Mar
29

MUST SEE TV: WA State Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Case Against MERS

 

“May a party be a lawful ‘beneficiary’ under Washington’s Deed of Trust Act if it never held the promissory note secured by the Deed of Trust?”

 

That’s the key question the Washington State’s Supreme Court heard arguments in the potentially pivotal case, Bain v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, et al and Selkowitz v. Little “Litton” Loan Servicing, LP, et al.  It’s also a form of the same question that’s been asked by countless homeowners and their lawyers as they’ve fought to prevent their homes from being lost to foreclosure over the last 3-4 years.

 

Go back in time fewer than five years and you’d be hard pressed to find anyone who had ever heard of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, but today the acronym “MERS,” is a household dirty word in American homes from coast-to-coast.

 

Although the mortgage banking industry would say that they created Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems for the benefit of mankind, there’s no question that its creation also provided the industry with a way to avoid having to pay the costs involved in recording mortgage transfers.  Lenders permanently list MERS as the “mortgagee of record,” and by doing so the avoid the expense of recording any subsequent transfers.

 

MERS makes the claim that it is both an “agent” of the lender and the “mortgagee,” but the practice has fueled a firestorm of debate over a wide range of legal issues, and although many courts seem to have accepted the MERS way… it’s often not clear whether such decisions were actually made in favor of MERS, or just against homeowners not making their mortgage payments.

 

What MERS does is operate a computer database that’s supposed to track mortgage servicing and the ownership rights of mortgage loans throughout the U.S.  And when I first heard that explanation, I thought… well, that sounds incredibly boring.

 

Frankly, as a layperson… the whole thing is kind of insane, especially when you stop to consider that although MERS would readily admit that it doesn’t own any mortgage loans… it is also the recorded owner of over half of the nation’s residential real estate.  At least I think that’s right… every time I try to understand it better, the whole thing confuses me and then I have to take a nap.

 

 

The best way to understand the issue I’ve seen…

 

The video below puts you in the courtroom to watch as both sides of the debate present oral arguments related to MERS’ involvement in the foreclosure process in front of the nine justices of the Washington State Supreme Court.

 

I found it fascinating to watch… almost as good as an episode of “Boston Legal,” in fact, the MERS lawyer kind of reminded me of Bill Shatner’s character on that show, Denny Crane.

 

You’ll watch the plaintiff’s attorneys who are representing homeowners at risk of foreclosure argue that MERS violates the state’s Deed of Trust Act, among other things… followed by the attorney flown in from Minnesota to appear “pro hac vice,” on behalf of defendant MERS, who basically argues that MERS isn’t the problem no matter what because no one ever needs to know who owns their loan.

 

I’m paraphrasing, of course, but you’ll see what I’m saying when you watch it.  It’s not quite 45 minutes long, but it feels shorter… and afterwards, I’ll pick up the discussion below and share my thoughts on the matter.

~~~

 

A simplified view of how we got here…

 

The foreclosure crisis put MERS in the national spotlight as it started filing foreclosure lawsuits on behalf of financiers and servicers against millions of American families.

 

These people losing homes to something using the name MERS had been told by President Obama that because of his new government program, Making Home Affordable, they would be able to get their loans modified and hence save their homes from foreclosure simply by calling their bank… assuming, of course, they weren’t “irresponsible borrowers.”

 

So, believing that he was both smart and “a man of the people,” they did what he said they should do… but he wasn’t, and it didn’t work.

 

But, more than just “didn’t work,” the experience was nothing short of torturous, and in fact, I’m quite certain that many who lived through it, would have jumped at waterboarding as an alternative.

 

Lawyers representing homeowners who had clearly been wronged tried turning to the courts to enforce the HAMP guidelines, but to no avail.  So, they went after anything and everything… TILA/RESPA… MERS and the failings of securitization… and most recently robo-signing related allegations are all the rage…

 

“I’ll take one securitization audit, and one forensic… oh… and give me one of those fraud reports too… to-go, please… how much?  Oh my.  Do you take Texaco cards?”

 

The thinking was obvious… judges and everyone else could see them coming a mile away… cause enough trouble for the servicers and they’d offer to modify loans and hence save homes.  And soon… when even that wasn’t working… well, then even just delaying the loss of a home was something of a win, right?

 

 

Right… wrong… it didn’t matter… homeowners not making their mortgage payments was the issue at hand, as far as the vast majority of judges went, and today, although the battle rages on fueled by words like “forgery and fraud,” the outcomes are fundamentally the same as far as homeowners at risk of foreclosure are concerned.

 

Oh sure, some states became better than others, and bankruptcy courts seemed to fare better than others, but homeowners became more and more confused as courts of appeals, in some cases, tooketh away, what lower courts had given.

 

The OCC turned out to be an acronym for the Office of Ceremonial Complacency.

 

Many states today have bills on their legislative calendars that could help in some ways, but banking lobbyists don’t give up a single yard without a fight.

 

And finally it was OCCUPY… the blunt force edition of the foreclosure defense game, but again, to most… sort of a delay with a side of pepper spray.

 

So… now what?  What’s next?  The UCC 9 v. UCC 3 argument?  Okay, fair enough.  Not as exciting as securitization fail and REMICs exploding all over the place, but I’m in… why not?

 

I don’t like it any more than anyone else, but the fact is that in 2011… a year during which in some states like New Jersey and Nevada, foreclosures were said to be down year over year by something like 80 percent, even with the servicers waiting for the settlement to be reached so they could pick up their “Get Out of Fail Free” card… even with all of the things that caused delays… foreclosures were essentially flat when compared with 2010.  Absent anything new that I’m not seeing… can you imagine how bad this year and next are going to be?

 

Well, of course, there is the $2,000 if you were foreclosed on in 2009-2011… do I have that right?  I think so, but every time I type that out my mind says… no, that can’t be right… and then it is.

 

So, in the Bain case you watched on the video… what happens if the court sides with the plaintiffs?  Says that MERS does violate the state’s Deed of Trust Act… does that save homes in a way that I’m not seeing.  Or, will the servicers just start foreclosing judicially, as they’ve done in response in Hawaii, for example.

 

So… I called a couple of lawyers licensed to practice in the State of Washington to ask if their views of the Bain case confirmed mine… and they did.

 

Please understand what I’m trying to say, because I’m not saying everyone shouldn’t fight this year and next and next and next… and harder than ever, for that matter.  I know I will…

 

BUT, WAIT A MINUTE… some changes have come to pass.

 

Like what?  Like, the new servicer standards, for one.

 

Remember… the servicers and their propensity to ignore the toothless HAMP guidelines is one of the main reasons we’re all here, right?  Well, now we have new servicer guidelines that are part of the settlement agreement between the 49 AGs and the five largest servicers that doesn’t quite exist as yet, but I’m willing to believe if you are.

 

Ever since the day that the Obama administration prematurely asseverated that the AG settlement had arrived, I’ve had only one thought on my mind… what happens if servicers don’t adhere to the new standards?

 

Is there a private right of action?  I don’t think so… they’re not even laws, right?  So what good are ANOTHER set of servicing guidelines related to loan modifications that no one can enforce when they’re ignored?  We’ve already got a perfectly good set of servicing guidelines related to loan modifications that no one can enforce when ignored… they’re called HAMP guidelines and they’re like new, hardly used at all.  If they were a car they might be a 2009, but they’d have no miles on them and still come with the full factory warranty and that new car smell.

 

Why are we troubling the servicers with having to come up with another set of guidelines they don’t have to follow?  Don’t they have enough on their plates already?  I mean… they’ve got all those foreclosures still to get handled… and without several of their biggest mills, like Stern and Baum.

 

Then there’s designing the next phase of document creation, that’s not going to be done in a day or two.  And I hear that some servicers may actually have to get things notarized… no, I mean for real… actually notarized.

 

 

I think we should just call the five servicers involved and tell them not to bother with the new guidelines… we don’t need them.

 

Either that, or we should put some pressure on our AGs and our state legislatures to give the new standards or guidelines the force of law… you know… including a private right of action for homeowners, and a provision for attorneys fees.

 

What are the banking lobbyists going to say in response to that?  There will never be lending again in this state?  No chance.  Plus, even if the new standards were made into state law, it would be very easy for the banks to not get sued and lose… just don’t break the new law and follow the standards you agreed to follow in the settlement, which you said you’d follow… so, what’s the problem?

 

To the AGs and state legislators, I would put forth that we don’t need new rules that lack teeth… that no one who agreed to them has to follow.  We’ve got plenty of those kinds of rules related to loan modifications already.  Why would the AGs oppose taking the terms and making them law?

 

I realize the states are gong to have “independent monitors,” but I’m not worried about the monitors getting screwed over and losing their homes… monitors aren’t being damaged by rules being broken, it’s the homeowners, silly.  They’re the ones that need to be able to assert their rights under the agreement.

 

And to the homeowners not at risk of foreclosures just yet…  forget about the deadbeat cracks, shouldn’t any rules of any federal program or settlement with our government be followed?  Period?  Of course they should.  So, since we KNOW the last set were ignored, let’s make these new standards into a law with a private right of action and a provision for attorneys fees and let’s see what happens from there.

 

Maybe with such a law and attorneys fees clause, the trial bar will get interested, and they’ve got a lobby in DC that’s pretty effective, I hear.

 

I know… there are allowable margins for error in the settlement agreement, and extended timeframes for compliance… but, so what?  Whatever we’ve got, make it a law… something that must be adhered to, or consequences might result.

 

Embrace incremental improvements…

 

If you’re waiting for a BIG BANG, you’re going to be waiting for a long time.  It’s become obvious that, as I’ve been saying for so long I’m tired of saying it… it’s a game of inches.

 

And it’s a simple game.  You hit the ball… you catch the ball.  Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose and sometimes it rains.

 

Well, some things are actually better.  Over 80 percent of trial modifications become permanent modifications today… that didn’t used to be true.  And I’ve checked with lawyers all over the country and they’re seeing what I’m seeing… better modifications… and principal reductions more and more.

 

Bank of America has started granting principal reductions as part of their loan mods.  I’ve seen eight in the last two weeks, and a dozen lawyers from around the country, including Bruce Levitt in New Jersey, have reported the same thing.  And how about BofA’s new rent-for-three-years-if-you-can’t-afford-it-any-more program?  I call it a soft landing.

 

And Ocwen is offering shared appreciation modifications (“SAM”) and they’re offering quite a few of them by the way.  But they are still awaiting approval from several states… it’s a requirement, I’m told.

 

And look… I’m not just saying this stuff to protect homeowners from bankers… I’m saying it to protect the bankers and our society too.  I just don’t believe many people can take another failed program that happened because no one followed the rules.  Last time, well… that’s one thing… it wasn’t pretty, but we made it through.

 

 

Not to put too fine a point on it but there are more than a few programs I could reference… like, dozens… that have failed so spectacularly that… and I do mean this literally… their reported outcomes would have been identical had they been administered by farm animals or house pets.  And that would be funny, were it not so entirely accurate.

 

Allow the same exact things to happen back-to-back and I’m not at all sure… all bets could be off.

 

Or… tell me I’m wrong.  I’m always willing to be wrong.  I actually like being wrong because I always learn something… and it happens so infrequently these days… lol.

 

Mandelman out.

 

 

 

Nov
28

Open Letter to State Attorney Dennis Ward | Marshall Watson – Potentially Questionable Documents by Patricia Arango & Caryn Graham

Open Letter to State Attorney Dennis Ward | Marshall Watson – Potentially Questionable Documents by Patricia Arango & Caryn Graham To: Mwilson <Mwilson@KeysSao.org> Subject: Marshall Watson – Potentially Questionable Documents by Patricia Arango & Caryn Graham   Dennis Ward, State Attorney Chief Investigator Mark Wilson Office State Attorney 16th Judicial Suite 2001, 530 Whitehead Street … Read more Related posts:
  1. State Attorney Dennis Ward To Take Closer Look at Robo-signing, The Marshall C. Watson Firm and Patricia Arango
  2. False Statements | Patricia Arango, Denise Bailey, Docx, Lender Processing Services, Liquenda Allotey, Litton Loan Servicing, Cheryl Samons, Shapiro and Fishman, David Stern, Marshall Watson
  3. BAM! | Full Deposition of Patricia Arango of Marshall C Watson – ARANGO’S TESTIMONY CONTRADICTS CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY OF MERSCORP PRESIDENT
Oct
25

False Statements | Patricia Arango, Denise Bailey, Docx, Lender Processing Services, Liquenda Allotey, Litton Loan Servicing, Cheryl Samons, Shapiro and Fishman, David Stern, Marshall Watson

False Statements Patricia Arango Denise Bailey Docx, LLC Lender Processing Services Liquenda Allotey Litton Loan Servicing Cheryl Samons Shapiro and Fishman, LLP David Stern Marshall Watson Action Date: October 25, 2011 Location: West Palm Beach, FL JUST IN TIME FOR HALLOWEEN… Some attorneys general might want to investigate the strange phenomenon of signatures missing from filed mortgage … Read more Related posts:
  1. Bank Fraud | Akerman Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A., American Home Mortgage Servicing, Docx, LLC, Florida Default Law Group, Law Offices of David Stern, Law Offices of Marshall Watson, Lender Processing Services, Inc., Shapiro & Fishman Law Firm
  2. Florida Attorney General Subpoenas to David J Stern, Marshall C Watson and Shapiro Fishman
  3. State Attorney Dennis Ward To Take Closer Look at Robo-signing, The Marshall C. Watson Firm and Patricia Arango
Jun
27

Ocwen Loan Servicing Takes Home from Handicapped Because There’s Equity

Well, that’s a fairly inflammatory headline, wouldn’t you say?  I certainly meant it to inflame, or perhaps even enrage… because I believe it to be the truth.  So, how about we make a deal: I’ll give you the facts of the case and let you decide from there.  If you agree with my assessment, then you send this article to everyone you know on the planet and let’s see if we can’t stop this horrific injustice from taking place.

Do we have a deal?  I sure hope we do.

This is the story of Dina and Robert Giangregorio of Huntington Beach, California. That’s them, just above.  They have three beautiful children who they’ve raised in their home for the last 17 years.  Robert has “Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis, one of the worst types of MS one can have.  Today, only one arm works, he is in a wheelchair… has a colostomy bag.

They pay someone to come and shower him several times a week.  Dina says that it wouldn’t be safe for her and the kids try to lift him, which to me is the least of all reasons to have someone come in to help him shower.

They had to have the home “handicapped,” which thank God they were finally able to do with some financial assistance from the MS Society.  Last year they transformed a small bathroom into a roll-in shower, for example.  It has not been an easy path they’ve been on, and there but for the grace of God go us all.

Their 17 year-old son just graduated from high school, their 15 year-old son will be a junior next year, and then there’s their 10 year-old daughter.

Last year, Robert had to have some medical procedures that didn’t go all that smoothly.  He ended up having a pump inserted into his stomach… it’s about the size of a hockey puck… and it releases medicine.  It was a difficult time, Dina had to provide almost full-time care for a few months there, and couldn’t get to work much; she owns her own successful photography business, by the way.

Robert was a General Manager for Clark Drugs/Savon.  He had worked his way up and would have soon been some type of regional manager, had he not been afflicted with MS.

They didn’t own their home at first… they rented it for six years as they saved up a down payment, but even still, they had to use money from his 401(k) plan to get it done.  They were high school sweethearts who married and wanted more than anything to own the home in which they would raise their family. Pretty responsible sorts, if you ask me.

Robert had checked the box at work for disability coverage when he went to work for his employer… and thank God once again… for that.  Social Security approved him as being disabled, but it was still a big fight with Prudential to get his disability checks going.  Apparently, Prudential thought Robert could keep working in his condition, I mean… why not?

They finally did approve him, of course… Dina’s back to work too, so that’s all behind them now.

Last year, with Dina providing full-time care for Robert, along with being a super-mom, they fell a couple of months behind on their mortgage payments.  But, in month three… when they tried to start catching up by making a single payment, Ocwen said they had to pay all three… one payment would not be accepted.

The couple told Ocwen of their tragic situation and Ocwen told them they should apply for a loan modification… and so they did… roughly a year ago… maybe a little more than a year ago.

After applying for the Obama plan, or HAMP, they were told they did not qualify… they apparently made too much money.  But, Ocwen said… no to worry… they’d try again… only to get the same result the second time.  Then it was try applying for an in-house modification, which they did, only to be turned down once again… and this time because they didn’t make enough money.

And the loan modification fun was just getting started.

Ocwen was maintaining that they should not worry, as their file was always in review or underwriting… or perhaps it was in review or in underwriting.  And then there were times when it was in review or in underwriting.  Ocwen’s representatives continually assured them that everything looked good and that they were not going to sell their home out from under them.  Relax, Ocwen essentially said… have a little false hope.

Then last January 30th the Giangregorios received a 3-page letter from Ocwen via regular mail.  It said that they had been approved for a “streamlined modification,” that would have lowered their monthly payment by about $400, but tacked on a fairly large balloon payment in 17 years.  Not a great thing, they thought, but it would save their home so why not?

Here’s what it said on the 3-page letter the Giangregorios received from Ocwen last January 30th:

“You have been selected to receive a special streamlined loan modification.  ACT NOW!  Because this I If this great offer does not meet your financial situation, call us at number, there are other options that are part of this initiative program, but the key is to ACT NOW, because all of the options are tied to this initiative program and it ends on January 31, 2011.”

The couple did have a few questions, however, and since the letter said the offer would expire THE NEXT DAY, they didn’t have much time to ask them.

They called Ocwen and the first person they spoke with had no idea what they were talking about, but that’s to be expected because that person was in India, so it’s easy to see how they might have missed it.  The next person they spoke with at Ocwen did know of the offer, but couldn’t answer any questions… they were given another number to call… Ocwen’s research department, and that department did their best to answer the questions they had.

Just to make sure they weren’t about to do anything incredibly stupid, they decided to check with a local financial planner they knew, and all told, they decided to accept Ocwen’s offer.  They went to get the certified funds that accepting the offer required… $2,078.66… and the next morning they called Ocwen to tell them the good news and arrange to transfer the funds.

Ocwen, however, had some less than good news for the Giangregorios… turns out, the offer had already expired.  Too late… you just missed it.  A few hours difference and you might have saved your home from foreclosure.  Darn the luck, you missed the deadline.  Too bad.  That’ll teach you to have questions.  You should have signed without questions… but no… now you’re nothing but an irresponsible borrower once again.

See, isn’t this getting more and more fun?  I told you it would.  Well, just wait… because the real fun is yet to come.

Once again, Ocwen said the couple shouldn’t worry, there was no foreclosure and no sale date scheduled, and they would be reconsidered for a modification.  But soon they started receiving scarier and scarier letters now from a company by the name of Western Progressive about the threat of foreclosure and the sale of their home.  Each time another letter would arrive in the mail, Dina Giangregorio would call Ocwen and each time she was told not to worry they were still under review for their modification and that the servicer would not foreclose as long as they were being considered for a loan modification… so, there was nothing to worry about.  Then they’d ask her to re-send some paperwork or documentation she had already sent in multiple times.

On May 19th they received a notice from Western Progressive saying that their home would be sold on June 6, 2011.  Dina called Ocwen immediately and spoke with Ocwen’s representative, Amrit Oswal.  She told Amrit that she had contacted Western Progressive and they had told her that to them it appeared to be a “seamless foreclosure,” and that their home would be sold on June 6th at noon, just as the notice had shown.  But Amrit told Dina that this was not the case.

According to Amrit there was NO SALE DATE scheduled, and he told Dina to have Western Progressive contact Ocwen.

She called Western Progressive to ask that they contact Amril Oswal at Ocwen, and was told that they would update Ocwen’s system.  When she called Ocwen back roughly 30 minutes later, although Amrit was not available to take her call at that time, she was told that in fact there was a sale date scheduled… June 6, 2011 at noon.

Dina was now understandably upset.  She had made countless calls to Ocwen throughout the past year and was repeatedly told that everything was fine and that she was under consideration for a modification.  Now, all of a sudden, with absolutely no explanation, her home was to be sold at a trustee sale.  Again she explained why they had fallen behind in the first place, that things had stabilized since then, that Ocwen had not allowed them to try to make up the payments they had missed, but rather had advised them to apply for a loan modification.

OCWEN made appointment with her and her husband for the coming Friday evening at 7:00 PM.  It was very important, they told her, that she be available for a call at that time because an OCWEN “loan specialist” would be calling to discuss options and review their paperwork.  They said it was very important that she have all of her paperwork ready for that call.

At 7:00 PM, Dina and Robert Giangregorio were sitting with their paperwork at the ready… staring at their telephone.  No call ever came.  At 7:30 PM Dina tried calling Ocwen… they were closed, but on a positive note, she was invited by Ocwen’s recorded voice to call back during normal business hours.

Early Saturday morning the Giangregorio’s phone rang.  It was OCWEN calling to inform them that their loan was past due.  The caller knew nothing of their situation.  Dina thanked them for calling and hung up the phone.

She glanced down at one of the letters she had received from Ocwen over the last several months.  On the letter was printed the following phrase:

Helping Homeowners is What We Do.

Ocwen Loan Servicing

Epilogue…

Dina called me to tell me her story this past week, and I’ve done my best to re-tell it to you in detail.  However, you should also know that in the interest relative brevity, I’ve left out countless phone calls and the re-submitting of documents, but rather focused only on the lowlights of the couple’s experiences dealing with Ocwen Loan Servicing.

Now, I’ve heard stories like Dina’s… oh, I don’t know anymore… maybe a few thousand times, and not just about Ocwen, but also about EVERY SINGLE OTHER MORTGAGE SERVICER IN THE COUNTRY.  How often do I hear a story like Dina’s, you might wonder.  Not more than EVERY SINGLE DAY, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK AND 365 DAYS A YEAR.

There are a couple of key facts about Dina’s story that I think bear repeating for additional emphasis.

  1. The couple fell behind for a reason that defines the word “hardship.”  Being afflicted with MS can happen to anyone of us at any time.  That this family has remained together and positive about their future is a testament to their love for each other.
  2. They weren’t even asking for a modification, they were only trying to make up a couple of back payments when this saga began, but Ocwen wouldn’t take fewer than the three payments they owed at that time.  All they needed was a second chance to get current now that their lives had stabilized, Robert’s disability income was coming in and Dina was back at her job.  It was Ocwen that suggested that they apply for a loan modification.
  3. If Ocwen had been honest with Dina from the day they had refused her one payment and told her they would move to foreclose, then per California law, the Giangregorio’s would have had 90 days from the date they received their Notice of Default, plus a couple of weeks after that, to make up the back payments and save their home.  And I’d bet money they would have done it.
  4. Instead Ocwen behaved just like a servicer.  They deceived her into believing that they would modify her loan because of the hardship her family had endured, and then proceeded to torture her for over a year with empty promises and false hope… right up until May 19th, when they finally verified that her home was to be sold on June 6th.   And even then, they told her to prepare for a phone call from one of Ocwen’s “loan specialists” that never came.
  5. Ocwen could have lowered the couple’s interest rate from 6% to 5%, offered them a repayment plan for the handful of back payments and everything would have been fine.  At the very least, Ocwen could have offered them a simple repayment plan for the back payments… that could have worked too.

Of course, there is one more thing of which the reader should be aware: The Giangregorios have equity in home; they are not “underwater.”  The amount of equity is less than $100,000… but still… there’s equity.  All other factors support a loan modification or repayment plan except that one: equity.

I don’t know what to say to them now, except that I guess they should have borrowed more… then they might have saved their home?  I guess I should tell them that they were too responsible to save.

I called a very experienced attorney who helps homeowners get loan modifications and that I know quite well to see if she could make a call to Ocwen and she said she would try.  She also said the following:

“Well, Martin… this is awful, but it’s also no surprise, it’s nothing new.  They all do this.  They want to foreclose.  And how is it that they all have the same dysfunctions.  They always blame the borrower.  It’s the same crap over and over again.  I just don’t understand how they can keep getting away with it.  This is awful, just awful.”

She did try but got no return calls, so keeping in mind that the Giangregorio’s home was scheduled to be sold on Monday… which is tomorrow by the way… I personally tried reaching Ocwen at every phone number and via every email address I could find on their site and elsewhere.  I left voice messages with the Ocwen Ombudsman and sent the Ombudsmen emails numerous times… nothing… not a single call or email in reply.  I tried the same with Ocwen’s senior management… nothing… nary a peep in response.

Had the Giangregorios won the lottery on Thursday or Friday… just days before their home was to be sold at the Trustee Sale, they couldn’t have reached Ocwen to pay off the home… and the sale would proceed.  Fannie Mae would walk into the sale, sign a credit bid and their home would go into the vast inventory of homes that sit vacant for no reason on the books of the failed, corrupt mortgage behemoth, now funded by the taxpayers of this country.

All while our government says they want loans to be modified… that they want foreclosures to be prevented if possible… that they want to help the “responsible homeowners.”  As long as they don’t have equity, that is.  And the really good news is that Ocwen just bought up Litton Loan Servicing and Home EQ servicing, so they obviously feel they are profitable enough to expand their operations.

And that’s just what this crisis situation needs, don’t you think… more like Ocwen?

I’ve paid a few bucks in taxes in my lifetime… and I don’t want to see the Giangregorios lose their home.  Does anyone anywhere?  I mean, besides the severely autistic chimpanzees that are running Ocwen.

On Ocwen’s website it says that they are a founding sponsor of the NeighborWorks® America- Ad Council campaign for foreclosure prevention.  What the hell does that mean?

Ocwen’s Website also has a page titled: Ocwen’s 15 Point Loan Servicing Customer Commitment Plan, where it says such things as, “We promise you our total commitment to provide the highest quality in customer service.”  And point #3 of fifteen says the following:

“If your loan becomes delinquent, Ocwen will assist you in a professional and consultative manner to work out a fair and reasonable resolution, such as a repayment plan, to avoid a foreclosure.”

A Message for Ocwen’s Senior Management Team…

As my regular readers would no doubt attest, I’ve been quite restrained in my writing of this expose about Ocwen.  Frankly, I have meetings in the morning, and I didn’t want to get myself any more upset than this story has already made me.

Also, call me naïve, but I have to believe that this is all some sort of gigantic oversight, and you’re going to learn of it… correct it immediately… and the Giangregorios are going to live in their home… happily ever after, as the saying goes.

But let me assure Ocwen’s President, Ronald M. Faris, and Mr. William C. Erbey, the company’s Executive Chairman of something… if that’s not the case, then I am nowhere near done with you.

And if you want to know just what I mean by that, I would only suggest that you Google me.  Don’t worry, I’ll be real easy to find.  In fact, I’ll come up right at the top of your Google search… just like when I write about you.

Mandelman out.

Want to send Mr. Erbey a note to share your thoughts on the Giangregorio’s situation…

Well, by all means… be my guest:

Ocwen Financial Corporation

William C. Erbey, Executive Chairman

Phone: (561) 682-8520

Email: William.Erbey@Ocwen.com

Jun
27

Ocwen Loan Servicing Takes Home from Handicapped Because There’s Equity

Well, that’s a fairly inflammatory headline, wouldn’t you say?  I certainly meant it to inflame, or perhaps even enrage… because I believe it to be the truth.  So, how about we make a deal: I’ll give you the facts of the case and let you decide from there.  If you agree with my assessment, then you send this article to everyone you know on the planet and let’s see if we can’t stop this horrific injustice from taking place.

Do we have a deal?  I sure hope we do.

This is the story of Dina and Robert Giangregorio of Huntington Beach, California. That’s them, just above.  They have three beautiful children who they’ve raised in their home for the last 17 years.  Robert has “Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis, one of the worst types of MS one can have.  Today, only one arm works, he is in a wheelchair… has a colostomy bag.

They pay someone to come and shower him several times a week.  Dina says that it wouldn’t be safe for her and the kids try to lift him, which to me is the least of all reasons to have someone come in to help him shower.

They had to have the home “handicapped,” which thank God they were finally able to do with some financial assistance from the MS Society.  Last year they transformed a small bathroom into a roll-in shower, for example.  It has not been an easy path they’ve been on, and there but for the grace of God go us all.

Their 17 year-old son just graduated from high school, their 15 year-old son will be a junior next year, and then there’s their 10 year-old daughter.

Last year, Robert had to have some medical procedures that didn’t go all that smoothly.  He ended up having a pump inserted into his stomach… it’s about the size of a hockey puck… and it releases medicine.  It was a difficult time, Dina had to provide almost full-time care for a few months there, and couldn’t get to work much; she owns her own successful photography business, by the way.

Robert was a General Manager for Clark Drugs/Savon.  He had worked his way up and would have soon been some type of regional manager, had he not been afflicted with MS.

They didn’t own their home at first… they rented it for six years as they saved up a down payment, but even still, they had to use money from his 401(k) plan to get it done.  They were high school sweethearts who married and wanted more than anything to own the home in which they would raise their family. Pretty responsible sorts, if you ask me.

Robert had checked the box at work for disability coverage when he went to work for his employer… and thank God once again… for that.  Social Security approved him as being disabled, but it was still a big fight with Prudential to get his disability checks going.  Apparently, Prudential thought Robert could keep working in his condition, I mean… why not?

They finally did approve him, of course… Dina’s back to work too, so that’s all behind them now.

Last year, with Dina providing full-time care for Robert, along with being a super-mom, they fell a couple of months behind on their mortgage payments.  But, in month three… when they tried to start catching up by making a single payment, Ocwen said they had to pay all three… one payment would not be accepted.

The couple told Ocwen of their tragic situation and Ocwen told them they should apply for a loan modification… and so they did… roughly a year ago… maybe a little more than a year ago.

After applying for the Obama plan, or HAMP, they were told they did not qualify… they apparently made too much money.  But, Ocwen said… no to worry… they’d try again… only to get the same result the second time.  Then it was try applying for an in-house modification, which they did, only to be turned down once again… and this time because they didn’t make enough money.

And the loan modification fun was just getting started.

Ocwen was maintaining that they should not worry, as their file was always in review or underwriting… or perhaps it was in review or in underwriting.  And then there were times when it was in review or in underwriting.  Ocwen’s representatives continually assured them that everything looked good and that they were not going to sell their home out from under them.  Relax, Ocwen essentially said… have a little false hope.

Then last January 30th the Giangregorios received a 3-page letter from Ocwen via regular mail.  It said that they had been approved for a “streamlined modification,” that would have lowered their monthly payment by about $400, but tacked on a fairly large balloon payment in 17 years.  Not a great thing, they thought, but it would save their home so why not?

Here’s what it said on the 3-page letter the Giangregorios received from Ocwen last January 30th:

“You have been selected to receive a special streamlined loan modification.  ACT NOW!  Because this I If this great offer does not meet your financial situation, call us at number, there are other options that are part of this initiative program, but the key is to ACT NOW, because all of the options are tied to this initiative program and it ends on January 31, 2011.”

The couple did have a few questions, however, and since the letter said the offer would expire THE NEXT DAY, they didn’t have much time to ask them.

They called Ocwen and the first person they spoke with had no idea what they were talking about, but that’s to be expected because that person was in India, so it’s easy to see how they might have missed it.  The next person they spoke with at Ocwen did know of the offer, but couldn’t answer any questions… they were given another number to call… Ocwen’s research department, and that department did their best to answer the questions they had.

Just to make sure they weren’t about to do anything incredibly stupid, they decided to check with a local financial planner they knew, and all told, they decided to accept Ocwen’s offer.  They went to get the certified funds that accepting the offer required… $2,078.66… and the next morning they called Ocwen to tell them the good news and arrange to transfer the funds.

Ocwen, however, had some less than good news for the Giangregorios… turns out, the offer had already expired.  Too late… you just missed it.  A few hours difference and you might have saved your home from foreclosure.  Darn the luck, you missed the deadline.  Too bad.  That’ll teach you to have questions.  You should have signed without questions… but no… now you’re nothing but an irresponsible borrower once again.

See, isn’t this getting more and more fun?  I told you it would.  Well, just wait… because the real fun is yet to come.

Once again, Ocwen said the couple shouldn’t worry, there was no foreclosure and no sale date scheduled, and they would be reconsidered for a modification.  But soon they started receiving scarier and scarier letters now from a company by the name of Western Progressive about the threat of foreclosure and the sale of their home.  Each time another letter would arrive in the mail, Dina Giangregorio would call Ocwen and each time she was told not to worry they were still under review for their modification and that the servicer would not foreclose as long as they were being considered for a loan modification… so, there was nothing to worry about.  Then they’d ask her to re-send some paperwork or documentation she had already sent in multiple times.

On May 19th they received a notice from Western Progressive saying that their home would be sold on June 6, 2011.  Dina called Ocwen immediately and spoke with Ocwen’s representative, Amrit Oswal.  She told Amrit that she had contacted Western Progressive and they had told her that to them it appeared to be a “seamless foreclosure,” and that their home would be sold on June 6th at noon, just as the notice had shown.  But Amrit told Dina that this was not the case.

According to Amrit there was NO SALE DATE scheduled, and he told Dina to have Western Progressive contact Ocwen.

She called Western Progressive to ask that they contact Amril Oswal at Ocwen, and was told that they would update Ocwen’s system.  When she called Ocwen back roughly 30 minutes later, although Amrit was not available to take her call at that time, she was told that in fact there was a sale date scheduled… June 6, 2011 at noon.

Dina was now understandably upset.  She had made countless calls to Ocwen throughout the past year and was repeatedly told that everything was fine and that she was under consideration for a modification.  Now, all of a sudden, with absolutely no explanation, her home was to be sold at a trustee sale.  Again she explained why they had fallen behind in the first place, that things had stabilized since then, that Ocwen had not allowed them to try to make up the payments they had missed, but rather had advised them to apply for a loan modification.

OCWEN made appointment with her and her husband for the coming Friday evening at 7:00 PM.  It was very important, they told her, that she be available for a call at that time because an OCWEN “loan specialist” would be calling to discuss options and review their paperwork.  They said it was very important that she have all of her paperwork ready for that call.

At 7:00 PM, Dina and Robert Giangregorio were sitting with their paperwork at the ready… staring at their telephone.  No call ever came.  At 7:30 PM Dina tried calling Ocwen… they were closed, but on a positive note, she was invited by Ocwen’s recorded voice to call back during normal business hours.

Early Saturday morning the Giangregorio’s phone rang.  It was OCWEN calling to inform them that their loan was past due.  The caller knew nothing of their situation.  Dina thanked them for calling and hung up the phone.

She glanced down at one of the letters she had received from Ocwen over the last several months.  On the letter was printed the following phrase:

Helping Homeowners is What We Do.

Ocwen Loan Servicing

Epilogue…

Dina called me to tell me her story this past week, and I’ve done my best to re-tell it to you in detail.  However, you should also know that in the interest relative brevity, I’ve left out countless phone calls and the re-submitting of documents, but rather focused only on the lowlights of the couple’s experiences dealing with Ocwen Loan Servicing.

Now, I’ve heard stories like Dina’s… oh, I don’t know anymore… maybe a few thousand times, and not just about Ocwen, but also about EVERY SINGLE OTHER MORTGAGE SERVICER IN THE COUNTRY.  How often do I hear a story like Dina’s, you might wonder.  Not more than EVERY SINGLE DAY, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK AND 365 DAYS A YEAR.

There are a couple of key facts about Dina’s story that I think bear repeating for additional emphasis.

  1. The couple fell behind for a reason that defines the word “hardship.”  Being afflicted with MS can happen to anyone of us at any time.  That this family has remained together and positive about their future is a testament to their love for each other.
  2. They weren’t even asking for a modification, they were only trying to make up a couple of back payments when this saga began, but Ocwen wouldn’t take fewer than the three payments they owed at that time.  All they needed was a second chance to get current now that their lives had stabilized, Robert’s disability income was coming in and Dina was back at her job.  It was Ocwen that suggested that they apply for a loan modification.
  3. If Ocwen had been honest with Dina from the day they had refused her one payment and told her they would move to foreclose, then per California law, the Giangregorio’s would have had 90 days from the date they received their Notice of Default, plus a couple of weeks after that, to make up the back payments and save their home.  And I’d bet money they would have done it.
  4. Instead Ocwen behaved just like a servicer.  They deceived her into believing that they would modify her loan because of the hardship her family had endured, and then proceeded to torture her for over a year with empty promises and false hope… right up until May 19th, when they finally verified that her home was to be sold on June 6th.   And even then, they told her to prepare for a phone call from one of Ocwen’s “loan specialists” that never came.
  5. Ocwen could have lowered the couple’s interest rate from 6% to 5%, offered them a repayment plan for the handful of back payments and everything would have been fine.  At the very least, Ocwen could have offered them a simple repayment plan for the back payments… that could have worked too.

Of course, there is one more thing of which the reader should be aware: The Giangregorios have equity in home; they are not “underwater.”  The amount of equity is less than $100,000… but still… there’s equity.  All other factors support a loan modification or repayment plan except that one: equity.

I don’t know what to say to them now, except that I guess they should have borrowed more… then they might have saved their home?  I guess I should tell them that they were too responsible to save.

I called a very experienced attorney who helps homeowners get loan modifications and that I know quite well to see if she could make a call to Ocwen and she said she would try.  She also said the following:

“Well, Martin… this is awful, but it’s also no surprise, it’s nothing new.  They all do this.  They want to foreclose.  And how is it that they all have the same dysfunctions.  They always blame the borrower.  It’s the same crap over and over again.  I just don’t understand how they can keep getting away with it.  This is awful, just awful.”

She did try but got no return calls, so keeping in mind that the Giangregorio’s home was scheduled to be sold on Monday… which is tomorrow by the way… I personally tried reaching Ocwen at every phone number and via every email address I could find on their site and elsewhere.  I left voice messages with the Ocwen Ombudsman and sent the Ombudsmen emails numerous times… nothing… not a single call or email in reply.  I tried the same with Ocwen’s senior management… nothing… nary a peep in response.

Had the Giangregorios won the lottery on Thursday or Friday… just days before their home was to be sold at the Trustee Sale, they couldn’t have reached Ocwen to pay off the home… and the sale would proceed.  Fannie Mae would walk into the sale, sign a credit bid and their home would go into the vast inventory of homes that sit vacant for no reason on the books of the failed, corrupt mortgage behemoth, now funded by the taxpayers of this country.

All while our government says they want loans to be modified… that they want foreclosures to be prevented if possible… that they want to help the “responsible homeowners.”  As long as they don’t have equity, that is.  And the really good news is that Ocwen just bought up Litton Loan Servicing and Home EQ servicing, so they obviously feel they are profitable enough to expand their operations.

And that’s just what this crisis situation needs, don’t you think… more like Ocwen?

I’ve paid a few bucks in taxes in my lifetime… and I don’t want to see the Giangregorios lose their home.  Does anyone anywhere?  I mean, besides the severely autistic chimpanzees that are running Ocwen.

On Ocwen’s website it says that they are a founding sponsor of the NeighborWorks® America- Ad Council campaign for foreclosure prevention.  What the hell does that mean?

Ocwen’s Website also has a page titled: Ocwen’s 15 Point Loan Servicing Customer Commitment Plan, where it says such things as, “We promise you our total commitment to provide the highest quality in customer service.”  And point #3 of fifteen says the following:

“If your loan becomes delinquent, Ocwen will assist you in a professional and consultative manner to work out a fair and reasonable resolution, such as a repayment plan, to avoid a foreclosure.”

A Message for Ocwen’s Senior Management Team…

As my regular readers would no doubt attest, I’ve been quite restrained in my writing of this expose about Ocwen.  Frankly, I have meetings in the morning, and I didn’t want to get myself any more upset than this story has already made me.

Also, call me naïve, but I have to believe that this is all some sort of gigantic oversight, and you’re going to learn of it… correct it immediately… and the Giangregorios are going to live in their home… happily ever after, as the saying goes.

But let me assure Ocwen’s President, Ronald M. Faris, and Mr. William C. Erbey, the company’s Executive Chairman of something… if that’s not the case, then I am nowhere near done with you.

And if you want to know just what I mean by that, I would only suggest that you Google me.  Don’t worry, I’ll be real easy to find.  In fact, I’ll come up right at the top of your Google search… just like when I write about you.

Mandelman out.

Want to send Mr. Erbey a note to share your thoughts on the Giangregorio’s situation…

Well, by all means… be my guest:

Ocwen Financial Corporation

William C. Erbey, Executive Chairman

Phone: (561) 682-8520

Email: William.Erbey@Ocwen.com

Aug
08

Loan Servicer Tactics… Foreclose don’t modify; lie, deceive, whatever it takes

As a citizen, please start asking tougher questions and demanding truthful answers of your elected officials. We MUST hold these men and women accountable to representing ‘we the people’ instead of their lobby pals.

Whatever you hear from the Administration or any of the large institutions via the drive-by media you can assume that it’s a lie or many shades of gray with dash or two of spin. Why? Well, of course, the truth is not going to get votes for politicians or more investors and account holders for any of these characters who operate in the shadows of financial institution corporate offices across America.

Let me give you a dose of truth serum in case you’re tempted to believe the drive by media reports on the foreclosures and the Making Home Affordable plan we’ve been told is going to rescue our economy and the housing market and the millions of families jobless and now facing foreclosure. You ready?

Here it is: the loan servicers don’t care about anything but money and the modus operandi is clear… foreclose as fast as possible on everyone in a mortgage hardship. Just modify enough loans to make everyone think we’re really on board with this. Make excuses for everything else. Lie to media about what’s really going on because mostly everyone believes what they hear anyway.

A deeper look into the numbers and statistics will leave you scratching your head though – and asking yourself the question, “but why?”

According to an article by Gretchen Morgenson from the New York Times, “Alan M. White, an assistant professor at the Valparaiso University law school in Indiana, analyzed data on 3.5 million subprime and alt-A mortgages in securitization pools overseen by Wells Fargo. The loans were written in 2005 through 2007; data on their performance is provided to the trusts’ investors. Mortgages handled by five of the nation’s largest loan servicing companies — Bank of America, Chase Home Finance and Litton Loan Servicing among them — are contained in the Wells Fargo data.

Mr. White found that mortgage modifications peaked in February and have declined in all but one month since. While servicers modified 23,749 loans in these trusts in February, they changed only 19,041 in May and 18,179 in June. This is exactly when servicers were supposed to be responding to the government’s loan modification urgings.

Foreclosures, meanwhile, keep rising. In June, 281,560 were in process, slightly above the 277,847 in May. Last January, there were about 242,000 foreclosures in the pipeline among the Wells Fargo trusts.”

Well, isn’t that interesting. You see, the numbers simply don’t lie. They tell the truth and expose the raw data of what is really happening. The report continues, “the most fascinating, and frightening, figures in the data detail how much money is lost when foreclosed homes are sold. In June, the data show almost 32,000 liquidation sales; the average loss on those was 64.7 percent of the original loan balance.”

Did you catch that? The AVERAGE loss on a house that a servicers takes to foreclosure sale is a whopping 64.7% of the original loan balance!!!! The average loan amount was $223,000. But in the liquidation sale, the property sold for $144,000 less, or a $79,000 sales price on average.

So any logical person goes, “why? Why would a servicer foreclose on the home instead of providing a loan modification for a homeowner who wants to pay but just needs a reduction in that payment?” I know I can’t be the only one who’s wondered that…

If you want to find the answer you just gotta follow the money… it’s that simple. And the answer does not shed any more favorable light on these servicers – who, by the way, are just subsidiaries of the main financial institutions. Example: Citimortgage is the servicer. They are owned by Citigroup. America’s Servicing Company is the servicer. They are owned by Wells Fargo.

So back to following the money. First, the pooling and servicing agreements governing these trusts, servicers and trustees usually contain “default servicing provisions” which provide the servicer which much higher fees when the loan goes into default. Then the servicer also gets all sorts of other fees reimbursed to them upon a liquidation sale such as BPO fees, inspection fees, legal fees, etc. These fees may get paid to the servicer right away but may not be reimbursed until the sale goes through. But, here’s the BIG reason…

Very often, if not most of the times, these servicers were paid in full for all these loans when they acted as the sponsor and sold the Notes (assets) to these trusts. The trust investors put up a lump sum amount to the servicer and the servicer agreed to collect the monies, manage the escrow accounts and in turn, made a guarantee of cash flow payments to the trust each month. The trust investors are most worried about one thing… their monthly payment on the cash flow. If they keep getting their monthly cash payment, do you think they’re going to be screaming bloody murder? Probably not. As long as the check keeps coming, I got no qualms. Stop the checks and I’m going to be gettin’ all in your business. Think about it… haven’t you noticed a peculiar lack of lawsuits being filed by MBS trust investors or the trusts themselves? One would think the federal courts would be littered with lawsuits by these trusts against all the institutions in the securitization chain for all sorts of allegations regarding the massive losses you’d think they’re realizing due to the defaults.

So, to keep the investors out of their “business” the servicer has to figure out a way to keep those cash flow payments going. Well, let’s say I’m servicing a pool of 1000 loans and the monthly cash flow on that pool is $1 million (or $1000 per loan average). But my default rate starts rising and now 10% of these loans are not paying. Well, that’s $100,000 per month less that I’m getting as the servicer. Shoot, how do I keep making the payment of $1 million per month if I’m only receiving $900,000?

Oh, I got it! If I can foreclose on a couple homes in default, take a 64.7% loss on it but I still get $79,000 in one lump sum from each home I liquidate, I can keep making that cash payment to the trust. All I need to do is liquidate about 1.2 homes per month on average, and, even though I take a huge loss on these homes, I can keep making that cash flow payment to the trust, keep my investors happy and better yet, keep them out of my business and away from asking all sorts of questions I really don’t want to answer. Note: this game can only carry on for so long. At some point the pied piper is going to pipe…

This my best stab at a simplified answer to “why” these servicers are ignoring the Making Home Affordable program and foreclosing as fast as they possibly can. Nothing else makes sense to me. If you have any other input, I’d love to hear about in the forum on this topic.

The kicker here is that these servicers don’t have legal standing to foreclose. They don’t own the Note in 80%+ of the cases – and that number is probably higher than 90% of the time. So they unlawfully seize a family’s home, sell it even though they don’t own it and in the process they also violate the servicing agreements they are governed by. These agreements mandate that the servicer act in a fiduciary manner with respect to the interests of the investors. I can tell you unequivocally that taking an average 64.7% loss on a trust asset is worse for the trust versus modifying the loan at a higher amount (still with principal reduction for the borrower) and recapturing the interest. There is NO WAY the current servicer model of foreclose and liquidate passes the NPV test for these trust assets – at least as far as I can see.

For reference and further context, here is the article written by Gretchen Morgenson at the New York Times.

So Many Foreclosures, So Little Logic

By GRETCHEN MORGENSON

LAST week, the stock market tumbled on news that housing foreclosures and delinquencies rose again in the first quarter. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said that among the 34 million loans it tracks, foreclosures in progress rose 22 percent, to 844,389. That figure was 73 percent higher than in the same period last year.

But the comptroller’s office also said that amid the gloom, there was promising data about loan modifications: they rose 55 percent in the quarter. That growth came on a very low base, of course, but the move encouraged John C. Dugan, head of the comptroller’s office.

“As the administration’s ‘Making Home Affordable’ program gains traction and helps offset the impact of this very difficult economic cycle,” he said in a statement, “we should continue to see progress in future reports.”

A glimpse of second-quarter mortgage data, however, indicates that the progress Mr. Dugan and his colleagues in Washington are hoping for may take longer to emerge — raising questions about whether policymakers and banks are moving quickly or intelligently enough on the foreclosure problem.

Foreclosures remain one of the great financial ills for the economy. The Bush administration largely overlooked foreclosures affecting average homeowners, focusing instead on propping up elite, troubled financial institutions with taxpayer funds. The Obama administration has said it wants to wrestle the foreclosure issue to the ground by encouraging mortgage loan modifications, but its efforts have gotten little traction.

Loan modifications occur when a lender agrees to change terms of a troubled borrower’s mortgage; the most common approach is to reduce the loan’s interest rate. Cutting the amount of principal owed — an option that could be of more help to a borrower — is rare because it means homeowners pay less money back to the bank over time.

Lenders and their representatives, however, don’t like to modify loans through interest rate cuts or principal reductions because, of course, it reduces the income they receive from borrowers. No surprise, then, that loan modifications have been a trickle amid the recent foreclosure flood.

Enter the government, with the program it announced in March to encourage modifications. It offers incentives to loan servicers to change mortgage terms, providing $1,000 for each loan they modify. The program focuses on making payments more affordable through lower interest rates, but delinquent amounts and late fees are typically tacked onto the mortgage balance. “Making Home Affordable” does not compel lenders to reduce mortgage balances.

Servicers signed on to the program in April. The program’s early months were not covered by the O.C.C.’s first-quarter report. But other figures on modifications conducted in April, May and June are available. And they show a decline in modifications, not an increase as the government hoped.

Alan M. White, an assistant professor at the Valparaiso University law school in Indiana, analyzed data on 3.5 million subprime and alt-A mortgages in securitization pools overseen by Wells Fargo. The loans were written in 2005 through 2007; data on their performance is provided to the trusts’ investors. Mortgages handled by five of the nation’s largest loan servicing companies — Bank of America, Chase Home Finance and Litton Loan Servicing among them — are contained in the Wells Fargo data.

Mr. White found that mortgage modifications peaked in February and have declined in all but one month since. While servicers modified 23,749 loans in these trusts in February, they changed only 19,041 in May and 18,179 in June. This is exactly when servicers were supposed to be responding to the government’s loan modification urgings.

Foreclosures, meanwhile, keep rising. In June, 281,560 were in process, slightly above the 277,847 in May. Last January, there were about 242,000 foreclosures in the pipeline among the Wells Fargo trusts.

“I was hoping we would see some impact in June of the government’s program,” Mr. White said. “Is ‘Home Affordable’ working? My short answer is no.”

To be sure, the government’s data differs from that which Mr. White analyzed, and its loan modification figures for the second quarter may look better as a result. The O.C.C. includes prime loans as well as subprime, for example, while the Wells Fargo data contains no prime loans.

Nevertheless, Mr. White has collected the figures since November 2008, and he said that in the months since, the performance of the 3.5 million mortgages that he analyzes tracked the O.C.C. data pretty closely.

THE Wells Fargo data is illuminating. It shows that in June, 58 percent of modifications cut the payments that the borrower has to pay, a slightly smaller percentage than in April or May. The average reduction in June was $173 a month.

But the most fascinating, and frightening, figures in the data detail how much money is lost when foreclosed homes are sold. In June, the data show almost 32,000 liquidation sales; the average loss on those was 64.7 percent of the original loan balance.

Here are the numbers: the average loan balance began at almost $223,000. But in the liquidation sale, the property sold for $144,000 less, on average. Perhaps no other single figure shows how wildly the mortgage mania pumped up home prices. It also bodes poorly for the quality of the mortgage-related assets lurking in banks’ books.

Loss severities, like foreclosures, are rising. In November, losses averaged 56.1 percent of the original loan balance; in February, 63.3 percent.

Given losses like these, Mr. White said he was perplexed that lenders and their representatives were resisting reducing principal when they modify loans. His data shows how rare it is for lenders to reduce principal. In June, for example, 3,135 loans — just 17.2 percent of the total modified — involved write-downs of principal, interest or fees. The total loss from these write-downs was just $45 million in June.

And yet, the losses incurred in foreclosure sales involving loans in the securitization trusts were a staggering $4.59 billion in June. “There is 100 times as much money lost in foreclosure sales as there was in writing down balances in modifications,” Mr. White said. “That is not rational economic behavior.”

If banks have written down the value of these loans to the 40 cents on the dollar that they are fetching on foreclosures — the only true value for these homes right now — then why don’t they bite the bullet and reduce the loan amount outstanding for the troubled borrowers? That type of modification would be far more likely to succeed than larding a borrower who is hopelessly underwater with yet more arrears.

“You can reduce payments with a lot of gimmicks similar to those built into subprime loans — temporary rate reductions that defer a lot of principal, balloon payments,” Mr. White said. “To me that leads to a situation where American homeowners are paying 50 to 60 percent of their incomes for mortgages which reset in 2011 and 2012. That is not solving the problem.”

Certainly not for borrowers, that is. And because many of these losses will ultimately be passed on to taxpayers, it’s not solving our problem, either.

Website Designed and Developed by Tampa Web Designer