SUTCLIFFE v. WELLS FARGO BANK | Wells Fargo Loses Bid to Dismiss Homeowner Suit RE Permanent Loan Mod
SUTCLIFFE v. WELLS FARGO BANK | Wells Fargo Loses Bid to Dismiss Homeowner Suit RE Permanent Loan Mod
Federal Judge Magner: Wells Fargo’s Behavior “Highly Reprehensible”

Does anyone know what’s happened at Wells Fargo Bank? If so, please let the rest of us know, because in a line up of TBTF bank CEOs, to stand out as being particularly awful is no easy task… and yet Wells Fargo’s CEO, John Stumpf has risen to the challenge and then some.
At the beginning of April of this year, Judge Elizabeth Magner, a federal bankruptcy judge in the Eastern District of Louisiana, characterized Wells Fargo’s behavior as being “highly reprehensible.” Think about that for a moment. That means that the judge decided that to describe Wells Fargo as merely “reprehensible,” wasn’t enough.
Wow, that is something. Can you imagine someone saying that about you… a federal judge, no less? I’m thinking that if a federal judge ever has the occasion to describe my behavior as being worse than “reprehensible,” I’m going to jail for a long time.
Of course, no danger of anything like that happening here… bankers don’t go to jail in this country, every one knows that. But, in this instance, after more than five years in litigation with a single homeowner, Judge Magner ordered Wells Fargo to pay the New Orleans man $3.1 million in punitive damages.
Now, if that sounds like a paltry sum for the likes of Wells Fargo, that’s only because it is. And that it represents one of the largest fines ever levied related to mortgage servicing misconduct hardly makes it feel any better.
It’s kind of like being forced to eat dog turd ice cream, but finding out that it’s okay if you pour motor oil on top. Does that improve your circumstances? I guess so, but…
Judge Magner, in her opinion, wrote…
“Wells Fargo has taken advantage of borrowers who rely on it to accurately apply payments and calculate the amounts owed, but perhaps more disturbing is Wells Fargo’s refusal to voluntarily correct its errors. It prefers to rely on the ignorance of borrowers or their inability to fund a challenge to its demands, rather than voluntarily relinquish gains obtained through improper accounting methods.”
So, what was Wells Fargo doing exactly? Well, they were systematically over-charging the people least able to do anything about it… those filing bankruptcy. In this case, Wells Fargo improperly charged the borrower $24,000 in fees, but it wasn’t done by hand, it was the bank’s automated systems doing precisely what they were programmed to do. Like, anything but an isolated incident.
After the borrower fell into default on his mortgage, Wells Fargo’s automated system began applying his mortgage payments to interest and fees that had accrued instead of to principal, as required by his servicing contract, which in turn led to him being charged with a virtual waterfall of additional fees and interest. And even after the borrower filed bankruptcy, Wells Fargo continued to misapply his payments, according to Judge Magner’s written opinion.
And why wouldn’t they? I know, it sounds weird to say it, but I think I would have been disappointed had Wells stopped there.
There’s even a terme de l’art for this scenario used by consumer lawyers… they call it a “rolling default.” I suppose the name refers to the idea that once the scheme gets rolling, it’s all downhill from there. I think it should be called a “boiling default,” because once it’s boiling, you’re goose is most assuredly cooked.
Or, wait a minute… hang on… how about we call it: “Getting Stumpfed.”
(Come on, admit it… I’m good.)
Judge Magner went on to describe Wells Fargo’s litigation tactics as involving the filing of dozens of briefs, motions and other filings clearly designed to slow down legal proceedings to such a point that anyone thinking of mounting a legal challenge against a bank quickly finds it essentially impossible.
And since it’s only through costly litigation that the insidious crimes of Wells Fargo become apparent, all the bank has to do is prevent those with limited resources from doing what they can’t do with limited resources. Now there’s a winning business model for you. Like making billions by stopping blind people from seeing.

What sort of a company engineers this sort of strategic core competency anyway? Remember Ford’s infamous Pinto strategy… rather than fix the problem, just settle them as they exploded? Well, this Wells Fargo stuff makes that look as benevolent as Girl Scouts selling cookies after church.
Wells Fargo actually engineered a strategy and built a system to rampantly abuse the individuals in our society least able to defend their interests. This is a bank that deserves to have a statue erected in its likeliness and even its own Lazarus-styled sonnet. I’m just thinking out loud here, but how about…
“The Statue of Larceny”
And inside the base, engraved on a bronze plaque, could be these words…
Give us your jobless, injured, bankrupt filers, whose lawyers won’t work free.
The wretched refuse against whom in court we’ll always score.
Send them one by one, homes all sold by substitute trustee,
We’ll rape them, rob them, force them out Wells Fargo’s golden door.
Not bad, right? No? Sheesh… tough crowd.
Judge Magner, in an interview with Ben Hallman of Huffington Post, said that she personally analyzed the loan files of twenty borrowers in her court and found supposed “errors” in every single instance. So, at least we know the systems are working properly, and somehow I find that oddly reassuring.
I don’t know why but there’s something even more terrifying about the idea that we might be getting ripped off by banks in an entirely random way. Like one day you get hit for a hundred… and the next day not only is your entire IRA gone, but two weeks later you learn that the bank bounced one of your checks to the IRS for the penalty on the early withdrawal.
I know, right? Now, that would be rude.
I guess I only have a couple of questions I’d like to ask, and the most obvious is: Why would anyone whose read about this decision continue to bank at Wells Fargo?
I mean, if they do this sort of thing systematically… AND THEY UNQUESTIONABLY DO, how do you know where the other spots are that are picking your pocket for twenty here and twenty there. Because you’re not going to tell me you think this case has uncovered the only place at Wells Fargo where this sort of thing goes on, are you? Come on… what are you, six?
And, my second question is: What do our elected representatives do these days… I mean specifically? State or federal, I don’t care which… you pick. Because it kind of seems like we’ve quietly been transformed into a lawless society in many ways, don’t you think?
Like in this bankruptcy case… the judge has uncovered the systematic stealing from the defenseless, but it’s not like it’s a major news story, or anything. To the contrary, it’s nowhere. Doesn’t anyone but me find that amazing? How do they do that? Where have all the journalists gone?
I can tell you that I receive more complaints about Wells Fargo refusing to approve loan modifications than any three other mortgage servicers combined. But then, Wells did modify one of the homeowners I wrote about a few months back. I don’t know why, maybe it was an accident.
Here’s one more thing Judge Marner said about Wells Fargo in her written opinion…
“These are loans of working-class people who bought homes they could afford and whose loans were not administered correctly from an accounting perspective,” Judge Magner said. “I think that these types of problems occur in almost every [defaulted] loan in the country.”
Good Lord.
So, Mr. John Stumpf… Wells Fargo’s CEO… you just go ahead committing those criminal acts with impunity. Don’t change now… go down with your ship. Besides, I’m sure there are deceptions your people haven’t thought of yet.
Do you have a program that targets autistic children yet? Or what about something abusive for unmarried pregnant chicks that never finished high school? Or, what about the elderly, are you doing enough to take advantage of the elderly?
I’m sure you’ll think of something, which is why I’ve told my wife and daughter to stay out of banks for the foreseeable future. We only make deposits at the ATM at night, which may sound crazy, but I’m betting will one day soon prove considerably safer than being inside during the day.
Lo siento. Que se mejore pronto.
Mandelman out.
Oakland County, MI Wins Federal Suit Against Fannie/Freddie for Transfer Taxes on Deeds
BELL v COUNTRYWIDE | Latest Foreclosure Ruling Sides with Utah Homeowners, BofA’s Recontrust Unit can’t Rely on Texas Law
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Promotes National Consumer Protection Week
- Utah Federal Judge David Sam is WRONG (IMHO) RE ReconTrust is Operating Under the National Bank Act Regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)
- Comptroller of the Currency Orders National Banks to Cover Up Foreclosure Scandal
- No Federal Preemption by a Trustee of a Mortgage Backed Security Trust from Senior Counsel of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Motion to Dismiss Denied | Bank of America May Owe “Foreclosure King” David J. Stern $11 Million
Breaking: Federal judge rejects Perry’s challenge to Virginia ballot law
Denied.
Gingrich, Santorum, and Huntsman failed to qualify for the ballot too, you’ll recall, so Perry’s loss is also their loss. Which means, unless this gets turned around on appeal, the Virginia primary ballot will consist of Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, and … that’s it. Huge news considering that, er, Romney and Paul will almost certainly [...]
Judge Jed S. Rakoff Says S.E.C. Misled Two Courts in Citi Case
Utah Federal Judge David Sam is WRONG (IMHO) RE ReconTrust is Operating Under the National Bank Act Regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)
- No Federal Preemption by a Trustee of a Mortgage Backed Security Trust from Senior Counsel of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
- No Federal Preemption by a Trustee of a Mortgage Backed Security Trust from Senior Counsel of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
- Comptroller of the Currency Orders National Banks to Cover Up Foreclosure Scandal
FL Homeowners Hit a Bump in Suit Over ‘Reprehensible’ Fraudclosure Court Filing Fees but Case Can Go Forward
- Florida Court System Facing $72.3 Million Deficit Due to Shortfall in Foreclosure Filing Fees
- Fraudclosure | Hillsborough County Chief Judge Menendez Responds to Accusations of Restricted Court Access
- Foreclosure Fraud – BAC / Countrywide Must Pay $108 Million for Illegally Overcharging Struggling Homeowners; Loan Servicer Inflated Fees, Mishandled Loans of Borrowers
Crony Capitalism? Hank Paulson’s Extraordinary Meeting
Why a Federal Judge Trashed the SEC’s Settlement With Citigroup
U.S. SECURITIES COMMISSION v CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC | $285 Million Citi Settlement With SEC Rejected by Judge Jed Rakoff
- Unsealed Complaint | Citi Tried to Pass Off Madoff Exposure – Irving Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC v Citibank and Citigroup Global Markets Limited
- Wells Fargo to Pay $125 Million to Settle Billion Mortgage-Backed Securities Fraud Case
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bank of America Corporation, Civil Action Nos. 09-6829, 10-0215
WSJ | NY, Delaware AGs Allowed To Intervene In $8.5B Bank of America Settlement
Matt Taibbi | Finally, a Judge Stands up to Wall Street
MTD Denied | FDIC has to Face a $10 Billion Lawsuit Tied to the Failure of Washington Mutual Bank
Kingman Holdings, Big MERS Dustup in Texas…
Ultra Viresis
a Latin phrase meaning literally “beyond the powers”, although its standard legal translation and substitute is “beyond power”. If an act requires legal authority and it is done with such authority, it is characterised in law as intra vires (literally “within the powers”; standard legal translation and substitute, “within power”). If it is done without such authority, it is ultra vires. Acts that are intra vires may equivalently be termed “valid” and those that are ultra vires “invalid”.
Just because you have an assignment or a deed or any other document purportedly executed on behalf of a corporation, does not mean that it is valid. If the person executing does not have the authority or if the act itself is not authorized by the corporation, the act is not valid. Here’s a clear example. Two clients come in my office, the President of a corporation “sells” a property to my client and the client writes a check for $500,000. Problem is I didn’t examine the corporate records and I didn’t see the corporate books so I didn’t catch that the President was not authorized by the Board of Directors to sell the property….the deed is invalid and I’m in big trouble. Many across the country have been making the argument that the MERS signing officers system is similarly flawed because the corporate procedures are not followed. Such is the case in a case filed in Texas. The text of the Order released by a federal judge spells all this out…
Defendants argue that Plaintiff alleges that MERS’ corporate secretary appointed Blackstun as a MERS assistant secretary, and the appointment was not valid because Blackstun’s appointment was not also approved by MERS’ board of directors, as allegedly required by MERS’ by-laws. Defendants argue that this is negligence at best, and not fraud. Defendants also assert that the party that would be the defrauded party would be MERS, not Plaintiff, and that Plaintiff’s interest in the Property is wholly unaffected by the assignment.
Plaintiff argues that the Assignment filed in the property records is a fraudulent lien claim. Plaintiff alleges that the assignment is void because it was executed by a person neither employed nor authorized by MERS to execute a conveyance. Plaintiff alleges that MERS intended that the document be given the same effect as a lawfully executed instrument, and the execution and filing of the documents were done for the purpose of harming Plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges that there was a scheme on the part of a MERS officer to bypass the Board of Directors and cloak others with authority only allowed by the Board of Directors. Plaintiff argues that this is not an inadvertent failure to comply with a duty, but rather an intentional act, done knowingly with the specific intent that the consequences of his action be brought to fruition.
In this case it is alleged that MERS did not properly appoint Blackstun as an officer of MERS and that Blackstun did not have authority to bind MERS, and when Blackstun executed the assignment, it caused MERS to file a fraudulent document in the deed records. The Court finds that Plaintiff has stated a plausible claim, in part, because Defendants fail to address the issue of the legal effect of Blackstun not being authorized to execute the assignment. If he had no such authority, MERS would know that fact. It appears to be more than mere negligence by MERS. Discovery should be allowed, and after discovery is completed, the issue of whether there is a valid claim under ß12.002 can be determined by a motion for summary judgment.
Read all the pleadings for much more on this most interesting discussion, also read the deposition of MERS officer Hultman below.
But there was another post I did yesterday which really had me thinking. It’s the Reveredo case which is cited in a recently published article in the esteemed Cardozo Law Review Journal. What is most astonishing about all of this dustup is (as expressed by Judge Walt Logan in Azize) the fact that MERS just came out of nowhere, no legislation, no court order and spread all across this country. Another key opinion acknowledges this point but the court just shrugs its collective shoulders and says, “hey we know all this MERS stuff ain’t exactly legal, but what the heck, what can possibly go wrong?”…..
“To the extent that courts have encountered difficulties with the question, and have even ruled to the contrary of our conclusion,” the court opined, “the problem arises from the difficulty of attempting to shoehorn a modern innovative instrument of commerce into nomenclature and legal categories which stem essentially from the medieval English land law.” (suggesting that a formalistic application of foreclosure law might lead to the conclusion that MERS lacks standing to foreclose in some circumstances, but “no substantive rights, obligations or defenses are affected by the use of the MERS device, [so] there is no reason why mere form should overcome the salutary substance of permitting the use of this commercially effective means of business”).
Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
Scridb filter
BOMBSHELL- According to Federal Judge MERS Assignment May Be INVALID
By now we all know the dangerous and absurd fiction that the MERS menace has wrought across the property records and courts across this land. The MERS menace is predicated on the fiction that tens of thousands of so-called limited signing officers spread all around the world can execute documents that purport to bind corporations when the very procedures of the corporation may not have been followed expressly.
In this particular case, the homeowner defendant claimed the foreclosure case was fraudulent and invalid because of a fatal flaw in the MERs procedures….procedures that exist all across this country. Now if a federal judge in one state has now issued a Final Order that puts a major crack in the foundation of the entire MERS foundation….what happens in all the other states?
Defendants assert that Plaintiff’s section 12.002 claim lacks plausibility because it rests on legal conclusions instead of facts and that Plaintiff has failed to allege facts to show that MERS made, presented or used the assignment with knowledge that it was a fraudulent court record or a fraudulent lien or claim against the Property, that MERS intended the assignment be given the same legal effect as a court record evidencing a valid lien against the Property, and that MERS intended to cause another person to suffer financial injury.
Defendants argue that Plaintiff alleges that MERS’ corporate secretary appointed Blackstun as a MERS assistant secretary, and the appointment was not valid because Blackstun’s appointment was not also approved by MERS’ board of directors, as allegedly required by MERS’ by-laws. Defendants argue that this is negligence at best, and not fraud. Defendants also assert that the party that would be the defrauded party would be MERS, not Plaintiff, and that Plaintiff’s interest in the Property is wholly unaffected by the assignment.
Plaintiff argues that the Assignment filed in the property records is a fraudulent lien claim. Plaintiff alleges that the assignment is void because it was executed by a person neither employed nor authorized by MERS to execute a conveyance. Plaintiff alleges that MERS intended that the document be given the same effect as a lawfully executed instrument, and the execution and filing of the documents were done for the purpose of harming Plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges that there was a scheme on the part of a MERS officer to bypass the Board of Directors and cloak others with authority only allowed by the Board of Directors. Plaintiff argues that this is not an inadvertent failure to comply with a duty, but rather an intentional act, done knowingly with the specific intent that the consequences of his action be brought to fruition.
In this case it is alleged that MERS did not properly appoint Blackstun as an officer of MERS and that Blackstun did not have authority to bind MERS, and when Blackstun executed the assignment, it caused MERS to file a fraudulent document in the deed records. The Court finds that Plaintiff has stated a plausible claim, in part, because Defendants fail to address the issue of the legal effect of Blackstun not being authorized to execute the assignment. If he had no such authority, MERS would know that fact. It appears to be more than mere negligence by MERS. Discovery should be allowed, and after discovery is completed, the issue of whether there is a valid claim under ß12.002 can be determined by a motion for summary judgment.
Kingman+Holdings+V.+CitiMortgage+&+MERS.2011+US+Dist.+LEXIS+52770.D..Ct.+ED+Tex.+April.21.2011
Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
Scridb filter
Don’t Blame the American Borrower For The Fraudclosure Mess
Recently a federal judge implicitly suggested that it might be unethical to defend homeowners in foreclosure. In response I articulated the reasons why the defense of homeowners in foreclosure is my profession’s highest calling at this moment because the battle is exposing far bigger problems than it would appear on the surface of a simple foreclosure case. The economic, legal and societal mess that we’re all now in as a result of the collapsed real estate market began with the overheated subprime financing boom of the last decade. Millions of Americans borrowed billions of dollars that they never had any hope of repaying. Thousands of mortgage lending companies and hundreds of Wall Street brokerage operations skimmed hundreds of millions in profits off these loans once packaged while still thousands of their executives pocketed millions of dollars in profits and obscene bonuses once the deals were done.
Those that criticize the lowly American borrower may be correct to criticize…in some cases they borrowed more than they could afford to pay…but simply blaming the borrower misses the much bigger and far more significant picture. In order to fully grasp the full depth and magnitude of the problems facing our country, you’ve got to extrapolate that criticism across that mortgage, banking and finance industries, then have plenty of blame left to heap on the regulatory bodies, government leaders and business mechanisms that should have been in place to keep all that spun wildly out of control in check. We all now know that they totally and completely failed all of us.
It is quite simply naïve and short sighted to blame too much of this crisis on the over-extended borrower. The fact of the matter is you cannot blame the over-extended borrower without turning the burning glare of blame on the entire lending and finance industry, the heads of industry and regulatory agencies and authorities at the local, state, federal and international levels. How in God’s name did all the bright people that should have known better allow this mess to occur? It was either gross incompetence or unfettered greed and corruption or a caustic, toxic mixture of both. Sure, blame the borrower that borrowed too much, but remember that on the other side of every loan was a sophisticated, well-financed, multi-billion dollar industry that signed those proceeds over to that largely uneducated and always far less sophisticated borrower. So before you heap scorn on top of the down and out borrower, you better take a closer look at the Monster Behind the Loan. For all the big shot institutional investors who are just now realizing that their Wall Street advisors were lying to them or committing fraud I ask, “Where was you due diligence?” To the individual investor that is relying on the stream of income from these investments I ask, “Where was your due diligence?” To all of you blaming the borrower I ask ,”Did it ever occur to anyone that the school teacher and cop family with combined income of $70,000/year could never afford to live in a home that cost $500,000?”
Hard Questions, Hard Looks and Hard Time….HARDLY.
The Crash that we’re all (sort of) suffering from now really began in 2008. Remember those dark times? Remember the crushing pain we all felt? Remember the forced austerity, the individual and nationwide self examination the crash caused us? Remember the investigations, the trials, the post mortem examinations? Remember the sentencing and punishment phase for the Wall Street Wizards and the architects of America’s financial Armageddon? Yeah, me either. Our “leaders” huddled in secret rooms and devised the plan to paper over The Crash with billions of dollars in bailout cash that got mainlined to the criminal institutions that were guilty of the crimes that caused the collapse.
The bottom line is The Crash resulted in windfalls to the corporations and the corporate criminals that created The Crash and none suffered any consequence for their evil deeds. Nothing, Nada, Zilch. No prosecutions, no real investigations, no jail time at all. Just billions of dollars of the looted treasure representing decades of middle American equity and production. Forget for just a moment about punishment, there was never any real investigation or examination by regulatory or government officials so we could prevent something like this from occurring in the future. The only credible scholarship on The Crash comes from reporting and books that are found in newsstands all across the country. A careful review of this research and reporting reveals that the root cause was not a few outliers, this was two entire industries (Wall Street and the subprime mortgage industry) combined to create a newly-formed Frankenstein industry permeated by fraud, lies, deceit and massive, obscene profits. No lessons were learned from the crash and no punishment was ever delivered. Compounding the systemic problems that led to the crash, the “fix” that was ultimately presented was a lie. In the immediate aftermath of the crisis, Hank Paulson lied to Congress when he convinced them to pass the 2008 TARP bailout package, because the program as advertised had the Fed using the TARP funds to purchase the “toxic” assets that lie at the heart of the crash. But in a classic bait and switch, Paulson (a classic Wall Street insider) changed the intent of the program prior to voting and instead determined that all our cash would be pumped to the institutions. That’s right, they got pumped flush with billions of dollars in taxpayer money, while the “toxic” assets that caused the problems still remain right where they are today….soiling our economy and clogging our courtrooms. (Post Mortem Exam Here.) The unpunished resolution of the crisis ignored another fundamental law, the law that crimes will be punished because punishment serves as a deterrent to future criminal behavior. And, (surprise surprise) the corrupt behavior continued.
Where Did All The Money Go?
The sub prime boom and the resulting catastrophic bust was a direct product of unregulated, unrestrained, uncontrolled greed. The sub prime mortgage industry was predicated on one overarching, supreme motivating force…..MONEY, MONEY, MONEY. From the originating mortgage broker straight up through the executive suites at all the sub prime lenders, paychecks and success were determined by the volume of loans closed….no matter the quality, no matter whether these loans would ever be repaid. The union between the “close at all costs” culture of the sub prime industry and the unchecked, testosterone charged profit-driven culture of Wall Street was a marriage made in populist economic hell. Think of the profits and bonuses that were thrown around in these industries….million dollar bonuses, multi-million dollar compensation packages. How in God’s name did any of us, especially Those In Power, ever allow an economic system to grow so wildly out of control that a worker’s work was deemed worth of multi million dollar compensation..much less hundreds of workers spanning several industries? The volume based bonus culture spawned swarms of financial leeches all pouncing on each residential loan, sucking percentages of the principle away to pay their supercharged salaries and bonuses. Long before these loans were diced up and sold by the Wall Street vipers in the securitization shuffle, the cumulative value of these assets had already been whittled down. With all this whittling, shaving and sucking, how can the mortgage backed securities (Nothing Backed Securities) that we see today be anything but a monstrous Ponzi scheme?
No One Knows Anything
The thing that I find so astonishing is just how little All The Bright People knew about what All The Other Bright People were doing. Like most Americans, I suffered under the delusion that The Bright People knew what they were doing. Surely all the big shots in fancy suits at the United States Treasury, The Fed, The SEC, Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns, The White House, Congress, AIG, etc., etc., etc., knew what they were doing and knew what the others were doing right? WRONG. After digesting all the journalism and books on The Crash, the thing I find most astonishing is that NO ONE KNEW ANYTHING. Seriously…the complex financial instruments, the cross bets, the credit default swaps, the derivatives, the leveraging. No one had any idea how interconnected all the bets (for and against) were. No one had any idea how conflicted all the entities were. No one had any idea how totally outgunned and unequipped all the regulatory agencies were….actually that can’t be true at all. The Wall Street Wizards had to know just how completely out of touch Those We Placed In Power to supervise them were…and when the crash came Those We Placed In Power were just dumbstruck. Go back and look at the Paulson interviews right after the crash. Focus on his deer in the headlights, “golly gee we”re really in a pickle here”, confused look. Bajillions of dollars was being sucked out of the American middle class and becoming ever more concentrated among criminal syndicates operating in New York city and no regulators or government officials stepped in to regulate or to at least question the business assumptions that were driving this machine that was flying so wildly out of control.
As an example, one of the key figures in the whole debacle that was The Crash was Joe Cassano, who became the Chief Operating Officer at AIG. AIG’s nuclear meltdown was largely a byproduct of the credit default swap. The credit default swap was hatched around 1997 and was called BISTRO. BISTRO and its spawn are essentially bets against pools of loans defaulting. These evil, toxic bets earned the Wall Street Wizards billions of dollars and AIG became one of the largest players in this toxic sandbox. In retrospect a 5th grader could have recognized that these bets were bad for all those making them and our leaders should have recognized that they were bad, bad news for the overall economy, but apparently all The Really Smart People were too busy spending their millions of dollars in bonuses to think through the risks they were all subjecting us to. Cassano is quoted in an excellent book, “Too Big To Fail” as late as 2007 saying, “It is hard for us to even see a scenario that would see us losing $1 in any of these transaction.” So Cassano and AIG couldn’t foresee any problem with their entire business model, but in September 2008, you and I started pumping billions of dollars into AIG and the total taxpayer exposure exploded to $152 million.
Even after the collapse, Cassano was kept on a $1 million/month consulting contract. But it gets worse. The week following the September bailout, AIG employees and distributors participated in a California retreat which cost $444,000 and featured spa treatments, banquets, and golf outings. It was reported that the trip was a reward for top-performing life-insurance agents planned before the bailout. Less than 24 hours after the news of the party was first reported by the media, it was reported that the Federal Reserve had agreed to give AIG an additional loan of up to $37.8 billion. AP reported on October 17 that AIG executives spent $86,000 on a previously scheduled English hunting trip. News of the lavish spending came just days after AIG received an additional $37.8 billion loan from the Federal Reserve, on top of a previous $85 billion emergency loan granted the month before. Regarding the hunting trip, the company responded, “We regret that this event was not canceled.” An October 30, 2008 article from CNBC reported that AIG had already drawn upon $90 billion of the $123 billion allocated for loans. On November 10, 2008, just a few days before renegotiating another bailout with the US Government for $40 billion, ABC News reported that AIG spent $343,000 on a trip to a lavish resort in Phoenix, Arizona. Just think about all of that, you and I pumped billions of dollars into this failed and probably criminal enterprise and what was the punishment for the players? They were sentenced to spa treatments in California and hunting trips in England.
The banks, the lenders, the brokers, the appraisers, the attorneys, the analysists. They all shoved billions of dollars in their pockets during the run up to the crash of 2008. Then in the aftermath of the crash, they figured out a way to continue shoving money into their pockets….this time taxpayer funded bailout money. They were sloppy, reckless, conniving criminals that sucked the economic lifeblood out of the middle class then when they were caught they were rewarded with first dibs on the money earned by the children and grandchildren of the middle class. What could possibly be more criminal or devastating?
The HAMP Booddoggle- Bailout The Criminals Version 2.0.
As if the 2008 billion dollar boon doggle bailout was not enough, the Wall Street Wizards teamed up with their friends in Washington, DC and arranged to transfer as much as $50 billion dollars in additional money to the criminal mortgage companies through the HAMP program. Now, theoretically at least not all $50 billion dollars went out the door, but according to the government’s own numbers as of September 2008, less than 500,000 Americans got permanent modifications through the program and the net “benefit” was a median monthly payment reduction of less than $500. While real numbers are hard to come by and any numbers published by any of the lenders, servicers or our elected officials are suspect, one thing is beyond dispute…..the HAMP program has been an abject failure for the American consumer, but another windfall for the lenders and servicers. While Americans struggle to make their monthly mortgage obligations and while the lenders and servicers rush feverishly to them onto the streete, they’re busy sucking down billions of taxpayer dollars….helping themselves to the lavish buffet of tax breaks and direct cash infusions that fatten their bottom lines….benefits paid to them courtesy of the American taxpayer they’re trying to throw into the street.
They’re not playing by the new rules established by HAMP and other government programs that are express conditions of receipt of the taxpayer funding and they’re not playing by the long established rules of the state courts they must slither through on their way to snatch a home back through foreclosure. And that’s what really, really bothers me about the whole mad rush through foreclosure. Many of the phantom entities that are foreclosing have dubious, questionable or non-existent legal standing to bring the claims they’re bringing so they’ve got to fabricate the evidence they need to pursue their questionable claims. That’s bad enough, but what makes matters far worse is they’re using taxpayer dollars to fund their fabrication and to fuel the evil machine that grinds forward, leaving a path of fraud and destruction in its wake. If the entities had been left to dangle in the wind and survive by their own devices and if they played by the rules I’d have far more sympathy for them, but the fact of the matter is the long and continuing pattern of lies, deceit and outright fraud that is being perpetrated upon the American people by the biggest institutions in this country is unprecedented. Even more disturbing is the fact that they could not continue the perpetuation of this fraud and crimes without the participation of our own court systems and government.
The end is nowhere in sight. The crimes, the cover up, the lies, deceit and fraud continue unabated. The real question is when will the American people finally stand up and make it clear to the world that they’ve had enough. Until then, the crimes continue.
Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
Scridb filter
The Defense of Homeowners In Foreclosure is Our Profession’s Highest Calling
Does The Defense of Homeowners in Foreclosure Border on The Unethical?
That’s not a question I need to ask myself, I know in my heart and deep within my professional soul, that defending foreclosures is not only ethical, it is the highest calling of my profession at this moment in our country’s history. I’m not just defending homeowners in foreclosure, I’m fighting to save my country, my courts and the Constitution of the United States of America.
The fact that this exact question was recently posed and published in the Huffington Post by retired federal judge H. Lee Sarokin only serves to illustrate just how dangerous these times we live in really are. (Original Post Here) I remember debating the reasons why this country gave murders and rapists the right to due process in high school and think that most people, even terribly unsophisticated people, understand that the right to due process is a bedrock of our country. The fact that a retired federal judge does not understand that the same due process protections that protect murders and rapists provide important protections to all of society vis a vis foreclosure defense is truly disturbing. The issues exposed in the defense of homeowners have exposed dangerous and systemic flaws in our legal and economic systems and the fault lines exposed represent very real challenges to the Constitutional rights of all Americans.
Reading between the lines, I suspect that the good retired judge who posed the question is one of the millions of Americans whose very existence is tied to examining his monthly stock and investment statements and that this perspective, rather than legal analysis, is at the heart of his question. The calculation from that limited and myopic perspective is simple. Value and balance up, life is good. Value and balance down, we’ve got problems. As the good judge recognizes, there are a myriad of reasons why homeowners find themselves in foreclosure (unemployment, economic unrest) and those factors, more than any issues related to foreclosure, pose the real threat to the economy and to our country’s overall well being.
I don’t have a retirement account and I don’t understand Wall Street or any of Wall Street’s charts and graphs and ratios and equations and statements and formulas. I read them. I examine them. I consider them but I don’t understand them. I am terribly, anxiously, increasingly afraid that the charts and graphs are as flawed, fraudulent and manipulated as the business practices of Wall Street that the defense of homeowners in foreclosure has exposed. I desperately hope that I’m wrong, but I fear that the investment accounts tied to this country’s mortgage market and investments are already worth far less than the charts and graphs and formulas say they are. I fear that large sectors of our economy operate like a Ponzi scheme. I am particularly convinced this is the case with the trillions of dollars that flow into mortgage servicers. To whom do millions of Americans mail or electronically transfer billions of dollars in monthly mortgage payments to each month? Where do these billions of dollars flow out to? Does any honest, verified, comprehensive, audited accounting exist? How much is skimmed off by the servicers? How much is shifted to affiliated insurance companies? How much goes offshore and to entities and interests whose ultimate goals and motives Americans do not share? And the questions directly related to our governments failed efforts to address this society changing crisis.
What are the perverse financial incentives involved that keep homeowners hurtling through foreclosure and prevent reasonable settlement or short sale offers from being accepted when these offers are objectively far superior than any other outcome the lender could hope to achieve? Where have the billions of dollars in federal money paid to servicers and banks gone? How much have the banks, the servicers, the foreclosure mills, the document mills made while everyday Americans wallow in the pit of despair, uncertainly and misery that is foreclosure. The banks and institutions that are driving this crisis made billions when the originated these loans (often under fraudulent circumstances). They took billions in the 2008 bailout orgy. They took additional billions in HAMP money that was supposed to provide relief to homeowners. But what relief do homeowners have to show for all these billions of dollars sloshing around? Precious little but generations of additional debt.
And the banks? They’ve got plenty. I have watched first hand in horror as Florida’s courts requisitioned nearly $10 million dollars of taxpayer money that was used to establish Kafka-esque Rocket Docket courtrooms where the express purpose was a speedy verdict in favor of the very banks and institutions that created the “technical” problems that are responsible for today’s court backlog. While we’re on the subject, it must always be noted that the vast majority of homeowner foreclosure cases are never defended by any attorney, much less a competent and experienced foreclosure defense attorney who can spot the real issues that cause these cases to grind to a halt. The fact that the vast majority of cases go undefended means that some obscene number of cases, perhaps 80 percent, go unchallenged. A post mortem examination of those undefended cases will reveal gross and systemic abuses the likes of which our court system is unprepared to address. Our foreclosure courtrooms and now our country’s record title system are crime scenes and there’s blood on the hands of the banks and institutions that are responsible for these crimes. Will there be any investigation or consequences for these crimes?
The robo signer controversy is a side show, a distraction. The robo signer controversy merely exposes much deeper and far more dangerous flaws in the financial and mortgage servicing industries. The question is not whether any robo signer or any signer for that matter does have or even could have personal knowledge. The question is why these robo signers and document mills even exist at all. If all these companies that were doing all this foreclosing actually owed, possessed, controlled, held or had the rights to own, hold, posess or control the mortgages they claim they do prior to foreclosing then why did none of them get around to actually producing the assignments, endorsements and real evidence of ownership years ago? When the arguments about ownership and holding and back dating assignments started being raised consistently months ago, why didn’t all these Plaintiffs start documenting the ownership of the mortgages they’re foreclosing on today months ago? Cut all these pesky defense arguments off before you even file the case. Get the documents required to foreclose prepared (fabricated) months before you file foreclosure rather than creating (fabricating) those documents during the course of the litigation. There are reasons why this still does not occur and we should not continue with foreclosures until we understand all of those reasons.
Keep in mind that the many significant issues raised by those who are defending foreclosure came because a handful of dedicated legal pioneers set out to challenge the sloppiness, greed and unrestrained arrogance of the banks. April Charney, James Kowalski, Tom Ice, Chip Parker. Those are just a handful of the dedicated consumer rights attorneys that struck out to challenge the banks, the foreclosure mills. Their pioneering work inspired legions of attorneys and activists that are standing up to fight for the rights of everyday Americans. As the battle to defend homeowners raged on, we’ve all come to realize that The Fourteenth Amendment right to Due Process has been eviscerated in the mad rush to grant more foreclosures to undeserving banks. Rules of Civil Procedure? We don’t need them. Rules of Evidence? Forget about them. Hundreds of years of case law? No place in this brave new world of foreclosure folly. The Fourth Amendment? Well, when Fannie and Freddie are the real parties in interest in more than half the mortgages being foreclosed, that means the foreclosure mills and foreclosure courtrooms have been commandeered to seize property from the taxpayer in order to render it to the federal government, a seizure all the more violative when those from whom the property was seized were not afforded basic due process protections. The First Amendment? Well, the only reason we’ve seen any real push back against the overpower of the banks and institutions is because our Free Press has contrasted the plight of the American people with the fraud, the abuses and the arrogant attacks being visited upon our courts by the banks and institutions. This freedom to share the details of the misdeeds that were committed and which are continuing to be committed throughout the foreclosure process is being attacked, with attorneys (like myself) and activists suffering threats of legal action and other sanctions for daring to share information about what the purveyors of the the financial evil have done. Their attacks will continue and we’ll all have to determine just how hard we’re all willing to fight to protect that most important right…the right to protest, the right to share the despair, the right shine the disinfecting light of free information on the financial cancer they’ve spread across the country. Are you willing to join in the fight or will you allow the banks and institutions to muzzle our Free Speech Rights?
It is not only ethical for attorneys to defend homeowners in foreclosure, it’s a lawyers highest ethical calling because the issues extend far beyond the homeowner in foreclosure and touch the cornerstone of our American experience….The United States Constitution.
Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
Scridb filter
Does the Defense of Foreclosures by Lawyers Border on the Unethical?
Wow, another mind bender here…that is a question asked by a retired federal judge…
I’ll post more later…I’ve decided to take a deep breath and wait before responding to things that make my head explode, but wasn’t this the country that felt that even rapists and murders deserved a defense? Wasn’t there a document called the Consti-something or other?
Wasn’t there a Fourteenth Amendment? Oh right, Was.
Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
Scridb filter
Hot Off the Press – CA Federal Judge Grants Homeowner TRO against Chase
Alright… so not every federal judge in CA is in the tank for the banks. Surprising but refreshing. At least the judges around this country seem to be “getting it” as well. By getting it I mean starting to understand that the banks, servicers and secondary mortgage market players are generally deceptive, dubious, misleading, unfair, immoral, unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous – oh my goodness… I’m in adjective heaven here!
Seriously, though, the servicers are bottom-dwellers in every sense of the word and it’s nice to see a judge actually recognize that their collection tactics are oppressive and immoral and, when pleaded with specificity, accepted by the judge as true. In this case, a pro se homeowner went on the offense (as needed in California) and filed a complaint (23 pages) and also motioned for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and a Preliminary Injunction. The judge granted the homeowner’s request for a TRO in her order. All of these documents can be downloaded below as well. Read and Learn… if you’re a pro se homeowner, this is some really good research for you. Way to go Mr. Khast!
Motion for Preliminary Injunction
Memorandum in Support of Motion for Prelim Injunction
Opposition by Chase and CA Reconveyance Company
Oh and by the way, I didn’t know this until I read Chase’s Certification of Interested Parties that JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA actually purchased CA Reconveyance Company. Isn’t that convenient? Our tax bailout dollars hard at work making home seizure even more convenient and easy for Chase. Seriously, if you have any bank account of any sort with Chase, B of A, Wells Fargo, Citi, you have got to be out of your mind. I ABSOLUTELY REFUSE TO PATRONIZE THESE LARGE BANKS AND GIVE THEM ANY OF MY MONEY, PAY THEIR FEES OR LET THEM KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT ME. YOU SHOULD DO THE SAME. IMAGINE HOW GREAT IT WOULD BE IF WE STARTED A MOVEMENT TO REMOVE OUR DEPOSITORY ACCOUNTS FROM THESE LARGE BANKS!
For over two years now, my banking is done exclusively with a small community bank. You know, the old face to face, relationship banking that used to be the norm. These large banks can kiss my ass. They are horrendous in how they treat their customers. Use the power of choice and abandon the big banks. Start a trend in your neighborhood and community. I would just love to see one of the big banks fail because of a run on their bank deposits.
Federal Judge Finds The Modification Morass a Basis to Halt Foreclosure
Calling the conduct of a loan servicer, “immoral, unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous or substantially injurious to consumers” a federal judge refused to allow the lender to proceed with foreclosure…surely a case to watch.
Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
Scridb filter
Pelosi’s Plan to Violate the US Constitution
This Washington Post headline yesterday is all you need to know about how corrupt the process has become to pass ObamaCare by any means necessary this week: “House may try to pass Senate health-care bill without voting on it.”
Huh? You read that correctly. Because Speaker Pelosi cannot find enough votes to pass the deeply unpopular ObamaCare bill in a constitutional way, she is hoping you and other Americans won’t notice, or won’t care, whether she passes ObamaCare in an unconstitutional and blatantly corrupt way.
Her latest plan is called the “Slaughter Rule”, which would allow the House to vote on a different bill and “deem” the Senate’s ObamaCare bill as being “passed” at the same time as the other bill is passed, without having an actual up and down vote on the ObamaCare bill.
Said Pelosi in an interview: “It’s more insider and process-oriented than most people want to know….but I like it, because people don’t have to vote on the Senate bill.”
Pelosi may like “deeming” laws passed, but passing laws without voting on them is blatantly unconstitutional. As former federal judge Michael McConnell wrote in the Wall Street Journal, “It may be clever, but it is not constitutional. To become law…the Senate health-care bill must actually be signed into law. The Constitution speaks directly to how that is done. According to Article I, Section 7, in order for a “Bill” to “become a Law,” it “shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate” and be “presented to the President of the United States” for signature or veto. Unless a bill actually has “passed” both Houses, it cannot be presented to the president and cannot become a law.”
Speaker Pelosi and President Obama are counting on you, your friends, and your family not to notice or care that they are doing this. That’s why together, we must get the truth out and tell everyone that we know about what they are trying to do.
This is just one more example of the bribery and corruption that has been used to try and pass ObamaCare, like the Cornhusker Kickback and the Louisiana Purchase. If they are willing to corrupt our constitutional system right before our eyes to pass Obamacare, why should we have any confidence that they won’t corrupt your healthcare when nobody is paying attention?
Bank of America loses in Federal Ruling – Judge says investors own the loans
The report of the ruling below by this Federal Judge has several implications:
- Mortgage modifications may come to a halt again
- Attorney’s and anyone supposedly “helping” with modifications should be very, very wary
- The federal court in Manhattan is recognizing a couple very important issues:
- Servicers are NOT the owners of the loans (in the case of a securitized loan)
- Investors own the loans
- Servicers MAY be liable to buy back modified loans (subject to the terms of the PSA)
This ruling could ultimately end up being the demise of ALL foreclosure actions involving securitized loans. One thing is clear in that the federal court identifies the investors as the owners of the loan and is so doing the court also recognizes that the servicer/intermediaries/pretender lender have no authority to do ANYTHING in the way of enforcement, modification, collection through legal means such as a foreclosure action because they simply have no standing (the alleged debt is not owed to anyone other than the investors).
Just because a secret deal between Wall Street, servicers, banks and MERS occurred to obscure the ownership and the transfers of mortgages doesn’t mean their deal will hold up under the careful eye of diligent judge who understands AND cares about the law being upheld.
* Federal judge lacks jurisdiction, moves case to states
* Loan modifications can hurt mortgage investors
NEW YORK, Aug 20 (Reuters) – A federal judge has ruled that Bank of America Corp (BAC.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) cannot have a lawsuit by investors seeking to force it to buy back mortgages heard in federal court, saying he lacks jurisdiction to decide the case.
Tuesday’s ruling by Judge Richard Holwell of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan means the case will move to state court. Holwell did not decide the merits of the case.
“Congress passed two statutes within a year of each other to address the mortgage crisis,” the judge wrote. “In neither of these statutes did Congress federalize the case.”
The ruling is a win for investors, to the extent that Holwell rejected a claim by the bank’s Countrywide Financial Corp unit that new federal laws to encourage loan modifications to help struggling borrowers stay in their homes govern this case.
Countrywide had argued that the laws negated obligations it might have had to buy back modified loans. In 2008, Countrywide agreed with some 11 state attorneys general to modify $8.4 billion of loans made to roughly 400,000 borrowers.
Investors who own mortgage securities typically receive interest and principal payments. If servicers modified the underlying loans to reduce borrower obligations, investors would be harmed because they would receive lower payments.
Holwell did rule that investors bear the burden of showing that pooling and servicing agreements for their loans, taken “as a whole,” require Countrywide to buy back the loans.
Bank of America could not immediately be reached for comment. A published report said a spokeswoman agreed that the court did not rule on the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims.
The current case was brought by two investment funds holding Countrywide mortgages, Greenwich Financial Services Distressed Mortgage Fund 3 LLC and QED LLC.
These investors complained they would be harmed if Countrywide shifted the burdens of loan modifications to 374 trusts into which loans had been repackaged and securitized.
These investors would rather Countrywide repurchase modified loans for the full unpaid amounts.
Countrywide had been the largest U.S. mortgage lender before Bank of America acquired it last July for $2.5 billion.
The case is Greenwich Financial Services Distressed Mortgage Fund 3 LLC and QED LLC v. Countrywide Financial Corp, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan), No. 08-11343. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel, with additional reporting by John Tilak in Bangalore)
© Thomson Reuters 2009. All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and its logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world.



