Sep
11

INSIDE CHASE and the Perfect Foreclosure

“JPMorgan CHASE is in the foreclosure business, not the modification business’.”  That, according to Jerad Bausch, who until quite recently was an employee of CHASE’s mortgage servicing division working in the foreclosure department in Rancho Bernardo, California.

I was recently introduced to Jerad and he agreed to an interview.  (Christmas came early this year.)  His answers to my questions provided me with a window into how servicers think and operate.  And some of the things he said confirmed my fears about mortgage servicers… their interests and ours are anything but aligned.

Today, Jerad Bausch is 25 years old, but with a wife and two young children, he communicates like someone ten years older.  He had been selling cars for about three and a half years and was just 22 years old when he applied for a job at JPMorgan CHASE.  He ended up working in the mega-bank’s mortgage servicing area… the foreclosure department, to be precise.  He had absolutely no prior experience with mortgages or in real estate, but then… why would that be important?

“The car business is great in terms of bring home a good size paycheck, but to make the money you have to work all the time, 60-70 hours a week.  When our second child arrived, that schedule just wasn’t going to work.  I thought CHASE would be kind of a cushy office job that would offer some stability,” Jerad explained.

That didn’t exactly turn out to be the case.  Eighteen months after CHASE hired Jared, with numerous investors having filed for bankruptcy protection as a result of the housing meltdown, he was laid off.  The “investors” in this case are the entities that own the loans that Chase services.  When an investor files bankruptcy the loan files go to CHASE’S bankruptcy department, presumably to be liquidated by the trustee in order to satisfy the claims of creditors.

The interview process included a “panel” of CHASE executives asking Jared a variety of questions primarily in two areas.  They asked if he was the type of person that could handle working with people that were emotional and in foreclosure, and if his computer skills were up to snuff.  They asked him nothing about real estate or mortgages, or car sales for that matter.

The training program at CHASE turned out to be almost exclusively about the critical importance of documenting the files that he would be pushing through the foreclosure process and ultimately to the REO department, where they would be put back on the market and hopefully sold.  Documenting the files with everything that transpired was the single most important aspect of Jared’s job at CHASE, in fact, it was what his bonus was based on, along with the pace at which the foreclosures he processed were completed.

“A perfect foreclosure was supposed to take 120 days,” Jared explains, “and the closer you came to that benchmark, the better your numbers looked and higher your bonus would be.”

CHASE started Jared at an annual salary of $30,000, but he very quickly became a “Tier One” employee, so he earned a monthly bonus of $1,000 because he documented everything accurately and because he always processed foreclosures at as close to a “perfect” pace as possible.

“Bonuses were based on accurate and complete documentation, and on how quickly you were able to foreclosure on someone,” Jerad says.  “They rate you as Tier One, Two or Three… and if you’re Tier One, which is the top tier, then you’d get a thousand dollars a month bonus.  So, from $30,000 you went to $42,000.  Of course, if your documentation was off, or you took too long to foreclose, you wouldn’t get the bonus.”

Day-to-day, Jerad’s job was primarily to contact paralegals at the law firms used by CHASE to file foreclosures, publish sale dates, and myriad other tasks required to effectuate a foreclosure in a given state.

“It was our responsibility to stay on top of and when necessary push the lawyers to make sure things done in a timely fashion, so that foreclosures would move along in compliance with Fannie’s guidelines,” Jerad explained.  “And we documented what went on with each file so that if the investor came in to audit the files, everything would be accurate in terms of what had transpired and in what time frame.  It was all about being able to show that foreclosures were being processed as efficiently as possible.”

When a homeowner applies for a loan modification, Jerad would receive an email from the modification team telling him to put a file on hold awaiting decision on modification.  This wouldn’t count against his bonus, because Fannie Mae guidelines allow for modifications to be considered, but investors would see what was done as related to the modification, so everything had to be thoroughly documented.

“Seemed like more than 95% of the time, the instruction came back ‘proceed with foreclosure,’ according to Jerad.  “Files would be on hold pending modification, but still accruing fees and interest.  Any time a servicer does anything to a file, they’re charging people for it,” Jerad says.

I was fascinated to learn that investors do actually visit servicers and audit files to make sure things are being handled properly and homes are being foreclosed on efficiently, or modified, should that be in their best interest.  As Jerad explained, “Investors know that Polling & Servicing Agreements (“PSAs”) don’t protect them, they protect servicers, so they want to come in and audit files themselves.”

“Foreclosures are a no lose proposition for a servicer,” Jerad told me during the interview.  “The servicer gets paid more to service a delinquent loan, but they also get to tack on a whole bunch of extra fees and charges.  If the borrower reinstates the loan, which is rare, then the borrower pays those extra fees.  If the borrower loses the house, then the investor pays them.  Either way, the servicer gets their money.”

Jerad went on to say: “Our attitude at CHASE was to process everything as quickly as possible, so we can foreclose and take the house to sale.  That’s how we made our money.”

“Servicers want to show investors that they did their due diligence on a loan modification, but that in the end they just couldn’t find a way to modify.  They’re whole focus is to foreclose, not to modify.  They put the borrower through every hoop and obstacle they can, so that when something fails to get done on time, or whatever, they can deny it and proceed with the foreclosure.  Like, ‘Hey we tried, but the borrower didn’t get this one document in on time.’  That sure is what it seemed like to me, anyway.”

According to Jerad, JPMorgan CHASE in Rancho Bernardo, services foreclosures in all 50 states.  During the 18 months that he worked there, his foreclosure department of 15 people would receive 30-40 borrower files a day just from California, so each person would get two to three foreclosure a day to process just from California alone.  He also said that in Rancho Bernardo, there were no more than 5-7 people in the loan modification department, but in loss mitigation there were 30 people who processed forbearances, short sales, and other alternatives to foreclosure.  The REO department was made up of fewer than five people.

Jerad often took a smoke break with some of the guys handing loan modifications.  “They were always complaining that their supervisors weren’t approving modifications,” Jerad said.  “There was always something else they wanted that prevented the modification from being approved.  They got their bonus based on modifying loans, along with accurate documentation just like us, but it seemed like the supervisors got penalized for modifying loans, because they were all about finding a way to turn them down.”

“There’s no question about it,” Jerad said in closing, “CHASE is in the foreclosure business, not the modification business.”

Well, now… that certainly was satisfying for me.   Was it good for you too? I mean, since, as a taxpayer who bailed out CHASE and so many others, to know that they couldn’t care less about what it says in the HAMP guidelines, or what the President of the United States has said, or about our nation’s economy, or our communities… … or… well, about anything but “the perfect foreclosure,” I feel like I’ve been royally screwed, so it seemed like the appropriate question to ask.

Now I understand why servicers want foreclosures.  It’s the extra fees they can charge either the borrower or the investor related to foreclosure… it’s sort of license to steal, isn’t it?  I mean, no one questions those fees and charges, so I’m sure they’re not designed to be low margin fees and charges.  They’re certainly not subject to the forces of competition.  I wonder if they’re even regulated in any way… in fact, I’d bet they’re not.

And I also now understand why so many times it seems like they’re trying to come up with a reason to NOT modify, as opposed to modify and therefore stop a foreclosure. In fact, many of the modifications I’ve heard from homeowners about have requirements that sound like they’re straight off of “The Amazing Race” reality television show.

“You have exactly 11 hours to sign this form, have it notarized, and then deliver three copies of the document by hand to this address in one of three major U.S. cities.  The catch is you can’t drive or take a cab to get there… you must arrive by elephant.  When you arrive a small Asian man wearing one red shoe will give you your next clue.  You have exactly $265 to complete this leg of THE AMAZING CHASE!”

And, now we know why.  They’re not trying to figure out how to modify, they’re looking for a reason to foreclose and sell the house.

But, although I’m just learning how all this works, Treasury Secretary Geithner had to have known in advance what would go on inside a mortgage servicer.  And so must FDIC Chair Sheila Bair have known.  And so must a whole lot of others in Washington D.C. too, right?  After all, Jerad is a bright young man, to be sure, but if he came to understand how things worked inside a servicver in just 18 months, then I have to believe that many thousands of others know these things as well.

So, why do so many of our elected representatives continue to stand around looking surprised and even dumbfounded at HAMP not working as it was supposed to… as the president said it would?

Oh, wait a minute… that’s right… they don’t actually do that, do they?  In fact, our elected representatives don’t look surprised at all, come to think of it.  They’re not surprised because they knew about the problems.  It’s not often “in the news,” because it’s not “news” to them.

I think I’ve uncovered something, but really they already know, and they’re just having a little laugh at our collective expense… is that about right?  Is this funny to someone in Washington, or anyone anywhere for that matter?

Well, at least we found out before the elections in November.  There’s still time to send more than a few incumbents home for at least the next couple of years.

I’m not kidding about that.  Someone needs to be punished for this.  We need to send a message.

Mandelman out.

Aug
06

It’s a Matter of Principal – HAMP’s New PRA

It seems like people have been talking about reducing the principal balances of underwater mortgages as a way of addressing the foreclosure crisis almost since the crisis began.  The thinking seems to be that if people weren’t so far underwater, there would be fewer foreclosures.  I’m not sure anymore… maybe that’s true to some degree.  But, would that really stop today’s foreclosure crisis?  I suppose, like anything else, it would depend on who qualified for the program.

I mean, it occurs to me that HAMP itself might not have been such a crackpot idea… in, say… the early part of 2008.  Of course, in the early part of 2008 we were watching Dubya fight over a housing rescue plan with Barney Frank.  And by the time that brilliantly conceived piece of legislation was signed on July 30, 2008, it was destined to be the stunning success the Help-4-Homeowners program turned out to be.  Six months later that program, with its budget of $320 billion, and having been the subject of intense debate throughout the entire first half of that year, managed to successfully modify ONE solitary mortgage, in case you’d forgotten.

So now, with the foreclosure crisis coming into full bloom, and about to engulf the entire nation from coast-to-coast,with how many TRILLIONS of home equity and consumer wealth having vanished into thin air for good… now, Bernenke is saying stuff like… “Gee, guys… do you think we’re going to double dip?”  No, Benjamin… we think YOU’RE A DOUBLE DIP.

I hate to say this, because I was really hoping that we, as a nation, were going to come together and manage to avoid a couple of decades of pain and suffering, but like a wild fire that firefighters arrived at too late to fight, we’ve let our own meltdown burn too far, and it is now out of our control.

I’m afraid that now all we can do is giggle incessantly at the incompetent  fools we’ve got in charge of things, stock up on canned goods and ammo, and wait for the next easily predictable downturn to “shock” our nameless economists.  The economists whose names we know, buy the way, aren’t shocked in the least at our race to the bottom, but somewhere there are other economists and they’re constantly “shocked that the recovery isn’t .

Roubini, Stiglitz, Johnson, Krugman, Shiller, Schiff, and many more have been warning the our descent was ahead, but the other nameless economists must have had more clout, because rather than dealing with the problem, what we decided to take last year off to screw around debating  health care and then pass a bill that can only increase its costs.

Well, now Treasury’s new Principal Reduction Alternative (PRA) is scheduled to become effective on October 1, 2010, or whenever version 4.0 of the HAMP NPV is implemented, which ever is later.  HAMP’s NPV Version 4.0, was originally scheduled to be released on June 1, 2010, but instead, the servicers received only new tables for use with version 3.1.  As I write this, I’m told that testing of 4.0 is well underway and is should be released to the servicers in the next couple of weeks.

And NPV 4.0 is what drives the PRA, which is a “deferred principal reduction program” that allows the homeowner to earn a principal reduction over a three-year timeframe by making all payments in accordance with the loan’s modified terms. According to Supplemental Directive 10-05, the PRA is:

“… designed to give servicers additional flexibility to offer relief to borrowers whose homes are worth significantly less than the remaining amounts owed under their first lien mortgage loans (negative equity).”

Under the PRA, servicers are required to evaluate the benefit of principal reduction for every HAMP eligible loan with “high negative equity,” which Treasury defines as having a mark-to-market loan-to-value ratio greater than 115%.  The language found in the directive says that servicers are:

“… encouraged to offer principal reduction whenever the net present value (NPV) result of a HAMP modification using PRA is greater than the NPV result without considering principal reduction.”

Treasury will be introducing an “Alternative Modification Waterfall” test that servicers are to use in performing this evaluation, and Step 2, in the Alternative Waterfall test, incorporates a principal reduction.  To encourage servicers to participate in the PRA, the Treasury is offering new financial incentives.
The PRA dictates that servicers must evaluate any loan being considered for HAMP, with a mark-to-market loan-to-value ratio greater than 115%, using both the Standard and the Alternative waterfall test.

The loan’s unpaid principal balance should be determined after capitalizing amounts just as is done now under the current HAMP guidelines.  And servicers are being instructed to follow regulatory and investor guidance to select the appropriate valuation method that will be used in determining the mark-to-market value of the property. Then they are to use that value for both the NPV model and the MTMLTV calculations.

Here’s an Overview of How the New Plan Works:

FIRST: Reduce the UPB by an amount necessary to achieve either the target monthly mortgage payment ratio of 31%, or an MTMLTV ratio equal to 115 percent, whichever is reached first.

NEXT: If the reduced UPB creates a MTMLTV ratio of 115%, but the target monthly mortgage payment ratio of 31 percent has not been achieved (based on a fully amortizing principal and interest payment over the remainder of the current loan term and using the current mortgage interest rate), continue with the standard HAMP modification waterfall steps of interest rate reduction, term extension and principal forbearance, each as necessary, until the target monthly mortgage payment ratio of 31% is achieved.

LAST: The NPV model is then used to evaluate the modifications proposed by applying both the Standard Waterfall and the Alternative Waterfall.

There are three possible outcomes:

A. Just as is the case today, if the NPV for the modification using the Standard Waterfall is positive, servicers must modify the loan.

B. If neither the Standard Waterfall NPV nor the Alternative Waterfall NPV is positive, the servicer is not required to modify the loan.

C. If the NPV for the modification using the Alternative Waterfall is positive, servicers are ENCOURAGED, BUT ARE NOT REQUIRED, to perform a HAMP PRA loan modification.  This is true even in when the NPV from the Standard Waterfall is negative, or is less than the NPV of the Alternative Waterfall.

According to Treasury:

“… the primary purpose of the Alternative Waterfall analysis is to demonstrate whether reducing principal on loans with MTMLTV ratios greater than 115% results in a positive NPV.”

However, when servicers are deciding whether to reduce the principal balance on a homeowner’s mortgage, they may, based on investor guidelines and contractual obligations, reduce the UPB of a loan to an amount that results in a MTMLTV ratio that is greater or lesser than the 115% target ratio in the Alternative Waterfall.  But, this time around, because servicers do still have discretion as to when principal reductions are offered, servicers must:

“Develop and adhere to a written policy for making principal reduction determinations that treats all similarly-situated loans in a consistent manner and in compliance with fair lending and other applicable laws and regulations.”

A new NPV model, referred to as Version 4.0 is still under development, but it will reflect principal reduction incentives and will compare the NPV result of modifications, with and without principal reduction, with the NPV result without modification.  And this time out, the software application for NPV 4.0 will be available on www.HMPadmin.com, which is the HAMP servicer portal, where there will also be as detailed guidelines for submitting proposed modification data.

BUT, BUT, BUT…

BUT, BUT, BUT, IN ADDITION… Treasury has made it clear in the Supplemental Directive that servicers are free to conduct other internal evaluations… IN ADDITION TO THE NPV 4.0 EVALUATION… in order to ensure that such reductions are in the best interest of investors.  And these additional “internal evaluations” are not being disclosed.

So, even though the software application for NPV 4.0 will be available to consumers, the fact that servicers will still conduct “internal evaluations” to assess whether modification or principal reductions are in the best interests of the investors, means that it’s critical that homeowners know with certainty whether there are ways to modifying their mortgage that are in the best interests of the investors that own it their mortgage.

Only the REST Report can provide homeowners with that level of analysis, because REST is not some homemade software program.  It is a loan disposition analysis platform, just like the major banks and servicers use, and it is already being updated for HAMP Version 4.0, and the PRA program, among others.

There is simply NO OTHER software system available to homeowners that can even come close to delivering the power of REST, how that?

Treatment of the Principal Reduction…

Initially, principal reductions under the PRA should be treated as a non-interest bearing principal forbearance, which will be referred to as the “PRA Forbearance Amount.”  Borrowers in good standing on the first, second and third anniversaries of the trial period’s effective date, the servicer MUST reduce the principal balance of the loan in three installments of one third of the initial PRA Forbearance Amount on each year, on the loan’s anniversary date.

Homeowners who receive a principal reduction under the PRA will be notified that principal reductions are reported to the Internal Revenue Service and may have tax consequences, and new documents will advise homeowners to seek guidance from a tax professional.  (Although, I don’t understand for the life of me why borrowers couldn’t just contact their bank directly to get help with this too, but who am I to say anything?)

The Impact to Second Liens under the 2MP Program…

Servicer participating in the Second Lien Modification Program (2MP): When a first lien mortgage loan is modified under PRA and the servicer is servicing a second lien mortgage loan secured by the same property, whether or not that servicer also services the first lien mortgage loan), that 2MP servicer must also reduce principal in conjunction with the modification of the second lien.

If there was principal forbearance or forgiveness on the HAMP-modified first lien, a servicer must forbear or forgive principal on the second lien in the same proportion, based on the ratio of the principal forbearance or forgiveness amount of the HAMP-modified first lien to the total UPB of the HAMP-modified first lien on its modification effective date.

All principal forgiveness required or provided under 2MP will be applied at the time of the permanent 2MP modification and will not be deferred.

Example: The total unpaid principal balance plus the forgiveness amount of the HAMP-modified first lien on its modification effective date is $100,000, the amount of principal forbearance on the first lien is $5,000 and the amount of principal forgiveness is $5,000. Therefore, the servicer must forbear five percent of the second lien and must forgive five percent of the second lien. If the total unpaid principal balance of the second lien on the modification effective date is $40,000, the servicer must forbear $2,000 and must forgive $2,000, or the servicer may elect to forgive a larger amount.

The Supplemental Directive ALSO clearly states:

If a servicer receives a written request from a homeowner, or an authorized representative of that homeowner, related to principal reduction, “the servicer must, within 30 calendar days of receipt of the request, respond in writing,” and that response must include the reason(s) for a principal reduction not being offered, when applicable.

And if the servicer doesn’t respond in writing within the 30 day period, and provide the homeowner with a detailed written explanation as to why the serivcer is not granting a principal reduction, then the CEO of the servicer is not allowed to have desert for a week, or watch T.V. past 9:00 PM.  (Okay, so I’m kidding about that last paragraph… sort of.)

If a homeowner loses good standing, the loan cannot be restored even if the borrower subsequently cures the default.

If a borrower loses good standing before the entire PRA Forbearance Amount has been applied to the UPB, the unapplied PRA Forbearance Amount shall remain as non-interest bearing principal forbearance for the remaining life of the loan.

The Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009 (HFSTHA) established a Servicer Safe Harbor, and TILA was amended for the purpose of providing a safe harbor to enable such servicers to modify and refinance mortgage loans under a “qualified loss mitigation plan.”

Treasury has determined that each residential loan modification under HAMP (including PRA modifications) and 2MP, as well as each short sale and deed-in-lieu of foreclosure under HAFA, is a “qualified loss mitigation plan” as defined in the Servicer Safe Harbor. In addition, Treasury anticipates that the “FHA Program Adjustments to Support Refinancings for Underwater Homeowners,” will also constitute a “qualified loss mitigation plan” as defined in the Servicer Safe Harbor.

In Conclusion…

So, with the introduction of Treasury’s new HAMP PRA now only a few short moths away, the question on everyone’s mind should be: will it work?  I , for one, think it could have… perhaps if it had been introduced in 2009.

I’ll say one thing for these clowns… their timing is impeccable.

Mandelman out.

~~~~~~~~~~


P.S. There’s a much better way to deal with your servicer when in need of a loan modification, and its called the REST Report.  Find out more about it here: REST REPORT

The REST Report Results have been REMARKABLE… Click here to read more: REST RESULTS

And why not click both… especially if you’re trying to get your mortgage modified.  I think you’ll be very glad you did.

Jul
29

Testimonials About the Regal 2, Electronic Cigarette

I’m sure some that read what I wrote about the Regal 2, the new electronic cigarette that I fell in love with, have wondered what others, besides me, would think about the product.  Well, here’s what a couple of my new Regal 2 users (and distributors) had to say in emails to me about a week ago, right after they received their Regal 2s in the mail.  And in case you missed my original article about this new product, click here: We Interrupt this Meltdown for a Brief Commercial Message.

Dear Mr. Mandelman –

I purchased the inLife last week because I trust you – you make me laugh and you shoot from the hip.  Although I got it on Thursday, I hesitated until Saturday to open the box, and after reading the instructions, found I had to wait 8 hours till the battery was charged.

Finally, at 5:15 last night, I took my first puff – it was amazing – a 3 pack a day chain smoker, a writer like you – I smoked 3 real cigarettes last night, instead of probably half a pack – today I have smoked a pack, but sitting on my butt I would have probably smoked three packs by this time tonight – it takes a little getting used to, but it does satisfy the psychological need of having it in your hand.  I grab for it now without thinking, and have even tried to tap the ashes off a few times. :)

Thanks for introducing us to inLife – It’s a wonderful product!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ken Baumgardt

Newark, Delaware

~~~~~~

Hey Mandelman!

I just got my Regal 2 today.  I know you’re busy, you probably get a thousand emails a day, but I had to tell you… it’s exactly what you said… I love it.  I live in Vegas and I’m already building a business around it.  A casino manager asked me about buying 3,000 of them!  Everyone who sees it is excited too.

I’m glad you wrote about it because I would never have found it on my own… I didn’t even know electronic cigarettes existed before.  I’ve been involved in multi-level marketing before, but this is the best product for that type of marketing I’ve seen.

Thanks you so much for my Regal 2, and for your articles.  And post this on your site if you want.  I could always use the extra promotion… LOL.

Asia McKenzie

Las Vegas, Nevada

So, I’m pleased to be able to announce and recommend Ken as a distributor of the Regal 2 in Delaware, and Asia as a Regal 2 distributor in Las Vegas.  If you’re anywhere near Delaware, or Vegas, and you want to know more about the Regal 2, either as a product or as an income opportunity, you should absolutely contact Ken or Asia as shown below.

Kenneth Baumgardt, Delaware

Ph. 302-319-1509

http://www.kendigger.myinlife.com

Asia McKenzie, Las Vegas, NV

Ph. 888-652-6660

http://www.asia888.myinlife.com

~~~~~~

Did you check out the Regal 2 featured on the hit reality television show, The Deadliest Catch?  Click here to see the video: After the Catch Starring the Regal 2.

And, as always, if you want to talk to me about the Regal 2, email me at: mandelman@mac.com

Jul
29

Mandelman on the News Dissector Radio Show

My goodness, I’ve been doing quite a few radio programs lately, have you noticed?  I really like doing the radio show thing, it’s a lot easier than writing long, in-depth articles… LOL… just kidding… sort of.  Anyway, this is a link to me on Danny Schechter the News Dissector’s show, which is out of New York.  We’re talking about the economy and the foreclosure crisis, what else?

Here’s a link to the show:

Mandelman on the News Dissector, with Danny Schechter

Danny Schechter produced and directed the movie, PLUNDER, and I like the movie so much that I suggested that others watch it and even hold “Plunder Parties” so that people across the country would start to realize who caused the economic catastrophe we’re going to be living with for the next way-too-many years.  Here’s a link to that, in case you missed it:

Have a Plunder Party and Help Change Our World

I’m not kidding when I say, “help change our world,” by the way.  The only way we’re going to change things in this country (short of waiting for them to change on their own which will happen eventually, but at 49 years old, it won’t matter to me by then) is for the people to speak out and demand balance… in other words, tell our elected representatives that the banks aren’t the only important members of our society… and the only way the people will speak out is if they realize that what’s happened is not their fault.

Until they (read: you) understand that its not the borrowers, it’s the banks that caused our national meltdown… they’ll (read: you’ll) remain ashamed and unable to speak out.  So, watch Plunder… seriously… buy it and watch it.  It’s like $16.99… and  you can throw $16.99 at something this important.

Anyway… all this radio show practice is going to come in handy… because soon I might just be doing a radio show of my own.  And maybe even some Podcasting… I’m so techie, after all.

Mandelman out.

Jul
19

Elizabeth Warren on the Foreclosure Crisis

Elizabeth Warren is the only person I’ve seen in Washington D.C. that is both aware of what consumers are facing today, and I believe truly cares about homeowners in this country. She gets it in ways that no one else in government does, and she appeared just a few days ago on PBS to talk about the new agency and the foreclosure crisis. And I found it breathtaking to watch, and hear what she she had to say.

She says…

“It’s about respect. I believe that the American people ought to be part of the conversation about what’s happening in our economy, and what’s happening in Washington D.C. and what’s happening on Wall Street. I truly believe that if the insiders get together and rewrite all the rules, those will be rules that will benefit the insiders and the rest of America will just be left out of it.”

She was asked whether she believes that Tim Geithner is right about the way he’s handling the commercial real estate meltdown that’s around the corner.  She responded by saying:

“We have not seen a strong response from Treasury. I hope he’s right, but I would feel better if I saw more action, if we saw some plans in place. It is our job in oversight not to say ‘Oh good, let’s relax!’ Our job in oversight is push and say these are problems, and show us what you’re doing here, and we do this on behalf of the American people.”

She described it as a downward spiral. (Sound familiar?) She knows what’s ahead and she knows it doesn’t look good. People… she is our one true real hope. We need her now, and if we can’t make her the President of the United States, we must make sure she is allowed to establish and lead the consumer protection agency of which she conceived. It is only because of her that the agency will exist, and to pretend that there is anyone else to lead it, would be a travesty and a tragedy on an historic scale.

I pray… literally pray… that all of you reading me take the time to write to the White House and to  your elected representative telling both that her appointment is the single most important thing to you… and to all of us.

At the end of her interview, and I hope you’ll watch every single second of it as it appears below… she admits that she doesn’t know whether it’s possible to push back against Wall Street’s power, and she admits that many have told her that it is not. But, I’ve never felt more in-sync with anyone as when she utters her last words, saying: “I don’t know. I just refuse to give up.”

I was told by someone inside the beltway, as they say, that Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is still working hard to oppose her appointment to lead the new consumer protection agency. I’ve also been told that Larry Summers will also oppose her appointment.

These are the two guys who have bailed out the banks at every turn, and don’t want to see anyone question those banks, or limit what they’re allowed to do to us, in order to become solvent again.

The banks, however, are no more solvent today than they were a year ago. The toxic assets… remember the “toxic assets”… are right where they were in October of 2008. Geithner has not dealt with that problem. It is abundantly clear that his plan is to allow the banks to continue crippling our economy until they can make enough money to return to solvency.

But, and please listen when I say this, and go check it out for yourself if you don’t believe what I’m about to say… Japan took that approach and it took their banks over a DECADE. It could take our banks even longer.

My daughter is 14. How old are those that you love? We are literally staring down the barrel of a DECADE LONG GUN RIGHT NOW. Geithner cannot be allowed to continue doing what he’s doing to this country.

Last year, we spent more than $4 trillion propping up the banks, and we are no better off today than we were then. In fact, as everyone will know in a matter of months, if they don’t know it already, we are much worse off than we were a year ago.

It’s not just about the TARP for $700 billion, by the way. The TARP was just the beginning. The rest is not covered by the media, but you can look it up for yourself. Try Googling the following, because these are all programs Geithner and Summers and the Obama Administration have established and approved… quietly.

TLGP (Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program) This was set up by Geithner and Bair. It guarantees certain types of debt issued by financial institutions, and deposits in certain accounts. Thousands of banks are participating in this program. ALLOCATED: $1.5 TRILLION

GSEP (Government Sponsored Entity Purchases) This was set up by Tim Geithner and Ben Bernanke. It allows the Federal Reserve to being purchasing the toxic debt issued by Fannie and Freddie. ALLOCATED: $1.4 TRILLION

CPFF (Commercial Paper Funding Facility) This program was established by Geithner to fund the commercial paper market after Lehman’s demise. Commercial paper can be thought of as short term loans that many large companies use to cover payrolls. It was funded by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York… Geithner was the President of the Federal reserve Bank of New York before becoming Treasury Secretary, by the way. They say this program is closed, but how do we really know? ALLOCATED: $1.4 TRILLION

TALF (Term Asset Backed Securities Loan Facility) Geithner and Bernanke set this up last year to loan money to banks that offer bundled loans to small businesses and consumers. The hope was that it would make it easier for people to get car loans, student loans, and other forms of credit. Did it work? Maybe a little, but it sure didn’t fix anything. ALLOCATED: $200 BILLION

TAF (Term Auction Facility) A program whereby the Federal Reserve auctioned funds to depository institutions. Bids are submitted by phone through local Federal Reserve banks, and all advances must be collateralized, but how do we know what’s passing for collateral these days. ALLOCATED: $600 BILLION

AMLF (Asset Backed Commercial Paper Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility) This program provides loans to banks so they can buy certain types of commercial paper from money market mutual funds. The goal of this program was to make it easier for the funds to pay the investors that wanted to cash out. ALLOCATED: $1.6 TRILLION

FEDS (Foreign Exchange Dollar Swaps) This is a program whereby the Federal Reserve goes around the world offering dollars to the European Central Bank, the Swiss National Bank, the Bank of England and other central banks. These banks can print Euros, Francs, Pounds, etc. but not dollars. The european banks give the Fed their own currencies to hold, and then lend the dollars to other banks in an attempt to ease the strain in those banks. ALLOCATED: UNREPORTED AMOUNT SPENT AS OF A YEAR AGO: $420.26 BILLION

PDCF (Primary Dealer Credit Facility) This is an overnight loan facility that provides funding to primary dealers in exchange for any tri-party-eligible collateral. The purpose is to keep the markets functioning. Loans are taken out for one day, but new loans can be taken out each day. ALLOCATED: UNREPORTED SPENT: UNREPORTED

Still think it’s all about the TARP funds?

People have called me and said… “But the banks paid back the TARP funds, doesn’t that mean they’re doing better?” And I’ve replied: No, I’m afraid not. It just means they wanted to have the restrictions on executive pay lifted, and only the TARP funds place such restrictions on the banks. The rest of the programs above don’t place any restrictions on anyone.

Tim Geithner and Larry Summers are directly responsible for the situation we are in today. It’s worsening and worsening faster than ever. Don’t wait until you actually feel the pain to take action, because by then it will be too late, if it isn’t already.

Oh, and stop listening to the double dip nonsense. It’s not true. We won’t have a double dip, because we never had a recovery. We’re in the same downward spiral we went into in 2007. Elizabeth Warren knows this, but she also knows that government cannot continue to abandon the American people as it pumps trillions into the banks who caused and are continuing to cause such monumental and intense pain. We need her now… we need balance, as much as we can get.

And just like I’ve said many times over the last two years… she won’t give up. Write to the White House, and to your elected representative today. Demand that Elizabeth Warren head up the new consumer protection agency… please.

Here’s she is being interviewed just three days ago on PBS. Please watch the whole thing. Thank you… Mandelman

Watch the full episode. See more Need To Know.

Jul
15

After the Catch Television Show Features My Favorite New Product

My favorite new product and very part-time career choice, the Regal 2 electronic cigarette was on the “After the Catch” reality television show a few days ago.

Josh Harris, the son of Captain Phil Harris, called the Regal 2 “an awesome product”.  Apparently, his famous and unbelievably rugged father, who had what I think was the most dangerous job in the history of jobs, has passed away and he was a big time cigarette smoker… someone told me he smoked 9 packs a day, but I really don’t know whether that’s true.

His son, Josh and others, now all smoke the Regal 2, he’s smoking one on the video clip from the show that was on the other night in the video below.  I just thought it was cool, because apparently Josh is now a distributor for InLife’s Regal 2… just like me!  Yep, he’s a multi-level, or network, marketer too… and he’s a lot richer than me… like there’s me down here… and he’s basically on the moon… if it’s even that close.

So, now I feel like much less of a nerd for talking about the Regal 2, both as a great product for smokers, and as a business opportunity… because now that two unbelievably popular reality television shows, The Deadliest Catch, and After the Catch, are promoting the Regal 2 and InLife… well, how smart do I look now?  Like a genius, right?

If you didn’t read my article on this topic, here’s a link:

I’m Interrupting This Meltdown for a Brief Commercial Message

The response from readers to that article was awesome!  I’m glad so many others shared my thinking on this whole topic.  But, when I went down to the corporate headquarters yesterday, to meet with the company’s founders and senior executives, I had a great time… I really liked the guys.  And I learned about the After the Catch appearance, so I thought everyone should know.

By the way, I am actually making money at this already… I’ll share the specifics if you send me an email or we talk on the phone.  It’s not a huge amount or anything, but it’s not chopped liver either.

You can email me about this at mandelman@mac.com, as always.

So, here’s Josh, son of the late Captain Phil Harris, with some touching memories and him “not smoking” his Regal 2 in action.

Jul
09

I’m Interrupting this Meltdown for a Brief Commercial Message

Want to know what bloggers all talk about online and among themselves?  “Monetizing” their blogs.  That’s right… money, and how to make enough so they can afford to support their blogging habit and not have to work another full time job at the same time.  It’s should be easy to understand… after all, it’s not easy to work 16 hour days, month after month, year after year.  I know what that’s like and I do not recommend it to others.

So, when people that write blogs are talking with others about their sites, the conversation inevitably turns to the same question, and it’s always asked by the non-blogger: “How do you make money doing what you do?”  And when you tell them you don’t, they look at you with that strange expression that says: “So, why in the world do you do it?”

Someone recently asked me why I was so passionate about the foreclosure crisis and people losing their homes.  I replied: “Why aren’t you?”  Some things simply aren’t going to be understood by all.

The vast majority of bloggers today, when looking to monetize their sites, sell advertising.  I’ve been approached by all kinds of companies asking to put advertisements on my blog… and I’ve turned them all down.  Not because I think it would ruin my site’s credibility, necessarily, but because I just don’t like the idea of writing about such an important and tragic subject… and then… hang on… how would you like to save up to 50% on your car insurance?  Yuck.  There’s a time for that, but it isn’t now on Mandelman Matters.

I do write a book review occasionally, and I always put a link to Amazon.com at the end so that anyone who wants to buy the book can click that link and buy it.  I make 6.5% of the sales, which isn’t much money, but it’s something.  And most of my readers probably know by now that I fully endorse something called the REST Report for those trying to avoid foreclosure by negotiating with their bank.  And, as I’ve disclosed from the very beginning, Mandelman Matters does receive a small percentage on each REST Report, a very small percentage, by the way.

Well, now I’m writing to introduce something else that I’ve discovered recently, but it has nothing to do with what I write about, so don’t worry about that.  And many of you are probably going to laugh at me when you hear this, but oh well.  I’m writing now to tell you about the Regal 2, by InLife… my new electronic cigarette.

If you’re not a smoker, or don’t have someone in your life that smokes… you’re probably about to click off to somewhere else.  But, you may not want to… and you’ll see why in a minute.

First of all, I smoked for years.  I’m not going to tell you how many years, but suffice it to say that when I started they were 50¢ a pack.  Every year, for the past three years or so, I’ve been reading about these new electronic cigarettes, there’s at least a dozen competitors out there now, just a few years back there were only two or three.  I’ve been reading about them because everyone who’s ever smoked knows they should quit… like yesterday… and I’m no exception.

I’ve quit lots of times… for a year here and there… I might have made it for two years once… maybe not.

The truth is… I like smoking, so sue me.  I write a lot, as you know, and nicotine is the greatest when you’re sitting at your computer writing for 12 hours straight.  I tried cigars, a pipe, but nothing is quite as handy or as instantly satisfying as a cig.  Nicotine is a great drug… it’s like caffeine… a low-grade stimulant.  People have been chewing the leaves of the tobacco plant for 6000 years, according to Wikipedia, so there must be something enjoyable about it, right?

It’s not the nicotine in the cigarette that’s so bad for you, by the way, it’s the tar and all the chemicals.  Nicotine doesn’t even stick around your body for very long. It has a half-life of about 60 minutes.  That means that six hours after a cigarette, only about 0.031 mg of the 1 mg of nicotine you inhaled remains in your body, according to an article in Discovery Health.

Well, electric cigarettes don’t burn anything, there’s no tobacco involved, which means no tar and whatever else is in cigarettes, but they do deliver nicotine in strong, medium, or lite doses, just like actual cigarettes.  There’s no smell whatsoever, in fact you could smoke one in the car with the windows up and no one would know.  But, you do everything else that smokers do… take a drag, blow out what appears to be smoke (it’s not, by the way), and play with it between your fingers.

I tried one of these electronic marvels a couple of years back and I hated it.  No way, yuck.  Barely even worked, and was nothing like a cigarette… more like smoking a pen you’re holding in your hand.  And these things are not easy to try, you pretty much have to buy one to try one, and at $100-$150, you can’t exactly just pick-up all of the leading brands and see which you like best.  I’ve been through five or six, so that’s probably about $600 or $700 I’ve spent over the last few years experimenting.

Then, recently I was introduced to the Regal 2, and I have to tell you… smokers and/or closet smokers listen up: I love the damn thing.  I mean… really love it.  It’s just like a cigarette, but there’s no smell and no smoking involved, except that there is.  You take a drag, and it tastes like you’re smoking a cig, and you breathe out what looks like smoke, but it’s not… it’s vapor, like when you breathe out when it’s cold outside.  It looks like smoke, feels like smoke, but it just dissipates, it doesn’t hang in the air like smoke, and it has no smell whatsoever.

When you take a drag, the tip lights up and glows a really cool emerald green that’s eye-catching to say the least.  And mine is black and silver and looks like James Bond would have it, but you can get it in different colors too… hot pink, blue… very cool.  And get this… you can “smoke” an electronic cigarette pretty much anywhere… like in a bar in California for example… while you’re at the movies… even on an airplane.

Okay, so here’s the deal…

Some people switch to an electronic cigarette because they want to quit.  I switched so I wouldn’t have to quit.  (I hate quitters.)  I think all smokers know they should quit, and I think most if not all smokers have someone in their life always telling them to quit.  Well, I think this is THE answer… and I’m a smoking expert.  There’s nothing I don’t know about smoking… nothing.

I’m writing this because I know there are plenty of others out there just like me.  They know they should quit, but hey… they just don’t want to.  Especially right now… maybe it’s because they’re under stress, which is my excuse at the moment, because nicotine is great for stress.

So, I’m writing this because I want anyone that smokes to know… from one smoker (or closet smoker) to another… this thing is awesome.  I love it.  Oh, and by the way… it’s cheaper than smoking too!  Like less than HALF the cost!  What’s not to love?

But wait… there’s more.  And I know some of you are going to make fun of me about this… but hold on.

I was introduced to the Regal 2 when I called the company and talked to a guy who said I could come down and pick one up because they’re located in Irvine, California, which is 20 minutes away from my house.  He suggested we meet because he said there was a business opportunity involved… yes… the company that manufactures the Regal 2 is a network marketing company, which is the new term for multi-level marketing, I suppose because everyone hates multi-level marketing.  I know I do.

It was around 5:00 pm when I arrived, so we went out for a beer. While we were sitting in the bar at the Hilton Hotel across the street from the airport, the guy I was with asked the waiter: “Do you mind if I don’t smoke?”  The waiter saw his electronic cig and said: “Oh wow, what’s that?”  Next thing I knew we were “not smoking” in the bar, having a beer, and he had another customer… the waiter.

Before you think anything here… I’ve never been involved in a multi-level marketing thing… NEVER EVER.  I’ve been pitched a bunch of times over the last 20 years, but I always say the same thing: No.  Like I told the guy from that company that sells juice the same thing I tell all the multi-level people who try to get me involved: I don’t have many friends… I’m not going to drive around with juice in my car… I can’t keep track of paperwork… I hate selling people stuff… I’m never going to bring it up in conversation… So, no.

So, yes… I signed up as a distributor for InLife.  That’s my Regal 2 above.  I love it and here’s why:

1. I love the product.  It’s the best thing to happen to smoking since… well, smoking.

2. As I writer, I like the slow stream of nicotine, and the act of smoking while I’m writing, but I also know it’s really bad for me.  Now I feel like I don’t have to quit.  So, get off my back, people.  I’m not smoking.  Nothing’s burning, there’s no tobacco involved.

3. It’s a lot cheaper than buying cigarettes… like half the cost or less.

4. You never have to carry around anything with you in your trunk, or take an order, or touch a piece of paper, or accept a payment.  When someone wants to buy one, or sign up as a distributor, you just give them your Website address, the company gives you a Website automatically when you become a distributor, and you just tell them to go online and either buy one, or sign-up as a distributor.

5. It DOESN’T COST ANYTHING TO BE A DISTRIBUTOR.  Not a dime.  The product costs $130 retail, but as a distributor it’s only $99.  But, you pay $30 to be a distributor, so it’s a wash.  And, $130 is like two weeks of buying cigarettes, so big deal.

6. I never have to bring it up to anyone, and the damn thing sells itself.  The first week I had it, my wife and I went to a Bar Mitzvah.  We were standing outside drinking a glass of wine, because you can just imagine how excited I was to be at a Bar Mitzvah… and I took out my Regal 2, took a drag, and it lit up emerald green like it always does… and less than a minute later there were three people standing in front of me.

“What’s that?”  “It’s my electronic cigarette.”  “Wow, cool.  Do you really like it?”  “I love it.”  “I’ve heard about those, I want to try one.”  “No problem, here’s the Web address.  You can either buy one, or you can become a distributor.  It doesn’t cost anything to be a distributor, so you should probably do that.  That way you’ll make money when someone asks you about it, just like you just asked me.  Yeah, it’s a multi-level deal… I know… ha, ha, ha.  So, don’t do it then… just keep smoking until you kill yourself, I don’t give a… ”

Okay, so I didn’t really say that last part.

My point is… this thing is a magnet for smokers.  I just went to Starbucks the other morning.  Got my coffee, a copy of the New York Times Sunday Edition, sat down, took out my Regal 2… took a drag… the light turned green… and I spent the next 20 minutes talking to the line of people that came over to ask: “What’s that?”  I finally put it away so they’d leave me alone… I wanted to read the paper in peace.

So… that’s it.  I don’t care what anyone thinks of me… I’ve decided that I’m not too good to be a distributor of this product.  In fact, I could really use the money right now, and you can make a lot of money, by the way.  Not only do you get paid every time someone buys the Regal 2, but smokers sign up to have the cartridges auto-shipped every month, so ka-ching, right?  I mean, you can buy juice anywhere, but there’s only one place to buy the cartridges for the Regal 2.

It’s like buying a razor and needing the blades… but the blades cost half the price of the blades that are bad for you.  One cartridge lasts about as long as a pack of cigs, and costs less than half what my brand of cigs costs.

I know, you’ve heard the multi-level marketing pitch before… so have I.  But this is way different.  Smokers and others see that emerald green glow and want one… if not for them, for the person in their life who still smokes cigs and needs to quit.

I don’t have to carry anything around in my car.  I don’t have to write anything down.  I never have to bring it up, people ask me about it every time I take it out of my pocket.  And, in my opinion, this product is going to absolutely explode in the years to come.  The first generation ones sucked.  The second generation wasn’t much better… but this one totally rocks.  I noticed that 7-11 has started carrying an electronic cig, by the way, and if they’re carrying one, it’s because they know the demand is growing.  (Theirs is a cheaper but awful imitation of the Regal 2, in case you’re interested.  I tried it.  Yuck.)

And… are you ready for this… I actually think I’m going to make a bundle at this, how do you like that?  I’m not kidding about that, I’m serious as cancer, to be punny about it.  I’m talking real money here… like maybe hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.

One more thing and then I’ll shut up… If you’re interested, you should contact me and sign up as part of my organization, or down-line, or whatever it’s called.  Why?  Why not?  But, also because I checked and the top companies that market electronic cigs on-line have Google Page Ranks of ‘2’.  Are you feeling me?  A ‘2’ simply isn’t going to cut it if you’re competing against me online… sorry about that.  (Insert evil laugh.)  So, whose team do you want to be on?  Mine, on page one of Google, or theirs on page 12?

So… if you’re too cool for this, fine.  If you don’t need the money, fine.  If you just want to keep stinking up the place and getting bitched at by whomever because you should quit, fine.  Do whatever you want… I understand… I know smokers, remember?  I was one for a long time.

But, if you’re interested, then you should email me, because I’m all over this.  You can start “not smoking” and making extra cash as a part of my team.  I’ve seen the company up close, and I like everything about it.  So I’m involved in multi-level marketing for the first time in my life, so what?  I don’t care what anyone else thinks… I love the product and I’ll laugh every time I deposit the checks.

And I’m going to promote the Regal 2 on my blog… and “monetize” it, as they say.  If that bothers anyone, oh well.  I think what I’m doing is a win-win scenario, and I think others will too.

Meanwhile… do you mind if I don’t smoke?

Reach me via email at: mandelman@mac.com

And, to learn more about the Regal 2, you can sign up as a distributor, or just buy the Regal 2 for yourself or someone you care about by visiting: http://www.mandelman.myinlife.com.

Here’s the link and information to sign up as a distributor as part of my organization:

1. Go to:  http://www.mandelman.myinlife.com

2. Then click on “Join Now,” which is in top right corner.

3. Then fill out the form.

4. Then order either the “Regal 2 Deluxe Pack” or Supreme Pack.  Or you can just order the base unit, which is $99, but you don’t get two units, so the others are really much better deals.  Feel free to check with me if you have questions.

5. Then set up: “Auto-Ship” of the “Regal 2 Cartridge Standard Mix Pack” which is $29.95 a month. (You have to be on auto-ship to get paid, and the mix pack lets you allow others to sample different strengths.)

6. Then you can go to your “Back Office” and your Website will already be up and usable.  Your address will be like: www.YOURNAME.myinlife.com.

When someone you talk to wants to sign up as a distributor, or just buy a Regal 2, just tell them to go to your Website’s address, and do the same thing as shown above. It’s as simple as that.  And you can also find information on the site about the company, the product, the compensation plan, you know… all the stuff.  And contact me anytime…

I love talking about this thing… LOL.

Jun
14

FBI to target fraudulent lending, hundreds to be arrested

FBI to target mortgage fraud

By Suzanne Kapner in New York

Published: June 11 2010 02:25 | Last updated: June 11 2010 02:25

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is preparing a nationwide crackdown on mortgage fraud, the latest in a series of efforts to curb lending practices that contributed to the housing meltdown, according to people familiar with the matter.

The FBI is preparing to arrest hundreds of people across the US as early as next week for offences including encouraging borrowers to falsify income on mortgage applications, misleading home owners about foreclosure rescue programmes, and inflating home appraisals, said two people with knowledge of the operation. An FBI spokesman declined to comment.


Filed under: foreclosure
Mar
25

States Look Beyond Borders to Collect Owed Taxes

as more states catch on and start investing in more payroll auditors and data mining tools to get money back, the end result may be an arms race until every state comes out more or less evenly.
Editor’s Note: There is no better place to start than the trillions in profits from securitized mortgages and the millions of off-record transfers and transactions based upon “interests” in real property located within each state. But who has the courage to take on Wall Street?
March 21, 2010, NY Times

States Look Beyond Borders to Collect Owed Taxes

By CATHERINE RAMPELL

When Josh Beckett pitches for the Red Sox at Yankee Stadium, New York collects income tax on the portion of his salary that he earned in New York State.

But what about a Boston Scientific sales representative who comes to New York to pitch medical products to a new client? New York has decided it wants a slice of that paycheck, too.

Anyone who crosses a state border for work — to make a sales call, say, or meet with a client or do a road show on Wall Street — probably owes income taxes in that state.

If you live in Boston but spend one out of 250 workdays this year in New York, you owe New York income taxes on 1/250th of your salary. And vice versa if you are a New Yorker visiting Boston — or Anywheresville, for that matter — for business.

Such laws have been on the books for decades, and they vary by state. But it is only recently, accountants and tax lawyers say, that many states appear to have picked up enforcement, expanding it beyond the wealthiest celebrities and athletes.

“The states are all hungry for revenue,” said Alan Clavette, an accountant in Newtown, Conn. “We are certainly seeing states like New York and Connecticut looking more and more for executives and everyday taxpayers who may be spending time across the border.”

The states, for their part, say better techniques for tracking tax deadbeats, not pressure to fill their budget holes, have prompted them to become more vigorous at enforcing the provision.

“We are just trying to make sure our tax laws are complied with,” said Richard D. Nicholson, commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Revenue Services. “That’s not driven by a need for revenue. If we’re doing more, it’s because of advances in technology. We can do analysis we could never do before with just paper.”

Once upon a time, state tax officials relied on the sports pages and celebrity magazines to see when well-known higher-earners came to town for work. (Yes, even the taxman reads Us Weekly.) For everyone else, it was largely a “don’t ask, don’t tell” world, says James W. Wetzler, the former tax commissioner for New York State, because it was not cost-effective for states to monitor every bricklayer and lawyer crossing a border.

“We tried to preserve a reasonable balance,” said Mr. Wetzler, now a director at the firm Deloitte Tax. “We wanted to avoid imposing onerous burdens on people just for us to collect small amounts of revenue.”

But now states have greater access to data warehouses that help them better track taxes owed. Real estate transactions, federal data from the Internal Revenue Service, commercial license plates, traffic tickets, bids for government construction projects — all this information, newly digitized and dumped into a computer system, can help states find tax scofflaws.

“We’re sort of getting into ‘1984’ land here,” said Kenneth T. Zemsky, an accountant and partner at Ernst & Young. “A lot of the reason they went after athletes and entertainers is that they couldn’t find the other people. Now they’re able to get those people, too.”

Still, perhaps the best enforcement mechanism may be requiring companies to withhold additional taxes from their employees’ paychecks. State auditors may not be able to monitor every border-crossing, but with corporate payroll managers as their enforcers, they don’t need to.

“Our employees call me the ‘Tax Nazi,’ ” says Dee Nelson, the corporate payroll manager at the Koniag Development Corporation, a government contractor that works on military projects. “They get really angry at me when we withhold their pay if they do a project in Utah or wherever. And I have to explain this is the law, not me just trying to be a bully.”

Ms. Nelson’s employer is based in Anchorage, but at any given time its employees are generally working in five states with five different withholding requirements. She estimates that the administrative work required for managing multistate employees adds about 10 percent to the cost of each project.

Many Fortune 500 companies contacted for this article privately acknowledged having been slightly less vigilant than Ms. Nelson about tracking the minute-by-minute movements of their thousands of employees in the past. But these companies also say that they have been subjected to payroll audits more frequently in the last few years and that tax officials have requested travel logs for highly paid employees during these audits.

In some cases auditors check to see if, say, an employee who was reimbursed for airfare to California also had California income taxes withheld from his paycheck. If not, the company can be fined.

Finding out that you owe income taxes across the border can raise your overall tax bill, if your home state has a low tax rate (or no income tax rate at all, as in a handful of states). But your tax bill may not rise by much, since most states allow you to deduct income taxes paid to another state.

The bigger burden associated with distributing your taxes to more state governments is the administrative effort it requires, for both employee and employer. Many states require filing a return for a single day’s work. For peripatetic workers like salesmen or consultants, filing a pile of additional state tax returns can become prohibitively expensive, not to mention frustrating.

“There’s 50 states out there and 50 different laws,” said Nola Wills, senior vice president and chief compliance officer at Harbor America, a financial services company near Houston. “It’s difficult for a small business to have all the information and resources to know that. In most cases their C.P.A. doesn’t know that, either.”

So long as there is still a great deal of ignorance about these laws, the states with the most aggressive tax compliance teams have the most to gain. They can siphon off more revenue from their neighboring states than the other way around, all without fear of retaliation from anyone who has the power to vote them out of office.

But as more states catch on and start investing in more payroll auditors and data mining tools to get money back, the end result may be an arms race until every state comes out more or less evenly.

“If everybody goes after everybody, nobody wins,” said Arthur R. Rosen, a New York tax lawyer and partner at McDermott Will & Emery. “In this interstate war of ‘you tax my rich guy and I tax your rich guy,’ it’s just a wash, a preposterous flurry of tax returns.”

In the meantime, states may have a new prominent target.

Last year President Obama visited at least 30 states. But, like other presidents before him, he plans to file in just one: his home state, Illinois, according to a White House official.

State tax auditors, start your engines.


Filed under: bubble, CDO, CORRUPTION, currency, Eviction, foreclosure, Forensic Analysis Workshop, GTC | Honor, Investor, Mortgage, Motion Practice and Discovery, politics, securities fraud, Securitization Survey, taxes, workshop Tagged: CATHERINE RAMPELL, Ny Times, profits from derivatives, securitized mortgages, state borders, state deficits, state tax auditors, state taxes, tax collection
Dec
18

SEC JUST NOW SEEKING KEY INFORMATION ON MELTDOWN

A
Nov
12

The Long-Term Cost of the Mortgage Fraud Meltdown — The Real Legacy of Wall Street

A
Mar
01

Frontline Video: Inside the Meltdown

Inside the Meltdown

The link above is to Frontline’s new expose’ on the Economic Meltdown that has driven us deep into a recession. It’s a riveting explanation of what happened in 2008. I highly recommend watching it.

Website Designed and Developed by Tampa Web Designer