Foreclosure Diaries | A Foreclosure Film in the Making Awaits Final Scene
Say it isn’t so! | Lawsuit: Bank of America Pocketed Court Fees in Foreclosures
- BofA Lawsuit to Stay in State Court | State of Arizona vs. Countrywide, Bank of America, et al
- Dutcher, Ferguson, Ahlers v. Recontrust, BAC, Bank of America | New Lawsuit Alledges Thousands of ILLEGAL Utah Foreclosures
- Pot, Meet Kettle | Bank of America Sues HOA’s, Trustees and Collection Agencies Over Foreclosure Fees
“Very Pro-Wall Street” | So Much for Schneiderman Being Tough on the Street
Abigail Field | Spotting the Bankers’ Latest Propaganda Campaign
Spears et al v. Washington Mutual | Federal District Court Judge Grants Class Certification in Mortgage Appraisal Suit
- Evaluation of Federal Regulatory Oversight of Washington Mutual Bank April 2010
- BAM | CA Appeals Court REVERSES Countrywide Class Action Suit Dismissal in DAVID H. LUTHER et al. v. COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al.
- Lender Processing Services aka LPS Hit with Yet Another Class Action Suit for Violations of Federal Securities Laws
Lee Camp | Is The U.S. Being Sold For Parts?
Lee Camp | Is The U.S. Being Sold For Parts?
Attention! Attention! | Fannie Mae Now Requires Servicers to Protect the Priority of Mortgage Liens by Clearing ALL Liens for Delinquent Homeowners’ Association Dues
- The Association of Mortgage Investors Laments the AG Foreclosure Settlement Filing; It Fails to Adequately Protect Homeowners; Will Likely Negatively Affect Average Americans, Unions, and Seniors
- Press Advisory | May 23: CA Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Announces Major Initiative to Protect Homeowners from Mortgage Fraud
- Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae vs Ben-Ezra & Katz, P.A. | Fannie Mae Tells Lawyer to Get on the Ball
The Great Foreclosure Deception; Big Banks Renege on Obama Deal
Lee Camp | 15 Crucial Facts NEVER Heard On The Mainstream Media
We’re Back! Trip to NYC to Meet Former Head of SIGTARP Neil Barosky and Nobel Laureate Joseph Stiglitz was Awesome
- AWESOME | Sarah Palin, Meet Linda Green (And MERS): Was Palin’s New Home Purchase Preceded By A “Robosigned” (And Fraudulent) Title Release
- Road Trip | Meet Attorney General Pam Bondi at the Bankers Club of Miami October 12, 2011
- Back Off Banksters! NY AG Eric Schneiderman Fights Back After Being Kicked Off 50 State Robo-signing Investigation
Foreclosure crisis now includes “Irresponsible Churches”

According real estate information company CoStar Group, as of March of this year, 270 churches have been sold after defaulting on their loans. In 2011 alone, banks sold off 138 churches, and that compared with just 24 such sales in 2008, and only a handful in the prior decade.
So, when did our nation’s churches become so incredibly irresponsible?
According to Reuters, analysts are now saying that this surge in church foreclosures represents “a new wave of distressed property seizures,” and that “many banks are no longer willing to grant struggling religious organizations forbearance.”
Well, thank God for that, right? (Pun intended.) Praise the Lord, and please pass the foreclosures, right? We need to get through the foreclosures… clear the market… let it hit bottom… isn’t that what Mitt Romney, Rick Santelli, House Republicans, quite a few Democrats too… and a slew of supposed economists have all been saying?
And for the Rick Santelli fans, please let Rick know that the reason that many of these churches are going into foreclosure is that they took out loans to remodel or refurbish, and since we know all too well that Rick’s Tea Partiers don’t want to pay for anyone’s kitchen remodel, I’m sure they’ll be in favor of throwing these churches out into the street as quickly as possible, right?
Are you listening Rick Santelli?
We can’t do anything about these irresponsible churches being lost to foreclosure because to help them in any way would clearly involve far too much “moral hazard,” isn’t that right?
Apparently, the church foreclosures are occurring regardless of denomination all across the country, although California, Georgia, Florida and Michigan are the hardest hit states. Reuters’ story also pointed out that, as one might expect, small and mid-size churches are falling into foreclosure more than the larger ones. And presumably the larger ones are also the richer ones.
Interestingly, that’s also true when looking at residential foreclosures. I’m pretty sure that studies show that richer people get foreclosed on less frequently than poorer ones.
I know what we need… a new program from the Obama administration. We can call it:
“Making Church Affordable”
Scott Rolfs, who is the managing director of Religious and Education Finance at investment bank Ziegler, told Reuters that, “… banks have not wanted to look like they are being heavy handed with the churches.”
Really, Scott, mister managing director? Is that what it is? Banks are concerned about looking too “heavy handed with churches?” Is that your story? Banks could give a rat’s petute how they look with fathers, mothers and children… you know, we call them “families,” Scott… or “voters.” Why should they care how they look with churches?
In fact, that’s what is so weird about this story. That banks are supposedly concerned about being “heavy handed” with churches. I don’t believe that, do you believe that? I mean… European banks didn’t seem to be too terribly concerned about being heavy handed with Greece… and Greece is an entire country full of churches.
Unless we’re talking about a bank (or American Express Travel Related Services of course), in which case they’re too big to fail and we should do whatever is necessary to bail them out, irresponsible is irresponsible, isn’t that right?
According to Reuters: “The factors leading to the boom in church foreclosures will sound familiar to many private homeowners evicted from their properties in recent years.”
Really? Do tell… (Shhhh… I want to hear this…)
Well, it seems that following the financial crash of 2008, quite a few churchgoers lost their jobs and next thing you know, “donations plunged.” And wouldn’t you know it, “at the same time, so did the value of the church building,” Reuters reported.
So, let’s just see here… financial crash… check. Lost jobs… check. Less money to spend… check. Appraised value of property plunges… and check. Yep, I’d have to say that Reuters was right. Those things do sound at least somewhat familiar to homeowners who were evicted in recent years. And probably to other homeowners as well.
Now, Scott Rolfs also says that church defaults are different from residential foreclosures, because “church loans typically mature after just five years when the full balance becomes due immediately.”
Scott says that in past years banks would simply refinance their balloon payment loans when they came due, but recently, come to find out… banks are “increasingly reluctant to do that.”
According to Scott…
“A lot of these loans were given when the properties were evaluated at a certain level in 2005 or 2006. Banks have had to reappraise the value of these properties, whether it’s a church or a commercial office building. Values have gone down, so the loans cannot continue in the same form.”
Hmmm… correct me if I’m wrong here, Scotty my boy, but that sounds suspiciously similar to a concept with which homeowners have become increasingly familiar of late. It sounds like what you’re trying to say is that the churches can’t refinance because they’re “underwater,” meaning that they owe more than their properties are worth, isn’t that about right?
And not only that, but it also sounds like your saying that the churches took out loans that had enormous balloon payments due in five years. Didn’t these churches know what they were signing, Scotty? That sounds pretty darn irresponsible to me. Reckless gamblers, I’d have to say.
You know what else it sounds like, Scott? Predatory lending. I wonder what would be happening to these churches if they had been offered low interest 30-year fixed rate loans. Do you ever wonder that same thing, Scott?
Well, I’ll answer that question for you, Scott: It sounds to me like they wouldn’t be in foreclosure today, Mr. Scott Rolfs at investment bank Zeigler. What would be your best guess?
Also, if banks were so concerned about churches being foreclosed on, why would they offer them loans with five-year balloon payments in the first place? What would be wrong with a 30-year fixed on a church, for heaven’s sake. (LOL… sorry.)
(By the way, in case you weren’t aware… five-year balloon loans are what fueled the foreclosure crisis that began in 1926, that along with the stock market crash of 1929, led to the Great Depression of the 1930s. So, you’d think that bankers would already know how well they work as far as keeping a lid on foreclosures, right? Or do we have some sort of educational deficiency or learning disability in play here?)
If banks cared about churches, they wouldn’t be putting them into loans that have enormous balloon payments due in five years, right? That’s not the kind of loan you’d put your mother into… is it, banker-people? Oh… or maybe it is. Okay, point taken… bad example.
Well, regardless… it’s not the kind of loan that I’d put my mother into, let’s just say that.
Flat Rock Church in Lithonia, Georgia, was founded back in 1860.
In 2005, the church wanted to build a new 300-seat church so it took out an $850,000 loan from Sun Trust Bank.
The loan came due in May of 2010, but wouldn’t you know it, Flat Rock Church didn’t have $850,000 laying around, and Sun Trust Bank wouldn’t refinance the loan because the church was now underwater.
So, Sun Trust Bank foreclosed. The church’s sale date has already passed.
Pastor Binita Miles said: “The bank has refused to negotiate and to this day I just don’t know why.”
The spokesliar for Sun Trust Bank was quoted as saying:
“We view foreclosure as an action of last resort. We have been working for several years to address the issue with the client in hopes of avoiding foreclosure.”
Is that right, Sun Trust Bank? You guys have been “working for several years to address this issue in the hopes of avoiding foreclosure?”
Several years? And you still couldn’t do it?
After several years working and you failed completely? Several years trying everything that you bankers could think of and still… not a thing could possibly be done? Even after several years working and hoping?
Why that must have been crushing for the bankers who spent several years working on this… HOPING… you did say they were hoping too, right? They were hoping to avoid foreclosure… for several years… as they were working, right?
My Lord… to think of all that working and hoping going on for several years… and then after all that to just fail completely? Wow… what a disappointment that must have been. You guys at Sun Trust must have been crushed. How do you even go on after something like that?
Now, I don’t know who to feel worse for… the church folk, or the bankers at Sun Trust Bank?
Oh, wait a minute… hang on… maybe I do. Here’s what Forbes Magazine had to say about Sun Trust Bank on April 18, 2012:
Leading up to SunTrust Banks‘ (STI) announcement of its first quarter earnings on Monday, April 23, 2012, analysts have become more bullish as expectations have improved over the past month from 29 cents per share to the current projection of earnings of 32 cents per share.
The current estimate reflects a 45.5% increase from a year ago, when the company reported earnings of 22 cents per share. For the year, revenue is projected to roll in at $8.57 billion.
Yeah, that did it for me… I feel worse for Pastor Binita Miles and the church folk that since 1860 have worshipped at Flat Rock Church in Lithonia, Georgia.
Even if they are an irresponsible bunch.
As far as I’m concerned, the Sun Trust bankers can go… forgive me Pastor… straight to hell.
Mandelman out.
George Mantor | What “Banks” Really Do
Husband’s Suicide Over Foreclosure, Wells Fargo to Evict Wife Anyway
BIG BANK TAKEOVER | How Too-Big-To-Fail’s Army of Lobbyists Has Captured Washington
Will America Ever Recover From The Housing Crisis (INFOGRAPHIC)
California | Brown Proposes Clever Raid of Foreclosure Fraud Settlement Funds
California | Brown Proposes Clever Raid of Foreclosure Fraud Settlement Funds
Trashed Out | Cash Buyer Sues Bank Over Foreclosure Error Claim – JPMorgan Chase Changed Locks, Seized Property
- Trashed Out – Deutsche Bank Acts Like Paid Off Home is a Foreclosure – Broke Down Doors, Changed Locks, Stole Belongings along with the Home Owners Sense of Security
- “Goat Poo” | Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v JPMorgan Chase Bank NA AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS OF JPMORGAN CHASE BANK
- JPMorgan Chase Sues Florida Foreclosure Law Firm Ben-Ezra & Katz, P.A. Over Files
A Letter to Brian Stevens at TBWS: We Need More Houses?
BRIAN! Dude… My good friend… Mi amigo de la Hipoteca clase… My favorite lender defender from whom laughs do engender… please don’t take me an offender… but as the message’s sender… a response to you I’ll tender… and my views I’ll therefore render…
Okay, I give in… that TBWS Daily was hysterical. I mean, people say I’m funny, but I can’t hold a candle.
Overall, I loved the show, but, if I may… there were just a couple things…
Just to make sure I understand what you said there… the problem is that there aren’t enough homes for people to buy? We’re having a shortage of houses for sale, are we? Wow… you know, I was sleeping and woke up to today’s video and for a minute there, I thought I must have dozed off for a decade or more.
But seriously… I had no idea that was the problem. Well, alrighty then… I guess I’m going back to work… Mandelman doesn’t matter anymore… our economic problems have been solved. And, thank heavens for that, because I was getting darn tired of writing about… um… well… I guess you could refer to it as… oh, I don’t know… how about… “the truth?”
Get more houses on the market? Seriously? More houses is what we need? Am I on Candid Camera, or is there a rabbit hole around here somewhere that I can’t see?
So, I guess what you’re telling me is that at this point, the banks are actually hoarding them… holding them back for their own heads? Foreclosing on more and more of them every day because they have a plan to corner the deteriorating home market? Or are they just trying to pay us back for bailing them out by offering to pay most of the property taxes in this country going forward? Or, maybe they just have a handyman fetish, so the more vacant homes the better? Nothing turns them on like monitoring property preservation companies?
Why would they be hoarding empty houses? Correct me if I’m wrong, but I was always under the impression that empty homes COST money as a result of their tendency to… what do they call it? Oh yeah… decompose.

Aren’t banks the ones that are always trying to MAKE money? Or have that backwards and banks are the ones that want to have the highest possible costs? I can never keep that one straight… like eating eggs for breakfast… are they good for me or bad for me? I can never remember… so I eat granola.
But, I digress…
Why do you suppose it might be that banks aren’t putting more homes on the market… or in the parlance of the economist… why are they limiting supply… making sure that it remains lower than demand?
Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

Well, it can’t be because they don’t like money, right? Right. Okay, good. I was pretty sure we’d have no argument there.
Could it be that they’re just so busy foreclosing and proprietarily trading credit derivatives for fun and losses, that they just haven’t realized that there are throngs of Californians and Arizonans clamoring to buy the homes they’re holding onto? Again, I’d have to guess that… no, that can’t be it either.
Okay, let’s try this… What happens when the demand for a good exceeds its supply? Oh, now lets not always see the same hands…
Brian? Is that you I see in the back of the room doodling? What’s that a picture of? That’s you sitting at a table refinancing a four-plex for a dentist? Yes, that’s very nice, but we’re trying to hold a class here, so if you wouldn’t mind…
So, what happens when the demand for a good exceeds its supply? Right, Brian! Prices go up… or actually, in this particular case, they don’t go down as quickly.
And just what do you suppose would happen if the banks decided to make a bunch of homes available for sale, as you suggested is the thing to do in today’s TBWS Daily? Do you think prices would tend to go up or down? I’ll give you a hint… the answer is the opposite of “up.”

And, if home prices were to go down even faster than they are as a result of all of the other factors that haven’t changed a lick, except to worsen… you know… like, unemployment, long-term unemployment, foreclosures, average incomes… GDP… the state’s $16 billion budget deficit that’s about to constrict the state’s economy even further as we cut services and raise taxes on the wealthy… those kind of things?
Well, if home prices fell further and faster I’d have to venture a guess that more people would find themselves underwater and/or further underwater… and that would mean what do you suppose? If you guessed further reductions in consumer spending, higher unemployment and more foreclosures… well, you’d be right once again!
And then what about all the people who, having been duped into believing that housing had bottomed, bought homes recently? Would they be gaining equity or losing it? Losing it, right! And assuming an FHA/new-sub-prime loan was involved many would be underwater by Christmas… and you know what that would mean, right?
Even more foreclosures! Maybe that’s why FHA is reporting almost 20 percent defaults on loans made SINCE 2009. It’s kind of funny if you think about it… we’re actually creating foreclosures over at FHA even faster than we can foreclose down the street at Fannie and Freddie. It’s very “Dr. Strangelove – Or, how I learned to stop worrying and love the bomb,” don’t you think?

And I did hear you say that the shortage was “at the low end of the market,” right? I’m sure that’s correct, because that’s the end of the market that’s not only less expensive, but also less experienced. Those are the folks easiest to convince to buy a home because it’s never going to be this cheap or the rates this low again… so, better hurry and get your offer in today… isn’t that about right, Brian?
Of course, I wouldn’t want to leave out my favorite flavor of scumbag, the vulture investors who envision this as a once in a lifetime opportunity to become full fledged slum lords, gouging the unfortunate and credit impaired with top tier rents for at least a decade while they put the absolute minimums into maintenance and scheme to hold onto security deposits in all cases.
No, I wouldn’t want to forget them.
See, it’s not that there aren’t enough homes on the market really, right Brian? It’s that there aren’t enough homes that can be purchased below market value that’s the problem. Realtors don’t really want more inventory… they want more inventory that can be purchased at distressed prices. I’ll be happy to put my home on the market tomorrow, just not at a price at which it would sell any time soon.
Don’t get me wrong… I do understand that the banks dumping homes on the market at distressed prices would make summer fun for Realtors and mortgage brokers… and Lord knows I do like seeing you guys having a good time… after all, you’re always a fun lot to have at a party.
But, since the banks doing what you suggest under today’s circumstances would only push us further into a recession, with housing prices falling even faster than they will otherwise, thus creating even more foreclosures… thus further destroying the housing and credit markets once the fun ends… well, I’d like to humbly suggest that IT’S A TERRIBLE IDEA.

So, if you put it all together… the worsening employment and overall economic conditions (except in the media where it’s an election year), combined with the tightening of the already tight credit markets… and with the unabated flood of foreclosures on the horizon (forecasted to exceed the number of homes lost to-date, by the way)… and the permanently broken private securitization market… CA’s $16 billion and growing state budget deficit… and the need for Washington D.C. to reduce spending going forward…
… to say nothing of the EU’s high wire act, sans net, that’s destined to see one or two countries fall to their deaths sooner than we think, thus causing us to nationalize or bailout several or more of our TBTF banks once again… and then factor in the possibility of Mitt Romney and the GOP actually winning in November… OMG, OMG, OMG… consider all that…
… And you’ll want to eat a gun.
But… STOP! Don’t do that. That is NOT the answer, Brian.
Just like it’s NOT the answer to… “put more homes on the market.”
From your good friend who loves you… and as always I remain…
Most sincerely yours…
Martin
xoxoxoxoxo…
Martin Andelman
Mandelman Matters
P.S. If I’m in town, I think I’m going to come to Anaheim to see you guys… I figure you’re just dying to buy me a beer. And tell Frank to be careful on that bike.
Mandelman out.







