The OCC Independent Review | Fraudclosure Review Application Tips & Traps
WTF? PerfectChain℠ – Nationwide Title Clearing (NTC) Helps Homeowners and Borrowers by Identifying Cloud on Title of Properties
- Nationwide Title Clearing | Scientology founder’s tenets drive Pinellas title company, under fire for rapid document processing
- NY TOXIC TITLES | Herkimer County Clerk to Nationwide Title Clearing “MERS Assignments and Satisfactions Do NOT Comply with all the Legal Requirements Per NY Law”
- KABOOM | Illinois Attorney General MADIGAN ISSUES SUBPOENAS Against Lender Processing Services (LPS) & Nationwide Title Clearing (NTC)
Santorum’s meet & greet in Hollis, NH
Pressing flesh.
Earlier today, Rick Santorum held a town hall in Hollis, NH, and followed that with a personal appearance at Hollis Pharmacy and General Store. I missed the first event because of my appearance on the NARN show this afternoon with Mitch Berg, but I drove to Hollis from Manchester to make the second. I got [...]
A Fraudclosure Story | CitiMortgage Foreclosure, Loan Mods and Lies
Promissory Note Fraud | Bondi Capitulates, Admits Promissory Note Transfers Invalidated by Fraud
Promissory Note Fraud | Bondi Capitulates, Admits Promissory Note Transfers Invalidated by Fraud
DOER ALERT: Wells Fargo Bank… How could you do this to a mother of four?
“Integrity is not a commodity. It’s the most rare and precious of personal attributes. It is the core of a person’s — and a company’s — reputation.”
John Stumpf, Chairman and CEO, Wells Fargo Bank
Doug and Holly built their home in Raleigh, North Carolina back in 1994. It’s the only home their four children… ages 12, 13, 15 and 18… have ever known. For something like 18 years, they never missed a mortgage payment. I spoke with Holly for a couple hours last night… she’s simply as nice a person as I can imagine exists.
In 2009, the recession hit Doug’s business pretty hard… but no surprise there right? He certainly was far from alone. And I would think that Wells Fargo should at least somewhat understand that situation. After all, the federal government’s taxpayer funded bailout that year sent $38.6 billion Wells Fargo’s way, isn’t that right Mr. Stumpf? No matter.
Holly wrote to me yesterday… her message began by saying:
“Time is of the essence. I am writing to you today for your help.”
Here’s how her message ended:
“We really need to be out of our house today but Freddie mac put it out in the public that we have until January 3, 2011. I asked Wells Fargo and their attorney to put that in writing but they wouldn’t. They just agreed to it.
However, I am afraid that they will send the sheriff out today to lock us out of our home. We have not moved yet as we are still under review. Can you help us by pointing us in the right direction? We are so desperate.”
I’m going to tell you their story in a moment. But, first I want to point something out to Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf and the folks at Wells Fargo.
Holly asked you and the bank’s attorneys at Brock & Scott, if her family should expect to be evicted today or whether they had until the 3rd of January and you agreed that it would not be until January. You wouldn’t give her anything in writing, but that shouldn’t be necessary… you agreed.
But you see, Mr. Stumpf, as Wells Fargo’s CEO, at least one point should not be lost on you… she doesn’t TRUST you… she can’t trust you, and I don’t blame her.
She doesn’t believe your bank even when it comes to something like whether she and her four children will be evicted today or next week. Just before New Years’ Day or right after. She can’t trust your bank to answer a question like that and she has damn good reason… it’s because you and your bank have been proven to be entirely untrustworthy on so many occasions that she’d rather trust a convicted felon off the street than someone from Wells Fargo Bank.
And so would I, Mr. Stumpf, so would I. And the same will go for her four children… someday.
Mr. Stumpf, you were one of the 100 highest paid CEOs in the country last year, with almost $19 million in total compensation. That seems like a lot considering we don’t seem to be able to trust you to answer a question like the one Holly asked, does it not, sir?
Holly and her husband separated in August of 2009. I didn’t ask why, it’s none of my business, but I could tell that they were very loving and caring parents because she explained how they’ve alternated staying in the home with the kids, 4 days on, 3 days off. They didn’t want their marital problems to disrupt the lives of their children, so she stays at an apartment and he sleeps at his office.
Perhaps it was their financial difficulties that put too much strain on their marriage, it certainly couldn’t have helped. Doug’s business was coming back slowly but in October of 2010, Doug couldn’t make the mortgage payment for the first time in over 16 years. He didn’t tell his wife, I’m sure I know why… he couldn’t. Like I would have done, he probably devoted all of his time to work so he could catch up as soon as possible.
Holly received a letter from Wells Fargo in February of 2011. It said their home was in foreclosure. She called the bank immediately to make payment arrangements that would bring loan up to date right away, but the bank wouldn’t talk to her. She learned that she was not on the loan, she was just on the Deed of Trust.
She went to see Doug at his office, and the two of them called the bank on speakerphone to arrange to make up the back payments. Holly had $12,000 in her IRA, and she owned a second home that had equity of roughly $60,000. And wouldn’t you know it, that mortgage was with Wells Fargo too, and she had never missed a payment.
But, Wells Fargo said they couldn’t accept payments at that time, the couple would have to contact the bank’s foreclosure attorneys at the law firm of Brock & Scott.
SIDEBAR: I’m no banker, but I hear about this sort of thing happening all the time. Why the hell can’t banks accept a payment… ever? And don’t bother telling me there’s a rule or a law, because banks treat either like a speed bump when it suits them, that much is clear. When a homeowner tries to make a payment, figure out how to accept it and get them back on track as quickly as possible.
Doug ended up asking Wells Fargo about a loan modification. There were delays on Wells Fargo’s end, according to Brock & Scott, so for the purposes of our story, let’s fast forward.
On October 7, 2011, Doug received a letter from a Wells Fargo Preservation Specialist, Katerina Williams. The letter said that all Doug had to do was have all of the required documents submitted to Wells by October 22, 2011 and he would be reviewed for a loan modification or some other program offered by the bank.
Here’s what the letter of October 7th said:
“As your mortgage servicer we want to help you stay in your home. If you do not qualify for a loan modification, we will work with you to explore other options available to help you keep your home.”
Doug submitted and Wells Fargo confirmed receipt of all required documents by October 19th, three days before the deadline of October 22nd. (Holly has the fax receipts showing the date.)
So, the bank immediately started doing what Katerina Williams said the bank would do… they began reviewing Doug and Holly’s file for a loan modification? No, I’m afraid they didn’t do that.
What Wells Fargo did do was sell their home at a Sheriff’s Sale on October 21, 2011… a day BEFORE THE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS.
I can only imagine the feelings of panic Holly and Doug were experiencing as they made call after call to their Wells Fargo Preservation Specialist who “wanted to help them stay in their home.” They had been told that there would be no sale assuming everything was submitted by the 22nd. But, now Katerina couldn’t be reached.
I’m sure she was busy. Perhaps friends had unexpectedly come in from out of town, or maybe she had a dentist appointment… that lasted for the next two months. What? It could happen.
Holly and Doug were finally able to reach the woman’s supervisor who said all she could do is submit their file for review after the sale because no one had bid on it and so it ended up going back to Freddie Mac.
So, the supervisor did exactly what she said she’d do and submitted the couple’s file for review? No, I’m afraid not… once again.
Next thing the couple knew two letters arrived from the foreclosure attorneys at Brock & Scott. One was an eviction letter, which said they had 10 days to get out of the home they had built in 1994 and for which they had paid without incident for 16 plus years. The other was a cash-for-keys letter that said they could stay in their home until December 29, 2011.
They checked and were told that if they left the home it would be considered abandoned and any review of their situation would be over. So, with no other choices apparent, they chose the cash-for-keys offer, hoping the extra time would allow them to fight the foreclosure and allow them to get an answer to their case, still supposedly under review.
The couple wrote to Wells Fargo, to Freddie Mac, and to Brock & Scott asking that the eviction date be postponed as their review was still pending. Not even one person even responded.
Out of desperation, Holly sent an email to the bank’s CEO, John Stumpf. (Oh good… that’s you John. Here’s your chance to help your customer stay in her home. For almost $19 million a year, I’m thinking you can at least make sure the nonsense stops, right John?)
Holly and Doug heard from Paula Kingery, who said that Mr. Stumpf had forwarded Holly’s email and that she was now on the case. And what a relief that must have been. The bank’s CEO had taken action, and thank the good Lord for that.
Today is the 30th of December… and still no response from anyone, even though Holly has called, faxed and emailed too many times to count them anymore. The couple assumes that their originally assigned Preservation Specialist, Katerina Williams, must be dead, as they have been unable to reach her via phone, fax or email since before the date of the Sheriff’s Sale.
Here’s the situation in Holly’s own words, as I could not improve on them no matter how I might have tried…
“Paula Kingry called me last night to let me know that she has a phone call in to the lead investigator on our case to see if they can do anything to lift the eviction date. I don’t understand how they don’t know if they can do that and how they can ask us to leave our home when we are still under review. We were told that if we leave we will give up our rights to that review, but if we stay I’m scared that the Sheriff will forcibly remove my four children, and me… and any belongings in the home will be forfeited.”
That’s very nice John Stumpf… very nice indeed. Have you ever felt like that? Have you ever felt afraid that the Sheriff would soon be coming to forcibly evict you and your four children from somewhere? Probably not, would be my guess.
By the way, I should have asked earlier… are you having a nice holiday, Mr. Stumpf?
I only ask because Holly’s living through her own personal hell because of your bank, Mr. Stumpf. You foreclosed on their home illegally… and if it wasn’t technically illegal because your industry’s lobbyists have made it so, I don’t care one bit… it was WRONG. And I am going to assume you know the difference between RIGHT and WRONG.
Your bank sold Doug and Holly’s home the day before the submission deadline for the paperwork required to apply for a loan modification. Then your people told the couple that they were in review to see if the sale can be rescinded… and never called, nor could anyone involved be reached again.
Mr. Stumpf… I want you to know that I take absolutely no pleasure in any of this. It is now 5:29 AM, and I’ve been up all night writing this article for Doug and Holly because I care about them. I have a family and I could be doing other things, not the least of which is sleeping… if only Wells Fargo were able to treat its customers like anything above the way a state penitentiary treats its inmates.
You see… I’ve been writing about the financial and foreclosure crises for just over three years now… I’ve written over 600 articles on the subject. Your bank, meanwhile, has not gotten any better at this whole loan modification thing during that time. How is that even possible, Mr. Stumpf? How can you not be any better at this after three years of doing it every day?
It seems, for example, that you still can’t answer the phone with any consistency. What’s the problem? Is it all those buttons?
Here’s what you were supposed to do in this situation, and trust me… although it may seem presumptuous, I feel safe speaking for EVERYONE in America…
As Holly has informed your people, she’s prepared to make the payments to prevent the loss of her home. In fact, she tried to do just that on several occasions. She has more than $10,000 in her IRA, and she owns another home on which Wells Fargo has the mortgage… it’s current, by the way… and there’s approximately $50,000 in equity. She’ll sell it and use that money to pay for her home, if that’s what is required.
Also, she’s working, earning $4-5,000 a month on her own. Doug’s insurance agency business is also doing better, and he’ll likely make close to $100,000 this year. They remain separated, but he still supports the family. Plus, they only have 10 years left on their loan. If Wells could extend the term to a 30-year loan, there would be no problem making the payments as they always have.
I imagine that there could be some issues because she’s not on the loan, and only appears on the Deed of Trust, but they’re not divorced… and regardless, those are the sort of issues that a bank is supposed to help their customers with… what the bank is not supposed to do is screw around for months, lie, stop responding to calls, and then sell someone’s home the day before the bank told them to submit the paperwork required to apply for a loan modification.
In fact, I had a woman in Tennessee that I had to write about a couple of months ago… same problem, but Bank of America figured it out and got her mortgage modified… after I wrote about them too, of course. (And if you’re not already familiar with me, feel free to ask Brian Moynihan about me, he’ll fill you in, I’m quite sure.)
Doug and Holly were excellent customers of your bank for over 16 years, and then they hit a rough patch. They needed the bank’s help… some guidance to get them through difficult times. You had a chance to earn the trust of a customer for life… (and the good news is you still do… but as Holly said in her message to me: Time is of the essence.)
Here’s an excerpt of what Mr. Stumpf wrote about his company’s Vision & Values…
“Our progress has not been perfect. We learn just as much from failure (perhaps more) as we do from success. Companies are made up of human beings who make mistakes. When we make them we admit them, learn from them, then we keep moving forward with even more understanding, guided by the same values toward the same vision.”
I like the sound of that, Mr. Stumpf.
Here’s what Holly said at the very end of our conversation:
“We went to the courthouse yesterday Dec 28, 2011 to file a TRO but they didn’t have forms there for us and we weren’t sure how to do it, but they told us we had to have a attorney file them. We are having a very difficult time finding an attorney here in Raleigh, NC on such short notice. I have called a few but they can’t help and am waiting for phone calls to be returned from others.”
You see, the thing is… I DO KNOW LAWYERS IN NORTH CAROLINA, lots of them, actually, and one in particular… a good friend… Max Gardner. And I’m going to have to call Max later today and find out what can be done through the courts to stop you from sending the Sheriff to Holly’s to throw her children into the street. I don’t want to, mind you… especially since you could so easily correct this.
See, and I’d like to think that what I’ve written here would be enough… but I fear it won’t be. So, if you’ll excuse me for just a moment… I’m going to introduce you to some friends of mine… Mandelman out.
~~~~
Ahem… Excuse me…Are there any DOERS in the house?
CALLING ALL DOERS!
~~~~
Doug & Holly Niemic
Raleigh, NC
Loan Number: 0157248618
~~~~
And look what I found… a whole list of Email addresses for Wells Fargo execs, but let’s start with letting Mr. John Stumpf know how littler we think of this situation his bank has created. Let’s let him know we’re here and we’re paying attention… and that there are quite a few of us.
Chairman of the Board, President, CEO: John.G.Stumpf@wellsfargo.com
~~~~
John Stumpf (415) 396-7018
john.g.stumpf@wellsfargo.com
CEO: John G. Stumpf
420 Montgomery St.
San Francisco, CA 94163
1-866-878-5865
~~~
Sharon Cecil, Assistant to Both
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
sharon.cecil@wellsfargo.com
~~~
Todd M. Boothroyd
Senior Counsel, Real Estate Division
Todd.M.Boothroyd@wellsfargo.com
~~~
**** Kovacevich (415) 396-4927
kovacedm@wellsfargo.com
~~~
John Stumpf (415) 396-7018
john.g.stumpf@wellsfargo.com
CEO: John G. Stumpf
420 Montgomery St.
San Francisco, CA 94163
1-866-878-5865
~~~
Mark Oman (515) 324-2035
mark.oman@wellsfargo.com
~~~
Cara Heiden (515) 213-4040
cara.heiden@wellsfargo.com
Executive number for members to use to escalate the mod process 1-800-853-8516.
Executive Communications
MAC X2302-02J 800 S. Jordan Creek Parkway
West Des Moines, IA 50266
515-324-3130
&
515-324-2872
~~~
Denise Erickson
Executive Mortgage Specialist, Office of the President, WF Home Mortgage
MAC X2302-019
1 Home Campus
Des Moines, IA 50328
denise.erickson@wellsfargo.com
1-515-324-2610
~~~
Cara K. Heiden, CEO
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
cara.k.heiden@wellsfargo.com
~~~
Mary Coffin, Vice President
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
mary.coffin@wellsfargo.com
~~~
And a few more… just in case…
Executive Vice President, General Counsel: James.M.Strother@wellsfargo.com
Executive Vice President, Controller: Richard.D.Levy@wellsfargo.com
Senior Executive Vice President – Wholesale Banking: David.A.Hoyt@wellsfargo.com
Senior Executive Vice President David.M.Carroll@wellsfargo.com
Senior Executive Vice President: patricia.r.callahan@wellsfargo.com
Senior Executive Vice President, CIO: kevin.a.rhein@wellsfargo.com
Senior EVP, Community Banking: Carrie.L.Tolstedt@wellsfargo.com
Senior Executive Vice President: AVID.MODJTABAI@wellsfargo.com
The Board of Directors, Wells Fargo Bank: BoardCommunications@wellsfargo.com
DAVID J. STERN v. STATE OF FLORIDA | Attorney General Pam Bondi Asks Fourth District Court of Appeal to Certify Important Foreclosure Investigation Case for Florida Supreme Court Review
- David J. Stern Loses Appeal on Class Action Case RE Banner v Stern
- FL 4th DCA | (Bank) Lawyers ARE Above the Law – STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. SHAPIRO & FISHMAN, LLP
- Marshall C. Watson | Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi Settles Investigation Against One of Florida’s Largest Foreclosure Firms
OhioFraudclosure Blog Warns… Fannie & Freddie Eviction Moratorium Ends January 3rd
I’m actually quite proud to be able to say that I’ve inspired a few people around the country to help homeowners. Two lawyers have written to me to say that they’ve come out of retirement to help defend homeowners in court, for example. OhioFraudclosure is a blog written by Marco, who, at least partially, has been inspired by Mandelman Matters… he’s a very nice, caring, and dedicated person who started a blog to help homeowners… and it’s not an easy thing to do, as I know… so, I’ve tried to help if I can, and he’s always willing to help me as well.
Marco was sort of peripherally involved in the Occupy Foreclosure movement that launched on December 6, 2011. He had contacted a homeowner he knew was about to be evicted to see if he would want the Occupy folks to occupy his home in an attempt to delay the eviction. The homeowner declined, saying that his wife was recovering from being in a car accident. I interviewed Marco in the second half of my Front Line News podcast, if you’re interested in hearing him explain what happened… he actually DID stop the eviction that was attempted… it’s one heck of a story, actually.
So, below is a video that Marco just put together. It’s dramatic… disturbing even. And okay, the music is a tad over the top. It includes footage of the sheriff coming to evict a family, obviously without notice… or at least without adequate notice. Marco put the video together to let people know that the Fannie and Freddie annual-moratorium-for-the-holidays is ending on January 3rd.
And for the rest of the story, please click on over and check out Marco on OhioFraudclosure… he’s very complementary about Mandelman Matters.
Thank you, Marco.
Mandelman out.
A land once filled with promises…Where the American Dream was a family’s home,
has now become the land of broken promises and shattered dreams.
Sounds of children crying ….haunt parents ….who find it hard to sleep…
Everyone……waiting…. for the next knock or pounding….on the front door.
Communities are being destroyed, as families disappear into the night.
This will leave heavy scars on the very fabric of our nation.
These wounds are so deep…it will take a generation…or two….to heal.
3,000 ….EVICTIONS…. EVERY SINGLE DAY of the YEAR.
Maybe not today, or tomorrow, but ……THEY ARE COMING
They come……often with little or no warning.
Fannie and Freddie stopped foreclosing for the holidays, but only for a brief moment,
They did not stop…..out of the goodness of their hearts.
They paused, so no one witnesses THE HORRORS OF THEIR ACTS AT CHRISTMAS.
The powers that be ….wouldn’t want the world to see…..this sheer terror
January 3rd is coming and the daily mass evictions need to be ramped back up….again
THEY ARE COMING
HO, HO, HOmeless… A Sobering View of the Crisis Affecting Us All
Originally posted in December of 2009… how tragic is that? Read it and you’ll see why.
HO, HO, HOmeless!
The Real Story Behind the Crisis
We Still Don’t Want to Understand.
A 46 year-old single mother lies awake as night threatens to turn to morning. She wonders how she’ll make it through even one more day. She can’t cry… anymore. Can’t look into the eyes of her two young children, age 7 & 9. For a fleeting moment she wonders if her sister, 3,000 miles away, should take the kids, for a while anyway. She pushes that thought from her mind, reaches for her prescription on the nightstand, swallows two without water, and rolls onto her side. She’s a Registered Nurse; she knows sleep will soon come.
~~~~~
A father of three stands in the shadows made by the tree in the front yard of his home of 14 years. It’s 2:30 AM. He’s wearing a tee shirt and boxer shorts. The wind is audible and cold. His eyes fixate on the flower box he built his first year as a homeowner. His stare moves to the driveway… his driveway… and remembers pitching underhand to his youngest son. He had thought they would live in this house forever. He absent-mindedly scratches his chest with the barrel of the .38 Smith & Wesson Super he’s holding in his hand. He wonders if insurance policies pay off after suicide.
~~~~~
An older couple, returning from a trip to the grocery store, pulls into their driveway. They’ve been married for 38 years; bought the house in ‘72. He opens the back door of the sedan and reaches in for the bags. She admonishes him not to do so. The doctor said not to lift anything heavy… might tear his stitches. They walk inside together, close the door; neither speaks. There is paperwork taped to the front door. It says they’ll have to be moving soon.
~~~~~
A young child listens to her father talking on the phone as he makes her breakfast. His voice doesn’t sound normal to her ear. He sounds nervous… he’s being very polite. Like when he’s talking to the men at church. He hangs up and even though she didn’t ask, he tells her everything is fine. But the child doesn’t think so. She looks at him. Thinks he’s crying. She wants to help. He wipes his eyes. He says cutting an onion made them water.
~~~~~
A mother is on the phone first thing one morning. She reads my column on-line. She calls to tell me that her son, 41 years old, hung himself in the basement of his home last night. She found him yesterday morning. He had been laid off and out of work for nine months. He tried to convince his bank to modify his mortgage since then. Went through his savings. Started spending hers. Her voice shakes. “Now,” she says, “the bank will finally get what they’ve wanted all along… his house.”
~~~~~
Happy Holidays everybody…
This has been a very hard article for me to write. It’s been hard for me this year during the holidays. I want to be happy. I want to make this holiday season even more wonderful than the last, for my daughter, my wife and my family. But it’s just harder this year. Harder to forget everything else that’s going on around me.
The foreclosure crisis that began in mid-2006 continues to destroy the wealth of American consumers and the financial strength of our nation’s banking institutions. And, although it pains me to say it, the end is still nowhere in sight.
It now seems likely that, before the crisis is over, not just millions, but tens of millions of Americans will have lost their homes to foreclosure, and thousands of banks will have shuttered their doors for good. The scars will be deep and we will be a nation forever changed.
In 2007, the number of foreclosures filed hit 1.3 million, a 79% increase over 2006. In 2008, that number had risen to 2.3 million, an 81% increase over 2007. It appears that this year we’ll have something in the neighborhood of 3.9 million foreclosure notices sent out homeowners, if not more. And next year, absent some unexpectedly competent response from government, is all but certain to be even worse.
As of August 2008, 9.2% of all U.S. mortgages were either seriously delinquent or already in foreclosure. Today, that number is 14.7%. Forecasts predict a staggering 14-17 million foreclosures over the next five years, depending on their source. And, according to Bloomberg, mortgages of $1 million plus are now defaulting at twice the national rate, so there’s no question that the water level is rising.
Meanwhile, unemployment… the real unemployment, known as U6… has reached 17.5%. In October of this year alone, our country lost another 558,000 jobs, and most of those in manufacturing and other areas that may never return. In Detroit, according to the city’s Mayor, the actual unemployment rate is fast approaching 50%.
By now it should be abundantly clear that foreclosures breed foreclosures and that the problems are spreading state by state. And it should be equally clear that our nation’s economy cannot begin to recover until the free fall in the housing market, and the resulting foreclosures, have been brought to an end.
Perhaps you’re among those only interested in blindly optimistic thoughts, and if so, there’s certainly no shortage of those. Now that our government has run out of things to actually do, and since they’ve run out of money with which to paper over problems, as this year draws to a close it seems they simply would like us to believe the worst is over. That recovery is right around the proverbial corner. Few do, though, at least not in earnest. It’s like Ben Bernanke keeps saying in so many words, the recession is over, damn it… probably… I think… sort of… it’s a jobless recovery… yeah, that’s the ticket… a jobless and homeless recovery.
I’ve come to understand many things about this housing led, increasingly complex economic crisis as I’ve written more than 200 articles on related subject matter over the last year. I now believe in every fiber of my being that we will remain incapable of finding meaningful solutions until we as a nation come to understand the problems we’re facing and why we’re facing them. And in this regard we have a very long way to go.
We still don’t know… and maybe some of us don’t want to know.
I have never in my life seen anything like what’s happening in this country today. I’m not just talking about the severity of the crisis; I’m talking about the amount of misinformation and utter confusion about its proximate cause. It is truly stunning to behold. I can barely get through a week without bumping into another armchair economist who’s got lots of opinions on AIG, but has no idea what a Credit Default Swap is, let alone how one works, or why they were sold or purchased in the first place.
It’s uncomfortable to be around, frankly. When did we become a nation filled with people who feel the need to hold a view on everything? A few weeks ago I wrote a piece in favor of judicial loan modifications… you know, bankruptcy reform… the “cram down,” if you must. Quite a few people wrote in to say they disagreed with my position, every one of them based their argument on the identical position: “It will raise borrowing costs in the future for everyone.”
It’s a ridiculous presumption, you should realize. The “cram down” bill that recently was once again killed by the banking industry has no significant measurable potential to raise borrowing costs in the future. For one thing, it would only apply to loans on the books at the time of its passage, so no future loans would be affected. And for another, it only applies to those filing bankruptcy, a statistical probability that investors already price into their models. And for a third, when a judge writes down a mortgage to the market value, that judge isn’t costing the investor a nickel… which is why it’s called the “market value”.
The funny thing about judicial loan modifications is that we clearly need them badly at the moment, as we watch another 14-17 million homes fall into foreclosure, so some miniscule, incalculable, potential threat hardly seems a good enough reason to kill the amendment within hours. And many of the people who hold onto views in opposition to changing the bankruptcy code, would all unquestionably benefit from such a common sense approach. But, regardless… no one changes his or her view on much of anything these days. I suppose only two factors result in real learning: age and pain. We don’t have the time to wait for age to do it, but stand by, because the pain will be increasing each month that passes, so maybe there’s still hope as that pain increases.
As it stands, all we’re left with in terms of a plan to stop the free fall in the housing market, is… well… we don’t really have a plan to stop the free fall in the housing market, now do we? Even if Obama’s loan modification program was working, which it is not, it’s not designed to stop the foreclosure crisis. Remember, it’s only designed to help “responsible” homeowners, if there’s still such a thing.
My intention is that this article doesn’t beat around the bush, so I want to go directly at the question of why we don’t have a plan to stop the foreclosure crisis. What is it that prevents our adoption of policies that would lead to our economic recovery?
We don’t have a plan for two reasons, and both are political as opposed to economic. What I mean by that is that we could fix the problems we’re facing, but a lot of people won’t like what we need to do. In other words, if we could just get over ourselves, we’d all be much better off.
Okay, so here goes:
1. Stopping the Foreclosure Crisis
In terms of fixing the housing market and stopping the foreclosure crisis, we’re going to have to write down the seriously underwater mortgages to their market value, and we can’t do that because politically it’s potential suicide.
There are still many people that view the homeowners losing their homes to foreclosure today as being “irresponsible,” and who could possibly want to bail irresponsible homeowners out of their underwater mortgages?
What people fail to realize is that the mortgages that are seriously underwater need to be… and will be… written down to their market value. The only question is the mechanism we use to write them down. If we continue to use foreclosure as the mechanism, then we’re going to be in for a lot of pain, as we take down everyone else’s home value at the same time.
As a country, however, we don’t want to write down mortgages, in fact we barely want to modify them, because we’ve still got a sizable percentage of our population that blames homeowners for the economic collapse and therefore believes they must be punished. And by punishing them through foreclosure, we will punish everyone else as well.
The problem with this kind of thinking, besides it being untrue, is that it prevents our elected officials from looking at real solutions to the problem. Eventually, people will change their views on this issue, but it may take several years for the pain to become intense enough and sufficiently widespread, before people are willing to look at the situation differently.
Until then, we’ll keep foreclosing, and those foreclosures will continue to drive housing prices down… which will in turn create more foreclosures.
2. Fix the Banks and the Credit Markets
In terms of fixing our insolvent financial institutions, the only plan with the potential to succeed, short of nationalization, of course, is to buy the toxic assets off of the bank balance sheets at 100% of their face value… something that’s simply not politically palatable. We could pay some amount less than full face value but that would only leave giant holes in the balance sheets of banks and we’d have to pony up the difference anyway.
It looks to me like Geithner’s plan is to keep the banks propped up with federal slush money, provided under one wonky acronym or another, and the suspension of all accounting rules that would give away their insolvency… until the banks can earn enough by lending to Treasury and charging us exorbitant fees. There’s a bit more to it than that, but those are the important points.
I’m not the only one who sees this plan not working. Geithner isn’t just forecasting economic recovery in 2010… he’s depending on it. When it doesn’t happen, he’s going to act surprised, I’m sure, but he’ll be acting because he knows now that he’s taking a huge risk.
The “toxic assets” that are still clogging up bank balance sheets aren’t getting any less toxic on their own. In fact, the more homes that are lost to foreclosure, the more toxic they’ll become. So far, we’ve papered over the problems, but that only fixes the problems in the short run. Remember, if the banks believed their balance sheets today… they’d be lending.
Let’s look at today’s conventional wisdom pertaining to the economic meltdown:
1. It’s the fault of sub-prime borrowers…
No, it’s not. Today’s crisis isn’t a sub-prime crisis, and never was a sub-prime crisis. From the beginning, sub-prime and prime loans defaulted at the same proportional rate. That’s not to say that there weren’t more sub-prime foreclosures than there were sub-prime foreclosures… there were. But proportionate to prime loans, the problem was never a “sub-prime” problem.
2. It’s unemployment that’s causing foreclosures…
No, it’s not. Unemployment and other life events don’t cause foreclosures. Look at the spikes in unemployment that followed the dot-com crash that began in April of 2000. Unemployment in places like Northern California and Massachusetts skyrocketed, as did mortgage delinquencies, but foreclosures remained low. Why? Because in flat or slightly appreciating real estate markets, when people get in financial trouble or lose their jobs, they sell their homes, they don’t start losing them to foreclosure en masse.
3. Borrowing too much and not properly qualifying for loans caused the crisis…
I’m sorry, but no. Roughly 54% of the foreclosures are prime loans for which people did qualify, and as far as borrowing too much, well… it’s just beside the point. In light of where things are today, it would seem that any borrowing was over-borrowing. And when you look at the leverage employed by Wall Street firms, which was in some cases up to 100:1, the whole idea that homeowners could have caused the economic meltdown of this country becomes preposterous.
Think about the 40:1 leverage at Lehman Bros. On one hand, you’ve got a homeowner taking out a 100,000 mortgage, and on the other you’ve got Lehman Bros. borrowing $4 million based on that mortgage. In terms of de-leveraging, which is the problem… the $100,000 mortgage or the $4,000,000 in leverage. And, by the way, while we’re talking about it… who was it that thought that housing prices would go up forever?
None of this is to say that lending standards weren’t far too lax, that more sub-prime borrowers didn’t initially lose their homes than others, or that today’s unemployment rate isn’t contributing to the number of loans in default. All are true, but none are the proximate cause of the crisis we face today.
The Birth of a Crisis… and the Crises that Followed
First of all, we’re not having a crisis; we’re having multiple crises. The foreclosure crisis is one. The credit crisis is another.
We could go back many years to begin such a discussion, but I don’t see the point. Many say that the Glass Steagall Act should not have been repealed. At the moment, however, I don’t care one way or the other whether it should or shouldn’t. I’m sure some combination of experts and political types will figure that out soon enough, and resolving the issue today won’t change anything tomorrow morning.
For the moment, I’m only interested in what happened in July of 2006, on a day when housing prices dropped by 30% or more… although we didn’t all realize it at the time.
Declining real estate values are what cause foreclosures, and on a day in July of 2006, a number of pension funds realized that the AAA bonds they were holding were not in fact AAA… and they dumped them in a hurry. They might have been AA… they might have been junk… no one could be sure. All investors needed to know is that they were not AAA, as they had been rated by the ratings agencies, Standard & Poors, Moody’s or Fitch, and that was enough for them to know that they didn’t want to hold them in their portfolios any longer than they had to… and the bond market froze solid. Money stopped moving. And wherever the mortgages were at that moment, that’s where they would stay.
Banks, like IndyMac, who had $40 billion in mortgages on their books that they had planned to sell to Wall Street, now had real problems. Banks don’t have any money they can loan out for 30 years. They originate mortgages, but then they sell them to recoup their cash… or at least that’s what they did prior to the day the bond market froze solid. Now, unable to sell their mortgages, banks immediately began hoarding cash. Lending dried up within days. And all of a sudden, what had been a market plush with mortgage cash, was now dry as a bone.
At the same time, there was another force in play… interest rates had been rising. In fact, by the summer of 2006, the Fed had increased interest rates 17 times in a row. Those with adjustable rate mortgages had already started to default, and sales had already started to slow appreciably.
Now, however, since essentially no one could get a mortgage, no one could buy a house… and prices had nowhere to go but down. As they dropped, refinancing became impossible, and foreclosures were the only option. The crises had begun.
Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson saw the problem as being limited to the sub-prime market and believed it would be contained there, but he failed to take into account what had really happened. The credit markets had been broken. Banks didn’t trust each other. And as housing prices fell, and more loans defaulted as a result, the bonds were downgraded, and Bear Stearns was the first to go. Paulson wanted to act at that point, but the now Democrat controlled Congress told him not to come to Congress unless he could assure the legislators that “a crisis was at the door”.
There are always a certain number of homeowners that need to sell their homes each year for a variety of reasons, both personal and career related, and when housing prices are declining rapidly, many of those sales inevitably become foreclosures. The bubble was deflating fast and the loans that were the worst of the bunch went first. But as prices fell, people who had over-extended themselves, and everyone else for that matter, stopped spending, and it was only a matter of time before unemployment would start to rise. It was the beginnings of the downward spiral that continues today, albeit at a slightly slower pace than was experienced at its beginning.
The response by our government has been to pump trillions of dollars into our financial institutions in order to prevent their insolvency and make investors whole, but as long as the flood of foreclosures continues unabated, economic recovery cannot occur and we will all increasingly suffer as a result. Hank Paulson tried to buy some of the toxic assets off of the bank balance sheets using the now infamous TARP funds, but the banks needed him to pay face value, not some discounted amount, and that would not have been politically palatable.
Even with the evidence of our deepening problems all around us, there is still a significant percentage of our population that is preventing our politicians from taking the steps necessary to stop preventable foreclosures and start the economy back on the road to prosperity. Those that make up this group, in large part, gained their inadequate understanding of what’s transpired since 2006 from government and banking lobby inspired sound bites. And even more importantly, their views haven’t changed over the last couple of years, even though almost everything else has.
The bottom-line is that this group continues to blame the borrower… the homeowner… as opposed to the commercial and investment banks, and if you’d like, the government regulatory agencies that stood idly by as Rome burned.
It’s a bleak picture, and sadly it is also one whose duration could be easily be reduced significantly if we as a nation shared a common understanding of how our crisis began and what must be done to stop its continuing spread. That’s right… I have seen the enemy and it is us.
President Obama, however, now places the blame for the recession on “the irresponsibility of large financial institutions on Wall Street that gambled on risky loans and complex financial products, seeking short-term profits and big bonuses with little regard for long-term consequences.” He and others are trying to get us to change our view of what happened so he can do something about it, but we continue to resist… we continue to hold onto our desire to punish our neighbors for buying too much. It appears that we’d rather go down with the ship then reduce the principal on our neighbor’s mortgage.
In Conclusion…
Look… I realize that there’s more to the crisis than I’ve described here. I realize that the bonds I’m referring to were insured by AIG’s credit default swaps, which were unregulated and resulted in a systemic risk to our financial system. I know that AIG went under because of collateral calls that came along with the downgrading of the bonds it was insuring.
I realize that the process of securitization played a major role in how banks viewed mortgages, and why they were underwritten so poorly. I realize that Wall Street’s CDOs, collateralized debt obligations, and other derivatives were, if not instruments of destruction, then something in that neighborhood. And most recently, I’ve come to realize that the investment banks like Goldman Sachs, that packaged these deceptively risky investments and sold them to investors all over the world, bet against their success without disclosing their positions to investors or anyone else.
Yes, I realize that what I’ve described here is a dramatic oversimplification of a very complex situation, and I plan to write more about each aspect of the crisis in simple terms in the hopes that more people will become comfortable with what is now part of our history, and as a result tell their elected representatives that they are not to do whatever the banking lobby wants them to do.
But for the purpose of this article, none of that matters. For the purpose of this article, I only wanted to say in no uncertain terms:
A. It wasn’t the borrowers that caused this crisis. Did some people buy too much house? Sure, some did. Did some act irresponsibly? Sure, to varying degree some did. But today’s foreclosure crisis won’t abate as long as many cling to the belief that they should somehow sit in judgment as to who was irresponsible and who was just caught up in the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, a task that will be increasingly difficult as each day passes.
B. Water is wet, the sky is blue, children want candy, and people want houses and money. Some knew what they were doing and some didn’t. So what? No one entrusted individual people to make sure our banking system was safe and well managed. We trusted the banks and they, of one variety or another, let us down.
C. We would be experiencing a similar meltdown regardless of whether we had a real estate bubble. As long as some group’s actions were going to destroy the secondary mortgage or credit markets, then house prices were going to fall and fall fast. And that’s what causes foreclosures: declining home values.
D. Our government mischaracterized its cause in the beginning. Or, in other words… it was never a “sub-prime” borrower crisis. We know that now. If you still think it was a sub-prime crisis, caused by those high-risk loans… well, it’s time to take another look at the data. Your views are wrong.
And to the homeowners who feel ashamed… who have suffered the indignity of losing a home in silence… this wasn’t your fault. You didn’t break the bond market and send housing prices into a free fall. You didn’t fail to address the problem, or fall asleep at the switch as a regulator. You didn’t securitize every payment stream in the country, or leverage untold billions of investments or create untold trillions in synthetic derivatives. It wasn’t your belief that real estate would continue to go up that caused the problem, it was Wall Street’s belief that it would continue to do so that brought the financial markets to the brink of destruction.
All you did was buy a house you thought you could afford. Now it’s worth half of what you paid for it… or it will be worth half soon. No one saw THAT coming. No one.
So, don’t be ashamed and afraid to speak about what happened here. Your neighbor may seem to know what he’s talking about, but he more than likely doesn’t know any more than he heard on television or read in some Newsweek article. Besides, he’s going to be drowning soon enough anyway. The economic situation we’re in as this New Year begins doesn’t discriminate… everyone will feel its powerful bite as this year continues to see our economy spiral downward.
Unless you’re a banker, of course. In which case… stop judging others, you jackass. You want to have a debate someone about how it was borrowers who caused the meltdown, or pick on someone for being an irresponsible… have the debate with me… pick on me. Go ahead… it’s easy… I’m at mandelman@mac.com. And I respond to even the most idiotic of opinions. Bring it.
In fact, next week I’ll be in Park City, Utah, debating this very issue with a bunch of lawyers that represent bankers at a conference of the American Bar Association. I’ll let you know how it goes, but I think you have some idea already.
For everyone else reading this… let’s stop the madness and tell our politicians we want solutions for the homeowners in trouble, not punishment. Because at this point, we’re only punishing ourselves… because it’s the right thing to do… because we smarter now and see the situation more clearly… because there, but for the grace of God, go us all.
~~~
(P.S. If anyone wants sources for any of the data presented, just email me and I’ll send you the links. It’s the holidays and I didn’t feel like writing a term paper, but I’ve got plenty of sources for everything I’ve written.)
And, as always, the illustration of Santa coming down the chimney into a foreclosed home was brilliantly interpreted and then drawn by Richard Taylor.
Now Hiring | Media Relations Director Job at MERSCORP, Inc.
The Ed Morrissey Show: Duane “Generalissimo” Patterson & the Week in Review
3 pm ET, 90 minutes!
Today, on the Ed Morrissey Show (3 pm ET), we’ll take a look at the past week with Duane “Generalissimo” Patterson of the Hugh Hewitt Show. Duane and I will try to keep up with the latest on the payroll-tax holiday standoff, the Great Debate retreat, and all of the Iowa news we can stand. [...]
DOJ Arrests Attorney Mitchell Stein at LAX – A Mass Clusterf#@k
This is a story for the ages… you want crazy, I’ve got crazy.
Remember attorney Mitchell J. Stein? His law office was shut down along with the the law offices of Kramer & Kaslow. Stein filed the first lawsuit against Bank of America that came to be know as a “mass joinder,” or multi-plaintiff suit… Ronald v. Bank of America.
When I first called Mitchell Stein to find out what he was up to, I discovered that coincidentally, he went to my high school. He was two years older than me, so he didn’t remember me, but I did remember him. And he seemed like a smart trial lawyer who certainly talked like he was dedicated to fighting for the rights of homeowners against the banks. He said that many of his clients were pro bono and contingency cases, where the homeowners were paying nothing. I never listed him on my “Trusted Attorneys” tab… because I just didn’t know him long enough… but I did try to keep tabs on him.
Then this past September, I believe, both he and Kramer got shut down by the State Bar and AG, the allegations being that they were “running and capping,” essentially meaning that they were paying non-lawyers sales commissions. Kramer continues to deny that happened, and I suppose we’ll have to wait to see what evidence is presented at trial to be sure one way or the other. Stein, on the other hand, not only denied any involvement with Kramer’s marketing, but further said that he had never received any funds from that marketing… and to-date, I haven’t seen any evidence that he did. So, I was waiting to see how all that came out, as well.
But… never mind all that… in fact, as far as Stein is concerned, it’s pretty much mass-smash… joinder-schmoinder.
Okay, ready for this? I wasn’t.
Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division announced today that attorney Mitchell J. Stein was arrested on Sunday, December 18, 2011, at Los Angeles International Airport on charges related to his alleged role in a multi-million dollar market manipulation stock fraud scheme. Stein was arrested for his role as attorney for a South Carolina health care device company, Signalife… now known as Heart Tronics.
Huh? Say what?
Apparently, an indictment was unsealed yesterday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida charging attorney Mitchell J. Stein, 53, of Hidden Hills, Calif., and Boca Raton, Fla., with one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, three counts of mail fraud, three counts of wire fraud, three counts of securities fraud, three counts of money laundering and one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice. The indictment also seeks forfeiture of the proceeds of the offenses.
Huh? Say what?
The indictment alleges that Stein has been engaged in a scheme to pump up the stock price of Signalife Inc. by lying about the company’s sales activity. Signalife is now known as Heart Tronics. It was a publicly traded company that purported to sell electronic heart monitoring devices, and according to the indictment, Stein’s wife owned approximately 85 percent of the shares.
According to the indictment Stein and co-conspirators faked purchase orders from fictitious customers and then issued press releases and filed documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that reported the fictitious sales. They also created the false appearance of sales activity, by shipping products to an individual who would store them even though they had not purchased any products.
The indictment also says that Stein and co-conspirators sold shares of Signalife at inflated prices, hiding the fact that they were doing so by placing shares in purportedly blind trusts. And not only that but Stein and co-conspirators also allegedly issued additional shares to third parties so that those third parties could sell the shares and remit the proceeds of those sales to Stein and his co-conspirators.
Stein also conspired to obstruct an SEC investigation into Heart Tronics by testifying falsely and directing others to do the same.
If Stein is convicted, he could face up to 20 years in prison on each count of mail fraud, wire fraud, securities fraud, and conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, and up to 10 years on each count of money laundering, and up to five years on the conspiracy to obstruct justice count. And the SEC announced its filing of a civil enforcement action against Stein and others, the result of their conducting a parallel investigation.
And according to Thompson Reuters, Stein had help… and look who the help was:
“Willie Gault, a former Chicago Bears wide receiver, faces a civil lawsuit by U.S. securities regulators accusing the American football player and several others of engaging in an alleged scheme to inflate the price of stock in a heart-monitoring device company.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said in a complaint filed on Tuesday in federal court in California that the company, known as Heart Tronics, installed both Gault and a former Hollywood executive named J. Rowland Perkins as figureheads of the company to help fuel publicity and pump up investor confidence.”
Okay, so what the heck has been going on here. I thought Stein was suing banks, but apparently he was actually a lot closer to robbing them? It’s like finding out that you went to high school with Charles Keating. Like… OMG. I mean… OMG!
It’s more than strange to come to such a realization about someone who grew up in your neighborhood, someone in your age group. Like, what the heck could have led him down the path on which he’s been traveling? What possesses someone to do such things?
I mean… he seemed like a successful attorney… he’s been practicing law for something like 25 years and hadn’t committed any sort of crimes before… I even met his wife at California Attorney General’s press conference on mortgage fraud, held maybe six monts ago and she seemed like a lovely woman. Was it the money? That would be the easy answer… he did what he did for the money.
But, the thing is… his wife is quite wealthy in her own right. Her father was a very successful songwriter and music industry executive… I mean, very, very successful. And Mitch, I’m sure, made a very good living for many years… someone gave me their home address and I looked at it on Google Earth and it looked like the largest home I’ve ever seen… 28,000 square feet. And Mitch drove a Mercedes the one time I saw him in his car, but it wasn’t a new one, in fact it was maybe 10 years old. He’s accused of illegally receiving something like $8 million. Was that enough money to get him to be willing to break all the rules and put his freedom at risk.
Before you answer that, let me give you one more fact… Mitch has a daughter… who I’m told is 6-7 years old. And he was arrested on Sunday, and Christmas is only days away. Now, I understand that he was able to post bail… $300,000… so he’ll be home with her for the holidays, but what about next year? Is he that certain that he’ll prevail? Is he innocent of all charges, or does he believe he’s innocent of all charges?
I don’t know about about everyone in the world, it should go without saying, but I think most fathers wouldn’t risk leaving their daughters for $8 million… or $800 million, for that matter. I wouldn’t even want to be kept away from my daughter for a week, let alone face decades in prison. Not a chance in the world. The only way I’d risk my life would be to save hers. No amount of money would be in the running.
Is Mitch that much different than me? It’s not like we’re from different planets… we grew up in the same neighborhood, for heaven’s sake.
Now, for some inside scoop…
Okay, so although I haven’t been able to reach Mitchell Stein in months, he simply stopped taking my calls after his firm was shut down… I received a call last night from someone who had been in contact with Mitchell Stein since his arrest. And what he said, especially when combined with other facts, was alarming.
The person said that Mitch seemed to think everything was just fine. Yes, he had been in jail, but only for one night, and he was none the worse for wear. Not only that, but he started talking about how the U.N. had “bought” or somehow “approved” of his Heart Tronic device. He said he had just returned from Ireland when he was arrested, but that everything was otherwise just fine… in fact, the prospects for his Heart Tronics business were quite exciting even.
Here’s a copy of the criminal indictment related to Mitchell Stein’s stock fraud allegations. Take a look, and you tell me what you think, because I’d say things were a long way from being “fine.” In fact, I’d say it looks like things have never been worse, and even though I understand that if the allegations are true or even close to true, then a lot of people were hurt financially… it still breaks my heart to think of any father of a 6-7 year-old daughter going away for a long time.
Mitchell Stein Criminal Indictment
But, the person who interacted with Mitch since he bailed out of jail little more than a day ago said that Mitch just kept talking about the U.N. having bought his Heart Tronics device, that according to the Department of Justice, for the most part was always pretty much a complete fraud.
Below you’ll find three links to Heart Tronics documents… press releases, for the most part… sent out recently by Heart Tronics executives… with names that don’t appear anywhere in the indictment. There’s even one that proudly proclaims that “Heart Tronics to Participate in United Nations Health Initiative,” just as Mitch told my confidential source.
And when my source asked Mitch about being arrested and being in jail, Mitch just said, “oh yes.” How long he was asked… to which Mitch just said, “one day.” And then he went back to talking about either Heart Tronics or the charges being brought as we speak by the California Attorney General for his alleged participation in Kramer’s alleged marketing scheme.
And, by the way, Phil Kramer is a 30 year, Martindale Hubble ‘A’ rated lawyer with a perfect State Bar record… and teenage boys at home, as well. If you were to read Kramer’s and Stein’s resumes back to back, you’d have to come away quite impressed. So, what the heck is going on that these two edned up where they are today. At least Kramer is scared to death, I’m told. From what I was told, Stein seems to be barely aware of what’s happening.
I’d be throwing up around the clock were I even in his shoes for a nano-second. He’s still talking about Heart Tronics. And he thinks he’s going to defeat the AG’s charges as well. In fact, I’m told, he’s sure of it. He’s even connected the two, telling my source that it’s because he sued Bank of America that the DOJ has come after his Heart Tronics company. Even his wife is accused of being unduly enriched, or something like that.
And in light of all of that, he seems disconnected with reality. I have to tell you, I’ve only known him for maybe six months and only saw him in person on maybe three occasions, but for whatever reason, I’m worried about him.
And here’s another fact that gave me pause… according to published reports, Stein’s most recent message on Twitter, which was posted on the day of his arrest read:
“As long as the roots are not severed, all is well … and all will be well … In the garden.”
Well, okay then. It’s not in my nature, but as far as this story goes, all I can say is that I’m at a loss for words…
Mandelman out.
HeartTronics to Participate in United Nations Health Initiative
LightSquared “running out of cash”
The Minus touch.
In my first full-time job, I sold men’s clothes on commission for a small regional chain called Silverwoods in Southern California, a subsidiary in Hart Schaffner & Marx’ retail division (long since defunct). Some days, I could meet my quota in a couple of hours, and on some days, I couldn’t have sold heaters in [...]
BonusSpeak | 2 Month Tax Cut = Hidden Permenant Fee in Future Mortgages to Help Support Freddie & Fannie
Dallas Morning News: Is anyone really buying Holder’s excuses on Fast & Furious?
One year after Brian Terry's murder, the DoJ still stonewalling.
To answer Mike Hashimoto, the DMN’s editorial writer, no. That, however, hasn’t kept them from sticking with their stonewall strategy: What we still don’t know — what Attorney General Eric Holder with great determination will not say — is who in Washington signed off on this awful idea of letting straw purchasers cart off armloads of high-powered [...]
The Ed Morrissey Show: Duane “Generalissimo” Patterson & the Week in Review
3 pm ET, 90 mins!
Today, on the Ed Morrissey Show (3 pm ET), we’ll take a look at the past week with Duane “Generalissimo” Patterson of the Hugh Hewitt Show. Duane and I will give our post-debate analysis and talk about Newt Gingrich’s wild ride in the polls, and we may both do some Tebowing, too. All of this [...]
Lee Camp | Life, Liberty, & Indefinite Detention Without A Trial
Question & Answer Session RE AG Harris Announcment of Mortgage Investigation Alliance w/ AG Masto
Paid Too Early | New Port Richey Couple Files Harassment Suit Against Bank of America
- Fraudclosure | Pasco Couple Fear Losing Home to Foreclosure for Paying Bank of America Too Early
- Bank of America, Taylor Bean & Whitaker | Mortgage Fraud Creates Headache For Wagoner Couple
- Todd Allen Makes the Daily Show | The Forecloser – Florida Couple and Rookie Lawyer Foreclose on Bank of America (MOVIE)
Photoshop Fail | Shapiro & Ingle Aurora Loan Mortgage Fraud & Notary Fraud
The Ed Morrissey Show: Duane “Generalissimo” Patterson & the Week in Review
3 pm ET!
Today, on the Ed Morrissey Show (3 pm ET), we’ll take a look at the past week with Duane “Generalissimo” Patterson of the Hugh Hewitt Show. Duane and I will catch up on all of the week’s top stories, and stay tuned for a preview of tonight’s Hugh Hewitt Show. The Ed Morrissey Show and [...]
Issa: Holder misled Congress on Fast & Furious to cover for staff
Under pressure.
Jon Corzine isn’t the only Democrat heading down Pennsylvania Avenue for a Congressional grilling today. Attorney General Eric Holder will also appear today to answer questions about Operation Fast and Furious in the House at 10 am ET today. Politico reports that the pressure has been getting to Holder lately: Holder will be back on [...]
New e-mails: ATF officials discussed using Fast & Furious to … push gun control
"It's like ATF created or added to the problem so they could be the solution to it and pat themselves on the back."
The logical extension of Rahm’s famous remark about never letting a serious crisis go to waste. If a grave problem is an opportunity to push your agenda, imagine how much farther you can push it by making the problem graver. Another F&F bombshell from CBS’s Sharyl Attkisson: ATF officials didn’t intend to publicly disclose their [...]
















