May
14

Husband’s Suicide Yesterday, Wells Fargo to Evict Wife Tomorrow Anyway

 

 

Just like the last VICTIM OF WELLS FARGO I wrote about, Wells Fargo claimed that Norman and Oriane Rousseau had missed a mortgage payment.  But the payment HAD been made in person at a Wells Fargo branch by Cashier’s Check, and Mrs. Rousseau has the receipt for the transaction.

 

The Rousseaus file a dispute with Wells Fargo over the supposed missing payment.  Wells Fargo “investigates” and comes back saying that the Rousseaus had stopped payment on the check.  They stopped payment on a Cashier’s Check?  Seriously?

 

I don’t want to spend too much time on this ridiculous point, so here’s how Rousseau’s lawyer explains this technical yet wholly insipid issue, and then we’ll move on…

 

The teller’s receipt establishes that the cashier’s check was in the custody and control of Wachovia on April 1, 2009, and the research by the Cashiering Department should have concluded that Wachovia screwed up by not applying the cash-equivalent funds to the Rousseau’s account. After delivery and acceptance to the branch office, it was Wachovia’s responsibility to safeguard the instrument; Wachovia itself effectively stopped payment on the cashier’s check.

 

Okay, so let’s get back to the meat of the story…

 

Concerned that they could not resolve the payment dispute but told they should apply for a loan modification, the Rousseaus hired a law firm and submitted a loan modification application.  After that it was standard operating procedure at Wells Fargo… we lost this, and we lost that, resend this, and resend that… for almost a year.

 

Good Lord, Wells Fargo, could you please do something differently just once?  This article is almost becoming a form letter.

 

Wells Fargo then of course told the Rousseau family not to make their payments, that they were being considered for a loan modification and that making their payments would immediately disqualify them.

 

So, they saved their payments just in case Wells decided to deny them a modification.  Saved every single one just in case the bank decided to act like… well, Wells Fargo Bank.

 

Then Wells sent them a Notice of Default, but when they called to say they wanted to reinstate their loan, Wells said what they always say… IGNORE IT… don’t worry about it, everything’s fine, it’s just an automated sort of thing… why, you’re being considered for a loan modification.

 

Then Wells filed a Notice of Sale on October 28, 2010.  Their home would be sold on November 22, 2010.  And still Wells said… IGNORE IT… it’s just another automated sort of thing… your loan modification is still pending… and please re-submit some documents.

 

It was November 10, 2010… just 12 days before their home was to be sold… when the Wells Fargo representative told the Rousseau’s that their loan modification had been denied.  The reason: Insufficient income.

 

Yeah, but you know the funny thing about that is that their income hadn’t changed a nickel since they applied for the loan modification.  So, what’s the deal?  Did it take Wells Fargo a year to figure out the Rousseau’s income was insufficient?  Is that the story I’m supposed to be buying into?

 

You’re a liar, Wells Fargo.  Either you knew you weren’t going to approve their loan modification, or you’re the most incompetent financial institution in the history of the world.  And you don’t just do this sometimes, you do this all the time… and especially to people in their 60s or older.  Why is that do you suppose? 

 

In case you’re wondering what I’ve been up to, I’m actually collecting Wells Fargo stories at this point.  I figure it’ll be a hoot to put them all together into a book.  What do you think?  Should I autograph a copy for you when it’s done?

 

That same day the Rousseaus found a lawyer and discovered they had a RIGHT TO REINSTATE their loan.  (Nice of Wells not to tell them that, by the way.)  They contacted Wells and requested a reinstatement quote… TWO DAYS LATER Wells finally gave them the phone number for RCS, the trustee.

 

 

But, RSC said that reinstatement would take two weeks and trustee sale was going off as planned in 8 days.  Wells got them their reinstatement quote too… it was dated November 15, but received via email on November 17, 2010.

 

And it expired in two days and had to be received in Texas by November 19, 2010.

 

The Rousseaus had more than enough in savings to reinstate their loan, they told Wells Fargo that… but now they couldn’t get the money from their IRA in time for the 2-day deadline and Wells refused to postpone the sale.

 

So, the Rousseau’s home sold at the trustee sale on November 22, 2010.

 

Next the Rousseaus go through a series of lawyers.  Finally, they get a good one and in July of 2011, the court grants an injunction contingent on them making a monthly payment of $1800.

 

But, by December of 2011, Wells finally wore the Rousseaus down and they just couldn’t make December’s payment.  They used up all their money fighting Wells Fargo, and Norm had been unemployed since the foreclosure.  He was taking odd jobs as a handy man to make ends meet.

 

Wells Fargo immediately goes to court… gets the injunction dissolved… then proceeds with the Unlawful Detainer… the lockout is set for May 15th, 2012… at 6:00 AM.

 

THAT’S TOMORROW MORNING… AT 6:00 AM.

 

Over this past weekend, Norm Rousseau talked with their attorney who is working pro bono by the way.  Basically, his lawyer tells him…

 

“Look… let’s face the facts here.  We’ll proceed with the lawsuit.  We’ll fight like hell to get you back in the home, but you have to be ready with some sort of plan so you’re not left homeless and on the streets.”

 

Norm found someone who has a 27-foot motorhome he can use, but after he gets it home on Saturday… it stops running… it won’t start.  But, Norm Rousseau is a man in his 50s with mad skills.  He goes to work around the clock taking apart the engine, doing everything he can to get it running so that on Tuesday morning he will have somewhere to house his family.  He’s up all night Saturday night, but still can’t get it running.  It’s too big to tow with a car.

 

His mind must have been wandering late on Saturday night.  What must a man, a father, a provider be thinking when he knows that everything in life has somehow gone terribly wrong and there’s nothing left to do?  He must have been imagining the sheriff pulling up to evict his family on Tuesday morning… just two days away, as the motorhome’s engine lay in pieces in his driveway.

 

I can only imagine what must have been going through his mind as he worked tirelessly, without sleep, on that engine and electrical system… as the clock ticked away the hours, I’m sure going faster and faster as time was running out.  Damn, it’s already 11:00 PM… then it’s 3:00 AM… and then 5:00 AM… and then before he knew it… a most unwelcome sun was shining… 9:00 AM…

 

I can almost hear him thinking: “Damn it, what am I going to do?  How could this have happened?”  I can hear him swearing under his breath as he fights with the old parts trying to get them to work together again… I can see him staring at the engine as the will to go on was leaving his soul…

 

Norman and Oriane Rousseau had bought their home in Ventura, California in 2000, putting nearly 30 percent down, which was their life savings.  In 2006, every time they went into the World Savings branch they’d get pitched on refinancing into one of World’s infamous Option ARM loans… that are now illegal, I believe.  After a couple of years of being pitched, they finally bought into World Saving’s lies.

 

They had told World Saving’s loan officer, ERIC COOPER, that they were only interested in obtaining a conventional 30-year, fixed-rate loan.  They wanted consistent payments over the life of the loan.

 

But COOPER assured them that they could significantly reduce their monthly payments… by more than $600 per month, with a lower interest refinanced loan. COOPER said that the new Pick-A-Payment loan product was better suited to their situation.

 

He described the Payment Option ARM as the new industry standard.  He pointed out that the lower interest rate and payment flexibility were valuable advantages that were not available with other loan products.  And he said that even more importantly, unlike the previous WORLD loans, the interest rate was tied to an index with historically low rates that were continuing to decrease.

 

According to COOPER, industry experts projected the interest rates to continue to fall, and so their monthly payments would be EVEN LOWER than their initial payments.

 

 

Even under the worst case scenario, COOPER assured them, the historical data for the index indicated that changes in the interest rate would only be slight, and if an increase should occur it would have a negligible effect on their monthly payments… no more than a few dollars.

 

And besides, COOPER explained, the loan would only be around for a couple years, as they should expect to refinance within the next two years to take advantage of even more favorable interest rates and as the steadily rising housing values would surely increase the amount of their equity in the property.

 

Then COOPER went for the close…

 

On the condition that the Rousseaus apply for the new loan that very day, he would agree to waive their pre-payment penalty, stating that there would be virtually no costs to refinance beyond a $35.00 application fee.

 

Yeah, COOPER, you’re a real peach.

 

COOPER also convinced the Rousseaus that it was in their best financial interests to consolidate approximately $25,000 in unsecured debt in the refinance transaction, citing the benefits of the lower interest rate and the convenience of having only one payment.

 

The Rousseaus provided COOPER with accurate and truthful information regarding their income and assets, and COOPER was such a nice guy that he offered to complete the Quick Qualifying Loan Application on their behalf.

 

Gee, thanks COOPER.

 

It was right around November 1, 2007, that WACHOVIA arranged for a notary to complete the closing at the Rousseau’s home.  The notary discouraged their review of the documents and directed them straight to the signature lines, but the Rousseaus noticed that a pre-payment penalty in excess of $4000.00 was included in the closing costs… the fee that COOPER had promised to waive if they applied that same day.  They called COOPER and he apologized for the oversight, but tried to get them to sign anyway, because it would only add a couple of bucks to their payment.

 

They said… no… they’d reschedule the appointment and wait for the four grand to be taken off their bill, thank you very much.

 

Two weeks later, the notary returned and they signed the paperwork for their new $368,000 state of the art loan.

 

Now, the Rousseaus didn’t know it at the time, but COOPER was a lying sack of garbage that had misrepresented just about everything having to do with their new loan.

 

The 7.2% interest rate of the new loan was actually higher than their old loan and higher than the 6.8% quoted by COOPER.  The “significant reduction in monthly payments” was an illusion accomplished by comparing the fully amortized payment of the 2006 loan with the negative amortizing minimum payment due under the new loan.

 

The new loan, at annual change dates, added deferred interest to principal and the loan amortized, with payment increases capped at 7.5% for ten years.  Then, the new loan recast when negative amortization reached 125%.

 

The Rousseaus were never told about the new loan’s fully amortizing payment of $2,497.94 per month, in fact their payment amount was intentionally misrepresented by COOPER.  And the new monthly payment could never decrease because it represented the minimum payment possible… the negatively amortizing option that meant payments would increase at each change date.

 

But that wasn’t enough for our boy COOPER.  The Rousseaus were charged $2,640.00 in origination fees for the “low cost” refinance, which made a tidy profit for World/Wachovia/Wells/Whatever bank.

 

And best of all, an undisclosed Yield Spread Premium (“YSP”) of $4,195 was charged for placing them in a loan with an interest rate .50% higher than they qualified for, and that YSP increased their monthly payments by $123.32, or $44,395.20 over the life of the loan.

 

The truth is that the Rousseaus were a heck of a long way from being considered well qualified for their new loan. Their fully amortized payment represented a total debt-to-income ratio of 27.91%, but that percentage was based on income figures that were grossly overstated by guess who? That’s right… COOPER.

 

The Rousseaus told COOPER their total gross annual income was, $76,000, but somehow it got listed as $136,800 on the application.  You know… the application that good old COOPER was nice enough to fill out for the Rousseaus.

 

 

So, it was Sunday… yesterday… around 10:00 AM… and Norm couldn’t get the motorhome running.  He must have realized that he couldn’t handle the shame of seeing his wife and stepson evicted with nowhere to go… living on the street.  I don’t know how anyone could face that reality.  I don’t think I could. 

 

How could it be that just 12 years before they had put their life savings down on their first and likely last home?  They had done everything right, but nothing was right anymore, and I’m sure to Norm Rousseau, nothing would ever be right again. 

 

Their church had offered to help them, maybe find them somewhere to stay temporarily, and that would be fine for his wife and her son… but not for him.  I’m sure he wept as he looked at the engine parts laying there, realizing that it was over.

 

Norm Rousseau called me a couple of months ago.  He wasn’t asking me to help him, in fact, he never even told me about what he was going through with Wells Fargo.  No, Norm was concerned about someone else who was losing a home.  A really good person who’s done so much for so many others, was how he described her.  It wasn’t right what the banks were doing he said.  He was hoping that I could do something to help someone he knew, because she was someone who had helped others… but he didn’t say a word about himself.

 

Norman Rousseau gave up over that engine that sits in pieces in his driveway today, the sun shining down making the metal parts hot to the touch.  Maybe it was the frustration of having nowhere to turn for justice, maybe it was the shame he felt that somehow he had let his family down… even though that was not the case at all.

 

Sometime mid-morning on Sunday Norm Rousseau ended his own life.  He went into his garage and shot himself.  At one point he could have reinstated his loan, that’s what he had planned to do, but Wells Fargo had made that impossible… they stripped him of everything he had.

 

And now, his wife and stepson are to be evicted at 6:00 AM tomorrow morning.  They have nowhere to go, they have no money, they are still in shock over the loss of Norm.

 

And I don’t know what to do really.  I’m going to call the sheriff’s office in Ventura… see if I can persuade them to drag their feet for a week before locking them out.  Their lawyer is trying to file something with the courts, but maybe you can think of something too.

 

Maybe you can forward this article to people in the media.  Tell them what’s going on… maybe someone will care enough to do something.  It’s 11:21 AM and I’ve been up all night again, I can’t really keep this up much longer… but somehow I felt like telling Norm’s story was the very least I could do.

 

Since Wells Fargo had already done the very least they could do.

 

Rest in peace, Norm Rousseau.

 

Mandelman out.

 

John Stumpf, CEO

john.g.stumpf@wellsfargo.com

Or, by phone: (415) 396-7018 or (866) 878-5865

Or, if you want to have some fun, since I know this physical address is correct, why not grab an envelope, buy a stamp and reach out to him via regular mail.  For extra smiles, consider throwing old keys in with your letter, or I’ve always enjoyed tossing a small handful of sunflower seeds in before sealing…

John G. Stumpf

Chief Executive Officer

Wells Fargo Bank

420 Montgomery St.

San Francisco, CA 94163

 ###

For a copy of the complaint in the Rousseau’s

lawsuit against Wells Fargo…

CLICK HERE.

May
14

Video: Revenge of the Nerds?

The descent into beta philosophy.


Have we become a beta-male culture, as Bill Whittle argues in his latest Firewall video?  Are we just a little too in touch with our feelings to take the necessary risks to expand our horizons, grow our economy, and defend our nation? As usual with Bill’s videos, there is a lot to unpack in them.  [...]

View the video »

May
14

Jamie Dimon tells Meet the Press he thinks we’re resenting “success.” He’s wrong.

This past week, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon announced that his bank lost $2 billion trading credit default swaps.  It was destined to become a major news story, and sure enough everyone and their cousin wrote about it from every conceivable angle, the consensus being that the loss exemplifies the need for Dodd-Frank, the Volker Rule, and even Glass-Steagall type legislation.

 

So, no surprise there, right?  I mean, JPMorgan Chase losing $2 billion in a little over a month betting on credit default swaps is pretty much why U.S. taxpayers ended up having to pump trillions into TBTF banks just a few years ago.

 

Dimon was quoted as having said that just because his bank had been stupid, it didn’t mean that all the other banks would be equally stupid.  But, see… it sort of does, right?  That’s why the sort of risk we’re talking about is termed, “systemic,” right?  That’s why all the Wall Street banks became insolvent at the same time, right?

 

The simple fact is that if JPMorgan Chase is being an idiot in it’s proprietary trading strategies, history shows us that chances are overwhelmingly that the other bankers are going to be idiots too.  Maybe not on the same day; okay fine.  But, within a matter of weeks or certainly months… for sure.

 

Oh, I know Wells Fargo will deny having done whatever it is that the other idiots have done, whenever bets go bad, but then we’ll soon find out that they were lying and not only did the same thing, but they did it to an even greater degree than the other morons du jour of the financial aristocracy.

 

The story of Dimon’s $2 billion loss got so big that Jamie even showed up to issue a mea culpa, Sunday morning on this week’s “Meet the Press.”  Among other things, he said…

 

“This is a stupid thing that we should never have done, but we’re still going to earn a lot of money this quarter, so it isn’t like the company is jeopardized.  We hurt ourselves and our credibility, yes – and that you’ve got to fully expect and pay the price for that.”

 

A billion here and a billion there…

 

The point that JPMorgan Chase is going to “earn” a lot of money this quarter is not only completely irrelevant, but it highlights another part of the problem we’re having with our mega-banks.

 

For one thing, and I can’t believe I even have to say this, losing $2 billion in a quarter at any corporation is supposed to be a significant problem.  If it’s not, then the corporation is gouging its customers with the expectation that it will need a multi-billion cushion to make up for its tendency to lose billions through stupidity at any given moment.

 

And for another thing, saying that this time around the stupidity isn’t going to jeopardize JPMorgan Chase’s future solvency, is not the point.

 

The point is, what will happen when the bank’s stupidity and obvious addiction to gambling does threaten to jeopardize the bank’s solvency.  What happens then?

 

Does the bank file bankruptcy?  Does the FDIC take it over, fire the executives, clean it up and re-sell it to the private sector?  Or, does it just mean that the U.S. taxpayer is forced to bail out the bank once again because it’s deemed too big to fail?  Because as long as it’s the latter… that’s the point.

 

Dimon also commented on the things he said a few weeks ago during a conference call, when he referred to the danger of what ultimately happened as being “a tempest in a teapot,” which is an idiom that refers to a small thing that’s been blown out of proportion.  On “Meet the Press,” Dimon said…

 

“So first of all, I was dead wrong when I said that.  I obviously didn’t know because I never would have said that. And one of the reasons we came public was because we wanted to say, ‘You know what, we told you something that was completely wrong a mere four weeks ago.’”

 

Yes, and that’s also the point, is it not?  Like all human beings, even the CEO of JPMorgan Chase can simply be wrong.  And the American taxpayer doesn’t want to be on the hook for however many billions wrong he or she is from time to time because what happened here that cost the bank $2 billion didn’t have anything to do with commercial banking.  So, there’s no reason in the world for us to be involved.

 

If we weren’t involved… if we could be sure that we weren’t going to be on the hook for the bank’s insolvency, then we wouldn’t care about any of this.  JPMorgan Chase could place multi-billion bets on which side of a room a fly will land on for all we would care.  We’d gladly sit on the sidelines and cheer as the bank gambled hundreds of billions on the derivatives of derivatives of derivatives.  We’d even go pay-per-view, like the ultimate poker challenge.

 

 

We like gamblers and big bets… we’re just too wimpy to be involved in making them ourselves.  Besides, we never seem to get to participate in the upside of these things, only the downside.

 

Success-haters hurt our recovery…

 

Lastly, Dimon said something during his interview that really got my goat.  Basically, he said that he’s sick of Americans being resentful of “success,” that “attacks on successful people,” were somehow harming our economic recovery.  And I have to say something about that because it’s just out of control ridiculous.

 

Americans are absolutely NOT resentful of success, in fact, we adore success… worship it, even.  In fact, success is like… our favorite thing in the whole world.  We’re success junkies.

 

In truth, we don’t resent failure either.  What we do resent is failure that comes as a result of irresponsible gambling in entirely unregulated environments and for which we have no choice but to pick up the tab.  That, we most definitely resent, at the very least.  We actually hate that with the white-hot intensity of a thousand suns.

 

We also resent that JPMorgan Chase was bailed out by taxpayers in 2008 and 2009, and continues to be allowed to profit based on a slew of special loan programs and accounting accommodations, while simultaneously foreclosing at will on homeowners who are only in their current situation because of Wall Street’s unregulated gambling addiction, appalling lack of judgment, and non-existent risk management systems.

 

Oh, and admittedly we’re not exactly nuts over Jamie’s $20.8 million in compensation for 2010 either, I suppose.  In 2010, his compensation went up by 1500 percent increase over the $1.3 million he was paid in 2009, if I’ve got my numbers right… and I do.  That’s one heck of a raise, I’d say.  What in the world did he do in 2010 that justified a 1500 percent raise?

 

(According to Reuters, he did quite a bit better than that in 2010, cashing in options and grants awarded during previous years for a grand total of $42 million that year.  And that same year his compensation also included $421458 in “moving expenses,” which would make total sense had he relocated from Chicago to the Uhuru Peak of Mount Kilimanjaro maybe.)

 

 

And all of that is to say nothing about the $35.8 million he received in 2008, the year he piloted his ship directly into the rocks and sunk it, were it not for the largesse of the U.S. taxpayer.  That was certainly a “successful year,” right Mr. Dimon?

 

You see, it’s not because we resent success that we give Jamie Dimon such a hard time, it’s because these days, we have a hard time viewing Dimon as “a success.”

 

Now, maybe if he would disclose his bank’s credit default swap counterparty positions, and off-balance sheet transactions, and conformed to GAAP accounting principals for valuing assets and recognizing losses… maybe then…

 

Or, maybe if his bank modified mortgages that were NPV positive even if it required a principal forbearance or, God forbid, a reduction, because keeping people in homes under these circumstances is simply the right thing to do.  Or, maybe if he just supported some sort of reasonable plan to handle things better than they’ve been handled to-date for America’s homeowners…

 

I’m sure then, we’d see Jamie Dimon as a major success, and wouldn’t care so much how much money he made…

 

Ya’ think?

 

Mandelman out.

 

In case you missed JPMorgan Chase’s CEO, Jamie Dimon on Meet the Press, hereeees… JAMIE!

 

 

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

May
12

UTAH Foreclosure Help from Mandelman Matters – START HERE

 

You have found the Mandelman Matters state specific series of pages dedicated to homeowners at risk of foreclosure in Utah.

On the pages in this section you’ll find accurate, straightforward information and guidance specific to the State of Utah related to such topics as loan modifications, short sales, foreclosure defense litigation, bankruptcy… and other topics related to getting through the foreclosure crisis.

 

We’ve created these Utah specific pages in response to the proliferation of scammers polluting the Internet with misinformation and outright lies intended to sell something to homeowners at risk of foreclosure that they don’t need.  These sites are literally everywhere, and some are very good at appearing credible, when in fact they are nothing more than elaborate cons.

 

Well, we’ve taken great care to make sure that the information you’ll find here is always correct… always impartial… always based on real facts… and always easy to understand.

 

In case you’re not already familiar with me, my name is Martin Andelman and for going on four years, I’ve been writing the widely read blog Mandelman Matters.  Over the last three and a half years, I’ve written more than 650 in-depth articles covering the political, economic, social and legal aspects of the financial and foreclosure crises.

 

I decided that I had to do more to help stop homeowners from getting ripped off, by providing the state specific information homeowners need to make the right decisions for their individual goals and circumstances.  Moving forward on the best possible path… that’s what my state specific pages are all about.

 

And just so you know, I’ve never been in the mortgage business or the real estate business, but for more than twenty years I’ve been a writer that specializes in making complex subjects easy for people to understand… oh yeah, and people say I’m funny.  I have in-depth experience writing about subjects that fall under the broad headings of accounting, insurance, financial services and law.

 

You can read a lot more about me HERE, HERE, and HERE.

 

You may want to start by getting to know my trusted attorney for the State of Utah, Walter Keane.

 

No one pays to be listed as a trusted attorney on Mandelman Matters… that’s just not how it works.  The lawyers I list as trusted… are simply those I trust.  And when I say that, I mean that I would trust these people to represent me, or to watch my house while I went away on vacation for the summer.

 

In order to write close to 700 articles on the economic situation we’re facing today, I had to learn everything possible about the mortgage and foreclosure crises.  Not only did I read dozens of books, research reports, court decisions, and more… I also had to interview a lot of people and many were attorneys from all over the country.  Over time, some became good friends.  So, when homeowners would call me to ask if I could recommend a lawyer, I would refer them to one that I had gotten to know well, and trusted.

 

So, in Utah, my trusted attorney is Walter Keane, and if you CLICK HERE, you’ll be taken to the Utah state specific page on which you can get to know him by watching a documentary style video on which Walter talks about the foreclosure crisis in Utah.

 

Walter became somewhat famous last year when he successfully quieted the title for four Utah homeowners.  Unfortunately, as he explains, that window is no linger open in Utah, but there are still things that can be done to fight a foreclosure action.  To hear a Mandelman Matters podcast featuring Walter Keane, CLICK HERE.

 

As a Mandelman Matters trusted attorney, Walter has agreed to take calls from Utah homeowners who have questions about foreclosures, and help them by providing answers regardless of whether the caller decides to hire his firm or not.  So, if you want to talk with someone who knows foreclosure in Utah, please don’t hesitate to call him.

 

For Walter’s contact information CLICK HERE.

And, if you’re looking for State Resources, CLICK HERE.

Need to know more about Utah Foreclosure Laws, CLICK HERE.

Want to read my latest post about Utah on Mandelman Matters?

Deceptive Foreclosure Headlines Spread Like Wild Fire in Utah

May
11

Friday predictions: Which dumb distraction will Obama’s campaign use next week to avoid talking about jobs?

Party of Ideas™.


I think I’m going to make this a regular Friday feature. We’ll be dealing with a new Obama-manufactured nontroversy every week from now until the economy starts to wake up and give him something meaningful to talk about. Why not try to guess next week’s shiny object ahead of time? Says the Examiner: The Labor [...]

Read this post »

May
11

Fast response: RNC already up with Obama-forgot-the-recession spot

Memory.


Yesterday, Barack Obama told an audience at a campaign rally that “sometimes I forget” the magnitude of the recession … and today, the RNC wants to make sure everyone remembers this quote.  Their rapid-response team already has a video spot up less than 24 hours later, complete with somber, funereal music and the obvious data [...]

Read this post »

May
11

Rasmussen daily tracking poll gives Romney his best lead yet

Bad week at the O corral.


A bad jobs report and an evolution out of the mainstream didn’t do any favors for Barack Obama’s standing in the presidential race against Mitt Romney.  Rasmussen’s daily tracking poll shows Obama dropping back seven points in the three-day rolling average, while Romney hits the 50% mark for the first time: The Rasmussen Reports daily [...]

Read this post »

May
11

Jobless benefits end for 230,000 this weekend

Wages of bad data.


Eight states will cut off long-term jobless benefits this weekend, which comes from an agreement in Washington to dial down the length of benefits from 99 weeks to 79.  The move will add more than 230,000 to the numbers of those cut off in 19 other states, bringing the total this year to over 400,000 [...]

Read this post »

May
11

Attention Homeowners & Lawyers: AG Mortgage Settlement Launches Online Complaint Sites

Finally, there are places online where homeowners, lawyers and other advocates can go to lodge complaints about a mortgage servicer’s handling of mortgage modifications, et al.  And all I can say is, it’s about time.

 

A story by Ben Hallman in the Huffington Post, quoted Joseph Smith, the ex-banking commissioner charged with enforcing the national mortgage settlement…

 

“This allows me, as monitor, to hear complaints and learn more about advocates’ impressions of how the settlement is working,” he said. “Although I’ll extensively review reports and monitoring from the banks and my own team of auditors, it is still critical for me to receive information from the heart of each community this settlement serves.”

 

Now, it’s probably at least somewhat important to remember that Smith has no power to investigate individual complaints or help individual homeowners in any way. Here’s what it says on the complaint form in bold…

 

“Please note that the Monitor cannot intervene with the servicer on behalf of your individual client.”

 

Of course, I’d also guess that he doesn’t have the manpower to read the hundreds of thousands of complaints the sites would no doubt receive if homeowners and their lawyers were actually to hear about the website.  (I’m also betting that there’s not much of an advertising budget with which they’ll be getting the word out across the nation.)

 

But, so what?  There may be another way to view these new online complaint sites.

 

Sure, there won’t be any action taken based on the complaints filed online, and nothing will likely change as a result.  And I realize that if a homeowner is being dual-tracked, can’t get a response from a mortgage servicer for months, or is losing a home to a wrongful foreclosure, these sites may only represent websites effectively dedicated to ignoring complaints online.

 

But, wait… there may be more.  Here’s what it says on the new sites…

 

“The Monitor and the Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight can assist you by providing information about the organization in your state that is appropriate for you depending on your situation. By filling out the simple form below, you will open a webpage that has state-specific contact information of various organizations that may be able to help you. The Monitor will use this information to better understand how the servicers are treating their customers and detect any patterns in violation of the agreement.”

 

So, I really do hope that everyone takes advantage of the new websites should they have problems with their servicers related to the National Mortgage Settlement.  Here’s what Mr. Smith says about the two new sites…

 

“Lawyers, caseworkers and other consumer advocates are the eyes and ears on the ground who will know first, and know intimately, what kind of difference these payments, adjustments and programs are making,” Smith said. “That’s why we’ve created this dedicated tool -– to see what they’re seeing.”

 

Look, people… the man used to be the banking commissioner in North Carolina, but now Mr. Smith has gone to Washington and he says he needs us to be his “eyes and ears on the ground,” as far as the AG settlement’s effectiveness goes.  So, let’s not let him down, okay?

 

 

Besides, if you consider the math, the whole thing becomes that much more fun…

 

Assuming one person can read a complaint in 10 minutes, and they were to read them 6 hours each day, working the standard 2080 hours a year, it would take 1.3 years to read 100,000 complaints.

 

So, if the same numbers applied and there were a million complaints, it would take 13.3 years for one person… they’d need to hire a thousand people to get it done in 1.3 years.  And that assumes everyone is writing fairly short complaints.  Stretch those babies out to a 20-minute read and now we’re talking two thousand people to read them in 1.3 years.

 

So, look… do you want to help create jobs in this country or what?  Oh, and don’t forget to attach a large file to your complaint, I’m sure the servers are quite robust, and someone may want to read the details.  Like they said back in the 60s… can you dig what I’m saying here?

 

So, for HOMEOWNERS who want to file a complaint having to do with the National Mortgage Settlement, click here: WHERE CAN I FIND HELP?

 

For LAWYERS or ADVOCATES. click here: REPORT CLIENT ISSUES HERE.

 

Here’s a list of topics under which your complaint may fall, as listed on the new sites…

Documentation: Documentation problems with foreclosure, bankruptcy or your loan file

Fees: Improper assessment of fees, including default, foreclosure, bankruptcy, attorney, late, or third party fees.

Loan Modification: Failure to modify or refinance loan.

Customer Service: Poor customer service, including no single point of contact or no customer portal.

Third Party Firms: Failure to properly oversee firms working for servicer on your mortgage.

Military Personnel: Failure to comply with legal protections afforded military personnel.

Bankruptcy: Improper failure to provide relief to homeowners in bankruptcy.

Force Placed Insurance: Required purchase of property insurance unnecessarily or improperly.

Community Blight: Failure to minimize community blight.

Tenant Rights: Violation of the rights of tenants in foreclosed properties.

Other: __________.  No issues. I just would like further information

 

The Huffington Post story also pointed out that the federal government has also made available two other avenues where borrowers can appeal for direct assistance.

 

1. CFPB

One is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which you can access here: File a Mortgage Complaint.  According to the Huffington Post, the CFPB,

 

“… promises to forward a grievance to the financial institution, assign it a tracking number and keep borrowers updated on the status.”

 

So, that’s very exciting, I would think.  I mean, if nothing else it sounds like you’ll have your very own individual tracking number, so that’s something right there.  I wonder how effective it will be when trying to persuade a judge not to have you evicted?

 

“But, hold on Your Honor… not so fast… have I showed you my tracking number?”

 

 

2. The OCC

And for homeowners who were in foreclosure during 2009 and 2010, don’t forget about the OCC’s infamously dishonest and entirely corrupt, Independent Foreclosure Review, which you can access here: Submit a Request for Review.  I visited the site to check out what would be involved and the best part was that right in the middle of the page there’s a warning for homeowners that reads:

 

“Watch out for scams – There is only one Independent Foreclosure Review.”

 

So, for parents reading this who have been looking for a really good example with which you could teach your children the meaning of the word “IRONY,” I’d have to say that your search has ended. 

 

The deadline to submit your complaint is July 31st, so if you’re planning to be condescendingly placated by the equivocation of your claims, you don’t want to put it off.  Fewer than three percent of eligible homeowners have submitted their cases for review, so the Obama Administration is no doubt planning to announce that 97 percent of those foreclosed on during those two years were okay with it.  I think that’s really taking one for the team, and I, for one, salute you.

 

And although it would seem that no flaws have been uncovered as yet, that’s no reason not to participate in the process.  I mean, look… someone has to win something, right?  Like the lottery.  Or, maybe not in this case… I really don’t know.

 

Here’s what the OCC’s site says about the review:

 

“The Independent Foreclosure Review will determine whether individual borrowers suffered financial injury and should receive compensation or other remedy because of errors or other problems during their home foreclosure process.”

 

The OCC’s site also STRONGLY WARNS HOMEOWNERS who want to file their case for independent review NOT TO PAY A LAWYER to help them do it under any circumstances.

 

Good heavens no… who would ever think of doing such a thing?  I mean, give us some credit, would you?

 

I think everybody knows by now that when it comes to authoring a document that alleges the suffering of financial injury for which damages or other remedy may be assessed in conjunction with errors committed by a party purporting to be the holder in due course or to have been assigned the rights of a beneficiary to a deed of trust, and or the substitute trustee who is seeking to enforce said rights as part of a foreclosure or unlawful detainer action… the last thing you’d ever want to do is hire a lawyer.

 

Sheesh, it’s not like we’re children.

 

After all, we handled getting our mortgages all by ourselves, initialing and signing all those contractual pages containing 3 point type about how our snapping turtle, spring loaded mortgage might result in payments that exceed our monthly income by three-fold at a time when the credit markets would require a 780 FICO and 30 percent equity to refinance.

 

And if we can competently handle that sort of complicated transaction, surely we all know not to pay a lawyer a nickel for something as simple as filing a complaint with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

 

Look, even if the OCC finds nothing was wrong with the foreclosures in 2009 or 2010, I think we’ll all be able to join in a giant collective sigh of relief.  At least we’ll know that no one “suffered financial injury” because of errors in the foreclosure process during those two years, and we can finally move from insult to injury as we close the chapter on the unnecessary destruction of some two million family’s lives.

 

It reminds me of the stress tests they use with the banks… you know, the ones where every bank always passes.  Like something from a Monty Python skit.  Aren’t those the best?

 

Move along people, there’s nothing to see here.

 

Mandelman out.

May
11

Attention Homeowners & Lawyers: AG Mortgage Settlement Launches Online Complaint Sites

Finally, there are places online where homeowners, lawyers and other advocates can go to lodge complaints about a mortgage servicer’s handling of mortgage modifications, et al.  And all I can say is, it’s about time.

 

A story by Ben Hallman in the Huffington Post, quoted Joseph Smith, the ex-banking commissioner charged with enforcing the national mortgage settlement…

 

“This allows me, as monitor, to hear complaints and learn more about advocates’ impressions of how the settlement is working,” he said. “Although I’ll extensively review reports and monitoring from the banks and my own team of auditors, it is still critical for me to receive information from the heart of each community this settlement serves.”

 

Now, it’s probably at least somewhat important to remember that Smith has no power to investigate individual complaints or help individual homeowners in any way. Here’s what it says on the complaint form in bold…

 

“Please note that the Monitor cannot intervene with the servicer on behalf of your individual client.”

 

Of course, I’d also guess that he doesn’t have the manpower to read the hundreds of thousands of complaints the sites would no doubt receive if homeowners and their lawyers were actually to hear about the website.  (I’m also betting that there’s not much of an advertising budget with which they’ll be getting the word out across the nation.)

 

But, so what?  Sure, there won’t be any action taken based on the complaints filed online, and nothing will likely change as a result.  But, at least now, if a homeowner is being dual-tracked, can’t get a response from a mortgage servicer for months, or is losing a home to a wrongful foreclosure, there’s a website effectively dedicated to ignoring complaints online.

 

Very cool, don’t you think?

 

I for one am glad to see that this country is finally taking the foreclosure crisis seriously and that my tax dollars are being put to good use, and I really do hope that everyone take advantage of the new websites.  Here’s what Mr. Smith says about the two new sites…

 

“Lawyers, caseworkers and other consumer advocates are the eyes and ears on the ground who will know first, and know intimately, what kind of difference these payments, adjustments and programs are making,” Smith said. “That’s why we’ve created this dedicated tool -– to see what they’re seeing.”

 

Look, people… the man used to be the banking commissioner in North Carolina, but now Mr. Smith has gone to Washington and he says he needs us to be his “eyes and ears on the ground,” as far as the AG settlement’s effectiveness goes.  So, let’s not let him down, okay?

 

 

Consider the math, and the whole thing becomes much more fun…

 

Assuming one person can read a complaint in 10 minutes, and they were to read them 6 hours each day, working the standard 2080 hours a year, it would take 1.3 years to read 100,000 complaints.

 

So, if the same numbers applied and there were a million complaints, it would take 13.3 years for one person… they’d need to hire a thousand people to get it done in 1.3 years.  And that assumes everyone is writing fairly short complaints.  Stretch those babies out to a 20-minute read and now we’re talking two thousand people to read them in 1.3 years.

 

So, look… do you want to help create jobs in this country or what?  Oh, and don’t forget to attach a large file to your complaint, I’m sure the servers are quite robust, and someone may want to read the details.  Like they said back in the 60s… can you dig what I’m saying here?

 

So, for HOMEOWNERS who want to file a complaint having to do with the National Mortgage Settlement, click here: WHERE CAN I FIND HELP?

 

For LAWYERS or ADVOCATES. click here: REPORT CLIENT ISSUES HERE.

 

The Huffington Post story also pointed out that the federal government has also made available two other avenues where borrowers can appeal for direct assistance.

 

One is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which you can access here: File a Mortgage Complaint.  According to the Huffington Post, the CFPB,

 

“… promises to forward a grievance to the financial institution, assign it a tracking number and keep borrowers updated on the status.”

 

So, that’s very exciting, I would think.  I mean, if nothing else it sounds like you’ll have your very own individual tracking number, so that’s something right there.  I wonder how effective it will be when trying to persuade a judge not to have you evicted?

 

“But, hold on Your Honor… not so fast… have I showed you my tracking number?”

 

 

And for homeowners who were in foreclosure during 2009 and 2010, don’t forget about the OCC’s infamously dishonest and entirely corrupt, Independent Foreclosure Review, which you can access here: Submit a Request for Review.  I visited the site to check out what would be involved and the best part was that right in the middle of the page there’s a warning for homeowners that reads:

 

“Watch out for scams – There is only one Independent Foreclosure Review.”

 

So, for parents reading this who have been looking for a really good example with which you could teach your children the meaning of the word “IRONY,” I’d have to say that your search has ended. 

 

The deadline to submit your complaint is July 31st, so if you’re planning to be condescendingly placated by the equivocation of your claims, you don’t want to put it off.  Fewer than three percent of eligible homeowners have submitted their cases for review, so the Obama Administration is no doubt planning to announce that 97 percent of those foreclosed on during those two years were okay with it.  I think that’s really taking one for the team, and I, for one, salute you.

 

And although it would seem that no flaws have been uncovered as yet, that’s no reason not to participate in the process.  I mean, look… someone has to win something, right?  Like the lottery.  Or, maybe not in this case… I really don’t know.

 

Here’s what the OCC’s site says about the review:

 

“The Independent Foreclosure Review will determine whether individual borrowers suffered financial injury and should receive compensation or other remedy because of errors or other problems during their home foreclosure process.”

 

The OCC’s site also STRONGLY WARNS HOMEOWNERS who want to file their case for independent review NOT TO PAY A LAWYER to help them do it under any circumstances.

 

Good heavens no… who would ever think of doing such a thing?  I mean, give us some credit, would you?

 

I think everybody knows by now that when it comes to authoring a document that alleges the suffering of financial injury for which damages or other remedy may be assessed in conjunction with errors committed by a party purporting to be the holder in due course or to have been assigned the rights of a beneficiary to a deed of trust, and or the substitute trustee who is seeking to enforce said rights as part of a foreclosure or unlawful detainer action… the last thing you’d ever want to do is hire a lawyer.

 

Sheesh, it’s not like we’re children.

 

After all, we handled getting our mortgages all by ourselves, initialing and signing all those contractual pages containing 3 point type about how our snapping turtle, spring loaded mortgage might result in payments that exceed our monthly income by three-fold at a time when the credit markets would require a 780 FICO and 30 percent equity to refinance.

 

And if we can competently handle that sort of complicated transaction, surely we all know not to pay a lawyer a nickel for something as simple as filing a complaint with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

Look, even if the OCC finds nothing was wrong with the foreclosures in 2009 or 2010, I think we’ll all be able to join in a giant collective sigh of relief.  At least we’ll know that no one “suffered financial injury” because of errors in the foreclosure process during those two years, and we can finally move from insult to injury as we close the chapter on the unnecessary destruction of some two million family’s lives.

 

It reminds me of the stress tests they use with the banks… you know, the ones where every bank always passes.  Like something from a Monty Python skit.  Aren’t those the best?

 

Move along people, there’s nothing to see here.

 

Mandelman out.

May
10

Trade deficit jumped 14.1% in March

"Unexpectedly"!


Looks like Goldman Sachs has the right perspective on first-quarter growth, although perhaps not the right amplitude.  Earlier this week, GS warned investors that the Q1 GDP estimate would drop to 1.9% based on limited warehouse inventory expansion, but that the trade numbers for March might push it down even further.  Today, the Commerce Department [...]

Read this post »

May
10

Weekly jobless claims at 367K

Will the media please wake up?


Weekly jobless claims came in at about the same level as last week, although once again last week’s level was adjusted upward, this time by 3,000.  Last week, 365,000 new jobless claims were filed: In the week ending May 5, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 367,000, a decrease of 1,000 from the previous [...]

Read this post »

May
09

Romney scolds reporter after social-issues questions: “Aren’t there issues of significance that you’d like to talk about?”

"The economy? The growth of jobs?... The challenges of Iran?"


Via BuzzFeed, a fun way to end Gay Marriage Day. The key bit comes at 2:15 but watch from the beginning or else you’ll miss why he’s so exasperated. This is what I was getting at in this morning’s post about why O was willing to take a calculated gamble on endorsing SSM. Simply put, [...]

Read this post »

May
09

Former NACA Home Save Counselor Says Commissions Create Complaints


NACA stands for the Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America; a nonprofit that provides “Home Save Counselors” to assist homeowners trying to get their mortgages modified.  They put on really big shows at convention centers and have lines of homeowners waiting overnight… that sort of thing.

 

I’m not sure why, but meeting with a “Home Save Counselor” doesn’t make me feel like I’ll be talking with a commissioned salesperson who will be potentially making up to $1,000 on my loan modification case?  A “Home Save Counselor” is on commission?  What’s next?  Does the nurse in the Emergency Room get a bonus if I get an MRI?

 

Well, according to a reader of mine who wrote to tell me that he or she had been working at NACA and, among other things he or she found objectionable, was the compensation structure… or, the commission plan would be a better way to phrase that.

 

Here’s what my reader, who shall remain anonymous, had to say after working as a NACA “Home Save Counselor” for almost a year…

 

The pay structure at NACA is unbelievable.  They start you off at $12.00 and hour until you finish your training.  You’re told that within four months you should have built your pipeline.  Most of that pipeline consists of files transferred from those who have left the company’s employ.  

 

After training ends, your hourly pay drops to $8.00 an hour and becomes a draw against future commissions, the thinking being that by this time you should be closing loans – YEAH RIGHT.  The commissions could be anywhere from $750 to $1,000 – depending on the target (credit).

 

If you are licensed you get the 100% commission – if you’re not licensed you get only 80%, with the other 20% going to the mortgage consultant that pulls the bank application.  I could never figure out what happens to the percentage that I would think would be given to the mortgage consultant that qualified the member initially.  

 

The turnover rate is very high.  And they don’t appear to care who leaves or stays – they profit either way.  You can’t imagine how many mortgage consultants leave the company and never get that 80%.    

 

And you have to re-pay what they call, “The Draw.”  There are countless employees that owe NACA thousands of dollars, and are constantly fighting to receive their commissions.

 

Now, to begin with, I checked the NACA website and found they recruit for open positions right there.  Here’s what it lists as desired experience, just in case you’re interested in becoming a NACA “Home Save Counselor.”

 

B. EXPERIENCE: 

a.      Counseling

b.      Call Center

c.      Loss Mitigation

d.      Strong computer skills.

e.      Community Involvement

f.       Financial Services

g.      Mortgage brokerage, origination, processing and/or counseling is preferred.

 

Well, I was glad to see that they, at least, did include “counseling” on the list.  But, I can’t help but wonder how many people out there have a resume that looks like this:

 

“Mortgage brokers” who have worked for “financial services” companies…

Who have “loan origination” experience, having worked in a “call center”

With strong desktop underwriting… no, that’s not right… I meant, “strong computer skills,” and know what the term “loss mitigation” means…

 

Who are also “counselors involved in their communities?”

 

I only ask because I’ve known quite a few people in my 50 years on this planet, and I’ve personally never even heard of a… “Computer literate involved community counseling mortgage broker with telemarketing and loan originating experience in the financial services industry,” have you?

 

Do they even make those?

 

“Hello, Central Casting?  Yes, I’m looking for someone to play the part of a “Computer literate involved, community counseling mortgage broker with… CLICK.  Hello?  Hello?”  Huh, we must have gotten cut off… don’t you just hate AT&T?

 

Come on… I was born at night, but not last night.  Once you put “mortgage broker” on that list, you’re looking for a mortgage broker, right?  You know any mortgage brokers with diverse skill sets that you’d consider “many and varied?”

 

Why don’t they just say they’re looking for a mortgage broker to work on commission and sell people on applying for loan modifications?  They should let me write their ad on Craig’s List, I’d have the phone ringing off the hook.

 

Here’s what else it says on NACA’s website about working there…

 

“NACA staff have a passion for and commitment to community advocacy and the delivery of excellent services to working people.

 

The Home Save Counselor works directly with at-risk homeowners across the United States by providing comprehensive phone counseling. The Home Save process requires homeowners to complete information and submit documents through NACA’s website.  The homeowner can obtain comprehensive counseling either face-to-face in a NACA office or by phone through the counseling center. 

 

The Home Save Counselor should have experience with counseling, calculating income, budget preparation and traditional loss mitigation workouts. While NACA’s Home Save solutions are not the same as traditional workouts offered by lenders/servicers, we need those individuals skilled in traditional workouts so we may teach the Home Save process.

Home Save Counselors work from the Counseling Center and will be counseling homeowners over the phone. The Counseling Center is operating from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.  Employees work on two shifts.  NACA, at its discretion, may change the shift hours.  All Counselors may be required to work longer hours or additional days to accomplish the work.  Some staff are provided the opportunity to participate in NACA’s Save-the-Dream events which occur throughout the country.”

 

Well, the long hours are no problem… they’re working on commission right?  Commissioned sales people never mind working late as long as they’ve got “Ups” or “Leads” to “close on a loan mod deal,” after all they’ve got to cover their “nut” and “pay back their draw”.… is that about right for how I should be phrasing that?

 

It’s funny too because a few months ago my wife and I bought my daughter a new car for her birthday, and we both have such fond memories of the “Vehicle Attainment Counselor” we worked with at the VW dealership.  Actually, by the time we left in our new car, he had also helped save our marriage and made me understand my inner feminine child… oh, shut up, shut up, shut up!

 

He was a car salesman, which was fine by us as we were looking to purchase a car.  And I couldn’t pick him out of a line up today if there were prize money involved.  I can, however, describe the car we bought… it’s a Jetta TDI, black and tan leather… sunroof… gorgeous.

 

“Counselors,” is that what we’re calling them now?  How stupid do they think we are?  I don’t have a stockbroker, I’ve got a “Monetary Separation Counselor,” is that the deal?

 

Look… I have wanted to like NACA ever since I started reading about how Bruce Marks was delivering old furniture to the front lawns of bank CEOs… he seemed like a guy after my own heart for a while.  But all I ever hear from homeowners is that they went to a NACA Revival Show, and either nothing happened, or something bad did.  It’s never a positive experience… never.

 

And now maybe I’ve discovered why… commissioned mortgage brokers masquerading as “counselors from the community,” making up to a grand for selling loan mods.  You know, I’ve been wondering where all the mortgage brokers who used to sell loan mods went ever since the FTC’s and AG’s task forces started shutting them down a few years back, and the MARS rule pretty much put anyone out of business all over the country, if they weren’t already.

 

So, now I know… they’re at NACA… of course… why didn’t I think if that.  I should have realized that they’d all end up as “counselors” at a nonprofit housing counseling agency largely funded by HUD or other tax dollars of mine.  That is a truly lovely thought… now if you’ll excuse me I’m feeling some projectile vomiting coming on.

 

By the way, it’s not as if I’m the only one who feels this way about NACA… check this out…

 

Cleveland, Ohio — Homeowners should beware of an out-of-town housing assistance group that claims to help people get better mortgage terms, local foreclosure prevention groups say.

 

The groups — Empowering and Strengthening Ohio’s People, Neighborhood Housing Services of Greater Cleveland, Community Housing Solutions and the Cleveland Housing Network – issued a statement Wednesday against an event planned in late June, saying the sponsor jilted homeowners last time it came to town.

 

The Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America, in Boston, has scheduled an event June 28-July 2 at Cleveland’s Public Auditorium. The organization held a similar event in June 2009 at Cleveland State University’s Wolstein Center.

 

“NACA claims to have the best homeownership and foreclosure prevention program in the nation,” the local group’s statement said. “But that is no consolation to the hundreds of homeowners who were jilted by the organization the last time they came to Cleveland.”

 

Bruce Marks, NACA’s founder and chief executive officer, said the local groups were threatened because his organization has serviced 650,000 clients nationwide.

 

“It is just petty organizational jealousy,” he said. “It should be about the homeowners.”

 

Yes, Bruce it should be about the homeowners, but you’re not exactly the one to be on that particular soap box, are you?

 

Can’t you just see an ex-mortgage broker telling some homeowner that they’ll get a principal reduction and all sorts of other garbage because he needs the commish to make his Benz payment on Friday?  Close that loan mod, close that loan mod… good Lord.

 

Lou Tisler, executive director of Neighborhood Housing Services, said NACA staff assured many Northeast Ohio homeowners in 2009 that they would get mortgage modifications to keep them in their homes. Often, the “guarantee” didn’t materialize, and the homeowners ended up at the local agencies, he said. By then, months often had passed, making it more difficult to prevent homeowners from going into foreclosure, Tisler said.

 

“I have nothing against Bruce Marks,” Tisler said. “I have something against an organization coming in and building up expectations for people and then leaving town not making people whole.”

 

Yeah, I understand that sentiment… actually, no I don’t.  See NACA is Bruce Marks.  He set this thing up… made it too big to be competent, and now it’s causing homeowner harm and setting them up to be closed like they’re attending a time share presentation.

Oh, and there have been 19 complaints filed since 2007, as far as the Ohio Attorney General’s Office knows, and that includes the complaints relating to telephone solicitations and foreclosure counseling. Gee… so what does that tell us?  Maybe it’s that fewer people complain when they aren’t paying anything for the service they didn’t receive?  You think that could be it?

 

“Nineteen is a very, very small percentage given the number of people we’ve helped,” is how Bruce Marks responded, and he should try that argument out here with the State Bar or BBB.  I know firms with fewer than 19 complaints over the last four years, and thousands of satisfied clients… and they have a D- with the BBB.

 

No matter anyway… the complaints did not result in any action against the group, and why would they?  NACA’s a nonprofit with Home Save Counselors.  Now, if they were just a traveling circus of a high-pressure sale show hawking loans and loan mods, well, that would be another matter, right?

 

Oh, shut the front door.

 

People, I don’t know what to tell you about whether you should go to NACA or not… but if it were me and I was going to check it out… I’d keep my wallet in my front pocket so it doesn’t get picked, and I’d be every bit as suspicious as when talking to any other kind of commissioned salesperson.

 

For the record, I tried sending a couple guys to one of the events once, but the NACA goons spotted them looking like they might be cognizant of their surroundings and they threw them out.  It would seem that Mr. Marks doesn’t think his show is ready for prime time.

 

Too bad.  I wouldn’t mind slamming a few seniors into some crummy mods in order to pick up a quick Ten Gs for this weekend.  Come on, Bruce… I’d make one heck of a “counselor.”  (Wink, wink.)

 

Mandelman out.

May
08

Obama bailed out of North Carolina visit as traditional-marriage amendment goes to voters

Plus, incoherence is now contagious.


Is the new sensitivity on the gay-marriage issue at Team Obama really all that new?  Last week, the White House scheduled a visit to North Carolina today to talk about the economy, which would have been interesting enough in a state with a jobless rate above the national average.  With traditional-marriage Amendment One appearing to [...]

Read this post »

May
07

New Obama ad will “run on our record,” but leave out …

... ObamaCare and Dodd-Frank?


Will Team Obama run on the President’s record, or from it?  In their new 60-second ad “Go,” aimed at swing states, the Obama campaign tries to sell voters on Barack Obama’s accomplishments in his term in office.  However, a couple of omissions are rather telling: “We’re certainly running on our record,” senior Obama strategist David [...]

Read this post »

May
07

California Homeowner in Foreclosure Wins Quiet Title – It’s a Free House!

 

Well, just when I thought I’d seen everything…

 

A Riverside, California homeowner, Denise Saluto, who was in foreclosure filed for quiet title against Deutsche Bank National Trust, as trustee for Long Beach Mortgage, and its successors and/or assigns, and Washington Mutual Bank, successor in interest to Long Beach Mortgage Company… and won by default.  (And Washington Mutual, turned into JPMorgan Chase.)

 

That’s right… neither Deutsche Bank nor JPMorgan Chase responded to the lawsuit.

When this happens, the Plaintiff still has to present his or her case, but it’s unopposed so it’s not exactly the highest of hurdles.  After considering the evidence presented by the Plaintiff, the court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against the Defendants, thereby voiding her Trustee Sale and the Deed of Trust.  So, presto-change-o… no more mortgage… as in… it’s a free and clear house!  Ms. Saluto may still owe the debt, but the mortgage company is now like Visa or Mastercard, insecure because they’re unsecured.  And no one wants to be unsecured, especially in bankruptcy court.

 

Now, some will say that Deutsche Bank/JPMorgan Chase didn’t respond because they just forgot or whatever, but I don’t know whether that’s the case or not.  In fact, when their lawyer tried using this excuse, the judge was quick to point out that the file had been with the lawyer for NINE MONTHS before any efforts were made to get the default judgment set aside.

 

When a party loses by default like that, assuming it was an oversight of some kind, they usually appeal the decision as soon as they’re notified of the judgment by coming back into court to ask the judge to set aside the default judgment, claiming they weren’t properly served or something like that.  And depending on the reason they defaulted, and almost certainly in the case of a bank and a foreclosure, the judge will set aside the default judgment and let the case start over. 

 

As a matter of fact, if it’s within six months of the default, and the lawyer takes the blame, the court MUST vacate the default judgment.  It’s actually the only time you ever get to see a lawyer willingly accept blame for anything.

 

So, in this case, as one would think, Deutsche Bank did appeal the decision, but the thing is, they waited almost a year to do so, in legalese… the bank, “failed to establish diligence in bringing their motion for relief.”

 

“On February 5, 2009, Saluto filed a complaint against JPMorgan Chase Bank and Deutsche Bank to set aside a trustee sale for violations of title 15 of the United States Code section 1601 et seq. and 12 Code of Federal Regulations part 226.1 et seq., to cancel the trustee deed upon sale, and for quiet title.

 

Defendants failed to respond to the complaint, and on March 16, 2009, Saluto served a request for entry of default on defendants.  The next day, Saluto filed the proofs of service and the request for default with the trial court. The trial court entered default on each defendant on March 17, 2009.” An entry of default just means that the defendant cannot file a response.  The Plaintiff still must file a “default judgment package,” which contains evidence supporting their claims.

 

In July 2009, Saluto filed a request for entry of default judgment, and on December 15, 2009, default judgments were entered.

 

 

Then… a year went by before…

 

“On June 15, 2010, defendants filed a motion to set aside the defaults and default judgments under section 473, subdivision (b), which allows relief from an action taken against a party through mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect when the motion for relief is made “within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.”

 

To support the motion, defendants filed the declarations of their attorney, Jenny L. Merris; a vice-president of Deutsche Bank, Ronaldo Reyes; and a research analyst of JPMorgan Chase Bank, Harold Galo. The declarations stated that defendants had no record of receiving service and were not aware of the lawsuit until March 2010.”

 

So, on October 28, 2010, Judge Mark E. Johnson heard the banks’ motion.

 

At the hearing, Judge Johnson stated:

 

“Im going to deny the motion. I do believe that I am outside of the six-month limit. . . . I also dont see the due diligence. So if you want to re-bring it under [section] 473.5, I will look at that, but at least as to this ground I have before me, [section] 473 subdivision (b), Im denying the motion.

 

On December 3, 2010, defendants filed a motion to set aside the defaults under section 473.5. Defendants submitted new declarations of Reyes, Galo, and Merris in support of the motion.”

 

Deutsche Bank claimed the bank had “no actual knowledge of this action until in or around early April 2010 when JPMorgan Chase Bank’s counsel informed it that Plaintiff had recorded the Default Court Judgment against this property.”  Deutsche Bank’s declaration claimed, “This was the first time that Deutsche Bank became aware of the existence of this action.”

 

JPMorgan Chase claimed that it “had no actual knowledge of this action until on or around March 2010 when JPMorgan was informed that Plaintiff was seeking to refinance the property . . . and that Plaintiff had recorded the Default Court Judgment against this property.”

 

This time, Commissioner Barkley granted the motion brought by the banks thereby vacating the default judgment the Plaintiff had obtained about a year earlier. Saluto then appealed the decision to California’s Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Division Two, contending that the defendants’ motion under section 473.5 was, in essence, a motion for reconsideration, and defendants failed to comply with the procedural requirements of section 1008. (Don’t worry about section 1008 for a moment.)  Saluto also argued that Commissioner Barkley simply got it wrong, and that the default judgment should have been upheld.

 

Now, this gets kind of technical, but Section 473.5 says that when service of a summons fails to result in actual notice to a defendant in time to defend the action… and therefore a default or default judgment is entered… the defendant may serve and file a notice of motion to set aside the default or default judgment and for leave to defend the action.

 

Section 473.5 says that the notice of motion has to be served and filed within a reasonable time, but not exceeding the earlier of two years after entry if a default judgment, or 180 days after service of a written notice that the default or default judgment has been entered.

 

 

Basically, because JPMorgan Chase Bank said it discovered the default in March 2010 and Deutsche Bank said it discovered the default in early April 2010, but they didn’t file their motion under section 473.5 until December 2010, the appeals court found no evidence that the two banks acted “diligently” in bringing their motion for relief under section 473.5, and therefore the trial court should not have granted the motion that set aside the default judgment.

 

As far as complying with the procedural requirements of section 1008, mentioned above, the court said the following…

 

“Because we have found reversible error based on defendants failure to establish diligence in bringing their motion for relief, Salutos additional contentions are moot.”

 

So, that’s that for Denise Saluto… she won, quieted her title and now she has no mortgage on her home.  She may still owe the money to some entity, but the debt is unsecured… like credit card debt… whatever she owes it’s no longer tied to her home.

 

Pretty amazing, right?  If you would have asked me last week, I would have said there’s absolutely no chance that filing for quiet title will result in your loan being unsecured.  And I would have been entirely wrong because Denise Saluto just did it.

 

And again… did it happen because Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase somehow let this slip through the cracks?  Maybe.  Or, was it that the banks weren’t prepared to defend the quiet title action… as in, they couldn’t find the note, or the assignment was a forged and fraudulent mess.

 

Honestly, I have no idea what happened here, and I don’t think anyone else can know for sure either.  All we can know is what happened.

 

So, what could happen next?

 

I started thinking about what could happen from here for Denise Saluto.  Would she simply walk away with her free and clear home and that would be it?  Or, would the banks have another move on the chessboard that would reverse the decision and cost Denise her home?

 

I called around to various lawyers and other experts, asking if the banks could somehow get the decision reversed?  The answer: No.  The decision by the Court of Appeal is essentially final.  Sure, the California Supreme Court could overturn a decision by this court, but I’m told that the chances of that happening are so remote that it’s not worth considering.

 

So, there are no legal maneuvers that will change what’s happened, but I can’t believe that the bankers are just going to give up and go home on this either.  Maybe they will, but maybe they won’t, right?  So, what else could happen next to threaten the title to Denise’s home?

 

Ooops, we forgot… we sold it to someone else?

 

I’m not saying this is going to happen, but it occurred to me that a “new owner” of Denise’s note could show up on the scene with paperwork showing they bought it from the prior owner, either Deutsche Bank or JPMorgan Chase, before all this transpired.

 

You know, like a surprise owner that just happens to have appropriately dated paperwork showing that they are the owners of Denise’s loan and therefore the quiet title doesn’t apply… she’s behind on her payments, and therefore they are moving to foreclose.

 

Would this be fraud?  I would certainly think so.  Would that stop the bankers from doing it?  I would certainly think not.  And would it work and cause Denise to lose her home?

 

The lawyers, however, all tell me the answer is no.  None of that would happen… it simply wouldn’t work.

So, Denise Saluto does now own her home free and clear.  However, it seems very likely that she still owes the amount of her mortgage as an unsecured debt.  Lawyers have told me that she could potentially have the debt discharged in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, but it would depend on a few things lining up just right, including the value of her home being less than the homestead exemption.

 

In general, a judgment creditor cannot force the sale of your home unless your home can be sold for an amount that would satisfy all superior liens PLUS the amount of your homestead exemption.  It looks to me like equity of up to $75,000 is exempt if you’re under 65 years of age, and $150,000 if over 65, and if you’re married it’s higher still.

 

But, as with everything having to do with the law, there are plenty of caveats, limitations and nuances.  I found many of them in the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 704.730, but as always, check with an attorney before assuming anything because my experience has been that just because it says one thing doesn’t mean that it doesn’t mean another.

 

Okay, so what does this mean to me?

 

Well, in my opinion… that’s an interesting question.

 

For one thing, filing quiet title did work out well for Denise Saluto, and since I would never have predicted it happening in her case, I’m certainly not going to tell you it won’t happen again in yours, because as I said earlier… I don’t know why it happened.  It might have slipped through cracks, or might have been caused by other factors.

 

Ever since yesterday when I started reading the decision by the California Court of Appeal, I’ve been trying to come up with a reason not to file one myself.

 

The lawyers I spoke with all told me that you have to have legitimate doubt about who holds title to your home, or else you’d be filing fraudulently, but I don’t see that as being a problem for me or anyone else in this country whose been paying attention to the news these last few years.

 

I mean, since I do know that Mickey Mouse has been signing the Assignment of the Deed of Trust in most cases, and Donald Duck has been notarizing it, and since the President of the United States recently told the country that there have been thousands of fraudulent foreclosures, and with countless lawsuits alleging that Mortgage-backed securities are in fact, less filling, as opposed to tasting great… let’s just say that I would not want to be asked under oath who owns my note.

 

As far as my having legitimate doubts as to the holder of title to my home, I could assure any court under oath that when it comes to my hizzle, my doubt is rizzle… it’s legit.  Word.

 

(That was me trying to be “hip,” but let’s not tell my daughter because she will be so embarrassed.)

 

This decision got me thinking about all sorts of possibilities, truth be told.  Like, what if many thousands of people all filed for quiet title around the same time… like maybe a million homeowners… LOL.  I would definitely have to go pay-per-view to see that shiznit go down.

 

If JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche were caught bo janglin in Denise’s case, I’d have to wager that many thousands of quiet title filings would leave them in a tizzle(Oops, I did it again.)

 

So, realizing that I wouldn’t be the only one thinking this way, I went online to see how many sites there were offering to teach homeowners how to file quiet title, or represent homeowners who want to file for quiet title… and not surprisingly, there were plenty of them… some want thousands of dollars for their services, and some want anywhere from many hundreds to a couple thousand dollars for a kit that claims to help you do it yourself.

 

And because, even though I think it’s a long shot, I don’t think it’s more of a long shot than winning the lottery or having a slot machine pay off, so I got together with some lawyers and other experts and am putting together a comprehensive guide to filing quiet title, which won’t cost more than $100, and will offer everything the more expensive versions have to offer, and probably even more.

 

Will it work?  I have no idea, and I’d have to guess that the answer will be no a lot more often than it’ll be yes.  But, if you’ve decided to try it, at least this way you won’t have to spend a lot of money doing so.  For a hundred bucks, you can spin the wheel and if it doesn’t work… oh well.  And if it does… well, then… Woohoo!

 

(Look for the new site in the next few days at www.filequiettitle.com and www.quiettitlecalifornia.com)

 

If you want more information on the Mandelman Guide to Filing Quiet Title, email me at mandelman@mac.com and I’ll send you an email response with more details.  The guide will be packed with easy to understand insight and instructions, tricks and tips, rules and limitations, and even sample templates to make it easy to file your own complaint with the court.

 

It will help you do it right… do it cheap… and do it safely.  And I’ll be consulting with lawyers in each state, so I’ll have the specifics for your state included, if applicable.

 

I’m not saying you should do it… and after Denise Saluto’s outcome, I’m sure as heck not saying you shouldn’t.  All I am saying is that I’m going to make sure that you don’t need to spend a bunch of money trying it.  And it shouldn’t become the primary strategy to keep your home, because no one knows why it worked in the Saluto case… or whether it will work for you.

 

But, it does prove one thing fo’ shizzle… when it comes to the foreclosure crisis, no one knows what will happen tomorrow, because the only thing that’s consistent about this mess is its glaring and scandalous inconsistencies.

 

Mandelman out.

 


May
07

Debt Forgiveness – The IMF, Iceland, and the U.S. of the 1930s all say it works


The International Monetary Fund (“IMF”), in its latest World Economic Outlook, stated quite clearly that mortgage write-downs, among other forms of debt forgiveness, can deliver significant economic benefits by substantially mitigating the negative impact of deleveraging on a nation’s economic activity.

 

The report points out that our recession is being driven by households forced to reduce their debt leading to reduced consumer spending, which in turn drives us deeper into recession.

 

Daniel Leigh, the report’s author, made the concept simple for anyone, except perhaps Ed DeMarco of the FHFA, to understand…

 

“Because debt is acting as a brake on economic growth, it is important to unstick the brake.” 

 

I love this guy… he’s like the Forrest Gump of the economics set.  Now get this…

 

“The IMF has studied the response of a number of countries to situations where large parts of the population are burdened with high mortgage debt in a recession, and finds that such programs can help prevent self-reinforcing cycles of falling house prices and lower aggregate demand.”

 

That sounds suspiciously familiar… which country would fall into that category?  Oh yeah… ours.  The report’s conclusions go on to give me goose bumps…

 

“Such policies are particularly relevant for economies with limited scope for expansionary macroeconomic policies and in which the financial sector has already received government support.”

 

The report focused in on the household debt reduction program implemented in the U.S. during the 1930′s… and in Iceland in our current crisis, which it said can…

 

“… significantly reduce the number of household defaults and foreclosures and substantially reduce debt repayment burdens.”

 

The report also contrasted those successes with examples of failures to effectively deal with the fallout of an economic crisis… such as the current response to the crisis in the U.S.”

 

 

Oh, dear Lord people… what do we need a ton of bricks to fall on our heads?  Because if we keep doing what we’ve been doing to-date, that’s at least metaphorically exactly what is going to happen.

 

The report also said that programs must be designed with incentives for BOTH banks and borrowers to participate, “notably by offering a viable alternative to default and foreclosure.”

 

The IMF also pointed out that…

 

“The friction caused by such redistribution may be one reason why such policies have rarely been used in the past, except when the magnitude of the problem was substantial and the ensuing social and political pressures considerable.”

 

I’m starting to feel a little nauseous over here… is any of this ringing any bells for anyone?  Who is it that keeps talking about the need for…considerable social and political pressures?  Me, right?

 

The report also cited a study which found that, “political systems tend to become more polarized in the wake of financial crises,” and as a result led to problems generating collective actions… like DOERS, comes to mind.  Specifically, the report said that, “distressed mortgage borrowers may be less politically organized than banks – and this can hamper efforts to implement household debt restructuring.”

 

I think I’m going to need to lie down soon… but first I think I’ll go out to my driveway and slam my hand in my car door… in an effort to make the pain go away.

 

 

Join me in the Way Back Machine…

It’s the U.S. during The Great Depression of the 1930′s and FDR has just introduced the Home Owners Loan Corporation or HOLC.

HOLC will be using government bonds that offer federal guarantees on principal and interest to buy up distressed mortgages from banks.  The purchases will represent 8.4 percent of our country’s GDP in 1933.

HOLC will then be restructuring these mortgages to make them more affordable to homeowners.  The result will be that 80 percent of these restructured loans, roughly 800,000, will be protected from foreclosure.

Primarily, HOLC will extend the term of the mortgages, in some cases doubling the term, and converting the loans from variable to fixed rate loans, but HOLC also wrote off principal in many instances so that no loans exceeded 80 percent of the current appraised value.

Over the next twenty years or so these mortgages will be sold and the government will even make a profit by the time the program ends in 1951.

 

Referring to the HOLC program, the IMF’s report said…

 

“A key feature of the HOLC was the effective transfer of funds to credit constrained households with distressed balance sheets and a high marginal propensity to consume, which mitigated the negative effects on aggregate demand, which was caused by the recession and need for household deleveraging.”

 

In other words, it worked.  Well, I’ll be Bernanke’s Uncle.  Isn’t Ben supposed to be an expert on The Great Depression?  I could have sworn…

 

But wait… there’s more…

 

Apparently, this year Iceland has been forgiving mortgage debt for its citizens in an effort to stimulate economic growth and guess what?

 

It’s working there too!

 

 

The Icelandic government and the reconstructed Icelandic banks worked together to develop, “a template to be used in case by case restructuring discussions between borrowers and lenders.”

 

“The templates facilitated substantial debt write-downs designed to align secured debt with the supporting collateral,” or in other words, reduce the loan in line with the current value of the home, and make sure that the terms are such that the homeowner has the ability to repay the loan.

 

Brilliant!  What are they putting in their Cheerios over there?  We need some, whatever it is.

 

“The IMF found that such case by case negotiations safeguard property rights and reduced moral hazard.”

 

No kidding.  Do tell.

 

Then only problem was that the process was time consuming because as of January of this year, only 35 percent of the restructuring applications were processed.  Here in the U.S. we’ve been knocking our politically divided heads against the wall for four years now, and we’re nowhere close to having processed 35 percent of anything.

 

But, Iceland is obviously a country with advanced critical thinking skills, likely the result of not having CNBC or Fox News channels, so it has introduced a debt forgiveness plan which writes down seriously underwater mortgages to 110 percent of the current value of the given property.

 

Iceland’s officials did say that before debt write-downs really took off, it took the announcement of “… a comprehensive framework and clear expiration date for relief measure.”

 

See, that leaves the U.S. out, right there.  Name one thing we’ve done since 2006 that you’d describe as being either comprehensive or clear?  Go ahead… I’m waiting.  Okay, I’ll make it even easier… what have we done that’s been somewhat comprehensive and reasonably clear?

 

Right… that’s what I thought you’d say.  The only way we’ll be able to make this Iceland strategy work over here is if we can succeed by developing something that’s “narrow and muddy.”  Comprehensive and clear seem entirely out of reach for us.

 

So… how’s it going, Ice, Ice Baby?

 

“As of January 2012, 15 to 20 percent of all Icelandic mortgages have been or are in the process of being written down.”

 

Of course, as an intuitive economist once said, and I’m paraphrasing here…

 

“If you want to create the much-admired Danish model, you’re going to need some Danes.”

 

Iceland’s mortgage write-down program happened as a result of thousands of its citizens taking to the streets demanding that something be done about the debts the people had incurred buying homes during the bubble at what turned out to be wildly inflated prices.  At one point, they surrounded the country’s parliament building and started throwing rocks.

 

(And people laughed at me last year when I suggested that we form a group called, “People in Favor of Hitting Politicians with Sticks,” or PIFOHPWS… for short.)

 

Of course, in our country, there’s no way that would ever happen because we’re all way too ashamed to be seen on CNN in what would be called, “The March of the Deadbeats.”  Which is why I suggested the DOERS idea… stay home, send emails and other clever things through the mail.  Occupy without leaving your house, if you will.

 

Even though, you would think that by now more people would be figuring out that if home values fall by 60 percent or more… and unemployment soars past the 20 percent mark… there are going to be an awful lot of people that may look, “irresponsible,” but are purely innocent victims of a global credit crisis.

 

Are you listening, Rick Santelli, you odious, insufferable, unenlightened and ill-bred jackass?  I doubt it.  I think it’s abundantly clear that you haven’t been able to listen to anything but the droning that goes on incessantly between your pinned back ears.

 

So, how come the whole debt forgiveness thing is working so well over in Iceland, but if the issue even comes up for discussion over here, we can’t stop a parade of badly behaved adult children from whining about how they’re paying their mortgage payments and therefore would rather see the country mired in a 40-year economic funk than lift a finger that could potentially benefit someone who took out a second to remodel a bathroom?

 

Who are these people, and more to the point, who are their parents?  Because when the revolution comes, I’m taking them out first.  Our new society simply cannot be allowed to start with their sort of genetic defect.  Or, like the man said… you can’t fix stupid or petty.

 

Brendan Keenan, writing in the Independent.ie, had the following to say on the topic of the Iceland debt forgiveness strategy…

 

“It will probably be necessary in the end to do something of the kind in this country, but any government trying should tread very, very warily. We may not be Greeks, but nor are we Icelanders.”

 

That’s true… but what are we in the eyes of the rest of the world these days?

 

A spoiled, drunk 15 year-old waving a gun in their face?

 

Mandelman out.

 

 

 

 

May
05

Romney to Obama: Where are the jobs, Mr. President?

"The results are a continuing tragedy for millions upon millions of people."


The Obama campaign keeps trying to change the subject in this election from jobs and the economy to almost anything else — contraception, Swiss bank accounts, Seamus the Roof-Ridin’ Dog, whatever works.  Republicans have countered these arguments, but when they do so, they run the risk of making the distractions work for Obama.  Yesterday, Mitt [...]

Read this post »

May
04

New DNC ad: Take it from Rick Santorum, Romney’s terrible on the economy

Oh my.


This sort of ad is obligatory after a tough primary loaded with biting attacks from the nominee’s former opponents but rarely, I think, does it ever draw blood. Voters expect primary candidates to criticize each other. Usually it’s just noise. This one’s a little smarter than most examples of the genre because it has Santorum [...]

Read this post »

May
04

Unemployment rate at 8.1%, only 115K jobs added, participation rate shrinks again to new low

Total employment level actually fell by 169K.


The April jobs report fell short of analysts expectations, as only 115,000 jobs were added.  Consensus expectations had been in the 165K-170K range, which still would have been below the rate jobs were added in February, January, and December.  While the jobless rate dropped slightly, the number of jobs added came in short of March’s [...]

Read this post »

May
04

Unemployment rate at 8.1%, only 115K jobs added, participation rate shrinks again to new low

Total employment level actually fell by 169K.


The April jobs report fell short of analysts expectations, as only 115,000 jobs were added.  Consensus expectations had been in the 165K-170K range, which still would have been below the rate jobs were added in February, January, and December.  While the jobless rate dropped slightly, the number of jobs added came in short of March’s [...]

Read this post »

May
03

Retail sales slow, service index drops

Stagnant Spring.


All eyes will focus tomorrow on the April jobs report, but two more economic indicators hit today that underscores the weakening of the American economy in the spring.  Retail sales slowed down, perhaps thanks to a warm winter that shifted demand: With the early start of spring and Easter behind us, retail sales slowed in [...]

Read this post »

May
03

Retail sales slow, service index drops

Stagnant Spring.


All eyes will focus tomorrow on the April jobs report, but two more economic indicators hit today that underscores the weakening of the American economy in the spring.  Retail sales slowed down, perhaps thanks to a warm winter that shifted demand: With the early start of spring and Easter behind us, retail sales slowed in [...]

Read this post »

May
03

Weekly jobless claims drop to 365K

Weak.


Looks like the White House finally got a little good news today on the jobs front.  After several weeks of escalating initial jobless claims, the level dropped to 365,000 in the report for last week: In the week ending April 28, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 365,000, a decrease of 27,000 [...]

Read this post »

May
02

Krugman to Obama: You’re gonna lose unless you demand a huge stimulus package

Romney's ad Exhibit A?


Paul Krugman continues his Chicken Little tour in service to his new book, End This Depression Now!, by giving the Obama campaign a little free advice.  Did I say “free”?  Actually, it comes at a steep, steep price: In his book, which hit shelves May 1, Krugman laments the “shadow of economic catastrophe” we live [...]

Read this post »

May
02

ADP: Hiring slowed significantly in April

Factory orders tank as well.


How bad will Friday’s employment for April be?  The ADP report, which usually paints a rosier picture of private-sector job gains, shows a decline in growth of almost half from their March report: Employment in the U.S. nonfarm private business sector increased by 119,000 from March to April on a seasonally adjusted basis. The estimated [...]

Read this post »

May
01

Krugman: We’re in a depression, you know

Misguided budget-cutting?


I’m pretty sure this isn’t helpful for the Obama re-election campaign message.  His ads talk about the Great Recession, and how his audacious leadership has led us out of it into … oh, I guess we can call it the Great Stagnation.  Paul Krugman’s declaration of a depression interferes with that message just a tad, [...]

Read this post »

May
01

White Powder in Envelopes Mailed to Wells Fargo in NYC – Idiots happy it’s not toxic

Well, here we go.  In our race to the bottom… our attempt to see how far we can push it before we break something… our desire to see chaos American style… ABC News reported yesterday that at least seven locations in Manhattan, “primarily Wells Fargo Banks,” according to the story, received envelopes in the mail containing  “suspicious white powder,” police officials said.

 

Well, thank heaven it wasn’t the non-suspicious form of white powder… you know, the kind we’re all used to getting in our mail every day.

 

The message that arrived in the envelopes read as follows:

 

“This is a reminder that you are not in control.  Just in case you needed a little incentive to stop working we have a little surprise for you.  Think fast you have seconds.”

 

AP reported that the powder in the envelopes caused evacuations at bank branches, but no injuries, as if that last part mattered in the least.  Idiots appear to be happy that the powder was found to be cornstarch… as opposed to Anthrax, I suppose.

 

Gee, now that’s certainly a relief.  Whew, I guess we dodged a bullet there, didn’t we?

 

 

Manhattan police, about ready to round up the usual suspects and get a rope, initially suggested based on absolutely nothing that the envelopes could have been mailed by “militants from within the Occupy Wall Street movement.”

 

Luckily, a spokesperson for Occupy Wall Street denied any connection to the mailings… and that seemed to accomplish what exactly?  I guess the NYPD said, “Oh, okay… sorry about accusing you guys of potentially mailing Anthrax to banks in Manhattan?  Our bad.”

 

The police say they thought that Wells Fargo was the target of the mailings because it’s based in San Francisco, and what they described as “about half of a key dozen Occupy Wall Street members have backgrounds in Oakland, San Francisco and Berkeley… and SIMILAR INCIDENTS OCCURRED IN CALIFORNIA EARLIER THIS WEEK, police sources said.”

 

“A key dozen Occupy Wall Street members?”  So, now there are probably a few hundred who are convinced that phrase was referring to them… perfect.  And what exactly was similar about the incidents that occurred in California that no one seems to have heard anything about until now?  Was it the cornstarch… the mailings… the scary message inside?  How similar were these events exactly and why were they mentioned before now?

 

Another theory I just made up is that Wells Fargo was targeted because it’s stage coach logo is reminiscent of the old West, when Native Americans were the victims of genocide, so the FBI is said to be investigating Indian casinos in several states.

 

What?  My theory makes every bit as much sense as theirs does.

 

Others on the list of potential suspects include any number of the 8 million Americans whose lives have been destroyed by the foreclosure crisis, or any of the hundred million or so that are beyond pissed over bailing out banks with trillions while leaving the country’s working class to die on the proverbial vine.

 

Or the commies, it could always be the commies.  And let’s not forget the Jews, al-Qaeda, ex-military wackos, or a prankish band of Ivy League college students, saddled by student loans and out to have some fun.  Or foreigners, don’t forget foreigners.

 

In other words, police had no idea whatsoever who sent the mailings.

 

Embarrassingly, ABC reported that the Manhattan mailings, “mainly appear to have reached low-level workers.”  And New York police spokesman Deputy Commissioner Paul Browne incoherently blathered to ABC News:

 

“Apparently, the message was aimed at the mail room workers among the 99 percent.”

 

The police are saying that the mailings were intended for May Day delivery, but arrived a day early.  One official, according to ABC News, inexplicably said…

 

”They underestimated the efficiency of the U.S. Postal Service.”

 

Ha!  So, the joke’s really on them after all, right?  Didn’t think the USPS could foil your plans with their efficient inner city delivery, now did you?  Ha!  So there.

 

 

I’m reporting, however, that regardless of who the mailings appear to have reached, senior executive seat cushions at Wells Fargo and other banks are all being replaced today after being soiled as the news of the mailings and their enclosed powdery substance spread through the executive ranks.

 

I’m also reporting that I have instructed my wife and daughter not to go inside the bank for any reason, and instead only use the ATM after hours.  And I’m not kidding about that in the least.

 

No one should be the least bit surprised that this is happening, and it’s nothing to take lightly or brush off as nothing to be worried about… it’s scary as all hell because it’s a certainty, in my opinion, that it’s only a matter of time before people are killed in one way or the other as a result of what this country has allowed to happen to untold millions.

 

“This is a reminder that you are not in control.  Just in case you needed a little incentive to stop working we have a little surprise for you.  Think fast you have seconds.”

 

There’s a word for that sort of message, it’s “terrorism.”  And it can strike without warning and claim the lives of thousands… and there’s no way to stop it, and no one who cares about being punished for it after the fact.

 

The Oklahoma City bombing, April 19, 1995, claimed 168 lives, including 19 children under the age of 6 years old.  More than 680 were injured.  The bomb destroyed or damaged 324 buildings in a 16-block radius, destroyed or burned 86 cars, and shattered glass in 258 buildings nearby.

 

 

Timothy McVeigh believed that the bombing had a positive impact on government policy.  And what angered him then is nothing compared to the potential for rage that exists today.

 

During the 1930s, after the attack and attempted lynching of a judge (who was signing eviction orders) by 200 Iowa farmers who stormed into Judge Bradley’s courtroom in April 1933, the Governor of Iowa placed the state under martial law.

 

In Minnesota, similar degrees of civil unrest and the threat of violence led Chief Justice Hughes to declare a moratorium on foreclosures.

 

Expressing frank understanding that the nation’s economic catastrophe threatened political stability, Hughes remarked, “the policy of protecting contracts against impairment presupposes the maintenance of a government by virtue of which contractual relations are worthwhile.” 

 

Hughes found that the mortgage crisis in Minnesota justified the stay of “immediate and literal enforcement of contractual obligations” insofar as the emergency was real and no mere legislative subterfuge; the statute was designed for the benefit of society as a whole rather than particular individuals; and the legislation was temporary and no broader than necessary to accomplish its purpose.  Hughes also denied that the statute violated due process or equal protection.

 

A foreclosure moratorium is not what we need… it is a last resort.

 

What we need is a fairer and more compassionate process through which we can get through the foreclosure crisis.  The way in which foreclosures have been handled to-date has been wrong to the point of being barbaric, and we will continue to deny and ignore this truth at our peril.

 

Mandelman out.

Website Designed and Developed by Tampa Web Designer