Apr
26

AG Coakley Launches “HomeCorps” Program and Hotline to Aid Distressed Borrowers and Ease Foreclosure Crisis

AG Coakley Launches “HomeCorps” Program and Hotline to Aid Distressed Borrowers and Ease Foreclosure Crisis Funding Result of Multi-State Bank Settlement Over Illegal Foreclosures And Loan Servicing Program Will Increase Loan Modification Specialists to Assist Homeowners; Provide Multiple Grants Aimed at Revitalizing Communities and Aiding Borrowers AG’s HomeCorps Hotline at 617-573-5333 BOSTON — Attorney General … Read more Related posts:
  1. MERS | Mass. AG Coakley Launches Probe of Foreclosure Mess
  2. MA AG Coakley Lawsuit Against Banks Ripped to Shreds in Settlement
  3. HAFA – New Program Offers Borrowers Foreclosure Alternatives
Mar
14

Ruiz v. 1st Fidelity Loan Servicing, LLC | Minnesota Appeals Court: Foreclosure By Advertisement Is Void Unless Strict Statutory Compliance Is Met

Minnesota Appeals Court: Foreclosure By Advertisement Is Void Unless Strict Statutory Compliance Is Met In a recent ruling by the Minnesota Court of Appeals, the court issued a reminder that, for a foreclosure by advertisement to be valid in Minnesota, strict compliance with statutory requirements is met. Accordingly, it reversed a lower court ruling adverse … Read more Related posts:
  1. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS | Foreclosure Judgments REVERSED – MERS May NOT Foreclose by Advertisement
  2. California | Bankruptcy Judge Denies MERS, Foreclosure Sale Void, “MERS System is not an Alternative to Statutory Foreclosure Law”
  3. NY Appeals Court Dismisses Lender’s Lawsuit; Says Bank Failed To Strictly Comply With State Anti-Foreclosure Ripoff Law
Mar
13

Fannie Announces an Initiative to Make Loan-level Data for Single-family MBS Accessible as a Move Towards Transparency

A Legal Take on Fannie-BofA Fannie announced an initiative to make loan-level data for single-family MBS accessible as a move towards transparency. The agency will start releasing loan-level data beginning the first quarter of 2012 and will provide data updates regularly. Obviously investors in agency MBS, and all MBS, want to know what they’re buying, … Read more Related posts:
  1. Fannie, Freddie, FHA combined REO Inventory at Record Level
  2. BofA, JPMorgan Fail to Make Fannie Mae Grade for Loan Servicing
  3. Michael Olenick: NAR’s Big Miss on Home Sales Underscores Lack of Transparency and Accuracy in Mortgage/Housing Data
Feb
28

Experienced Robosigners Wanted | JPMorgan, BofA Strain for Qualified Staff to Clear Foreclosures

JPMorgan, BofA Strain for Qualified Staff to Clear Foreclosures JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. told regulators they were straining last year to hire and keep enough qualified people who could clear a backlog of foreclosure complaints. JPMorgan, the largest U.S. bank by assets, vowed to expand training after its review found … Read more Related posts:
  1. BofA, JPMorgan Fail to Make Fannie Mae Grade for Loan Servicing
  2. Fraudclosure | Albany County Legislators Want to Pull $90 Million Account From BofA, Discontinue Procurement Cards with JPMorgan
  3. NY Times – JPMorgan Suspends Foreclosures Amid Document Review
Jan
30

Help Wanted | Wells Fargo “Robo-signing” Specialist 3 (Final Docs Dept. /Default Assignment Team) NO JOKE!

In the world of you just can’t make this stuff up… ~ Loan Servicing Specialist 3 (Final Docs Dept. /Default Assignment Team) From the job description… SHIFT AVAILABLE: The hours will tentatively be 7am-3:30pm. Shifts are subject to change based on business needs. The Default Assignment team is responsible for the creation, execution, and recordation … Read more No related posts.
Jan
23

Woman’s Home Loan Sold to Ocwen, $400 Payment “Lost” in the Process, $1100 in Fess Tacked On, Foreclosure Threatened

This may not be a case of a missing payment. We recently got word that Ocwen is charging a “transfer fee” to the homeowners when purchasing their loans… “It appears that when servicers sell loans to other servicers, the new servicer then charges the homeowner a ridiculous ‘transfer fee’, causing them to get behind or … Read more Related posts:
  1. Bloomberg | Goldman Sachs Will Sell Litton Loan Servicing to Ocwen for $264 Million
  2. Litton/Ocwen Foreclosure Threats | Not missed a payment and yet foreclosure warnings keep arriving
  3. Veteran’s Four Year Foreclosure Fiasco Finally Comes to an End – Ocwen Gives Back Stolen Title to Paid Off Home
Nov
22

BofA Clash With Fannie Mae Escalates Over Loan Buyback Stance

BofA Clash With Fannie Mae Escalates Over Loan Buyback Stance Bank of America Corp. (BAC) told Fannie Mae it refuses to cooperate with the U.S. mortgage firm’s new stance on loan buybacks, setting the lender up for a potential surge in claims and penalties. The bank is disputing Fannie Mae’s demand that lenders repurchase mortgages … Read more Related posts:
  1. Bloomberg | Ally Settles Fannie Buyback Demands for $462 Million
  2. FAIL | BofA Resolves Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Loan-Putback Dispute
  3. BofA, JPMorgan Fail to Make Fannie Mae Grade for Loan Servicing
Sep
16

BofA, JPMorgan Fail to Make Fannie Mae Grade for Loan Servicing

BofA, JPMorgan Fail to Make Fannie Mae Grade for Loan Servicing Bank of America Corp. (BAC), the largest U.S. mortgage servicer, failed to make a list of companies doing a satisfactory job of assisting homeowners struggling to pay their mortgage, according to Fannie Mae. Of the 11 biggest servicers of Fannie Mae mortgages, Wells Fargo … Read more
Aug
17

N.J. Judge Allows 4 Major Banks to Resume Uncontested Fraudclosure Proceedings

For Bank of America’s Home Loan Servicing division, Williams wrote that the company’s submissions showed “that it has processes and procedures in place” to ensure the information it submits in foreclosure cases is based on personal knowledge of the relevant records, “which were made in the regular course of business.” ~ N.J. judge allows 4 … Read more
Aug
15

BIG WIN IN GA | Morgan v Ocwen, MERS – ONLY A “SECURED CREDITOR” May Conduct A Non-Judicial Foreclosure In Georgia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION MICHAEL L. MORGAN, Plaintiff, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., and MERSCORP, INC. Defendants. ~ Wrongful Foreclosure Although the separation of the note and the security deed does not render either instrument void, it does create a … Read more
Aug
01

Fannie Mae Whistleblower: “HAMP was About the Numbers & Appeasing the Banks

This is a must see video to learn about how wickedly deceptive the loan servicing industry is and what a sham the Obama administration has perpetrated on the American people with all the do-good messages about the HAMP program.

News flash: it was never about the American taxpayer or homeowner. The lies are so bold-faced these days it’s shocking. They literally couch the entire TARP bailout and HAMP program as protecting Americans and our “way of life” and then in the same breath implement programs that do the exact opposite and protect the antithesis of the “American citizen.”

Watch and be shocked (or maybe not so much…)!

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

 

Jul
09

Mandelman SHOCKS Online Community, Says: “I don’t care about my readers anymore.”

If you’re a regular or even occasional reader of Mandelman Matters, you’re reading this now… and waiting for the twist or the punch line, right?  You’re thinking… “Oh yeah right… I know him… what’s he saying by saying he doesn’t care about his readers?  Okay, you hooked me in… now tell me what you’re talking about.”

But, it’s not like that… sorry to disappoint you… I’ve recently realized that I actually don’t care about my readers.  You read me all the time?  So what?  It’s not like I get a nickel a reader, or anything like that… so read me… read something else, I could care less.

I used to care about my readers but, truth be told, this past week leading up to today, something happened that changed me… and I think you all have the right to know what it was that has caused me to think this way.

You see… today, Dina and Robert Giangregorio of Huntington Beach, California received their permanent loan modification from Ocwen Loan Servicing.  Do you remember them?  I wrote about them last week… three kids… Robert has “Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis, one of the worst types of MS one can have.  He only has use of one of his arms and he’s in a wheelchair.  The headline to the story I wrote about them was: “Ocwen Loan Servicing Takes Home from Handicapped Because There’s Equity.”

Now do you remember?  If not, you’d better click that link and read the article before going on or the rest of this article won’t make nearly as much sense.  Like missing “Part One” of something and then trying to just dive in at “Part Two.”  It’s never the same as if you had seen the first one.

So, yes… Ocwen sent the Giangregorio’s the documents for their permanent loan modification today, and as you might imagine… they were way beyond pleased… in fact, it’s safe to say that they were overwhelmed.  Dina sent me an email right after she heard… all it said was:

“Martin!!  I am crying. Words cannot express…”

I understood.  I felt the same way, but not for the same reason.

I emailed her back maybe 15 minutes after they learned of the great news and asked her to call me.  I wanted to ask if they would be interviewed on camera for a documentary on the foreclosure crisis that I’m filming this summer.

Dina emailed me back right away… she said she needed time to compose herself… calm down a bit… before she could call me.  Like I said, they were quite happy that after living through a sale date for their home last Monday, they would not be moving any time soon after all.  Quite a relief, I’d imagine.

So, a few minutes later she and Robert called… I was on the speakerphone and as one might expect, they were both thanking me for helping them save their home.  Dina told me that she felt as if a cloud had been lifted… I said I understood, even though for me… that cloud was still there.

I said they were welcome and not to give it another thought.  Besides, as I told them… I was only a part of it… there were lots of others involved, and those others were really the ones who deserve the credit for making this happen.  First of all, CDA Law in Mission Viejo, who are true stars of the loan modification world, jumped in against all odds to represent Dina and Robert and really were the technical experts here, and Julie Greenfield, who is the absolute top of the food chain when it comes to loan modifications, also volunteered to help push the ball over the line. (Both CDA and Julie can be found on my Trusted Attorney list.)

All I did was write about it… it was the others who took action and made Ocwen take notice… they weren’t just “my readers”… they were my “DOERS,” and how I feel about them… well, I think Dina said it best when she said… “Words cannot express…”


It had all started a little over a week ago… my wife had just picked me up from the airport.  I had just flown in from Hawaii after meeting with members of the state legislature on issues related to the foreclosure crisis.  I wrote their story the following day, I believe.  It was hard to write, because it made me angry and sad.

And then, after wiping away a few tears and swearing like a drunk pissed off sailor… down at the very bottom of their article, after I typed “Mandelman out,” I gave out the email address and phone number of Ocwen’s Executive Chairman, and said:

“Want to send Mr. Erbey a note to share your thoughts on the Giangregorio’s situation… Well, by all means… be my guest…”

It wasn’t even 15 minutes later that I received an email… I was being cc’d on an email sent to Ocwen’s Executive Chairman by someone who I had thought was just a “reader,” but now I saw was a “DOER.”  I wrote back to her right away, thanking her for doing what she had done.

Minutes later another email… same thing… another DOER was cc’ing me on another email to Ocwen’s Executive Chairman.  And then another came in before I could even send another thank you note in response… and then another… and another… and yet another.  Some of my readers were DOERS and they had read my article and done something about it.

That went on for a few days.

Then I received an email from a senior executive at Ocwen’s Washington D.C. office.  He was responding to an email that I had sent him before I posted the Giangregorio’s story, telling him that I was about to run the story and giving him a chance to comment.  I wasn’t expecting to hear back from anyone… I do it all the time before I go after a banker or servicer or government boob… it seems like the journalist-sort-of-thing to do, right?  But no one ever responds.

Here’s what Ocwen’s senior exec said in his email to me:

Martin,

Your email was forwarded to me but I have been traveling and didn’t see
it until yesterday.  I apologize for not getting back sooner.

I understand the Giangregorious story has been posted, but would like to
discuss the situation with you if possible. We’ve actually worked very
hard on this case, are saddened by it and will continue to do what we
can. We have not foreclosed and will continue to try to assist the
family within our legal constraints. I can assure you that our
commitment to helping distressed homeowners keep their homes with
sustainable payment plans is genuine — it is also very much consistent
with our own business interests.  Since the outset of the mortgage
crisis, we’ve worked out solutions for over 100,000 families to avoid
foreclosure and are recognized as the industry’s loan modification
leader.

But, again, I think it would be worthwhile to talk…would there be a
time say later this afternoon or anytime this week for a call?

Thank you…

And then he signed it.

I emailed him back and within an hour or so we were talking on the phone.  It was later in the afternoon on the Friday before July 4th weekend, and with him being in D.C. I didn’t expect the call to last very long… but it did…  at least a couple of hours… it was after 7:00 PM East Coast time when we hung up, resolving to talk again after the holiday.

I had expected him to be a nice guy… and he was… but, he was also very smart and we talked about the financial and foreclosure crises in the big picture sense, going back to examine all of the many different factors that led to the meltdown.  He knew some “insider” sort of things that I hadn’t known, and I knew some stuff that he was interested to hear about.

I liked him, and I had not expected that to be the case.  As he phrased it… we were in “violent agreement” on just about every single issue we discussed.  He said he’d send me an article he’d written a couple of years back on loan modifications and the foreclosure crisis, and I said I’d send him links to a couple of hundred articles that I’d written on the subject.

After we hung up, I had two thoughts come immediately to mind:

  1. Wow… maybe he and I can make something happen here… start something that other servicers would see as a success, and then follow.  I felt the same way about what had happened in Hawaii… maybe, just maybe… I was gaining on it.  And…
  2. OMG… If April Charney and Max Gardner find out that I liked the guy, and that I could possibly work with him on something… they’ll kill me.  To say nothing of what my “readers” would think if I said something positive about Ocwen.  Someone could have a heart attack.

Well, I’m going to be talking with Ocwen some more… I did genuinely like the guy, so why not?  Someone has got to show those on the other side what’s going on from the homeowner’s perspective, and after writing 500 articles on the subject and talking to thousands of homeowners over the last couple of years… it might as well be me.

Also, just as I had posited to myself while sitting in a meeting in Rep. Herkes office in the Hawaii State Capitol building… if I wasn’t here, who would be… to which I answered what was the obvious truth of the matter… NO ONE.  There simply wasn’t anyone else, which made me wonder if perhaps I was insane, for a couple of seconds anyway.

So, now it looks like I might be visiting with members of other state legislatures as well.  I might even go to Florida and Atlanta to visit Ocwen and see what they’re doing down there…. maybe make a stop in D.C. too.  And I decided I would do whatever I needed to in order to finish the documentary I’d been working on for over a year… I wasn’t sure how exactly, without my wife choking me to death in my sleep, but I decided that I had to figure out some way to get it done.

Because that’s what DOERS do… they DO THINGS… they get things DONE… important things.

So, you see… it’s been quite a learning experience this past week or two… although I think I worked 120 hours and missed two nights of sleep, which I can’t keep doing if I expect to be able to DO anything for very long.

As far as my “readers” go, however, well… they can keep reading me if they want… or not… I don’t really care because from now on, I’m going to be concentrating on my “DOERS.”  Together, we’re going to DO IMPORTANT THINGS and we’re going to finally bring this unconscionable travesty of justice they call the foreclosure crisis to an end.

And after that, we’re going to start to rebuild America’s working middle class, brick by brick.  And one day… perhaps sooner than you might think… this country will once again be a place in which I can know that my daughter’s life will be as wonderful as mine has been… before all this happened… before Wall Street took over and broke the world.

People have asked me numerous times over the last two or three years, why I do what I do… and how I can possibly hope to beat the bankers… and I’ve always replied the exact same way: Because I’m going to win, I assure them.  Some also ask me why I’m so passionate about this? And I always reply: Why aren’t you?

You see, when Dina said that she felt that a cloud had been lifted, I understood but I didn’t feel that way at all, because I knew when I hung up with Ocwen that first time that they would modify the Giangregorio’s loan.  But, although that would be great for the Giangregorio family, what about the thousands of others all over this country that I didn’t write about?   No one should lose a home if there’s a way for them to keep it.  Not one person… ever.

Dina and Robert sent me another email shortly after we spoke… it read:

“We cannot express our gratitude for taking such an interest and huge involvement in our situation.  We are in awe that we are actually finally being ‘heard’.”

They sent it to me, but it’s a message to all of my readers who are also DOERS.  You really did something here… and what you did is a big deal… huge.  I’m so proud of you… and thankful… you should be proud of yourselves too.  You made a real difference in the lives of many.

And the best part of the whole thing is that even if you’re weren’t a DOER this time around… even if until now you’ve just been a “reader,” it doesn’t matter… ANYONE CAN BECOME A DOER AT ANY MOMENT.

That’s right… even right now… this moment… you can transform yourself from being a useless “reader” to being a DOER of important things.  Just say to yourself… assuming no one is around because you don’t want to appear as if you’re talking to yourself…

Starting today… I’m a DOER!

What are we DOERS going to DO?  Well, we’re going to figure that out as we go.  Every week, I’m going to try to post an article under the heading: “THINGS TO DO… THAT MATTER.”  So, when you read that line, you’ll know that after you’ve read the article, there will be work that needs to be DONE… send an email… make a phone call… whatever it is… so, JUST DO IT.  (LOL, I just couldn’t help that.)

This is a game of inches… there are no magic bullets or big sweeping solutions, of that I am quite sure.  We need to hit singles, not home runs… and sure as shootin’ we’ll win this battle one day… little by little, step-by-step… one day at a time, as they say… (OMG, I think I just mixed enough metaphors and exploited enough clichés to cause myself physical harm.)

Warren Buffet told Bloomberg today that he predicts “Job Growth When Housing Rebounds.”  Genius… that man really is a genius… who would have ever thought that solving the foreclosure crisis was so important.  Hmmm… maybe I should write something about that point.  I’ll have to give it some thought.  Thanks for weighing in, Warren… we’ll let you go back to bed now.

Housing doesn’t “rebound” as long as the foreclosures continue unabated, in fact nothing “rebounds” unless someone first throws a ball.  We have to DO something to STOP the foreclosure crisis. It’s a forest fire and it will continue to burn until it runs out of forest.

Every time housing prices fall, more people go underwater on their loans.  And every time a homeowner goes underwater, they are removed from the real estate market because most of the people that buy homes are not first time buyers, they have to sell their old home before buying their new one.  But once underwater, they can’t, so demand for housing falls as more people find that they owe more than their home is worth.  And as demand falls, so does price… and that means even more people go underwater.

Once you’re underwater, any of life’s events can lead to foreclosure.  An illness… an accident… a divorce… the loss of a job… any of those can lead to a foreclosure when the homeowner is underwater.  The Giangregorio’s only fell two months behind and that almost led to them losing their home.

Foreclosures breed foreclosures… period.  In Hawaii, Rep. Herkes repeated the phrase several times to others, and I’m sure he’s said it quite a few more times since I was there.  He’s a DOER, by the way.

Okay, so that’s all for now… I just thought I’d let my readers know how I feel and why… and I had to give my DOERS the great news about the Giangregorios.  Again… thank you from the bottom of my heart.

Oh, and Dina and Robert both agreed to be filmed next week, and I’m really looking forward to that.

But, now I’m off to Palm Desert where my daughter is dancing in a national dance competition this weekend.  She goes every year.  It’ll be 125 degrees outside, which is miserable, but inside there’ll be 5,000 girls from 5-16 years old all screaming their heads off at the same time, as the Moms try to get them ready for their next number.  So, when you think about it… 125 degrees really isn’t even that hot… LOL.

Mandelman out.


Jun
27

Ocwen Loan Servicing Takes Home from Handicapped Because There’s Equity

Well, that’s a fairly inflammatory headline, wouldn’t you say?  I certainly meant it to inflame, or perhaps even enrage… because I believe it to be the truth.  So, how about we make a deal: I’ll give you the facts of the case and let you decide from there.  If you agree with my assessment, then you send this article to everyone you know on the planet and let’s see if we can’t stop this horrific injustice from taking place.

Do we have a deal?  I sure hope we do.

This is the story of Dina and Robert Giangregorio of Huntington Beach, California. That’s them, just above.  They have three beautiful children who they’ve raised in their home for the last 17 years.  Robert has “Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis, one of the worst types of MS one can have.  Today, only one arm works, he is in a wheelchair… has a colostomy bag.

They pay someone to come and shower him several times a week.  Dina says that it wouldn’t be safe for her and the kids try to lift him, which to me is the least of all reasons to have someone come in to help him shower.

They had to have the home “handicapped,” which thank God they were finally able to do with some financial assistance from the MS Society.  Last year they transformed a small bathroom into a roll-in shower, for example.  It has not been an easy path they’ve been on, and there but for the grace of God go us all.

Their 17 year-old son just graduated from high school, their 15 year-old son will be a junior next year, and then there’s their 10 year-old daughter.

Last year, Robert had to have some medical procedures that didn’t go all that smoothly.  He ended up having a pump inserted into his stomach… it’s about the size of a hockey puck… and it releases medicine.  It was a difficult time, Dina had to provide almost full-time care for a few months there, and couldn’t get to work much; she owns her own successful photography business, by the way.

Robert was a General Manager for Clark Drugs/Savon.  He had worked his way up and would have soon been some type of regional manager, had he not been afflicted with MS.

They didn’t own their home at first… they rented it for six years as they saved up a down payment, but even still, they had to use money from his 401(k) plan to get it done.  They were high school sweethearts who married and wanted more than anything to own the home in which they would raise their family. Pretty responsible sorts, if you ask me.

Robert had checked the box at work for disability coverage when he went to work for his employer… and thank God once again… for that.  Social Security approved him as being disabled, but it was still a big fight with Prudential to get his disability checks going.  Apparently, Prudential thought Robert could keep working in his condition, I mean… why not?

They finally did approve him, of course… Dina’s back to work too, so that’s all behind them now.

Last year, with Dina providing full-time care for Robert, along with being a super-mom, they fell a couple of months behind on their mortgage payments.  But, in month three… when they tried to start catching up by making a single payment, Ocwen said they had to pay all three… one payment would not be accepted.

The couple told Ocwen of their tragic situation and Ocwen told them they should apply for a loan modification… and so they did… roughly a year ago… maybe a little more than a year ago.

After applying for the Obama plan, or HAMP, they were told they did not qualify… they apparently made too much money.  But, Ocwen said… no to worry… they’d try again… only to get the same result the second time.  Then it was try applying for an in-house modification, which they did, only to be turned down once again… and this time because they didn’t make enough money.

And the loan modification fun was just getting started.

Ocwen was maintaining that they should not worry, as their file was always in review or underwriting… or perhaps it was in review or in underwriting.  And then there were times when it was in review or in underwriting.  Ocwen’s representatives continually assured them that everything looked good and that they were not going to sell their home out from under them.  Relax, Ocwen essentially said… have a little false hope.

Then last January 30th the Giangregorios received a 3-page letter from Ocwen via regular mail.  It said that they had been approved for a “streamlined modification,” that would have lowered their monthly payment by about $400, but tacked on a fairly large balloon payment in 17 years.  Not a great thing, they thought, but it would save their home so why not?

Here’s what it said on the 3-page letter the Giangregorios received from Ocwen last January 30th:

“You have been selected to receive a special streamlined loan modification.  ACT NOW!  Because this I If this great offer does not meet your financial situation, call us at number, there are other options that are part of this initiative program, but the key is to ACT NOW, because all of the options are tied to this initiative program and it ends on January 31, 2011.”

The couple did have a few questions, however, and since the letter said the offer would expire THE NEXT DAY, they didn’t have much time to ask them.

They called Ocwen and the first person they spoke with had no idea what they were talking about, but that’s to be expected because that person was in India, so it’s easy to see how they might have missed it.  The next person they spoke with at Ocwen did know of the offer, but couldn’t answer any questions… they were given another number to call… Ocwen’s research department, and that department did their best to answer the questions they had.

Just to make sure they weren’t about to do anything incredibly stupid, they decided to check with a local financial planner they knew, and all told, they decided to accept Ocwen’s offer.  They went to get the certified funds that accepting the offer required… $2,078.66… and the next morning they called Ocwen to tell them the good news and arrange to transfer the funds.

Ocwen, however, had some less than good news for the Giangregorios… turns out, the offer had already expired.  Too late… you just missed it.  A few hours difference and you might have saved your home from foreclosure.  Darn the luck, you missed the deadline.  Too bad.  That’ll teach you to have questions.  You should have signed without questions… but no… now you’re nothing but an irresponsible borrower once again.

See, isn’t this getting more and more fun?  I told you it would.  Well, just wait… because the real fun is yet to come.

Once again, Ocwen said the couple shouldn’t worry, there was no foreclosure and no sale date scheduled, and they would be reconsidered for a modification.  But soon they started receiving scarier and scarier letters now from a company by the name of Western Progressive about the threat of foreclosure and the sale of their home.  Each time another letter would arrive in the mail, Dina Giangregorio would call Ocwen and each time she was told not to worry they were still under review for their modification and that the servicer would not foreclose as long as they were being considered for a loan modification… so, there was nothing to worry about.  Then they’d ask her to re-send some paperwork or documentation she had already sent in multiple times.

On May 19th they received a notice from Western Progressive saying that their home would be sold on June 6, 2011.  Dina called Ocwen immediately and spoke with Ocwen’s representative, Amrit Oswal.  She told Amrit that she had contacted Western Progressive and they had told her that to them it appeared to be a “seamless foreclosure,” and that their home would be sold on June 6th at noon, just as the notice had shown.  But Amrit told Dina that this was not the case.

According to Amrit there was NO SALE DATE scheduled, and he told Dina to have Western Progressive contact Ocwen.

She called Western Progressive to ask that they contact Amril Oswal at Ocwen, and was told that they would update Ocwen’s system.  When she called Ocwen back roughly 30 minutes later, although Amrit was not available to take her call at that time, she was told that in fact there was a sale date scheduled… June 6, 2011 at noon.

Dina was now understandably upset.  She had made countless calls to Ocwen throughout the past year and was repeatedly told that everything was fine and that she was under consideration for a modification.  Now, all of a sudden, with absolutely no explanation, her home was to be sold at a trustee sale.  Again she explained why they had fallen behind in the first place, that things had stabilized since then, that Ocwen had not allowed them to try to make up the payments they had missed, but rather had advised them to apply for a loan modification.

OCWEN made appointment with her and her husband for the coming Friday evening at 7:00 PM.  It was very important, they told her, that she be available for a call at that time because an OCWEN “loan specialist” would be calling to discuss options and review their paperwork.  They said it was very important that she have all of her paperwork ready for that call.

At 7:00 PM, Dina and Robert Giangregorio were sitting with their paperwork at the ready… staring at their telephone.  No call ever came.  At 7:30 PM Dina tried calling Ocwen… they were closed, but on a positive note, she was invited by Ocwen’s recorded voice to call back during normal business hours.

Early Saturday morning the Giangregorio’s phone rang.  It was OCWEN calling to inform them that their loan was past due.  The caller knew nothing of their situation.  Dina thanked them for calling and hung up the phone.

She glanced down at one of the letters she had received from Ocwen over the last several months.  On the letter was printed the following phrase:

Helping Homeowners is What We Do.

Ocwen Loan Servicing

Epilogue…

Dina called me to tell me her story this past week, and I’ve done my best to re-tell it to you in detail.  However, you should also know that in the interest relative brevity, I’ve left out countless phone calls and the re-submitting of documents, but rather focused only on the lowlights of the couple’s experiences dealing with Ocwen Loan Servicing.

Now, I’ve heard stories like Dina’s… oh, I don’t know anymore… maybe a few thousand times, and not just about Ocwen, but also about EVERY SINGLE OTHER MORTGAGE SERVICER IN THE COUNTRY.  How often do I hear a story like Dina’s, you might wonder.  Not more than EVERY SINGLE DAY, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK AND 365 DAYS A YEAR.

There are a couple of key facts about Dina’s story that I think bear repeating for additional emphasis.

  1. The couple fell behind for a reason that defines the word “hardship.”  Being afflicted with MS can happen to anyone of us at any time.  That this family has remained together and positive about their future is a testament to their love for each other.
  2. They weren’t even asking for a modification, they were only trying to make up a couple of back payments when this saga began, but Ocwen wouldn’t take fewer than the three payments they owed at that time.  All they needed was a second chance to get current now that their lives had stabilized, Robert’s disability income was coming in and Dina was back at her job.  It was Ocwen that suggested that they apply for a loan modification.
  3. If Ocwen had been honest with Dina from the day they had refused her one payment and told her they would move to foreclose, then per California law, the Giangregorio’s would have had 90 days from the date they received their Notice of Default, plus a couple of weeks after that, to make up the back payments and save their home.  And I’d bet money they would have done it.
  4. Instead Ocwen behaved just like a servicer.  They deceived her into believing that they would modify her loan because of the hardship her family had endured, and then proceeded to torture her for over a year with empty promises and false hope… right up until May 19th, when they finally verified that her home was to be sold on June 6th.   And even then, they told her to prepare for a phone call from one of Ocwen’s “loan specialists” that never came.
  5. Ocwen could have lowered the couple’s interest rate from 6% to 5%, offered them a repayment plan for the handful of back payments and everything would have been fine.  At the very least, Ocwen could have offered them a simple repayment plan for the back payments… that could have worked too.

Of course, there is one more thing of which the reader should be aware: The Giangregorios have equity in home; they are not “underwater.”  The amount of equity is less than $100,000… but still… there’s equity.  All other factors support a loan modification or repayment plan except that one: equity.

I don’t know what to say to them now, except that I guess they should have borrowed more… then they might have saved their home?  I guess I should tell them that they were too responsible to save.

I called a very experienced attorney who helps homeowners get loan modifications and that I know quite well to see if she could make a call to Ocwen and she said she would try.  She also said the following:

“Well, Martin… this is awful, but it’s also no surprise, it’s nothing new.  They all do this.  They want to foreclose.  And how is it that they all have the same dysfunctions.  They always blame the borrower.  It’s the same crap over and over again.  I just don’t understand how they can keep getting away with it.  This is awful, just awful.”

She did try but got no return calls, so keeping in mind that the Giangregorio’s home was scheduled to be sold on Monday… which is tomorrow by the way… I personally tried reaching Ocwen at every phone number and via every email address I could find on their site and elsewhere.  I left voice messages with the Ocwen Ombudsman and sent the Ombudsmen emails numerous times… nothing… not a single call or email in reply.  I tried the same with Ocwen’s senior management… nothing… nary a peep in response.

Had the Giangregorios won the lottery on Thursday or Friday… just days before their home was to be sold at the Trustee Sale, they couldn’t have reached Ocwen to pay off the home… and the sale would proceed.  Fannie Mae would walk into the sale, sign a credit bid and their home would go into the vast inventory of homes that sit vacant for no reason on the books of the failed, corrupt mortgage behemoth, now funded by the taxpayers of this country.

All while our government says they want loans to be modified… that they want foreclosures to be prevented if possible… that they want to help the “responsible homeowners.”  As long as they don’t have equity, that is.  And the really good news is that Ocwen just bought up Litton Loan Servicing and Home EQ servicing, so they obviously feel they are profitable enough to expand their operations.

And that’s just what this crisis situation needs, don’t you think… more like Ocwen?

I’ve paid a few bucks in taxes in my lifetime… and I don’t want to see the Giangregorios lose their home.  Does anyone anywhere?  I mean, besides the severely autistic chimpanzees that are running Ocwen.

On Ocwen’s website it says that they are a founding sponsor of the NeighborWorks® America- Ad Council campaign for foreclosure prevention.  What the hell does that mean?

Ocwen’s Website also has a page titled: Ocwen’s 15 Point Loan Servicing Customer Commitment Plan, where it says such things as, “We promise you our total commitment to provide the highest quality in customer service.”  And point #3 of fifteen says the following:

“If your loan becomes delinquent, Ocwen will assist you in a professional and consultative manner to work out a fair and reasonable resolution, such as a repayment plan, to avoid a foreclosure.”

A Message for Ocwen’s Senior Management Team…

As my regular readers would no doubt attest, I’ve been quite restrained in my writing of this expose about Ocwen.  Frankly, I have meetings in the morning, and I didn’t want to get myself any more upset than this story has already made me.

Also, call me naïve, but I have to believe that this is all some sort of gigantic oversight, and you’re going to learn of it… correct it immediately… and the Giangregorios are going to live in their home… happily ever after, as the saying goes.

But let me assure Ocwen’s President, Ronald M. Faris, and Mr. William C. Erbey, the company’s Executive Chairman of something… if that’s not the case, then I am nowhere near done with you.

And if you want to know just what I mean by that, I would only suggest that you Google me.  Don’t worry, I’ll be real easy to find.  In fact, I’ll come up right at the top of your Google search… just like when I write about you.

Mandelman out.

Want to send Mr. Erbey a note to share your thoughts on the Giangregorio’s situation…

Well, by all means… be my guest:

Ocwen Financial Corporation

William C. Erbey, Executive Chairman

Phone: (561) 682-8520

Email: William.Erbey@Ocwen.com

Jun
27

Ocwen Loan Servicing Takes Home from Handicapped Because There’s Equity

Well, that’s a fairly inflammatory headline, wouldn’t you say?  I certainly meant it to inflame, or perhaps even enrage… because I believe it to be the truth.  So, how about we make a deal: I’ll give you the facts of the case and let you decide from there.  If you agree with my assessment, then you send this article to everyone you know on the planet and let’s see if we can’t stop this horrific injustice from taking place.

Do we have a deal?  I sure hope we do.

This is the story of Dina and Robert Giangregorio of Huntington Beach, California. That’s them, just above.  They have three beautiful children who they’ve raised in their home for the last 17 years.  Robert has “Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis, one of the worst types of MS one can have.  Today, only one arm works, he is in a wheelchair… has a colostomy bag.

They pay someone to come and shower him several times a week.  Dina says that it wouldn’t be safe for her and the kids try to lift him, which to me is the least of all reasons to have someone come in to help him shower.

They had to have the home “handicapped,” which thank God they were finally able to do with some financial assistance from the MS Society.  Last year they transformed a small bathroom into a roll-in shower, for example.  It has not been an easy path they’ve been on, and there but for the grace of God go us all.

Their 17 year-old son just graduated from high school, their 15 year-old son will be a junior next year, and then there’s their 10 year-old daughter.

Last year, Robert had to have some medical procedures that didn’t go all that smoothly.  He ended up having a pump inserted into his stomach… it’s about the size of a hockey puck… and it releases medicine.  It was a difficult time, Dina had to provide almost full-time care for a few months there, and couldn’t get to work much; she owns her own successful photography business, by the way.

Robert was a General Manager for Clark Drugs/Savon.  He had worked his way up and would have soon been some type of regional manager, had he not been afflicted with MS.

They didn’t own their home at first… they rented it for six years as they saved up a down payment, but even still, they had to use money from his 401(k) plan to get it done.  They were high school sweethearts who married and wanted more than anything to own the home in which they would raise their family. Pretty responsible sorts, if you ask me.

Robert had checked the box at work for disability coverage when he went to work for his employer… and thank God once again… for that.  Social Security approved him as being disabled, but it was still a big fight with Prudential to get his disability checks going.  Apparently, Prudential thought Robert could keep working in his condition, I mean… why not?

They finally did approve him, of course… Dina’s back to work too, so that’s all behind them now.

Last year, with Dina providing full-time care for Robert, along with being a super-mom, they fell a couple of months behind on their mortgage payments.  But, in month three… when they tried to start catching up by making a single payment, Ocwen said they had to pay all three… one payment would not be accepted.

The couple told Ocwen of their tragic situation and Ocwen told them they should apply for a loan modification… and so they did… roughly a year ago… maybe a little more than a year ago.

After applying for the Obama plan, or HAMP, they were told they did not qualify… they apparently made too much money.  But, Ocwen said… no to worry… they’d try again… only to get the same result the second time.  Then it was try applying for an in-house modification, which they did, only to be turned down once again… and this time because they didn’t make enough money.

And the loan modification fun was just getting started.

Ocwen was maintaining that they should not worry, as their file was always in review or underwriting… or perhaps it was in review or in underwriting.  And then there were times when it was in review or in underwriting.  Ocwen’s representatives continually assured them that everything looked good and that they were not going to sell their home out from under them.  Relax, Ocwen essentially said… have a little false hope.

Then last January 30th the Giangregorios received a 3-page letter from Ocwen via regular mail.  It said that they had been approved for a “streamlined modification,” that would have lowered their monthly payment by about $400, but tacked on a fairly large balloon payment in 17 years.  Not a great thing, they thought, but it would save their home so why not?

Here’s what it said on the 3-page letter the Giangregorios received from Ocwen last January 30th:

“You have been selected to receive a special streamlined loan modification.  ACT NOW!  Because this I If this great offer does not meet your financial situation, call us at number, there are other options that are part of this initiative program, but the key is to ACT NOW, because all of the options are tied to this initiative program and it ends on January 31, 2011.”

The couple did have a few questions, however, and since the letter said the offer would expire THE NEXT DAY, they didn’t have much time to ask them.

They called Ocwen and the first person they spoke with had no idea what they were talking about, but that’s to be expected because that person was in India, so it’s easy to see how they might have missed it.  The next person they spoke with at Ocwen did know of the offer, but couldn’t answer any questions… they were given another number to call… Ocwen’s research department, and that department did their best to answer the questions they had.

Just to make sure they weren’t about to do anything incredibly stupid, they decided to check with a local financial planner they knew, and all told, they decided to accept Ocwen’s offer.  They went to get the certified funds that accepting the offer required… $2,078.66… and the next morning they called Ocwen to tell them the good news and arrange to transfer the funds.

Ocwen, however, had some less than good news for the Giangregorios… turns out, the offer had already expired.  Too late… you just missed it.  A few hours difference and you might have saved your home from foreclosure.  Darn the luck, you missed the deadline.  Too bad.  That’ll teach you to have questions.  You should have signed without questions… but no… now you’re nothing but an irresponsible borrower once again.

See, isn’t this getting more and more fun?  I told you it would.  Well, just wait… because the real fun is yet to come.

Once again, Ocwen said the couple shouldn’t worry, there was no foreclosure and no sale date scheduled, and they would be reconsidered for a modification.  But soon they started receiving scarier and scarier letters now from a company by the name of Western Progressive about the threat of foreclosure and the sale of their home.  Each time another letter would arrive in the mail, Dina Giangregorio would call Ocwen and each time she was told not to worry they were still under review for their modification and that the servicer would not foreclose as long as they were being considered for a loan modification… so, there was nothing to worry about.  Then they’d ask her to re-send some paperwork or documentation she had already sent in multiple times.

On May 19th they received a notice from Western Progressive saying that their home would be sold on June 6, 2011.  Dina called Ocwen immediately and spoke with Ocwen’s representative, Amrit Oswal.  She told Amrit that she had contacted Western Progressive and they had told her that to them it appeared to be a “seamless foreclosure,” and that their home would be sold on June 6th at noon, just as the notice had shown.  But Amrit told Dina that this was not the case.

According to Amrit there was NO SALE DATE scheduled, and he told Dina to have Western Progressive contact Ocwen.

She called Western Progressive to ask that they contact Amril Oswal at Ocwen, and was told that they would update Ocwen’s system.  When she called Ocwen back roughly 30 minutes later, although Amrit was not available to take her call at that time, she was told that in fact there was a sale date scheduled… June 6, 2011 at noon.

Dina was now understandably upset.  She had made countless calls to Ocwen throughout the past year and was repeatedly told that everything was fine and that she was under consideration for a modification.  Now, all of a sudden, with absolutely no explanation, her home was to be sold at a trustee sale.  Again she explained why they had fallen behind in the first place, that things had stabilized since then, that Ocwen had not allowed them to try to make up the payments they had missed, but rather had advised them to apply for a loan modification.

OCWEN made appointment with her and her husband for the coming Friday evening at 7:00 PM.  It was very important, they told her, that she be available for a call at that time because an OCWEN “loan specialist” would be calling to discuss options and review their paperwork.  They said it was very important that she have all of her paperwork ready for that call.

At 7:00 PM, Dina and Robert Giangregorio were sitting with their paperwork at the ready… staring at their telephone.  No call ever came.  At 7:30 PM Dina tried calling Ocwen… they were closed, but on a positive note, she was invited by Ocwen’s recorded voice to call back during normal business hours.

Early Saturday morning the Giangregorio’s phone rang.  It was OCWEN calling to inform them that their loan was past due.  The caller knew nothing of their situation.  Dina thanked them for calling and hung up the phone.

She glanced down at one of the letters she had received from Ocwen over the last several months.  On the letter was printed the following phrase:

Helping Homeowners is What We Do.

Ocwen Loan Servicing

Epilogue…

Dina called me to tell me her story this past week, and I’ve done my best to re-tell it to you in detail.  However, you should also know that in the interest relative brevity, I’ve left out countless phone calls and the re-submitting of documents, but rather focused only on the lowlights of the couple’s experiences dealing with Ocwen Loan Servicing.

Now, I’ve heard stories like Dina’s… oh, I don’t know anymore… maybe a few thousand times, and not just about Ocwen, but also about EVERY SINGLE OTHER MORTGAGE SERVICER IN THE COUNTRY.  How often do I hear a story like Dina’s, you might wonder.  Not more than EVERY SINGLE DAY, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK AND 365 DAYS A YEAR.

There are a couple of key facts about Dina’s story that I think bear repeating for additional emphasis.

  1. The couple fell behind for a reason that defines the word “hardship.”  Being afflicted with MS can happen to anyone of us at any time.  That this family has remained together and positive about their future is a testament to their love for each other.
  2. They weren’t even asking for a modification, they were only trying to make up a couple of back payments when this saga began, but Ocwen wouldn’t take fewer than the three payments they owed at that time.  All they needed was a second chance to get current now that their lives had stabilized, Robert’s disability income was coming in and Dina was back at her job.  It was Ocwen that suggested that they apply for a loan modification.
  3. If Ocwen had been honest with Dina from the day they had refused her one payment and told her they would move to foreclose, then per California law, the Giangregorio’s would have had 90 days from the date they received their Notice of Default, plus a couple of weeks after that, to make up the back payments and save their home.  And I’d bet money they would have done it.
  4. Instead Ocwen behaved just like a servicer.  They deceived her into believing that they would modify her loan because of the hardship her family had endured, and then proceeded to torture her for over a year with empty promises and false hope… right up until May 19th, when they finally verified that her home was to be sold on June 6th.   And even then, they told her to prepare for a phone call from one of Ocwen’s “loan specialists” that never came.
  5. Ocwen could have lowered the couple’s interest rate from 6% to 5%, offered them a repayment plan for the handful of back payments and everything would have been fine.  At the very least, Ocwen could have offered them a simple repayment plan for the back payments… that could have worked too.

Of course, there is one more thing of which the reader should be aware: The Giangregorios have equity in home; they are not “underwater.”  The amount of equity is less than $100,000… but still… there’s equity.  All other factors support a loan modification or repayment plan except that one: equity.

I don’t know what to say to them now, except that I guess they should have borrowed more… then they might have saved their home?  I guess I should tell them that they were too responsible to save.

I called a very experienced attorney who helps homeowners get loan modifications and that I know quite well to see if she could make a call to Ocwen and she said she would try.  She also said the following:

“Well, Martin… this is awful, but it’s also no surprise, it’s nothing new.  They all do this.  They want to foreclose.  And how is it that they all have the same dysfunctions.  They always blame the borrower.  It’s the same crap over and over again.  I just don’t understand how they can keep getting away with it.  This is awful, just awful.”

She did try but got no return calls, so keeping in mind that the Giangregorio’s home was scheduled to be sold on Monday… which is tomorrow by the way… I personally tried reaching Ocwen at every phone number and via every email address I could find on their site and elsewhere.  I left voice messages with the Ocwen Ombudsman and sent the Ombudsmen emails numerous times… nothing… not a single call or email in reply.  I tried the same with Ocwen’s senior management… nothing… nary a peep in response.

Had the Giangregorios won the lottery on Thursday or Friday… just days before their home was to be sold at the Trustee Sale, they couldn’t have reached Ocwen to pay off the home… and the sale would proceed.  Fannie Mae would walk into the sale, sign a credit bid and their home would go into the vast inventory of homes that sit vacant for no reason on the books of the failed, corrupt mortgage behemoth, now funded by the taxpayers of this country.

All while our government says they want loans to be modified… that they want foreclosures to be prevented if possible… that they want to help the “responsible homeowners.”  As long as they don’t have equity, that is.  And the really good news is that Ocwen just bought up Litton Loan Servicing and Home EQ servicing, so they obviously feel they are profitable enough to expand their operations.

And that’s just what this crisis situation needs, don’t you think… more like Ocwen?

I’ve paid a few bucks in taxes in my lifetime… and I don’t want to see the Giangregorios lose their home.  Does anyone anywhere?  I mean, besides the severely autistic chimpanzees that are running Ocwen.

On Ocwen’s website it says that they are a founding sponsor of the NeighborWorks® America- Ad Council campaign for foreclosure prevention.  What the hell does that mean?

Ocwen’s Website also has a page titled: Ocwen’s 15 Point Loan Servicing Customer Commitment Plan, where it says such things as, “We promise you our total commitment to provide the highest quality in customer service.”  And point #3 of fifteen says the following:

“If your loan becomes delinquent, Ocwen will assist you in a professional and consultative manner to work out a fair and reasonable resolution, such as a repayment plan, to avoid a foreclosure.”

A Message for Ocwen’s Senior Management Team…

As my regular readers would no doubt attest, I’ve been quite restrained in my writing of this expose about Ocwen.  Frankly, I have meetings in the morning, and I didn’t want to get myself any more upset than this story has already made me.

Also, call me naïve, but I have to believe that this is all some sort of gigantic oversight, and you’re going to learn of it… correct it immediately… and the Giangregorios are going to live in their home… happily ever after, as the saying goes.

But let me assure Ocwen’s President, Ronald M. Faris, and Mr. William C. Erbey, the company’s Executive Chairman of something… if that’s not the case, then I am nowhere near done with you.

And if you want to know just what I mean by that, I would only suggest that you Google me.  Don’t worry, I’ll be real easy to find.  In fact, I’ll come up right at the top of your Google search… just like when I write about you.

Mandelman out.

Want to send Mr. Erbey a note to share your thoughts on the Giangregorio’s situation…

Well, by all means… be my guest:

Ocwen Financial Corporation

William C. Erbey, Executive Chairman

Phone: (561) 682-8520

Email: William.Erbey@Ocwen.com

Jul
12

15 Texas Homeowners Sue Bank of America for Abusive Practices – Don’t Mess With Texas

I’ll tell you what… there are times in life when you’ve just got to love Texas. People in Texas just don’t like getting misled, lied to, pushed around, and generally abused, so it’s not a great place for banks to do what banks do.  But apparently, Bank of America is just as abusive to the homeowners in Texas as they are to the homeowners in the other 49 states, and they’re being treated to a little Texas hospitality as a result.

The Texas Housing Justice League and 15 Texas homeowners have filed suit against Bank of America N.A. and its subsidiary, BAC Home Loans Servicing, alleging abusive servicing practices.  I’m not saying that homeowners in other states aren’t just as upset about being abused by the banks, but it’s the homeowners in Texas that aren’t just complaining, they’ve banded together to file the suit, and I’m guessing that not only is this going to be interesting, but it’s probably only the beginning of these types of actions.

I’ve said it before, I’ve even told bankers before… the banks may have taken an early lead against homeowners in this crisis, and they may think they’re winning, but in this country, if you push people far enough, they’re going to fight back.  And in the long run, Americans have a long history of coming out on top, as in… would you like a torch or a pitchfork?

The lawsuit, filed in US District Court, Southern District of Texas, Victoria Division, describes:

“… a systematic home loan servicing scheme that includes hours of telephone runaround, misleading and inconsistent information, lost correspondence, verbal abuse, and extensive delay, all of which have documented costs not only in terms of money, but in health. The facts in this case reveal the harsh reality that underlies the loan servicer’s press statements about loan modifications and forbearance agreements following collapse of the U.S. housing market.”

Yeah, that sounds about right.  I’d recognize Bank of America anywhere.

I’m no lawyer, but is Bank of America going to dispute these allegations, or just stipulate to them and go from there?  Because I would think even the judge would have to suppress the urge to snicker if the Bank of America lawyer started out by saying the bank didn’t do what the homeowners are alleging.

As in: “It’s not true, your honor.”  HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA… “Order in the court, this court will come to order.”  Isn’t that about how that would go?

Here are some of the highlights from the complaint:

“Many of the Plaintiffs were told that they were eligible for loan modifications or other workout assistance, only to spend months being shuffled through Defendant BAC’s “Home Retention,” “HOPE”, “Foreclosure,” “Bankruptcy” and “Collections” departments with no resolution.”


Okay, so that’s standard operating procedure at Bank of America, right?  I mean, they probably have a manual that describes that runaround, wouldn’t you think?

“Others simply wanted to know that they had been reviewed accurately for eligibility in any available programs, that a denial of assistance was final, and that their arrearage had been correctly calculated. Instead of providing Plaintiffs with basic information about the servicing of their loans and providing timely screenings for workout assistance, however, Defendant BAC misrepresented material information to the Plaintiffs about their loans, and forced them into a scheme of operation so dysfunctional that the constant barrage of misinformation, misdirection, and deliberate inactivity amounted to abuse and harassment.”

“Plaintiffs describe feeling “harassed,” “like a yo-yo,” and “blocked at every turn.”

Are you loving this as much as I am?  A yo-yo, huh?  I like it… I might have used a different metaphor, but I suppose in court you can’t just say what you’d want to say.

“When Plaintiffs called Defendant BAC the information they received over the telephone often conflicted with written statements or prior telephone conversations. In many of the telephone calls Defendant BAC spun Plaintiffs in a labyrinth of transfers from one department to another and back again. Plaintiffs spent hundreds of hours on the telephone, explaining their stories to a different person each time they called; often they were transferred between departments, knowing they would never speak to the same person again, and wondering if the information being provided would be contradicted by the next person they spoke with. Often, it was.”

Oh my God, I wish I made money at this, because I’d love to be able to go to Texas and watch this case proceed in person.  It’s going to be one for the books, that’s for sure.  I’m thinking there would have to be some stand up and cheer moments.  And I wonder how much trouble I’d get in for throwing rotten tomatoes at Bank of America’s lawyer in the parking lot.  I know, so immature, but guess what?  I know you are, but what am I?

What’s interesting about this case is that they’re using RESPA, the Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act, as the basis for the complaint.  As in…

RESPA Count: Part A

Plaintiffs each sent Defendant BAC written applications for a loan modification, including a hardship affidavit, and written submissions of financial information that were “qualified written requests” within the meaning of RESPA, in that Plaintiffs sought information about their eligibility for a loan modification or other methods to minimize their losses.

The complaint also describes how special it is to call Bank of America on the phone.

“Requests to speak with supervisors or managers were met with resistance. During the course of telephone calls to Defendant BAC, Plaintiffs often found themselves disconnected after waiting on hold to speak to a supervisor, or were told that no supervisors were available. Some Plaintiffs sought out face-to-face interviews by contacting Bank of America branch offices, but simply found themselves on speakerphones with the same unaccountable departments that had previously been providing them with misinformation by telephone.”

Well, wait a minute… maybe they should have tried communicating with Bank of America in writing, instead of just by phone.  Could be… right?  Maybe they just don’t have good phone skills.

“Written communications did not fare better. Plaintiffs’ written submissions were often lost or misplaced.  Plaintiffs were asked to sign the same documents three, four or even five times, and were asked to provide the same information repeatedly. Many of the Plaintiffs were assigned multiple “negotiators” who would not return telephone calls, or provide timely information to Plaintiffs.”

Oh well, I guess not.  So, maybe Bank of America is hoping that the judge will think that it’s all just an isolated incident, and that it’s not something that happens to everyone.

“Plaintiffs’ experiences are not isolated incidents, but instead reveal a pattern and practice by Defendant BAC of deliberately misinforming borrowers in default or at risk of default, and refusing to respond to Plaintiffs’ legitimate, written and oral requests for information.”


Whoops… I guess that’s not going to be an easy case to make either.  So, what about the damages?

Damages

Plaintiffs suffered damages including, but not limited to loss of credit, foreclosure, emotional harm, embarrassment and humiliation.  Plaintiffs’ damages were proximately caused by Defendant BAC’s noncompliance with the requirements of the mortgage servicer provisions of RESPA.

Defendant BAC has engaged in a pattern and practice of non-compliance with the requirements of the mortgage servicer provisions of RESPA, and Plaintiffs seek $1,000 in statutory damages per violation.

Plaintiffs seek attorney fees under 12 U.S.C. § 2605(f)(3).

So, anyway… there’s of course a lot more involved and I’m not going to include it all in this article, or it will be longer than my usual articles, and that would make it REALLY LONG, I realize.  Here are the other Counts listed in the complaint, but I’ll provide a link at the bottom to the actual complaint, so the attorneys reading this can dive right in to the details.  But here’s the overview:

Count Two: Breach of Contract – Loan Modification Agreement

Count Three: Breach of Contract – Forbearance Agreement

Count Four: Breach of Contract-Promissory Note and Deed of Trust

Count Five: Violation of the Texas Property Code

Count Six: Breach of Oral Contract-HAMP Trial Modification

Count Seven: Unreasonable Collection Efforts

Count Eight: Intentional Misrepresentation

Count Nine: Texas Debt Collection Act

Here’s how the complaint wraps up, with that wonderful Request for Relief section that always asks for the order, as they say in the sales biz.  And this one’s a good read.

REQUEST FOR RELIEF

A home is uniquely valuable. It is the largest investment many low income Texans will make in their lifetimes, and provides one of the few opportunities for low income Texans to build wealth. But a home is also where many of the Plaintiffs and other low income Texans raise their children and accumulate their memories. Misrepresentations that jeopardize a borrower’s home are unconscionable and the damage is irreparable. Defendant BAC’s misrepresentations to borrowers are systemic in nature and widespread in practice. Plaintiffs therefore ask that this court:

(1) Enter a temporary and permanent injunction that Defendant BAC, including its agents employees and contractors, refrain from practices, policies, and plans that result in or increase Defendants’ misrepresentations, errors, falsehoods, barriers to timely, accurate communication with Plaintiffs which are identified by the Court through the course of this litigation;

(2) Award each individual Plaintiff their actual, statutory, and exemplary damages;

(3) Award Plaintiffs their costs and attorney fees; and

(4) Grant such other relief as Court finds necessary and just.

Here’s a link to the actual complaint: 15 Texas Homeowners v. Bank of America.

Although for lawyers, I’m sure I’m stating the obvious, but for others… RESPA is a federal statute so I would think that this sort of thing could be happening all over the place… like in all 50 states.  And it’s also worth mentioning that what Bank of America is accused of here, is every bit as true for Chase, Wells, One West, US Bank, Aurora, Saxon… are you feeling me here?  Come on, multiply the number of banks and servicers times fifty states, and before you know it we could be having a national block party… I’ll bring the beer.

So, let’s all keep an eye on this, okay?  And not throw in the towel just yet.  There’s a lot going on around this country related to the foreclosure crisis.  We’re in a river, not a lake… the water we’re standing in today, won’t be the same water we’ll stand in tomorrow.

We have to win this eventually, we just have to.  We cannot just let this country deteriorate into a depressed land of inequality, lacking in opportunity, rife with corruption, besieged by poverty and dominated by a small oligarchy of immensely wealthy bankers and corporate executives who drive our elected officials like slaves.  Think that’s too dramatic?  Do you?  Which part, specifically?

We cannot lose this.  I have a daughter.

Mar
29

Death by Foreclosure: BofA Seeks Eviction of Dead man Killed by Swat Team

Charles Koppa (Poppa Kappa) has done some investigative reporting on this case and we find numerous discrepancies between the police and media version of the event from actual facts. The case was typical until it ended in the homeowner’s untimely death in what police reported was a gun battle. Current reports indicate that the property is “investor hold.”

Kurt Aho was a 64 year old man with cancer. His illness made him walk awkwardly but he was completely lucid according to his daughter. Police swat team members shot him dead outside his home apparently under the mistaken belief that he was drunk (by observing his uneven gait when he walked) and that this was a case of Suicide by Cop.

Aho was in modification negotiations with Bank of America, who took over Countrywide loan servicing in the merger of those companies. His daughter reports that he thought the modification was done and that the matter was settled. But that didn’t stop a paneled truck from driving up with two occupants claiming they owned the house as a result of a foreclosure sale that day which Aho had been told was canceled due to the modification. Koppa reports that when he recently called the servicing agent they reported that the property was “on beneficiary hold.”

The title record is unclear, but it seems that the men who said they own the property were told they were “given” the property in exchange for fees worth $105,000. The fair market value of the home was $220,000 even at distressed prices.

According to Aho’s daughter he challenged the men on their right to be on his property, asking them for proof of the sale. They admitted they had no such proof since the “paperwork” had not been completed. He ordered them off the property and they refused to leave. He called his daughter to report what was going on and then grabbed his weapon and told the men if they didn’t get off his property he would shoot the tires on their van. They apparently remained, and he fulfilled his promise — he shot the tires on the van.

At this time, without a police report, we are unsure who called the police. Six squad cars including a SWAT team showed up and Aho and his house were under siege. He was calm, sitting on his air conditioning compressor when a rubber bullet hit him, obviously fired by police. He fired back with neighbors saying he obviously was aiming at the top of the police van. Police returned fire and he was dead.

Now Tiffany and Bosco, the law firm that handles the largest number of foreclosures in the area, is attempting to evict Kurt Aho, even though he is dead. His daughter has moved into the house and is attempting to fend off the attempt but needs help. From what we have seen the loan was securitized and the entire foreclosure procedure was improper even if there had been no negotiations on modification.

So to Recap, we have an improper foreclosure based upon the usual array of fabricated assignments in a securitized loan where the real creditors (investors) were neither identified nor even notified. Aho’s daughter wishes to pursue a wrongful death claim against BofA, Tiffany and Bosco, and law enforcement.

Man killed after shooting at police, neighbors ask why

Reported by: Mitch Truswell
Email: mtruswell@abc15.com
Reported by: Katie Fisher
Last Update: 10/01/2009 5:46 am

PHOENIX – The day after the shooting of a 64-year-old man, neighbors are asking if it had to happen.

Kurt Aho was shot and killed Tuesday night near 31st Avenue and Bell Road.

He had been living in his home for nearly 30 years, but the home had recently fallen into foreclosure and was sold at a public auction on Tuesday.

When the new owners arrived at the property, they told 64-year-old Aho they were the new owners, and asked if he needed help moving out.

Police say Aho became distraught about losing his home and began to open fire, firing four rounds at the two men’s cars. The two men, a 49-year-old and a 42-year-old, then called police.

Officers arrived at the scene, near Bell Road and 35th Avenue, around 4:30 p.m. and said they saw Aho standing in the cul de sac with a gun in his hand.

Police tried talking to Aho for over an hour and reportedly asked him to put the weapon down as he walked in and out of the house before approaching the police department’s “Bearcat”, a specialty vehicle for officer protection, in a threatening manner.

Police said Aho began shooting at officers’ vehicles, so police shot at the man using rubber bullets.

According to officials, the rubber bullets were ineffective, and Aho raised his handgun and began firing at the vehicle and officers. That is when police reportedly shot and killed him.

Aho was pronounced dead at the scene.

Neighbors told ABC 15 that Aho had been trying to work with the mortgage company to keep his house.

Denise Montesquiou says, “He knew he was in trouble and he was trying to work it out. I don’t have a bad word to say about Kurt, right or wrong.”

Another neighbor, Yair Lavi, heard that Aho was dealing with cancer, for the second time.

Lavi says there was no reason to kill Aho.

“They had a sharpshooter on top of this house, on top of that house, and three of them behind a tree. Just shoot him in the hand and he’s no longer a threat.”

Police say the investigation is continuing.


Filed under: bubble, CDO, CORRUPTION, Eviction, foreclosure, Investor, Mortgage, securities fraud Tagged: Bank of America, BOA, BofA, Charles Koppa, Death by Foreclosure, Kurt Aho, Phoenix, public auction, Suicide by Cop, SWAT, Tiffany and Bosco
Aug
08

Loan Servicer Tactics… Foreclose don’t modify; lie, deceive, whatever it takes

As a citizen, please start asking tougher questions and demanding truthful answers of your elected officials. We MUST hold these men and women accountable to representing ‘we the people’ instead of their lobby pals.

Whatever you hear from the Administration or any of the large institutions via the drive-by media you can assume that it’s a lie or many shades of gray with dash or two of spin. Why? Well, of course, the truth is not going to get votes for politicians or more investors and account holders for any of these characters who operate in the shadows of financial institution corporate offices across America.

Let me give you a dose of truth serum in case you’re tempted to believe the drive by media reports on the foreclosures and the Making Home Affordable plan we’ve been told is going to rescue our economy and the housing market and the millions of families jobless and now facing foreclosure. You ready?

Here it is: the loan servicers don’t care about anything but money and the modus operandi is clear… foreclose as fast as possible on everyone in a mortgage hardship. Just modify enough loans to make everyone think we’re really on board with this. Make excuses for everything else. Lie to media about what’s really going on because mostly everyone believes what they hear anyway.

A deeper look into the numbers and statistics will leave you scratching your head though – and asking yourself the question, “but why?”

According to an article by Gretchen Morgenson from the New York Times, “Alan M. White, an assistant professor at the Valparaiso University law school in Indiana, analyzed data on 3.5 million subprime and alt-A mortgages in securitization pools overseen by Wells Fargo. The loans were written in 2005 through 2007; data on their performance is provided to the trusts’ investors. Mortgages handled by five of the nation’s largest loan servicing companies — Bank of America, Chase Home Finance and Litton Loan Servicing among them — are contained in the Wells Fargo data.

Mr. White found that mortgage modifications peaked in February and have declined in all but one month since. While servicers modified 23,749 loans in these trusts in February, they changed only 19,041 in May and 18,179 in June. This is exactly when servicers were supposed to be responding to the government’s loan modification urgings.

Foreclosures, meanwhile, keep rising. In June, 281,560 were in process, slightly above the 277,847 in May. Last January, there were about 242,000 foreclosures in the pipeline among the Wells Fargo trusts.”

Well, isn’t that interesting. You see, the numbers simply don’t lie. They tell the truth and expose the raw data of what is really happening. The report continues, “the most fascinating, and frightening, figures in the data detail how much money is lost when foreclosed homes are sold. In June, the data show almost 32,000 liquidation sales; the average loss on those was 64.7 percent of the original loan balance.”

Did you catch that? The AVERAGE loss on a house that a servicers takes to foreclosure sale is a whopping 64.7% of the original loan balance!!!! The average loan amount was $223,000. But in the liquidation sale, the property sold for $144,000 less, or a $79,000 sales price on average.

So any logical person goes, “why? Why would a servicer foreclose on the home instead of providing a loan modification for a homeowner who wants to pay but just needs a reduction in that payment?” I know I can’t be the only one who’s wondered that…

If you want to find the answer you just gotta follow the money… it’s that simple. And the answer does not shed any more favorable light on these servicers – who, by the way, are just subsidiaries of the main financial institutions. Example: Citimortgage is the servicer. They are owned by Citigroup. America’s Servicing Company is the servicer. They are owned by Wells Fargo.

So back to following the money. First, the pooling and servicing agreements governing these trusts, servicers and trustees usually contain “default servicing provisions” which provide the servicer which much higher fees when the loan goes into default. Then the servicer also gets all sorts of other fees reimbursed to them upon a liquidation sale such as BPO fees, inspection fees, legal fees, etc. These fees may get paid to the servicer right away but may not be reimbursed until the sale goes through. But, here’s the BIG reason…

Very often, if not most of the times, these servicers were paid in full for all these loans when they acted as the sponsor and sold the Notes (assets) to these trusts. The trust investors put up a lump sum amount to the servicer and the servicer agreed to collect the monies, manage the escrow accounts and in turn, made a guarantee of cash flow payments to the trust each month. The trust investors are most worried about one thing… their monthly payment on the cash flow. If they keep getting their monthly cash payment, do you think they’re going to be screaming bloody murder? Probably not. As long as the check keeps coming, I got no qualms. Stop the checks and I’m going to be gettin’ all in your business. Think about it… haven’t you noticed a peculiar lack of lawsuits being filed by MBS trust investors or the trusts themselves? One would think the federal courts would be littered with lawsuits by these trusts against all the institutions in the securitization chain for all sorts of allegations regarding the massive losses you’d think they’re realizing due to the defaults.

So, to keep the investors out of their “business” the servicer has to figure out a way to keep those cash flow payments going. Well, let’s say I’m servicing a pool of 1000 loans and the monthly cash flow on that pool is $1 million (or $1000 per loan average). But my default rate starts rising and now 10% of these loans are not paying. Well, that’s $100,000 per month less that I’m getting as the servicer. Shoot, how do I keep making the payment of $1 million per month if I’m only receiving $900,000?

Oh, I got it! If I can foreclose on a couple homes in default, take a 64.7% loss on it but I still get $79,000 in one lump sum from each home I liquidate, I can keep making that cash payment to the trust. All I need to do is liquidate about 1.2 homes per month on average, and, even though I take a huge loss on these homes, I can keep making that cash flow payment to the trust, keep my investors happy and better yet, keep them out of my business and away from asking all sorts of questions I really don’t want to answer. Note: this game can only carry on for so long. At some point the pied piper is going to pipe…

This my best stab at a simplified answer to “why” these servicers are ignoring the Making Home Affordable program and foreclosing as fast as they possibly can. Nothing else makes sense to me. If you have any other input, I’d love to hear about in the forum on this topic.

The kicker here is that these servicers don’t have legal standing to foreclose. They don’t own the Note in 80%+ of the cases – and that number is probably higher than 90% of the time. So they unlawfully seize a family’s home, sell it even though they don’t own it and in the process they also violate the servicing agreements they are governed by. These agreements mandate that the servicer act in a fiduciary manner with respect to the interests of the investors. I can tell you unequivocally that taking an average 64.7% loss on a trust asset is worse for the trust versus modifying the loan at a higher amount (still with principal reduction for the borrower) and recapturing the interest. There is NO WAY the current servicer model of foreclose and liquidate passes the NPV test for these trust assets – at least as far as I can see.

For reference and further context, here is the article written by Gretchen Morgenson at the New York Times.

So Many Foreclosures, So Little Logic

By GRETCHEN MORGENSON

LAST week, the stock market tumbled on news that housing foreclosures and delinquencies rose again in the first quarter. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said that among the 34 million loans it tracks, foreclosures in progress rose 22 percent, to 844,389. That figure was 73 percent higher than in the same period last year.

But the comptroller’s office also said that amid the gloom, there was promising data about loan modifications: they rose 55 percent in the quarter. That growth came on a very low base, of course, but the move encouraged John C. Dugan, head of the comptroller’s office.

“As the administration’s ‘Making Home Affordable’ program gains traction and helps offset the impact of this very difficult economic cycle,” he said in a statement, “we should continue to see progress in future reports.”

A glimpse of second-quarter mortgage data, however, indicates that the progress Mr. Dugan and his colleagues in Washington are hoping for may take longer to emerge — raising questions about whether policymakers and banks are moving quickly or intelligently enough on the foreclosure problem.

Foreclosures remain one of the great financial ills for the economy. The Bush administration largely overlooked foreclosures affecting average homeowners, focusing instead on propping up elite, troubled financial institutions with taxpayer funds. The Obama administration has said it wants to wrestle the foreclosure issue to the ground by encouraging mortgage loan modifications, but its efforts have gotten little traction.

Loan modifications occur when a lender agrees to change terms of a troubled borrower’s mortgage; the most common approach is to reduce the loan’s interest rate. Cutting the amount of principal owed — an option that could be of more help to a borrower — is rare because it means homeowners pay less money back to the bank over time.

Lenders and their representatives, however, don’t like to modify loans through interest rate cuts or principal reductions because, of course, it reduces the income they receive from borrowers. No surprise, then, that loan modifications have been a trickle amid the recent foreclosure flood.

Enter the government, with the program it announced in March to encourage modifications. It offers incentives to loan servicers to change mortgage terms, providing $1,000 for each loan they modify. The program focuses on making payments more affordable through lower interest rates, but delinquent amounts and late fees are typically tacked onto the mortgage balance. “Making Home Affordable” does not compel lenders to reduce mortgage balances.

Servicers signed on to the program in April. The program’s early months were not covered by the O.C.C.’s first-quarter report. But other figures on modifications conducted in April, May and June are available. And they show a decline in modifications, not an increase as the government hoped.

Alan M. White, an assistant professor at the Valparaiso University law school in Indiana, analyzed data on 3.5 million subprime and alt-A mortgages in securitization pools overseen by Wells Fargo. The loans were written in 2005 through 2007; data on their performance is provided to the trusts’ investors. Mortgages handled by five of the nation’s largest loan servicing companies — Bank of America, Chase Home Finance and Litton Loan Servicing among them — are contained in the Wells Fargo data.

Mr. White found that mortgage modifications peaked in February and have declined in all but one month since. While servicers modified 23,749 loans in these trusts in February, they changed only 19,041 in May and 18,179 in June. This is exactly when servicers were supposed to be responding to the government’s loan modification urgings.

Foreclosures, meanwhile, keep rising. In June, 281,560 were in process, slightly above the 277,847 in May. Last January, there were about 242,000 foreclosures in the pipeline among the Wells Fargo trusts.

“I was hoping we would see some impact in June of the government’s program,” Mr. White said. “Is ‘Home Affordable’ working? My short answer is no.”

To be sure, the government’s data differs from that which Mr. White analyzed, and its loan modification figures for the second quarter may look better as a result. The O.C.C. includes prime loans as well as subprime, for example, while the Wells Fargo data contains no prime loans.

Nevertheless, Mr. White has collected the figures since November 2008, and he said that in the months since, the performance of the 3.5 million mortgages that he analyzes tracked the O.C.C. data pretty closely.

THE Wells Fargo data is illuminating. It shows that in June, 58 percent of modifications cut the payments that the borrower has to pay, a slightly smaller percentage than in April or May. The average reduction in June was $173 a month.

But the most fascinating, and frightening, figures in the data detail how much money is lost when foreclosed homes are sold. In June, the data show almost 32,000 liquidation sales; the average loss on those was 64.7 percent of the original loan balance.

Here are the numbers: the average loan balance began at almost $223,000. But in the liquidation sale, the property sold for $144,000 less, on average. Perhaps no other single figure shows how wildly the mortgage mania pumped up home prices. It also bodes poorly for the quality of the mortgage-related assets lurking in banks’ books.

Loss severities, like foreclosures, are rising. In November, losses averaged 56.1 percent of the original loan balance; in February, 63.3 percent.

Given losses like these, Mr. White said he was perplexed that lenders and their representatives were resisting reducing principal when they modify loans. His data shows how rare it is for lenders to reduce principal. In June, for example, 3,135 loans — just 17.2 percent of the total modified — involved write-downs of principal, interest or fees. The total loss from these write-downs was just $45 million in June.

And yet, the losses incurred in foreclosure sales involving loans in the securitization trusts were a staggering $4.59 billion in June. “There is 100 times as much money lost in foreclosure sales as there was in writing down balances in modifications,” Mr. White said. “That is not rational economic behavior.”

If banks have written down the value of these loans to the 40 cents on the dollar that they are fetching on foreclosures — the only true value for these homes right now — then why don’t they bite the bullet and reduce the loan amount outstanding for the troubled borrowers? That type of modification would be far more likely to succeed than larding a borrower who is hopelessly underwater with yet more arrears.

“You can reduce payments with a lot of gimmicks similar to those built into subprime loans — temporary rate reductions that defer a lot of principal, balloon payments,” Mr. White said. “To me that leads to a situation where American homeowners are paying 50 to 60 percent of their incomes for mortgages which reset in 2011 and 2012. That is not solving the problem.”

Certainly not for borrowers, that is. And because many of these losses will ultimately be passed on to taxpayers, it’s not solving our problem, either.

Website Designed and Developed by Tampa Web Designer