- BofA Lawsuit to Stay in State Court | State of Arizona vs. Countrywide, Bank of America, et al
- Dutcher, Ferguson, Ahlers v. Recontrust, BAC, Bank of America | New Lawsuit Alledges Thousands of ILLEGAL Utah Foreclosures
- Pot, Meet Kettle | Bank of America Sues HOA’s, Trustees and Collection Agencies Over Foreclosure Fees
Say it isn’t so! | Lawsuit: Bank of America Pocketed Court Fees in Foreclosures
Judes Tells Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan He Must Testify in MBIA Lawsuit
- Bloomberg | Bank of America Said to Offer MBIA Settlement in Defective-Mortgage Suit
- MBIA Insurance Corporation v. Bank of America Corp., Countrywide Financial Corporation, Countrywide Home Loans, et. al.
- MBIA Insurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc | BofA Loses Ruling Against MBIA in Fight Over Loans
CNBC Tweet | New York AG Schneiderman Expected To Join Multi-State Mortgage Settlement-New York AG Schneiderman To Hold Media Call At 6pm ET
- #AGOs TWEET | AG Coakley to hold press conference at 1pm regarding a major lawsuit against 5 national banks
- Yet More Mortgage Settlement Lies: Release Looks Broad, Not Narrow; Other States Screwed to Bribe California to Join
- THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN vs JPMORGAN CHASE, CHASE HOME FINANCE, EMC MORTGAGE, BANK OF AMERICA, BAC HOME LOANS, WELLS FARGO, MERS and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS
MBIA Insurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc | BofA Loses Ruling Against MBIA in Fight Over Loans
Action Alert | SOS For Danielle Sterling Endorsements & Signatures For American Home Mortgage Entities
- Bank of America Attempts Another Theft of an American Home with PAID OFF MORTGAGE! Maria and Jose Perez v. Bac Home Loans Servicing Lp, ReconTrust, Na
- Ohio Attorney General vs AHMSI American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc
- KABOOOOM | Plaintiff’s Petition – American Home Mortgage Servicing vs Lender Processing Services (LPS)
BofA Clash With Fannie Mae Escalates Over Loan Buyback Stance
WSJ | NY, Delaware AGs Allowed To Intervene In $8.5B Bank of America Settlement
Schott v BAC Home Loans | Lawsuit Says Securitization Process Waives Banks Foreclosure Rights
- Facing Foreclosure, Vice President of Bank of America Home Loans, Michael Kim, Allegedly Stole $1 Million from Customers Before Disappearing
- Walnut Place LLC v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc | Bank of America Sued by Investors Seeking to Unload Loans
- Bank of America Attempts Another Theft of an American Home with PAID OFF MORTGAGE! Maria and Jose Perez v. Bac Home Loans Servicing Lp, ReconTrust, Na
FL 3rd DCA | Sarhan v. H & H Investors, Inc. – Defect In Stipulation Agreement Left Judge Without Jurisdiction To Summarily Enter Foreclosure Judgment Upon Subsequent Default
- FL 1st DCA Default Judgment REVERSED – Appellants were “under the reasonable belief that the foreclosure action had been abated.” During Loan Mod
- Sewer Service | FL 5th DCA Default Judgment Reversed, ABNER SILVA v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., ETC.
- Florida 5th DCA – Rubber Stamping Rocket Docket Judge REVERSED for Denying Motions to Cancel Foreclosure Sale Over and Over and Over
Dallas County v. Merscorp Inc | Merscorp Sued in Dallas With Bank of America Over Mortgage-Tracking System
Banks May Fight Banks as Mortgage Investors Pursue Class Status
Wall Street Aristocracy Got $1.2 Trillion in Secret Fed Loans
2nd DCA- SMACKDOWN! Florida’s Court DENIES BAC Petition for Writ!
BOMBSHELL IN OUR BACKYARD!
Florida’s District Court of Appeal refuses to cave in to the banks and their games….more later…this is HUGE victory for consumers and for the Rule of Law….Justice Prevails in Florida!
This decision is so important because the Court of Appeals refused the bank’s pleas to reverse our local judges who are standing up for consumers and who are forcing the banks to play by the rules.
I find this decision so important because the banks took swipes at the First Amendment when they asserted that publishing court orders which are contrary to them has a snowball effect and that this snowball effect hampers the orderly foreclosure process. The judges in this circuit in particular apply the law and stand up for consumers. An orderly foreclosure process would be one where the rules are followed, and the judges in this circuit and now the appellate court judges are simply doing their job to ensure an orderly foreclosure process.
GREAT JOB TO THE COURT AND TO GREG CLARK!
Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
Scridb filter
Bloomberg Reports on Foreclosure Hell
Their most recent lender, American Brokers Conduit, transferred custody of the loan to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, a digital database owned by huge lenders such as Bank of America (BAC). When the Hassells defaulted in 2008, MERS kicked the debt to American Home Mortgage Servicing, a company that specializes in handling subprime mortgages. AHMS filed a foreclosure suit against the Hassells—admitting in court papers that the couple’s promissory note had been “lost, stolen, or destroyed.”
Yet Matthew Weidner, the Hassells’ lawyer, is still fighting the claim. “This is a microcosm of the financial crisis,” he says.
Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
Scridb filter
Countrywide’s Mortgage Document Errors May Doom Bank of America
Dailyfinance.com Story | By: ABIGAIL FIELD
If that’s true, then Bank of America may discover that it has millions of loans on its books that it thought it had transferred to trusts that issued mortgage backed securities, because 96% of Countrywide loans were ostensibly securitized. “
Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
Scridb filter
Who Cares About Title Insurance? You Do
“By Dunstan Prial
Published October 14, 2010| FOXBusiness
The last thing most homebuyers want to think about at their closing is title insurance. They’ve already been through the ringer, paying thousands of dollars in often-confusing fees and signing mountains of documents.
Title insurance is almost certainly an afterthought.
But homebuyers may want to think again.
The messy fallout from badly — and, in some cases, perhaps fraudulently — processedforeclosures has cast into sharp focus the need for comprehensive title insurance. As always, homebuyers should make sure they’re getting a policy that covers any costs tied to hidden fees or liens placed against the property that may have not been detected during a title search.
But, now more than ever, homebuyers, especially those purchasing homes through a foreclosure or a short sale, need a policy that covers legal fees if someone challenges the validity of their title.
Lita Epstein, a foreclosure expert and author of several personal finance books, said one of the root causes of the recent financial crisis — a rush by lenders to sell mortgages willy nilly to as many investors as possible — can also be blamed for the current mess.
“These loans were sold so many different times that no one knows who has the original paperwork. That really gets to the core of the financial scandal. The original closing documents for these properties have been lost as those loans were sold and spread out among many investors,” said Epstein.
In recent weeks, many of the major mortgage loan servicers, including Bank of America (BAC: 11.99 ,-0.51 ,-4.08%), Ally Financial’s GMAC Mortgage, and JPMorgan Chase (JPM: 37.17 ,-1.58 ,-4.08%), have suspended foreclosures in the wake of legal challenges charging all manner of improprieties. And as of Wednesday all 50 state attorneys general have said they will investigate how foreclosures were conducted in their states.
The investigations will attempt to determine if loan servicers handling foreclosures processed all the paperwork properly. In affidavits made public since the foreclosure mess gained steam, some loan servicers, dubbed robo-signers, have acknowledged signing off on hundreds of foreclosures each day without ever verifying or even reviewing the documents included in the paperwork crossing their desks.
Thousands of homeowners whose mortgages were foreclosed on are now challenging the loss of their homes, and that number is rapidly climbing. These challenges throw into question the rightful ownership of homes sold through foreclosures.
“There are going to be cases where a homeowner has a right to walk back in that home,” said Matt Weidner, a Florida-based real estate attorney. “The title industry has to decide how they’re going to deal with these cases.”
That’s why comprehensive title insurance has suddenly become so important. So what is title insurance and why is it required by all banks making mortgage loans?
Title insurance is defined as protection against losses stemming from any problems connected to the title of a piece of property. So if there were homeowners’ association fees that went unpaid by a previous owner, or liens against the home placed by local tax assessors that weren’t detected during the title search conducted while the home was being purchased, those costs would be covered by title insurance. The insurance company will also cover all legal fees rising from the dispute.
The problems that have arisen in the wake of the real estate craze early last decade stem from the fact that mortgages and titles changed hands so quickly and so many times that, in many instances, no one knows how to track down all the original paperwork.
In regions hard hit by foreclosures — Florida, for example — much of that paperwork isn’t showing up when title searches are being conducted on sales of foreclosed home. Consequently, lots of potential problems are going undetected.
“There is information that isn’t making it to the proper place quickly enough and it’s making it difficult to be certain that the title has completely cleared,” Epstein explained.
Epstein said there are cases in which mortgages were split up among several investors and those separate investors have foreclosed on the same mortgage at different times, leaving the current title holder in an uneasy state of legal and financial limbo.
That’s the sort of dispute that title insurance is designed to settle.
At least one large title insurer isn’t exactly embracing these issues. On Oct. 1, Old Republic National Title Insurance Co., a unit of Old United International Corp (ORI: 13.93 ,+0.07 ,+0.51%), announced it wouldn’t issue new policies on homes recently foreclosed by GMAC or JPMorgan Chase.
Old Republic did not return calls seeking comment on its new policy.
Weidner said the title insurers should have seen this coming.
“Now they’re looking at all these allegations, and they’re asking how big is the risk and wondering what are we gonna do about it. The magnitude and the proportions are so big, you struggle to find an adjective,” he said.
According to Weidner, Florida alone has more than 500,000 foreclosure cases pending.
“Even if there’s a problem with a small fraction of these, it’s incredibly destabilizing to the real estate industry and financial markets in general,” said Weidner.”
Click to find original Fox Business report…
Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
Scridb filter
Who Cares About Title Insurance? You Do
“By Dunstan Prial
Published October 14, 2010| FOXBusiness
The last thing most homebuyers want to think about at their closing is title insurance. They’ve already been through the ringer, paying thousands of dollars in often-confusing fees and signing mountains of documents.
Title insurance is almost certainly an afterthought.
But homebuyers may want to think again.
The messy fallout from badly — and, in some cases, perhaps fraudulently — processedforeclosures has cast into sharp focus the need for comprehensive title insurance. As always, homebuyers should make sure they’re getting a policy that covers any costs tied to hidden fees or liens placed against the property that may have not been detected during a title search.
But, now more than ever, homebuyers, especially those purchasing homes through a foreclosure or a short sale, need a policy that covers legal fees if someone challenges the validity of their title.
Lita Epstein, a foreclosure expert and author of several personal finance books, said one of the root causes of the recent financial crisis — a rush by lenders to sell mortgages willy nilly to as many investors as possible — can also be blamed for the current mess.
“These loans were sold so many different times that no one knows who has the original paperwork. That really gets to the core of the financial scandal. The original closing documents for these properties have been lost as those loans were sold and spread out among many investors,” said Epstein.
In recent weeks, many of the major mortgage loan servicers, including Bank of America (BAC: 11.99 ,-0.51 ,-4.08%), Ally Financial’s GMAC Mortgage, and JPMorgan Chase (JPM: 37.17 ,-1.58 ,-4.08%), have suspended foreclosures in the wake of legal challenges charging all manner of improprieties. And as of Wednesday all 50 state attorneys general have said they will investigate how foreclosures were conducted in their states.
The investigations will attempt to determine if loan servicers handling foreclosures processed all the paperwork properly. In affidavits made public since the foreclosure mess gained steam, some loan servicers, dubbed robo-signers, have acknowledged signing off on hundreds of foreclosures each day without ever verifying or even reviewing the documents included in the paperwork crossing their desks.
Thousands of homeowners whose mortgages were foreclosed on are now challenging the loss of their homes, and that number is rapidly climbing. These challenges throw into question the rightful ownership of homes sold through foreclosures.
“There are going to be cases where a homeowner has a right to walk back in that home,” said Matt Weidner, a Florida-based real estate attorney. “The title industry has to decide how they’re going to deal with these cases.”
That’s why comprehensive title insurance has suddenly become so important. So what is title insurance and why is it required by all banks making mortgage loans?
Title insurance is defined as protection against losses stemming from any problems connected to the title of a piece of property. So if there were homeowners’ association fees that went unpaid by a previous owner, or liens against the home placed by local tax assessors that weren’t detected during the title search conducted while the home was being purchased, those costs would be covered by title insurance. The insurance company will also cover all legal fees rising from the dispute.
The problems that have arisen in the wake of the real estate craze early last decade stem from the fact that mortgages and titles changed hands so quickly and so many times that, in many instances, no one knows how to track down all the original paperwork.
In regions hard hit by foreclosures — Florida, for example — much of that paperwork isn’t showing up when title searches are being conducted on sales of foreclosed home. Consequently, lots of potential problems are going undetected.
“There is information that isn’t making it to the proper place quickly enough and it’s making it difficult to be certain that the title has completely cleared,” Epstein explained.
Epstein said there are cases in which mortgages were split up among several investors and those separate investors have foreclosed on the same mortgage at different times, leaving the current title holder in an uneasy state of legal and financial limbo.
That’s the sort of dispute that title insurance is designed to settle.
At least one large title insurer isn’t exactly embracing these issues. On Oct. 1, Old Republic National Title Insurance Co., a unit of Old United International Corp (ORI: 13.93 ,+0.07 ,+0.51%), announced it wouldn’t issue new policies on homes recently foreclosed by GMAC or JPMorgan Chase.
Old Republic did not return calls seeking comment on its new policy.
Weidner said the title insurers should have seen this coming.
“Now they’re looking at all these allegations, and they’re asking how big is the risk and wondering what are we gonna do about it. The magnitude and the proportions are so big, you struggle to find an adjective,” he said.
According to Weidner, Florida alone has more than 500,000 foreclosure cases pending.
“Even if there’s a problem with a small fraction of these, it’s incredibly destabilizing to the real estate industry and financial markets in general,” said Weidner.”
Click to find original Fox Business report…
Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
Scridb filter
Another BOMBSHELL- a HUGE class action lawsuit agiant MERS, GMAC, BAC….and others.
This crisis is going to spawn at least as many lawsuits as the foreclosures started….have a read on this class action suit that was forwarded to me. If there is any justice left in this country, there will be indictments, punishment and penalties for all those who were involved in this incredible fraud….
Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
Scridb filter
MERS-BAC Agreement Revealed
Damnedest thing I ever saw. BAC-Stewart – Plaintiff_s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants_ Motion to Vacate (8_13_10)
With the left hand in the right pocket and the left foot in the left pocket and the right foot in the back pocket. Read the whole thing through and give me comments.
Filed under: foreclosure
Devil in the Details
Submitted by Attorney
William H. Pincus
bpincus@whpincuslaw.com
I just received a Notice of Filing Assignment of Mortgage From MERS in Virginia to BAC in Texas and signed by — you guessed it — Caryn A. Graham in Florida. It was notarized by Shavonia L. Turner before her notary privileges were revoked. And it is dated Nov. 9, 2009.
However, I also have an Assignment signed by Ms. Graham in Florida between the same companies for the same property, assigning the same legal documents but this one was notarized by Evelyn Saillant (? – name is hard to read) and witnessed by 2 different witnesses than the other assigment. And its dated Oct. 28, 2009. How many times did they need to assign the same mortgage and note!?
Filed under: foreclosure
Bank of America loses in Federal Ruling – Judge says investors own the loans
The report of the ruling below by this Federal Judge has several implications:
- Mortgage modifications may come to a halt again
- Attorney’s and anyone supposedly “helping” with modifications should be very, very wary
- The federal court in Manhattan is recognizing a couple very important issues:
- Servicers are NOT the owners of the loans (in the case of a securitized loan)
- Investors own the loans
- Servicers MAY be liable to buy back modified loans (subject to the terms of the PSA)
This ruling could ultimately end up being the demise of ALL foreclosure actions involving securitized loans. One thing is clear in that the federal court identifies the investors as the owners of the loan and is so doing the court also recognizes that the servicer/intermediaries/pretender lender have no authority to do ANYTHING in the way of enforcement, modification, collection through legal means such as a foreclosure action because they simply have no standing (the alleged debt is not owed to anyone other than the investors).
Just because a secret deal between Wall Street, servicers, banks and MERS occurred to obscure the ownership and the transfers of mortgages doesn’t mean their deal will hold up under the careful eye of diligent judge who understands AND cares about the law being upheld.
* Federal judge lacks jurisdiction, moves case to states
* Loan modifications can hurt mortgage investors
NEW YORK, Aug 20 (Reuters) – A federal judge has ruled that Bank of America Corp (BAC.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) cannot have a lawsuit by investors seeking to force it to buy back mortgages heard in federal court, saying he lacks jurisdiction to decide the case.
Tuesday’s ruling by Judge Richard Holwell of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan means the case will move to state court. Holwell did not decide the merits of the case.
“Congress passed two statutes within a year of each other to address the mortgage crisis,” the judge wrote. “In neither of these statutes did Congress federalize the case.”
The ruling is a win for investors, to the extent that Holwell rejected a claim by the bank’s Countrywide Financial Corp unit that new federal laws to encourage loan modifications to help struggling borrowers stay in their homes govern this case.
Countrywide had argued that the laws negated obligations it might have had to buy back modified loans. In 2008, Countrywide agreed with some 11 state attorneys general to modify $8.4 billion of loans made to roughly 400,000 borrowers.
Investors who own mortgage securities typically receive interest and principal payments. If servicers modified the underlying loans to reduce borrower obligations, investors would be harmed because they would receive lower payments.
Holwell did rule that investors bear the burden of showing that pooling and servicing agreements for their loans, taken “as a whole,” require Countrywide to buy back the loans.
Bank of America could not immediately be reached for comment. A published report said a spokeswoman agreed that the court did not rule on the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims.
The current case was brought by two investment funds holding Countrywide mortgages, Greenwich Financial Services Distressed Mortgage Fund 3 LLC and QED LLC.
These investors complained they would be harmed if Countrywide shifted the burdens of loan modifications to 374 trusts into which loans had been repackaged and securitized.
These investors would rather Countrywide repurchase modified loans for the full unpaid amounts.
Countrywide had been the largest U.S. mortgage lender before Bank of America acquired it last July for $2.5 billion.
The case is Greenwich Financial Services Distressed Mortgage Fund 3 LLC and QED LLC v. Countrywide Financial Corp, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan), No. 08-11343. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel, with additional reporting by John Tilak in Bangalore)
© Thomson Reuters 2009. All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and its logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world.
