustrated… homeowners are frustrated.  You?  You are FRUSTRATING.

And he also said:

“We are in a set of circumstances in the housing market we have not seen since the Great Depression. It has taken a long time to get to that point, and it’s going to take a long time to recover.”

And evidently, Ed is going to do everything in his unchecked power to make sure of that.  So, ladies and germs… I have seen the enemy, and he is Mr. Edward DeMarco.  To paraphrase the immortal Will Rogers… He makes me feel the way I do when the baby gets a hold of a hammer.

Mandelman out.

Subscribe to Mandelman Matters

Lets Be Friends on Facebook

Nov
30

Mandelman’s Monthly Museletter – Version 16.0

Okay, so here’s the next installment of Mandelman’s Monthly Museletter, which I’ve decided I post whenever there are a bunch of things going on that need to be put into proper perspective, but there’s just no way I can write individual articles on each because to do so presents a serious health risk.  Capisce?  So, without further delay… here’s Version 16.0… it’s the DECEMBER EDITION, hence the festive photo above and throughout.

1. Robo-Signing KILLS…

First the facts of the matter, as reported: Tracy Lawrence was only 43 years old when it appears she took her own life after blowing the whistle on a foreclosure scheme involving “robo-signing,”  which was implemented by a company used by most banks when repossessing homes, Lender Processing Services (“LPS”), based in Jacksonville, Florida.  According to KLAS-TV in Las Vegas, Lawrence admitted that she had fraudulently notarized about 25,000 documents as part of the fraudulent foreclosure scheme.

Lawrence blew the whistle on the LPS operation in which title officers Gary Trafford, 49, of Irvine, Calif., and Geraldine Sheppard, 62, of Santa Ana, Calif. allegedly told employees to forge their names and notarize the signatures on tens of thousands of default notices from 2005 to 2008, which were used to initiate foreclosures, according to the Nevada AG.

Two weeks ago the State of Nevada charged Trafford and Sheppard with 606 counts of offering false instruments for recording, false certification on certain instruments and notarization of the signature of a person not in the presence of a notary public. You can read the indictment here: Nevada Robosigning Indicment 11-16-11

The Nevada AG’s office sent investigators to Lawrence’s home after she didn’t show up for her sentencing on Monday morning.  And here’s the fact that caused me to pause… she would have faced up to a year in jail and a possible fine up to $2,000.

Now, my views on this story: Am I being asked to believe that Tracy Lawrence took her own life because she might have been sentenced to up to a year in jail and a perhaps fined two grand?  Because if that’s what I’m supposed to believe… well, I don’t.  And yet the fact remains that she’s dead, and it certainly appears to be suicide.  I also don’t believe that she was overcome with guilt at having done what she did and that’s what caused her to take her own life.  Nope, I’m not buying either of those explanations.

The other thing I don’t like about the way the story has been reported is that LPS is mentioned sort of secondarily, as if Trafford and Sheppard were committing their crimes independently… like rogue employees… and that LPS had nothing to do with it.  And that is simply pure, unadulterated crap.  Robo-signing, as these crimes are euphemistically called, went on all over the country… all the major banks were involved, as were LPS and other vendors used in the foreclosure process.  It’s obviously anything but an isolated incident… plainly, as practices go, it is ubiquitous.  (And you know what they say about ubiquity… it’s everywhere.)

Did LPS know about the rampant robo-signing?  Of course they did.  Someone had to produce the documents for her to sign them, right?  Did the banks know it was going on?   Of course they did.  Did the CEOs of the banks know what was going on?  Of course they did.

Look, I spent twenty years working as a consultant for large corporations at the C-Suite and senior management levels, including several of the TBTF banks, and I’m very familiar with their corporate cultures and operations.  No mid-level manager at JPMorgan, for example, made a call to start committing fraud and forgery.  Why?  Because there’s be no reason to do so, that’s why.  Faced with the problems that robo-signing addresses, any mid-level manager at a Fortune 500 company could and would simply kick it upstairs for a decision.  There just wouldn’t be any upside to trying to handle it alone.

A First Vice President at Bank of America once told me the following story about the path to advancement at the bank.  He said that when you take over a department, as long as you don’t change anything, you’ll move up regardless of how your department performs.  But, if you so much as changed the brand of pencils ordered by that department, and then the department performs poorly… you’re fired.  Now, I understand that the story is an exaggeration, but it’s an exaggeration to make a point.

The people that work in giant organizations like JPMorgan are not entrepreneurs, if they were they’d be starting their own businesses.  Consequently, they are not the type to go around attempting to solve problems not of their own making, and for which they would receive no reward, especially when you realize how easily the issue can be kicked upstairs.

Lastly, robo-signing is not a solution that exists on a list that contains other solutions.  In other words, if you’re a giant financial institution, and you chose robo-signing as your solution, it’s because you didn’t have anywhere else to go.  For example, you didn’t say to the others at the conference table, “Well, we could solve the problem by doing XYZ.  But, no… lets go with the fraud and forgery idea instead.”

Now, as to why robo-signing only seems to be a serious prosecutable crime in the State of Nevada?  Why, hat’s a darn fine question with which few in positions of power seem to be concerned.  Of course, the question of MERS assignments, or even the question of proper legal standing seem to be the same sort of thing… in some states it matters, while in others it doesn’t.

Frankly, I’d be fine with it either way.  If many of our current laws governing the transfer of property don’t matter and aren’t going to be enforced then let’s get rid of them.   Just change the existing statutes to reflect our new definition of acceptable practices as related to foreclosure.  You don’t need standing, anyone can sign off on any required document as long as their boss say it’s okay, and nothing needs to be recorded.  If you receive a foreclosure notice from your bank, the only thing to do is pack your stuff.  You see?  Problem solved.

So, why did Tracy Lawrence take her own life?  Obviously, I couldn’t know for sure… but it also seems obvious that LPS is a very large and very powerful company with employees all over the country, and Tracy blew the whistle.  I don’t believe she was so scared that she might be sentenced to under a year in jail and up to a $2,000 fine, especially because as the whistle blower, she may have been sentenced to neither.  Nor do I believe that she was overcome by guilt at having fraudulently signed and notarized documents used to foreclose on people’s homes because it wasn’t her idea… she was told by her employer to do it.

But I do believe that she was scared of the repercussions for her having blown the whistle on LPS … in fact, I believe she was scared to death as to what the rest of her life would be like having turned on LPS and the largest financial institutions in the world.  And I also believe the Nevada AG should indict LPS or do whatever is necessary to put them on the stand, answering questions under oath.  Because there is no doubt in my mind that Tracy Lawrence’s death is on their collective hands.

2. OCC proposes credit rating duties go to banks – A real conversation with a banker-friend of mine.

Okay, so I might as well admit it… I do happen to have a few friends that are bankers.  They’re evil, of course, but it doesn’t make them bad people.  Well, actually it might… but they’re friends anyway.  I’ve also got a number of regular readers that are bankers, although I’d never give away their identities… if anyone knew they were reading me, they’d likely be killed.  One such senior executive at a major bank told me in an email that reading my column is her guilty pleasure… LOL.

So, you probably saw that yesterday Standard & Poors reviewed 37 banks, downgrading 15 of them, including the six largest U.S. banks each by one notch.  JP Morgan Chase went from A+ to A; Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup were downgraded from A to A-; and Wells Fargo was cut from AA- to A+.  S&P said that it was applying some new standards to its rating methodology that “focus on how institutions manage their businesses under market and economic stress.”

Now, you might be thinking… oh, big deal, who cares?  But, to give you an idea of the impact, in a regulatory filing, Bank of America said that a downgrade of one level would mean that the bank would have to post an additional $5.1 billion as collateral.  If you remember how credit default swaps, then you already understand what that posting of additional collateral means… if you don’t, however, then perhaps you could use a refresher course at Mandelman U, where complexity we eschew… lol.

So, although I hadn’t seen the story  yet, I was on Facebook last night and a banker-friend of mine popped up in a chat window to deliver the good news.  Apparently, the bank-friendly site, HousingWire ran a story that caused his little banker heart to go all aflutter.  The headline is probably enough to make you throw up, it definitely was for me: OCC proposes moving credit rating duties to banks.
Yes, you read that right… if you don’t like being downgraded, no problem.  Just get your regulator to issue a proposal that says that you’ll be rating yourself from now on… that oughta’ fix the problem, right?  I’m thinking of doing the same thing, because frankly… the whole FICO thing often pisses me off too.  Why let Experian or Equifax rate me… surely I know me better than they do… and I’ve given myself an 850… so approve my loan, betch.

Here’s how the HousingWire story described the proposed new rule:

“The rule, when finalized, would effectively eliminate references to credit ratings agencies in OCC regulations, as required under the Dodd-Frank Act. These firms came under fire after the financial collapse in 2008 for rating many securities, particularly those backed by faulty mortgages, as high as AAA. In the years since, the credit rating agencies have been downgrading billions of RMBS deals.”

Yes, well I can see how those pesky downgrades could get annoying.  And as bankers, I suppose you are the best possible choice for rating your own crap… I mean, securities… especially if we want to completely destroy whatever is left of our global financial markets.

So, I was going to write a bunch of snarky stuff about how it’s inconceivable that we would allow such a rule to become a reality, but then… like I was just telling you… this little pop-up chat window appeared on my Facebook page and my banker friend was all excited to deliver the obviously outstanding news.  We got into a texting conversation, and when we were done, I thought to myself… why not just post the conversation as my article on the topic, and if you want more, just click the HousingWire link above and you can read it for yourself.  I’m not recommending that, by the way, it just gave me a stomach ache, but it’s your call, of course.

So… here it is in its entirety… my real life conversation with a banker on the proposed new rule and a few other things as well.  He’ll probably read my blog later today and go into cardiac arrest, but don’t worry LUCY… not his real name… no one could possibly know it was you… I’ve got over 3,000 Facebook friends and more than one or two are bankers, believe it or not.

I think you’ll like it…

BANKER: Woooo-hooooo – Now us banksters get to assign our own credit ratings!  No sense greasing rating agency palms–might as well do it ourselves!

MANDELMAN: What?  Did that happen today?

BANKER: I sent you a link to the story.

MANDELMAN: Oh, good Lord.
BANKER: OCC proposal… party-time… hey, what’s better than AAA?

MANDELMAN: And why not, you guys did such an outstanding job of risk management last time around.
BANKER: But we learned from our mistakes.  I’ve got it… A-Squared, Squared!!! That’s it, not just A-cubed.

MANDELMAN: There’s never been a banker that learned from a mistake in the history of the world… hence, we are where we are.

BANKER: Careful, my FB blood pressure app is registering an elevation…

MANDELMAN: LOL… banks should be public utilities.

BANKER: “A” to the 4th is called biquadratic – much more scientific sounding.  Public utilities have done so well, haven’t they?  Did you see LV robo-signer found dead on eve of sentencing.

MANDELMAN: Yes, I’m writing about it tonight.

BANKER: FYI – Retired OCC staff are like GS alumni infecting the executive ranks of major banks;  we have several very senior managers that retired from the OCC.

MANDELMAN: What are implications of that?

BANKER: Mostly, I’m  just saying that nothing changes… that the change agents don’t exist. New DNA/blood does not come from outside to strengthen the gene pool. They’ve seen what they’ve seen and will act according to their predispositions, experiences which were successful at regulators.

MANDELMAN: Got it.

BANKER: Not deep-thinkers; a little weak-willed — don’t like to offend others, don’t like to buck the trend – political… that sort of thing.

MANDELMAN: Gotcha… sounds encouraging… exactly the kind of people we want running the world.

BANKER: Well, the meek shall inherit the earth, remember?

MANDELMAN: Didn’t a bunch of banks get downgraded today?

BANKER: 37 of ‘em reviewed, I think 15 downgraded.

MANDELMAN: Yeah, I’m sure the rest are fine.  And so… the answer is to let them rate themselves from now on?  Brilliant!  I do love the way you guys think.  And by “love” I mean “deplore.”

BANKER: Oh, so what? We borrow from depositors for nothing, we borrow from the Fed for nothing. Since we are all downgraded and we have each other as counterparties with the Feds backing, it probably doesn’t matter much.  I haven’t read the justification for downgrades – seems counterintuitive to say our debt is riskier, when you consider the level of government support we all enjoy.

MANDELMAN: Yeah, and Europe is too far a flight to make any difference, right?

BANKER: Europe, schmeurope… makes the dollar stronger – Yay!

MANDELMAN: LMAO! Here, here! Clearly, I haven’t been looking at this correctly.

BANKER: Besides, GS can go over there and advise them on how to get out of the trouble they’re in because of them.  Just means more jobs, more bonuses… Yay again!  And European vacations might become cheap.  Mandelmanissimo can buy an Italian villa!

MANDELMAN: Another very solid point.  I definitely was not looking at it right.

BANKER: See – you need banker schooling. It isn’t about the cool-aid you drink… you need single malt scotch, cuban cigars, shiny wing-tips, an inability to feel empathy, an air of total superiority, and the belief that you can outsmart anyone else creating and harnessing the next financial weapon of mass destruction.  You gotta breathe Gordon Gekko.

MANDELMAN: Of course it probably helps to have the Federal Reserve’s checkbook and credit card.

BANKER: Hey, “you” gave it to us. You gotta’ be the parent/adult and draw the line.  You can use your forum to make the populace understand.

MANDELMAN: I’m working on that.

BANKER: I’m all for a coup d’etat.

MANDELMAN: Shall I order you a torch or are you more the pitchfork sort?

BANKER: Marginalize us… return us to the 99%… take away our social standing as the aristocracy.  Oh, you’re a legacy?   No, your gene pool no longer belongs here in positions of power and authority.  We want rational thinking, enlightenment, selfless behavior – you were elected to act on behalf of the population – 5 year no-compete clause with private industry – go back to law and write up some wills, divorces, trusts… try a Accident/Injury practice.  And no automatic pension for 1-termers.

Ya’ll (Nomi, Yves, Abigail, Max, April, et al) ought’a gather at USC, UCLA, etc. for a rally or giant speaking engagement.

MANDELMAN: I’d sure love to host that event… a Mandelman Matters conference.

BANKER: Put a simple slide presentation together, collage like an Apocalypse Now montage… boom-boom-boom… ”class war” atrocities… show scale, scope, impact… gotta’ bring the war into the living rooms of America, and show the body bags – it affects all of us.  Nothing opinion-based… just the facts, show cause and effect, make FactCheck the AAA rating. BTW, have you thought about a simple video background for your articles to post on YouTube?

MANDELMAN: Yes, I’m working on that too.  All it takes is money… why don’t you send me some?  How about a no doc, stated income re-fi at 150% of appraised value?  It’ll be just like old times, you’ll love it.  Wouldn’t want to do anything that’s not professional.

BANKER: I said YouTube not Universal Studios. Just a panorama of North Las Vegas, Phoenix, etc. to use as a background. Maybe snippets of public use video clips that aren’t too far out of context. With you narrating the video… your wife and daughter could be the audience that asks you questions.  Obama/Bush can plant journalists to lob softball questions, why can’t you can stage it too?  Any chance you could get on NPR?

MANDELMAN: I’d love to… or maybe MSNBC on Dylan Ratigan’s show.

BANKER: Hook up with Whalen and you might have a great shot at it.  I don’t think the NAR will be inviting you to their X-Mas party.

MANDELMAN: Oh gee… and I so wanted to hang out with a room full of delusional liars.

BANKER: You might be on the short list to keynote JPM’s X-mas party though.  BTW… Occupy LA Raid Happening Tonight, LAPD En Route to Begin Eviction.  Live coverage of the raid via Ustream says the raid is slow moving and strategic. Venice 311 tweeted information from an LAPD scanner, which said that 900 officers are currently en route to evict the remaining occupiers and that the LAPD has setup a processing and booking station at Dodgers Stadium.

MANDELMAN: Oh God…

BANKER: Hearing that when LAPD helicopter light is turned off that is a signal for cops to move in.  Police clad in riot gear are standing at Broadway and 1st.  CBS just stated that they are “working with law enforcement” and are not showing scenes they are “not allowed to show.”  Quote from KCAL-9, “We made an agreement with LAPD not to give away their tactics.”

MANDELMAN: Well, good then… about time we did away with that pain-in-the-neck 1st Amendment.  They’re just a bunch of whiny hippie types anyway, right?

BANKER: Hey, now you’re talking like the chairman of my bank.  Nice to have you back.

MANDELMAN: Sorry, but no thanks.  I think I’ll just go back to my work making you and yours look like the destructive, power hungry despots that you are. Besides, I took that vow of poverty when I started blogging, remember?

BANKER: Okay, well… have fun storming the castle!  I think I’ll go see which fees I can raise for no reason and without disclosure.

MANDELMAN: Sounds like a gas… I’m sending you a current copy of GAAP for Christmas… figured you’d enjoy a little nostalgia.

BANKER: Yeah… I gotta go too… and FYI — The Fed has demanded capital stress tests by Jan 4th that consider Europe/unemployment, blah, blah, blah.  And as a result, many of us bankers have had to cancel vacations for the remainder of year.  But, at least we’re getting reimbursed for lost airline/travel spending, so that’s a relief. TTYL…

MANDELMAN: You’re disgusting… text me tomorrow… are you going to make it Christmas Eve?  Chinese food on me, as usual.

BANKER: Wouldn’t miss it.

MANDELMAN: Okay, and try not to bankrupt any sovereign nations before then, okay?

BANKER: You’re no fun… c-ya!

MANDELMAN: Mandelman out.

3. PMI Files Bankruptcy – Regulators step in and take over yet another mortgage insurer…

They’re almost dropping like flies… mortgage insurers, that is.  The latest casualty is PMI Group Inc. of Walnut Creek, California… a Delaware Corporation whose parent company is PMI Mortgage Insurance Co. whose headquarters are in Arizona.  And with all of those machinations in place to avoid paying taxes and no doubt obfuscate whatever else, they still went broke… so, nice job there… don’t you feel silly now?

Now, let me assure you that I could care less about PMI Group, or whatever other holding company is or isn’t involved.  The reason I’m writing this is because I found a few of the details involved fascinating.  The company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, filed on November 23rd, showed assets of $225 million… and debt of $736 million as of August 4, 2011.  PMI had posted losses for the last 16 consecutive quarters.

I don’t know about you, but to my way of thinking, that makes them irresponsible insurers.

Last month, Arizona Director of Insurance Christina Urias took control of the PMI unit on an interim basis, directing that claims be paid at 50 cents on the dollar. (Wait until Secretary Geithner hears about this, he’s not going to be happy… he hates haircuts, don’t you know.)

Of course, it goes without saying that this is not the first mortgage insurer to fall from grace… Triad Guaranty Inc. stopped selling mortgage insurance policies when it ran short of capital back in July of 2008.  A state regulator ordered the company to defer 40 percent of claims payments because of “uncertainty” over whether it could meet its obligations.  And Old Republic International Corp. was suspended by Fannie and Freddie as an approved guarantor of loans this past summer when it failed to meet capital requirements.

It seems that these companies do much better when they don’t have claims… so, go figure.

Here’s where I thought it got interesting…

According to data provider CMA, the credit-default swaps that are tied to PMI’s bonds went up in cost after the bankruptcy filing, and the effect may be that that contract provisions trigger amounts owed totaling more than twice the company’s debt.  They’re talking about collateral calls associated with credit default swaps again… see how devastating their impact can be, even on this relatively small scale.

So, the cost to protect the company’s debt increased by 0.7 percentage points to 75.2 percentage points upfront, which is roughly twice what it would have cost to do the same thing last June.  That means that today, investors would have to pay $7.52 million up front, and $500,000 a year to protect $10 million of the insurer’s debt obligations (read: bonds).  If we’re talking about a ten year bond, that would seem a tad pricey, don’t you think?  I mean, that means the total cost would end up around $12.5 million to insure $10 million in debt.

4. Citigroup may settle, but federal judge says not Yeti…

Remember the Bumbles, from the animated television classic, “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer,” starring the voice of Burl Ives as Sam the snowman?  You know the one… Rudolph gets tossed out of the reindeer games because of his glowing nose, and he ends up taking off with Hermey, an elf who wants to be a dentist, and Yukon Cornelius, the gold prospector. They run into the Abominable Snowman… the Bumbles… and then they find a entire island of misfit toys.  I don’t want to say any more, because I don’t want to give away the ending.

Well, the reason I bring it up is that the Bumbles always scared the heck out of me as a kid, until of course, we learn that he’s really a nice Bumbles who just has a toothache.  That’s not the part that scared me though… the scary part was that Hermey doesn’t just want to be a dentist, he fancies himself an amateur dentist… and he actually performs dentistry on the Bumbles… like, OMG.  I tell you… it was decades before I could sit in a dentist’s chair without inhaling nitrous oxide… or at least that’s my story and I’m sticking to it.  But I digress…

The SEC today reminds me of the Bumbles.  They growl and wave their arms in the air as they file a lawsuit against one of the TBTF banks, basically alleging that the bank destroyed the national and even global economy, but then they turn into the most accommodating, if not entirely malleable regulator in the history of regulators, offering to settle the case for relative nickels and dimes, complete with no admission of guilt by the settling bankster.  It’s so distasteful to watch that I’d stopped watching.

But, a friend of mine who’s a lawyer, recently brought to my attention what just happened in the latest SEC case, which is against Citigroup… the judge said no way to the flimsy proposed $285 million settlement.  It seems that Federal Judge Jed S. Rakoff believes that what’s interest of the public must be considered, and the proposed settlement clearly failed in that regard.

Now, get this… the SEC actually ARGUED in support of the proposed settlement, and part of their argument was specifically that the public interest was not a criterion that Judge Rakoff should consider.  Rakoff rejected the SEC’s argument and, citing legal precedent, refused to approve the settlement, and set the date for the trial to commence sometime next July.

Are you digging what I’m saying here?  The SEC actually argued that the judge should approve the settlement WITHOUT any concern as to what’s in the public’s interest.  I have to tell you… that revelation is, to me, proof positive of a regulatory agency that has so lost its way that it may never be able to find its way home.  I mean, were it Citigroup arguing the irrelevancy of the public’s interest  as related to the settlement, it wouldn’t faze me a bit… Citigroup, like the other TBTF banksters obviously don’t care about the public’s interests, but what in the Sam Hill is the SEC there for if not to represent… or at least be cognizant of the public’s interests?  In fact, how dare a federally funded regulatory agency stand up in court and attempt to convince a judge that the public’s interest should not be a factor in approval of a proposed settlement.

According to the SEC’s website, in the section describing the history of the agency, the SEC was created for two fundamental purposes:

  • Companies publicly offering securities for investment dollars must tell the public the truth about their businesses, the securities they are selling, and the risks involved in investing.
  • People who sell and trade securities – brokers, dealers, and exchanges – must treat investors fairly and honestly, putting investors’ interests first.

Okay, so call me crazy, but those two statements make it sound like the SEC is supposed to be concerned with the public’s interests, do they not?  And yet the SEC went as far as publicly and proudly proclaiming a settlement that the judge later described as being “POCKET CHANGE” for an organization of Citi’s size… and whether the settlement provided any benefit for the SEC beyond “A QUICK HEADLINE.”  And in the judge’s written opinion he said of the proposed settlement: “It is neither fair, nor reasonable, nor adequate, nor in the public interest.”

Keep in mind that we’re talking about allegations that center on Citi’s broker-dealer arm, Citigroup Global Market, for “intentionally misleading investors in relation to a $1 billion collateralized debt obligation known as Class V Funding III.”  You know the drill by now… Citi lied to investors, selling them crap, while betting against it on the side.

And in point of fact, it was that very behavior… far more than any sub-prime loans defaulting, that has caused an economic meltdown in this country, and around the world, not seen for more than 70 years.  Citigroup’s acts in this regard were the proximate cause behind the destruction of investor trust that has left the U.S. government the lender of first, middle and last resort.

5. Remember that final scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark?

Remember that final scene in the movie Raiders of the Lost Ark… the first one… when the U.S. Government is about to store the Ark of the Covenant and all you see are the rows upon rows of some giant government warehouse where nothing will ever be found once stored.  Well, a reader of mine was kind enough to send me a photo of one of the floors at Bank of America’s servicer… it’s where they store borrower files.

I think the photo speaks for itself. Happy holidays everybody!

Mandelman out.