- State of Arizona vs. Countrywide, Bank of America, et al – Office of Attorney General Terry Goddard Charges Bank of America with Mortgage Fraud
- DOLFO v BANK OF AMERICA | Homebuyers Claims BofA Found a New Dirty Trick Illegally Extract Money from Customers, Foreclose
- Beals v. Bank of America – Bank of America Sued in Class Action Over Foreclosure Fraud
HUD CHARGES BANK OF AMERICA WITH DISCRIMINATING AGAINST HOMEBUYERS WITH DISABILITIES
Federal Government and State Attorneys General Reach $25 Billion Agreement with Five Largest Mortgage Servicers to Address Mortgage Loan Servicing and Foreclosure Abuses
- Senators Urge OCC to Work with State Attorneys General, DOJ, and HUD to Hold Mortgage Servicers Accountable and Prevent Future Abuse
- Naked Capitalism | Yes, Virginia, Servicers Lie to Investors Too: $175 Billion in Loan Losses Not Allocated to Mortgage Backed Securities (and Another $300 Billion on the Way)
- NY Times | Attorneys General May Be Rushing Proposal for Loan Servicers
Texana Hollis | Evicted Woman, 101, Can’t Go Home as Promised – HUD Says Foreclosed Detroit Home is Unsafe
HUD: 101-Year-Old Texana Hollis Can Go Home and She Can Stay there for the Rest of Her Life
US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Evicts 101 Year Old Texana Hollis from Home of 58 Years
FHFA, Treasury, HUD Seek Input on Disposition of Real Estate Owned Properties
HUD Settlement | Bank of America Fined $175 for Failure to Offer Alternatives to Foreclosure
HAMP, HARP, HOP, HOOP… Like Watching Someone Spend $10 Trying to Fly to the Moon
The Washington Post, with Bloomberg, just did what I had been thinking about doing for quite some time, but frankly was just plain afraid to do.
They contacted the Treasury Department, the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Federal Housing Finance Agency to ascertain just how the Obama Administration’s housing rescue programs were doing to-date… in terms of their impact and cost.
I thought about doing the same thing about three months ago, but since it had about the same appeal as scheduling a colonoscopy, I somehow managed to stay just a little too busy to get to it. Once I got close to having time, but luckily my sock drawer needed rearranging, so that took care of that.
The Post’s post didn’t even have an attributed author at the top, which made total sense to me… I wouldn’t have wanted to attach my name to it either. And check out how the story kicked off…
The Obama administration has taken several stabs at stemming foreclosures and reviving the housing market. Here is a look at some of the administration’s largest programs:
You know, that sentence alone explained a lot to me, actually. And I’m not quite as disappointed in the president as I was before I read it. He only “took a stab” or maybe a couple of three stabs at “stemming foreclosures and reviving the housing market.” So, okay then… he wasn’t really trying… it wasn’t a major effort on which he was concentrating… he just took a stab… like maybe he came up with stuff to try during a commercial break while watching American Idol with his girls, or something like that.
Boy, that sure is a relief, wouldn’t you say? Because, see… I had been under the impression that he had actually been trying to do something big and important and was putting his best foot forward, as it were. And if that were the case, well… then he’d be an incompetent loser with the vision of a Star-nosed Mole. But since he wasn’t really trying… rather he was merely “taking a stab,” well, that just makes him a careless moron for fiddling while Rome burned.
See, I like him a lot more now that I know that, don’t you?
His bien-pensance, it should go without saying, is HAMP, the Home Affordable Modification Program, and we all know what a rousing success that has been. Sheer-joy-on-a-stick is how I hear most homeowners referring to it.
It was originally slated to help up to 7 million, but according to the Post, has come up just a tad short at right around 600,000. I’ve seen some say that number is 700,000, but I don’t want to split hairs… after all, what difference does 100,000 homeowners make anyway? It’s an insignificant number, really.
The Post puts the budgeted price tag for the entire Making Home Affordable program at $30 billion, with the money coming out of the TARP funds, and HAMP was to be the lion’s share of that amount.
Now, I’m not trying to be a stickler here, but if you remember back to 2009… I know it’s hard, but try… you might recall budgets for HAMP that were closer to $80 billion, but obviously the administration is counting on no one remembering that far back, so put it out of your mind and move along… there’s nothing to see here.
To-date, the program has cost roughly $1.42 billion. And to put that number in perspective, I looked it up and the government spends $20 billion a year to air condition tents in Iraq and Afghanistan. So, if that same math holds up… that means that instead of helping only 600,000 homeowners in this country, we would have had the money to help roughly 8.5 million homeowners avoid foreclosure had we simply invaded cooler countries.
Are you with me on that calculation? If not, see me after class.
Next up is HARP, the Home Affordable Refinance Program that rhymes with TARP, but that stands for FOOL (and if you remember Robert Preston in The Music Man, that was funny.)
HARP allowed homeowners with Fannie or Freddie loans underwater at first by 115%, and later as we chased the housing market down the drain, by 125%, to refinance into lower interest rate mortgages. Roughly 800,000 homeowners refinanced under the program so far, but again the program was originally forecasted to help millions. It doesn’t really matter, however, as these were the 800,000 homeowners that didn’t need help, and had nothing to do with the foreclosure crisis.
Here’s what the Post’s article had to say about HARP’s cost:
“The Federal Housing Finance Agency, which regulates Fannie and Freddie, does not assign a specific cost to the program and agency officials say the program likely saves the firms money by keeping some borrowers out of delinquency.”
Alrighty then… what else do we have here…
Next there was the Emergency Homeowners Loan Program… or, EHLP. This is that brilliantly conceived homeowner assistance program that seeks to help unemployed homeowners by loaning them up to $50,000 over a two-year period, and then if the homeowner stays current on their mortgage payments for five years, the loan is forgiven.
Should you have the unfortunate experience of losing your job twice in five years, however, the program socks you with the $50k debt and probably repossesses your car when you fall behind on your loan.
Congress allocated $1 billion to this stunning piece of thinking, saying that the program could help up to 30,000 borrowers. Help them what, I wonder? Help them get closer to bankruptcy, perhaps, but I wonder if the government loan can be discharged or whether it’s like one of them student loans that never goes away. It’s a lot like the gift that keeps on giving… emotional baggage.
The Post failed to mention just how many borrowers the program had helped to-date… probably just an oversight, I’m sure. I’ll take a guess though… you know, in an effort to fill in the blanks… I’m going to say the program has helped… hmmm… let’s see… umm… NONE.
But, don’t worry… today is July 19th and according to the Post, borrowers have until July 22nd to apply… so with three days to go, I’d say it’s too early to call this one a complete failure… maybe there’ll be a last minute rush to get in. What? It could happen.
And last up in the Post piece was the Hardest Hit Fund, which provided at first the five… then the nine… and then I believe, ultimately the 33 states hardest hit by the foreclosure crisis with a grand total of $7.6 billion. Each state’s housing finance agency was charged with designing its own solution to the fast spreading and deepening housing meltdown.
Now, the states have until 2017 to use the funds, so the Post points out that “it’s early,” presumably, to judge the program. Apparently, about70% of the state programs established assistance programs for unemployed workers, while 20% designed programs that would supposedly reduce the principal balance of underwater homeowners.
To-date, only $480 million has been spent, and other than providing hand-outs to the unemployed for a while… I can pretty much assure you that the rest of the money is safe, as I haven’t been able to find a single state program that’s helping anyone to ay degree.
When Arizona launched it’s homeowner assistance program last year, I made fun of it, and said that it wouldn’t help a single Arizona homeowner, so wasn’t I surprised when a year later, the Arizona housing authority announced quietly that the program had in fact helped one homeowner all year.
I didn’t hide from it though… I came right out and admitted that I had been wrong… and then apologized. I still don’t know how I could have missed it by that much.
So, that’s it and that’s all… that’s Obama taking a stab… yeah… man. You go Mr. president… keep on stabbing… you’re a stabbin’ fool, sir.
Well, like I said… at least he wasn’t really trying.
I feel like I’ve been watching someone spend the better part of ten bucks… trying to get to the moon.
Nice work, sir.
We’ll let you go back to bed now, sir.
Mandelman out.
HUD Investigation Shows Banks Covered Up Widespread Illegal Acts – Government offers to bring them their check and validate their parking
It seems that the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Inspector General has been conducting five confidential investigations into Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, and Ally Financial and with the investigations now complete, HUD has referred the findings to the Department of Justice.
Shahien Nasiripour of The Huffington Post is reporting that the findings accuse the banks of defrauding American taxpayers through the handling of foreclosures on homes that were purchased with government-backed loans. The audits accuse the five major lenders of violating the False Claims Act, a law designed for use against companies that are alleged to have cheated and/or defrauded the government.
According to Shahien’s story in HuffPo, the secret investigations were initiated in response to last year’s reports, which indicated that large lenders were improperly accelerating foreclosure proceedings… or, in other words… look who just figured out that robo-signing affidavits and other documents required for the legal transfer of title, might just be considered fraudulent in some circles.
Bummer… Just as I convinced my daughter to major in Fraudulent Document Production in college in anticipation of a career in the banking industry, and now I’m not even sure those departments will still exist 5-6 years from now. Is this the best time to get tough on fraud, don’t we need those jobs? What will the “Linda Greens” of the world do for work now?
Besides, I thought that last fall, Bank of America froze all foreclosures in order to conduct an internal investigation and two weeks later said everything was ship-shape and commenced foreclosing once again.
Same thing went on at JPMorgan Chase, GMAC/Ally Financial, and Citibank, right? And, Wells Fargo said they didn’t even have to conduct an investigation because they already knew that they didn’t have a single duck out of line, as far as foreclosures were concerned. Yes sir, perfect paperwork starts at Wells, the signs should say.
Well, what the heck was all that about? You don’t mean to say that it was all pure fabrication theater and that in reality the banks lied through their collective teeth and attempted to white wash their crimes so no one could see them, do you?
Actually, that’s not the amazing part, as far as I’m concerned. What I’m positively dumbfounded over is that there was actually someone in Washington D.C. who wasn’t dumb enough to buy off on the banks inconceivably goofy lies.
“Yes, we were robo-signing” tens of thousands of fraudulent documents a month, but it’s not a problem, because we have the proper paperwork… it’s just that it’s in storage and the robo-signing just seemed easier than driving all the way across town to the storage unit.”
“Oh, and it’s really nothing anyway… just dotting t’s and crossing I’s. What was that? Widespread? Oh heavens, no… we’re going with the words we use to describe everything that becomes public: “isolated incidents.” What’s that? Yes, we know we were robo-signing tens of thousands a month and at least the five largest banks were involved, but we were experiencing a lot of do-overs, so 100,000 robo-signed documents may have only translated into 6-7 mortgages… see… “isolated incidents,” like we said. All but those 6-7 are in tip-top shape, we swear.”
It’s too bad that back then, no one wrote anything that pointed out how absurd this line of crap from our bankers really was… oh, wait… that would be me: Alright Banker-People… That’s Enough. You’re Not Making Sense and You’re Making Me Dizzy. (It’s even got a Mandelman-adapted Broadway show tune in the middle.)
Okay, Shahien… back to you at HuffPo…
The resulting reports read like veritable indictments of major lenders, the sources said. State officials are now wielding the documents as leverage in their ongoing talks with mortgage companies aimed at forcing the firms to agree to pay fines to resolve allegations of routine violations in their handling of foreclosures.
The audits conclude that the banks effectively cheated taxpayers by presenting the Federal Housing Administration with false claims: They filed for federal reimbursement on foreclosed homes that sold for less than the outstanding loan balance using defective and faulty documents.
And, get this…
Two of the firms, including Bank of America, refused to cooperate with the investigations, according to the sources. The audit on Bank of America finds that the company — the nation’s largest handler of home loans — failed to correct faulty foreclosure practices even after imposing a moratorium that lifted last October. Back then, the bank said it was resuming foreclosures, having satisfied itself that prior problems had been solved.
See… what did I just say?
According to the sources, the Wells Fargo investigation concludes that senior managers at the firm, the fourth-largest American bank by assets, broke civil laws. HUD’s inspector general interviewed a pair of South Carolina public notaries who improperly signed off on foreclosure filings for Wells, the sources said.
OMG, not Wells… what happened to your linear ducks?
The investigations dovetail with separate probes by state and federal agencies, who also have examined foreclosure filings and flawed mortgage practices amid widespread reports that major mortgage firms improperly initiated foreclosure proceedings on an unknown number of American homeowners.
Why is that number always unknown? Maybe they need some volunteers with decent counting skills to head over to Washington D.C. and lend a hand. I’ll go… I can count to… gosh… I want to say… well, high.
The FHA, whose defaulted loans the inspector general probed, last May began scrutinizing whether mortgage firms properly treated troubled borrowers who fell behind on payments or whose homes were seized on loans insured by the agency.
Oooh, oooh, pick me, pick me… I know the answer to that one. No need for too much “scrutinizing” the answer is NOOOOOOO, and HELL NOOOOOOO.
A unit of the Justice Department is examining faulty court filings in bankruptcy proceedings. Several states, including Illinois, are combing through foreclosure filings to gauge the extent of so-called “robo-signing” and other defective practices, including illegal home repossessions.
Uh oh… those things sound like actual crimes though, right… I mean, like criminal crimes?
Such processes “have potentially infected millions of foreclosures,” Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairman Sheila Bair told a Senate panel on Thursday.
Oh, for heaven’s sake… Sheila… what are you doing here… this isn’t your article, you’re two articles to the right. I covered you two days ago… now back to your page this instant.
Last October, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan said his investigators found that numerous mortgage firms broke the agency’s rules when dealing with delinquent borrowers. He declined to be specific.
And why should he have to be specific? It’s only people losing homes that are at issue here… no big a deal. So what, if by those rules being broken someone lost their home but shouldn’t have… keep the details to yourself Shaun. Protect the bank that broke the rules… to hell with the homeowner.
In March, HUD’s inspector general found that more than 49 percent of loans underwritten by FHA-approved lenders in a sample did not conform to the agency’s requirements. The agency’s review later expanded to flawed foreclosure practices. FHA, a unit of HUD, could still take administrative action against those firms for breaking FHA rules based on its own probe.
Oh, that sounds positively great… more loans that don’t conform to a federal agency’s requirements? Because we didn’t collect enough of those this last time around, I suppose.
- The State of Illinois has begun examining potentially fraudulent court filings, looking at the role played by a unit of Lender Processing Services.
- Nevada and Arizona already launched lawsuits against Bank of America. California is keen on launching its own suits, people familiar with the matter say.
- And New York’s top law enforcer, Eric Schneiderman, wants to conduct a complete investigation into all facets of mortgage banking, from fraudulent lending to defective securitization practices to faulty foreclosure documents and illegal home seizures.
- Delaware sent Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., which runs an electronic registry of mortgages, a subpoena demanding answers to 75 questions.
Well, swing your partner round and round,
And turn those banksters upside down.
We’ll turn the corner ‘fore it’s too late,
And say goodbye to foreclosure-gate,
We’re gonna’ want more than an interest rate.
~~~
Watch out them banksters can be rough,
But this time we will call their bluff.
When they say they’re too big to fail,
Just send them all straight off to jail,
And tell the judge to deny their bail.
~~~
Homes underwater, as you well know,
So our principal you must forego,
We won’t stand for the status quo,
Now is the time, it’s apropos.
Before this turns into a drunken brawl,
And we turn banks from too big to small.
And put banksters up against the wall,
We’re here to fight for the long haul.
~~~
Rather than punishing banks for misdeeds, the administration is now focused on helping troubled borrowers in the hope that it will stanch the flood of foreclosures and increase consumer confidence, officials involved in the negotiations said.
WHAT WAS THAT? EXCUSE ME… WHICH OFFICIALS SAID THAT… SPECIFICALLY? I WANT NAMES, DAMN IT.
Rather than PUNISHING banks for MISDEEDS?
Misdeeds? What happened to fraud on the courts, illegal home seizures, countless abuses of the Servicemember Civil Relief Act… violations of the False Claims Act? MISDEEDS? NAUGHTY LITTLE DALLIANCES? ARE THESE PEOPLE KIDDING?
Look… you can’t possibly think… I mean… there’s absolutely no chance… wait… what I’m trying to say is… no, that’s not right… it’s more that… hold on… are you out of your… how can you say… I’m not going to… because the whole thing is… Excuse me just a moment…
Memo to Nameless Officials…
Not that any of you mindless sycophants ever listen to what I have to say, but in the unlikely event that I’ve caught you in a rare moment of clarity and mindfulness, and I mean this with all due respect…
If you think, even for a moment, that the 20 million ‘troubled borrowers’ and perhaps 60 million people that you have allowed to be abused, shamed and beaten down by the servicing companies of the major banks for the last three years, are going to be in any sense mollified by your “focused help” at this stage of the crisis, while they watch banks not be punished for their ‘misdeeds,’ as you put it… you’re wacked.
I realize that you guys are oblivious to what is going on in America’s middle class communities, but let me assure you people are near enraptured by the prospect that perhaps there might be a shard of hope that we are still a country of laws and not one where justice never visits the wealthy.
So, you go ahead and focus all the help on troubled borrowers you want, and there will never be joy, there will never be peace… as long as their tormenters are allowed to go unpunished, only made richer by their acts. Amen.
~~~
In a report last week, analysts at Moody’s Investors Service predicted that while the losses incurred by the banks will be “sizable,” the credit rating agency does “not expect them to meaningfully impact capital.”
Oh, well good then.
Representatives of HUD and its inspector general declined to comment.
Of course they declined. And how transparent of them…
Federal Regulators to Bring Enforcement Actions Against Banks… May Get Rid of Hot Towels in Washroom
After lawyers deposing bank personnel uncovered “robo-signers” fraudulently signing thousands of lost note affidavits and other documents the serivcers were required to have in order to foreclose on a home, but apparently didn’t, a regulatory review of mortgage servicer practices was initiated by the federal banking agencies.
Well, the magazine, American Banker (“AB”) is now reporting that formal enforcement actions against most, if not all, of the 14 mortgage servicers reviewed are expected soon.
AB says that Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co., and Ally Financial Inc. — are likely to face the toughest requirements, due to the sheer number of issues being addressed. Expectations are that the enforcement actions will include civil monetary penalties.
The regulators are still in discussions over the specific terms and state attorneys general, the Justice Department, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Treasury Department and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are all involved. According to prepared testimony of Acting Comptroller of the Currency John Walsh, which was obtained by American Banker and scheduled for Thursday in front of the Senate Banking Committee:
“The OCC and the other federal banking agencies with relevant jurisdiction are in the process of finalizing actions that will incorporate appropriate remedial requirements and sanctions with respect to the servicers within their respective jurisdictions. We expect that our actions will comprehensively address servicers’ identified deficiencies and will hold servicers to standards that require effective and proactive risk management of servicing operations, and appropriate remediation for customers who have been financially harmed by defects in servicers’ standards and procedures. We also intend to leverage our findings and lessons learned in this examination of enforcement process to contribute to the development of national servicing standards.”
The federal regulators have said that they hope the enforcement orders have the effect of sending a message to the rest of the servicing industry. I love it when federal banking regulators “hope” stuff will happen.
The details are still being finalized, but are likely to require servicers to increase staffing levels, establish a single point of contact for borrowers, and “conduct a comprehensive look back at their servicing portfolio to detect and correct problems,” whatever the hell that means.
AB says that the FDIC and other government officials are pushing for “servicers to offer enhanced, streamlined modifications to troubled borrowers in exchange for a clearer path to foreclosure if re-default occurs after the workout.”
But the AB story says: “It remains unclear, however, if regulators will take such a step.”
Okay, just wait a damn minute here.
When I started writing this article I thought I was going to be telling people that finally… finally… after being allowed to abuse literally millions of American homeowners in the worst ways and at the worst time imaginable, finally the federal banking regulators were going take steps to punish servicers for their crimes against homeowners, investors, and our society as a whole.
But, that’s not what’s happening here at all is it. What did that last paragraph say?
“… servicers to offer enhanced, streamlined modifications to troubled borrowers in exchange for a clearer path to foreclosure if re-default occurs after the workout.”
You know what… go to hell. How about the servicers offer “enhanced, streamlined modifications to troubled borrowers” just because it’s the right thing to do? How about the servicers do it because although they can never come close to making amends for what they’ve done, under your watchful eye, federal regulators, I might add… they start doing the right thing now because they owe it to the American citizenry? How about they do it because it’s their job… because it’s in the best interests of the nation… how about any of those reasons, you disingenuous pack of regulating clowns?
How about the servicers… and you guys that call yourselves banking regulators, although I would like to point out that clearly you have regulated nothing in the banking industry for perhaps 30 and certainly 20 years… how about if you all start to realize that it’s your bankers that have caused our economy to fall off a cliff and caused the pain that will no doubt be with us for decade or decades, and that if people re-default it’s your fault for not properly modifying the loan, or because of yet another economically induced hardship, and that you don’t get to foreclose quicker next time because you did such a lousy job the first time around?
How about if the servicers are never permitted to punish anyone else for anything because they lost that privilege when they proved themselves capable of being nothing short of sadistic, unfeeling monsters, unfit to socialize with the rest of humanity? How about something like that?
And the story goes on to say that although several banks were expecting the enforcement actions to come out this week, but that “the timeline appears to be slipping.”
Yeah, I’ll be the timeline is slipping. Something in Washington’s slipping, that’s for damn sure.
Now, sources are apparently saying that they hope to issue whatever milquetoast enforcement action orders the traveling sycophants finally agree on sometime in March, and that there’s going to be something called a “global settlement” that comes as part of the package.
“After the orders are released, regulators will follow up with a report on the findings of their review and further recommendations,” the AB story says.
Oh and guess what? “There appear to be differences among the agencies in how tough to make the enforcement orders and how high the monetary penalty should be.”
No kidding? Now that’s hard to believe, don’t you think? Reports say that Elizabeth Warren’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, is “pushing for steep fines to be assessed on servicers, coupled with stringent remedial actions.” Go Liz… you are the bomb.
The FDIC is also supposed to be in favor of tough enforcement measures. (Like what, do you suppose… a stern talking to?) The OCC… or, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, however, is “concerned about taking overly harsh actions.”
Let me guess, the OCC wants to get tough on servicers that have violated whatever it is they’ve violated by offering back rubs, blow jobs and a buck ninety-five as a fine. I can’t take this much longer… why the hell did I start writing about this in the first place?
It seems that this past Monday, the regulators… and I use that term extremely loosely… met with Tim “Transparency” Geithner, along with representatives from the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”), HUD and CFPB in order to consider the pending actions.
The AB story then says the following:
“Although the orders will effectively establish standards for the largest servicers, they are not expected to supplant efforts already underway for regulators to issue their own formal set of rules.”
What in the world does that mean? Why can’t these people talk like… I don’t know… people? I’ll tell you what… I wasn’t in favor of it before, but I’m starting to be pro-torture over here. Let’s waterboard these inconceivable wastes-of-space and then see how bright eyed and bushy tailed they are at work the next day.
Want more? Try this sentence on for size:
“Regulators are still divided on where and how to set such standards, with the FDIC pushing to include them as part of a risk-retention rule while the OCC wants to craft a stand-alone measure.”
Gee, which side of that pressing issue are you on, pray tell? Are you a risk-retention kind of person, or do you favor a stand-alone measure? Don’t answer that, damn it, I’ll have to hurt you.
There’s more and then I’m done with this topic forever… you want to read about crap like this, read someone else’s blog because I’d rather chop off all eight of my fingers than have to write about this kind of drool again. Here goes…
“Regulators have been hinting for weeks that they may take enforcement actions against servicers, and Walsh sought to reassure Congress everyone’s on top of the issue.”
“We are directing banks to take corrective action where we find errors or deficiencies, and we have an array of informal and formal enforcement actions and penalties that we will impose if warranted These range from informal memoranda of understanding to civil money penalties, removals from banking, and criminal referrals.”
Sheila Bair over at FDIC says that any solution “must result in industry-wide standards.” In her January 19th speech to the Mortgage Bankers Association. Bair said:
“In order to remedy failures endemic to the largest mortgage servicers, I hope to see enforceable requirements that will significantly improve opportunities for homeowners to avoid foreclosure.”
Wait a minute… what damn year is this? 2011? Yeah, fine… I was just checking. I’ll bet you anything that if I go back two years, I can find Sheila saying that same sentence.
Then the AB story says that it would have been better if the servicers had taken remedial steps on their own before regulators were forced to take action. Oh for crying out loud… yeah, I suppose it would have been better for Pablo Escobar to check himself into a drug rehabilitation center too, but that wasn’t very likely, now was it?
Then from the AB story:
“It’s unfortunate it had to get this point,” said William Longbrake, an executive-in-residence at the University of Maryland. “It would have been better if the industry had done these things without the federal government.”
What in the Sam Hill is an “executive in residence”? And what kind of distorted perspective looks at what the servicers have done her… these last three years… and says… gee, it would have been better if they wouldn’t have done those things. Mr. Longbrake, are you aware that people have committed suicide because of that these servicers have done to them? Marriages have ended. Entire communities destroyed. Damage to children that is inestimable. How about asking… where the hell has the federal government been for the last three years?
The AB story wraps up with talk about the “global settlement” claptrap, and I don’t know what the hell it means, but I sure don’t like the sound of it. Here’s what the AB story says:
“While the settlement is likely to be bad public relations for the servicers involved, Jaret Seiberg, a policy analyst at MF Global Inc.’s Washington Research Group, said a global settlement may still be positive news for the industry.”
“A global settlement should be extremely positive for banks by putting this issue to rest and letting the industry move past the paperwork snafus,” Seiberg said.
“Bad public relations?” “Paperwork snafus?” Jaret, Jaret, Jaret… my boy… you are such an asshat. And you’re a policy analyst at MF Global Inc.’s Washington Research Group? If there’s a God, someday you or someone you love will lose your home to foreclosure.
Jaret was also quite intrigued by “the potential for streamlined modifications.” It’s true… Jaret says that requiring streamlined modifications could have an impact. Maybe… he’s not sure, but they could… according to Jaret… it’s a possibility… according to Jaret… they might… have an impact… of some kind… who knows, but it’s a distinct possibility… says Jaret.
Here’s Jaret’s big finishing quote… pay attention, he’s a policy analyst remember… at MF Global Inc.’s Washington Research Group. Go Jaret… it’s your birthday… Go Jaret…
“The easier you make the modification the more likely you are to get a modification, so the concept makes a lot of sense. For the industry, where there is an automatic modification and then foreclosure if the borrower goes delinquent a second time, you could end up benefiting the banks because it’s going to eliminate a lot of uncertainty now about the ability of financial firms to foreclose on borrowers behind on payments. Right now there are so many programs out there, it difficult to know when banks can foreclose. This would set up a streamlined model.”
What? Yeah right… like I’m the only one thinking about how much fun it would be to kick the shite out of Jaret in a parking lot after a couple of beers and maybe a shot of Patron. Don’t punish yourself… It’s okay to dream.
And I’m going to have to watch this stupid story develop, you want to know why?
Well, believe it or not, a producer from KNX/KFWB, which are CBS Radio stations out here in Los Angeles, just called me a few minutes ago, as I was writing this unbelievably annoying story, and asked me if I would be on Bob McCormick’s Money Radio Show again this coming Monday morning starting at 9:00 AM.
It seems that they just saw this story come across the wire and want me to come on the show and discuss it. At 9:00 AM Monday morning. And I’m going to be in Las Vegas at the Paris Hotel and Casino attending Max Gardner’s Operation Strike Back attorney training event, so it’s really quite a problem.
I mean, I can do the show from the phone in my room, but how in the world am I going to have time to get drunk enough by 9:00 AM so that after I talk about this insipid drivel I don’t hurl myself from the top of the Vegas version of the Eifel Tower?
Mandelman out.
Bankruptcy Judges & DOJ Rip Mortgage Companies
Below is another story about Servicer abuses… At least some judges see the issues and are not allowing personal viewpoints or prejudices to cloud their assessment of how terrible the situation is for a homeowner in mortgage hardship or distress.
The servicers are also the main players in the massive foreclosure fraud that is occurring around this country.
One would think that at some point, the legal system is going to stop the train of abuses justice suffers because of the systemic fraud that is committed by servicers trying to foreclose on homes they have no financial stake in.
Bankruptcy Judges & DOJ Rip Mortgage Companies
by Karen Weise, ProPublica
“Systemic abuse.” “Extraordinary incompetence.” “Reckless.” In a growing body of legal cases, judges and the Justice Department are breaking from legal jargon to starkly chastise mortgage companies.

As mortgage delinquencies rise, more and more homeowners are learning the central role that mortgage servicers play in their lives. The legal cases show that role can be distressing. Judges have found that major mortgages servicers regularly mess up basic accounting, improperly credit payments and charge unwarranted fees. They’ve “not done a very good job of keeping the records,” said Judge Samuel Bufford of California.
Mortgage servicers — typically either bank subsidiaries or independent companies — handle the day-to-day work with homeowners, ranging from collecting monthly payments to determining when to modify or foreclose. Problems with servicing often, but not always, occur once homeowners start having trouble making payments.
Complaints to the government about mortgage servicers have soared in recent years. They’ve risen from 31 percent of the complaints that the Department of Housing and Urban Development received in 2006 to 78 percent in 2008, according to HUD spokesman Lemar Wooley.
Problems Exposed in Bankruptcies
Many homeowners in bankruptcy have legal representation and must settle claims with servicers. As a result, the process has revealed and documented a slew of servicer problems.
In many rulings, judges have shown frustration and even outrage. They’ve ruled that servicers have attempted to collect unjustified fees, charged homeowners for unnecessary insurance, failed to properly credit homeowners’ payments and failed to provide evidence to back up fee requests. In most cases, judges demand that servicers fix the problems and unwind the unjustified fees; sometimes, judges award damages and attorneys’ fees. In one extraordinary case, a judge issued $750,000 in emotional and punitive damages. (We’ve compiled five sample cases and rulings for you to see here.)

Take the case of Donald and Phyllis Moffitt of Arkansas. In June 2008, bankruptcy Judge Audrey Evans issued a restraining order against America’s Servicing Company, a division of Wells Fargo, saying it must stop attempting to collect payments that the Moffitts did not owe. In a 41-page ruling (PDF), the judge wrote:
“The evidence supports the premise that ASC’s servicing procedures, as exemplified by the Moffitts’ account, are not organized to assure accuracy and accountability. … ASC misapplied these payments, failed to record the correct information even though Mrs. Moffitt constantly called and talked to ASC’s agents, failed to follow her written instructions, failed to communicate with the Moffitts, sent mortgage statements that were incomprehensible and frightening, began collection calls, and engaged in a litany of mismanagement of the Moffitts’ loan.”
Wells Fargo did not respond to a call for comment.
A 2007 study looked at a majority of Chapter 13 bankruptcy filings in 2006 and found that in 70 percent of the cases studied, mortgage companies claimed homeowners owed an average of $6,309 more on their loans than homeowners believed.
Problems with servicing are not limited to families filing for bankruptcy, Katherine Porter, an author of the study and an associate professor at the University of Iowa’s law school, testified before Congress last year. She said servicers commonly foreclose when they do not have the legal right to do so, impose unwarranted or illegal fees, and miscalculate how much families owe.
In several instances, judges have taken broad action to address persistent problems with a servicer. This May, Judge Elizabeth Magner in Louisiana said her review of multiple cases involving Ocwen Loan Servicing had shown the servicer regularly acted in “bad faith.” The judge said Ocwen had charged improper fees and attempted to collect bankruptcy-related fees after the court closed a case. In one of the cases, Ocwen took 10 months to provide a full accounting of fees.
The judge wrote that Ocwen’s “systematic abuse” required more than monetary sanctions, which had not stopped the behavior in the past, so Magner issued an order (PDF) forcing Ocwen to follow specific accounting procedures. (We’ve noted before that Ocwen’s servicing procedures have raised eyebrows in the past). Ocwen’s general counsel, Paul Koches, said the company disagrees with the ruling and is pursuing an appeal in U.S. District Court.
Justice Department Takes Action
The Justice Department’s United States Trustee Program is a watchdog over the bankruptcy process. Its 21 regional offices oversee more than 1,300 private trustees who mediate between debtors and creditors in individual bankruptcy cases.
The Trustee Program’s annual report said combating servicer abuse (PDF) was a top priority last year. The program initiated 68 actions (PDF) against what it calls “systemic abuse” by mortgage servicers, including 25 large servicers such as Countrywide, HSBC and JPMorgan Chase, according to public documents (PDF) and speeches (PDF). The Trustee Program has sued Countrywide in at least six states.
Countrywide, now owned by Bank of America, is the largest participant in the federal Making Home Affordable program to modify troubled mortgages. A recent analysis by the Associated Press found that at least 30 of the 38 mortgage companies that have signed up for the program have been sued over their servicing practices.
In response to one U.S. trustee’s suit in Ohio, Judge Marilyn Shea-Stonum ruled in May (PDF) that Countrywide had charged fees with “no factual basis” and wrote: “Countrywide’s system is reckless. It appears to me designed to allow each actor in the process to act with indifference to the truth, and to rely solely on the limited information made available at each step. … [The errors in this case] evidence Countrywide’s disregard for diligence and accuracy.”
The judge is currently determining monetary and other sanctions. Countrywide spokeswoman Shirley Norton said, “We are reviewing the ruling and considering our options.”
Private trustees have sued servicers as well. Debra Miller, a private trustee in Indiana, has been active in litigation where servicers haven’t complied with federal regulations. Typically, she said, private trustees try to obtain settlements that are more about changing practices than monetary compensation. “Our job is to force mortgage companies to improve their systems,” she said.
Both the Justice Department and private trustees have stepped in to fill what they see as a regulatory void covering mortgage servicers, according to Andrea Celli, a private trustee in upstate New York.
Future Oversight Under Debate
Currently, a hodgepodge of agencies oversees mortgage servicing. HUD, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Reserve all have partial authority.
Concern over mortgage servicing was part of the early discussions about the proposed new Consumer Financial Protection Agency, according to Eric Stein, the Treasury Department’s deputy assistant secretary for consumer protection. The CFPA, as proposed by the Obama administration, would be the primary watchdog for servicer abuses.
Servicers are resisting the new consumer agency. Paul Leonard, a lobbyist for the Financial Services Roundtable, said his organization’s members believe that there should be better coordination among regulators and that existing agencies can handle the responsibility.
Tara Twomey, a lecturer at Standford Law School who co-authored the large study of bankruptcy cases, says that more regulation would help, but it would only be a “Band-Aid.” “The more fundamental problem is one of market structure,” she said. “Borrowers don’t get to choose their servicer.”




















