Jul
09

HOEPA Loans and TILA Mortgage Rescission

HOEPA Stands for the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act

HOEPA is an amendment to TILA that deals with the substantive abuses of creditors offering higher costing home loans to residents in certain geographic areas. The statute was enacted to ensure that consumers most vulnerable to abuse would be afforded a safety net without impeding the flow of credit altogether.

There are certain trigger points to determine if a loan is a “HOEPA or Section 32″ Home Loan.

Triggers for HOEPA Coverage

APR more than 10% above comparable Treasury security rate (8% on first-lien loans closing on or after October 1, 2002) on the 15th day of the month before the lender received the loan application. 12 C.F.R. 226.32(a)(1)(i); 66 Fed. Reg. 65,617 (2001).

“Points and fees” exceeding 8% of the “total loan amount.” 12 C.F.R. 226.32(a)(1)(ii).

Some examples of Points are:

All prepaid finance charges. 12 C.F.R. 226.32(b)(1)(i);

All compensation paid to mortgage brokers. 12 C.F.R. 226.32(b)(1)(ii);

All items paid to the lender or to a lender affiliate. 12 C.F.R. 226.32(b)(1)(iii);

Disclosure Requirements

A special HOEPA disclosure notice must be delivered to the consumer at least three business days prior to the closing of the loan. 15 U.S.C. § 1639(b); 12 C.F.R. 226.31(c). A signed statement to the effect that the consumer received the HOEPA notice creates a rebuttable presumption only. 15 U.S.C. § 1635(c).  The notice must inform the consumer that he/she need not enter into the loan, and that if he/she does enter the loan, he/she could lose the home and any money put in it. 15 U.S.C. § 1639(a); 12 C.F.R. 226.32(c)(1).

The notice must also include an accurate statement of APR, monthly payment and balloon payment amount, and maximum payment amount on a variable-rate loan. 15 U.S.C. § 1639(a)(2); 12 C.F.R. 226.32(c)(2)-(4); Official Staff Commentary 12 C.F.R. 226.32(c)(3)-2.

Prohibited Terms

The following terms or actions are prohibited (or limited) by the statute and Regulation Z: prepayment penalties, default interest rate, balloon payments, negative amortization, prepaid payments, negligent lending, direct payments to home improvement contractors. 15 U.S.C. § 1639(c)-(h); 12 C.F.R. 226.32(d). 

Remedies

Failure to deliver the required HOEPA notice or inclusion of a prohibited term triggers an extended (three-year) right of rescission (described above; also called TILA Mortgage Rescission). 15 U.S.C. § 1639(j); 12 C.F.R. 226.23(a)(3) n.48.;

In addition to regular TILA monetary damage remedies, HOEPA violations give rise to “enhanced” monetary damages under 15 U.S.C. § 1640(a)(4), namely, all payments made by the borrower. 

PLEASE NOTE: Remember that if you have a HOEPA rescission case, this effectively gives you a double deduction– you get to deduct all payments made twice before getting to your “HOEPA-adjusted” tender amount (once in calculating the TILA tender amount, and once in calculating HOEPA damages). Also, if you’re beyond three years and can’t rescind, you can still raise a HOEPA claim and deduct all payments made in the nature of defense by recoupment.

As with any TILA violation, the rescission remedy runs against any assignee of the loan. 15 U.S.C. § 1641(c). In addition, where the loan documents demonstrate that the loan is covered by HOEPA coverage, assignees “shall be subject to all claims and defenses with respect to that mortgage that the consumer could assert against the creditor.” 15 U.S.C. § 1641(d)(1). This provision mirrors the FTC Holder Rule and creates assignee liability for all state and federal claims and defenses. For monetary damages claims under TILA, it provides an exception to general rule that violations must appear on the face of the documents. 

Statute of Limitations

  • 1 year for affirmative claims.15 U.S.C. § 1640(e);
  • 3 years for rescission.Beach v. Ocwen, 523 U.S. 410 (1998);
  • Unlimited as a defense to foreclosure in the nature of a claim in defense by recoupment

Comments

  1. Gale says:

    You state
    "APR more than 10% above comparable Treasury security rate (8% on first-lien loans closing on or after October 1, 2002) on the 15th day of the month before the lender received the loan application. 12 C.F.R. 226.32(a)(1)(i); 66 Fed. Reg. 65,617 (2001)."

    We refinanced with a fixed rate that morphed into an adjustable rate 8.25% loan about 3 years ago The closing was postponed several times until the last day. It was then postponed several more times until 7:00 PM when all the lawyers had left the building. A clerk shoved the papers in front of us and told us to sign. By this time we had sat in the office for ten hours waiting to sign the papers. The loan was immediately sold to another company.

    We tried for an "Obama loan refinance" and were turned down. The bank has given us a month to come up with 12000 dollars or they will foreclose. Now we found out the guy who got us the loan is being investigated on charges of fraud in lending. The NC Banking Commissioner say he wants us to provide evidence and the original company will have to buy back the loan. SO where the heck does that leave Us? Out in the cold with no home while the banks haggle??

    My Hubby wants to give all the info to this Commissioner. I do not trust that the government is not siding with the bank. Previous experience has show government agencies are there to protect businesses not customers despite the propaganda to the contrary.

    Does anyone know of a good lawyer, or loan auditor in central North Carolina. My dealings with lawyers has also been very negative.

  2. ervin says:

    I live in New Mexico, a community property state. I refinanced in December of 2009. I asked the loan broker if I could include my wife name on the loan because it would raise my income level. My wife is a legal alien, but doesn't any credit. The broker told me adding her to the loan would lower my credit rating and I didn't need her income added to the loan, I make enough to go with out her.

    I filed chapter 7 bankruptcy, and didn't include my wife. However, now Wells Fargo is naming her in fighting the stay so they can move on to foreclose. My wife never signed the 3 day notice to rescind. Do I have a case for rescinding the loan? It seems to me, if they can go after her to collect, she should have been given the opportunity to sign the 3 day notice. I know for a fact if she would have been aware that in New Mexico, if I didn't pay the loan, then Wells Fargo would collect from her, she would have never signed the notice. I've read where this is reason enough to have a loan rescinded.

    Ervin

Speak Your Mind

*

 
Security Code: