Under the National Operations Center, Homeland Security Given Green Light to Monitor Journalists, Bloggers
Florida’s Chief Justice Comments on the “Robo Signing” Controversy
Before I get to the substance of this post, I want to share a very important lesson I’ve learned recently. Our basic liberties, in fact the most vital liberty of all, Freedom of Speech is under a vicious assault in this country. Your freedom to speak is no longer free, particularly when you are fighting for consumers and fighting the powerful banking industries that own this country. As an attorney, I face even greater challenges and liabilities when I fight this fight. The morality, the higher calling and the larger battle to protect crucial Constitutional principles do not, unfortunately, provide protection from the assaults those of us who are fighting the good fight for consumers face on a daily basis. The powerful interests that are aligned against the common man have infiltrated our court system and there is an active and aggressive campaign to silence and intimidate those who would dare to stand up for consumers and carry the mantle of the fight for basic rights. This fight is risky, but I believe attorneys must continue to fight…at great personal cost and greater professional risk, because we took an oath to fight for those larger principles, regardless of the personal cost.
That being said, I want to respond to a recent newspaper article where the Chief Justice of the Florida Supreme Court commented on aspects of the “Robo Signer” Controversy. In October 2010, the Wall Street Journal credited me with first using the phrase “Robo Signing” to describe the improper conduct that was occurring in foreclosure cases all across this country, so I offer my comments with a fair amount of credibility. (Read the Wall Street Journal Article on Robo Signer Controversy Here) Ever since the article appeared, more and even greater abuses have been exposed and all evidence suggests that the allegations of misdeeds and improprieties will only continue.
It is with this in mind that I must respectfully disagree with the Chief Justice of the Florida Supreme Court who is quoted as follows:
“The system has essentially been overwhelmed. The lawyers who are handling foreclosures for the lenders have been overwhelmed. Sometimes that’s because of these paperwork problems. Some people were taking some short cuts and they found out that the short cut was a long cut,” Canady said.
Read the Full Florida News Article Here
It is with profound respect and a sense of duty that I share my disagreement with the quote in the article and the general assessment of what continues to occur in courtrooms all across this state. I believe it is an understatement to characterize what has happened to our courts as merely, “paperwork problems” or “short cuts”…..this is all far more sinister than that. I believe our court system has been exploited by a calculated scheme to deprive all citizens of the Due Process protections provided for in both the United States Constitution and the Florida Constitution. I say that all citizens have been deprived of important protections because when weaknesses in our courts system have been exploited in such a widespread and systematic fashion, the victims are not just those who are directly involved in that case, but every single citizen subject to the jurisdiction of the courts. Put simply, if our courts have been exploited in this arena, what’s to stop such systematic exploitation from occurring throughout all cases heard by our courts?
The abuses that the banks and institutions are perpetrating in these cases are not merely errors, mistakes or shortcuts, they represent fundamental violations of the due process rights of every Floridian and by extension, every American. Our system of justice, and in fact our entire system of government, was predicated on rules of fairness, honesty and integrity. I say, “was” because the financial crisis of 2008 and the continuing downward skid through this crisis shows just how broken our entire system of government, including our system of justice has become. In the not so distant past, ours was a country of rules and laws. In the context of Fraudclosuregate however our rules and laws–developed over centuries–and the Rule of Law in general have been suspended.
The most direct example of the Rule of Law ignored can be found in the systemic violation of the Florida Supreme Court’s own “Verified Complaint Rule”. The Florida Supreme Court passed a Rule which mandated that all Residential Foreclosure Complaints be verified beginning on February 11, 2010. This new rule was widely ignored and in some cases is still ignored today. When sophisticated law firms that are staffed with hundreds of lawyers and which generate millions of dollars in revenue are permitted to blatantly and systematically ignore basic rules, this is not merely evidence of overwhelmed system or shortcuts…it is evidence of a calculated scheme to deprive citizens of protections the rule is intended to provide.
Finally, I find it terribly important to note that we have no idea at all exactly what the “Robo Signer” controversy really is. We cannot even speculate why these lenders suspended their procedures. The lenders provided written responses responding to the allegations of the New Jersey Supreme Court, but if you read the explanations carefully, they offer no details and only raise more questions. Where were the affidavits constructed? Where were the notary publics? Who signed the affidavits? Did the affiant have the entire affidavit in front of him when they were signed? A careful examination of all these affidavits raises even more questions in light of all the revelations, but we still have no details. All we know is major lenders suspended foreclosures in several states BUT WE HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA JUST WHAT LED TO THESE SUSPENSIONS. Foreclosures have resumed and the conduct that led to the suspensions has gone totally unexamined. Bizarre and unprecedented tactics have been implemented to allow wrongdoers to “withdraw” evidence that is submitted in files. Judges across the state are “ratifying” judgments that are based on admittedly false evidence….as if they can just ignore the improper evidence that now pollutes the file.
I hope that we will prevail in the larger battle to make right the chaos that is Fraudclosuregate. I hope that civic-minded elected and appointed officials begin to recognize the equities of fighting for the good of the common man and begin to reject the tyranny of the machine that is arrayed against us. I hope that all of our judges will recognize that the larger battle is not just about foreclosures, it’s about protecting the basic judicial principles that this nation was founded upon.
Tweet this!
Share and Enjoy:
Scridb filter
Demonstrations in the Street
I’ve always been puzzled by the lack of action and reaction of the public to the mortgage crisis. As I write this, it gets worse, more people lose their homes, more homes are beset by adversary relations between family members, more alcohol abuse, more spousal abuse, more child abuse, more anxiety, depression, divorce and grief. This was all done TO the people not BY the people. Tens of millions of people did not wake up one morning in 2001 with a plan to obtain fraudulent mortgages, with fraudulent appraisals, based upon non-existent income.
In the article below, you see how people can get things rolling by forgetting the ideology and getting with the program: this could not have happened without Wall Street running wild, without incentives to create bad mortgages, and without the tacit or express complicity of the federal Reserve and other U.S. agencies. How about letting them know you don’t like it? The Constitution allows for freedom of assembly and freedom of speech. Don’t let the oppressive tactics of the opposition stop you from using your constitutional rights.
By the way, this one led to immediate results. Read the article and then go to the follow-up at Resignations, Investigations and Salary Cuts of 90%
—————————————————————————–
L.A. NOW
Southern California — this just in
« Previous Post | L.A. NOW Home | Next Post »
Protesters incensed by Bell officials’ high salaries visit mayor’s business, home [Updated]
A boisterous crowd of more than 200 gathered at the corner of Gage and Corona avenues. Several were wearing T-shirts featuring a city seal and the words “My city is more corrupt than your city.”
Their first stop: Oscar’s Korner Market and Carniceria, owned by the mayor, Oscar Hernandez. They then moved on to the mayor’s house, near Florence Avenue, then to a home on Otis Avenue owned by City Councilman George Mirabal.
At the stops, protesters maintained a moment of silence and then shouted “Fuera!” — “Out!” Dozens of cars honked as they passed and offered thumbs-up, though one man stopped, defended the city officials and challenged a protester physically.
“I don’t think they are taking it seriously. And we’re serious,” said Nestor Valencia, 45, an organizer of the demonstration, a Bell resident since 1975 and a founder of the Bell Resident Club. “They need to resign.”
Bell is a working-class city of 40,000 residents. The Times revealed earlier this month that City Manager Robert Rizzo received a $787,637 annual salary, Assistant City Manager Angela Spaccia received $457,000, and Police Chief Randy Adams received $376,288. Rizzo earned more than President Obama, Spaccia earned more than the top administrator for Los Angeles County, and Adams earned 50% more than Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck.
All three resigned on Friday.
Four City Council members are paid close to $100,000 annually for their part-time positions — sums that are far higher than in other cities of comparable size and which have baffled and upset the League of California Cities and other local government organizations.
“This is a test for our community,” Valencia said. “There’s been a fiasco here.”
Hernandez, in particular, Valencia argued, represented “a culture that is not our culture.”
“It is a culture of rule-breaking,” Valencia said. “It is a culture of nepotism. … He thinks he can do anything because he is the mayor.”
Hernandez could not be reached for comment.
[Updated at 12:48 p.m.: Bell police have estimated the crowd at between 200 and 300.
Demonstrators have visited the residences or businesses of the mayor, the vice mayor and two City Council members -- all of whom they want to resign.
The crowd also stopped at a Chevrolet dealership, long a fixture on Atlantic Avenue, that shut its doors weeks ago, citing burdensome property taxes. Demonstrators are now approaching City Hall, their final stop.
"This city has woken up," said Jesus Casas, 35, a Bell resident for 15 years. "We want a new city government that will represent by the people and for the people."]
Filed under: foreclosure