Jan
08

Ohio Judge Follows JPMorgan Chase’s Advice, Ends up in Foreclosure

I have to tell you… I’ve been waiting for this to happen.

Ohio Judge Peter Sikora was looking to take advantage of the lowest mortgage interest rates in decades and refinance his eight-bedroom, lakefront Cleveland home, so he contacted his bank, JPMorgan Chase.  With property values in decline in Cleveland, Chase said no to refinancing but told the judge to apply for a loan modification instead.  The judge followed JPMorgan Chase’s advice to the letter and as a result has fallen a year behind on his nearly $1 million mortgage… hasn’t paid his property taxes… and now has ended up in foreclosure.

So, all I can think of to say is… don’t you just hate these irresponsible sub-prime borrowers who should never have been allowed to buy their homes in the first place and now think they’re entitled to loan modifications?  I know I sure do.  Maybe if the judge had called a scammer and paid an up front fee… he would have gotten his loan modified… no, wait… that’s not right… maybe if he had called a lawyer he would have… wait, no… he is a lawyer, right.  Well, maybe if he… oh wait, I know… MAYBE IF HE HAD NOT BELIEVED THE LIES TOLD BY JPMORGAN CHASE… yeah, that’s sure as shootin’ where he went wrong.

According to a story in the Cleveland Plain Dealer, that I’m betting mysteriously isn’t going to get a lot of national attention…

“The bank advised me that the only way they would consider a loan modification would be if I fell behind on my payments,” said Sikora, 59, a judge since 1989. “I took their advice and put the money aside.”

The judge has now pinned his hopes on an upcoming mediation session to keep him in his Edgewater Drive home, which according to the Cuyahoga County Auditor’s Office, appraises at $844,000.  Sikora told the Plain Dealer in a telephone interview that he has the money to make his mortgage payments, and that the only reason he’s in foreclosure is that he followed the advice of officials at JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Sikora, who was elected in 2008 as president of the Ohio Association of Juvenile Court Judges, also said that he was surprised when, back in June, right smack dab in the middle of his negotiations with JPMorgan Chase, the bank went ahead and filed the foreclosure lawsuit against him seeking $999,000, including $6,400 in unpaid property taxes.

According to Sikora…

“It’s unfortunate that it’s gotten to this situation, I’ve been talking with them for more than a year, but the bank hasn’t been responsive.”

JPMorgan Chase hasn’t been responsive?  Well, that can’t be right, can it?  Aren’t we all so surprised that Chase wasn’t responsive?  And the fact that Chase would file for foreclosure while in the middle of negotiating with him over a loan modification… that they told him he should apply for by stopping making his mortgage payments… well, frankly I’m just shocked, aren’t you?  Totally taken aback, I’d have to say.

I’ll tell you what’s really surprising to me… there are two things:

  1. A judge worked with JPMorgan Chase for over a year to get his mortgage modified, ended up in foreclosure… and all he has to say is that it’s “unfortunate”.
  2. Bank of America hasn’t done this to a judge yet.

Oh, and there was one more thing in the Cleveland Plain Dealer’s story that didn’t surprise me in the least…

“The attorney for JP Morgan Chase did not return a phone call.”

No surprise there.

Mandelman out.



Aug
05

Meet 5 homeowners who walked away

meet-5-homeowners-who-walked-away.aspx

As the housing crisis wears on, more homeowners are forced to consider handing their keys back to their lenders. Here’s what happened to 5 who did just that.

By Sally Herigstad

MSN Money

Three years into the housing crisis, nearly 15 million homeowners owe more than their homes are worth, and an estimated one in four mortgage defaults is voluntary. A recent poll found that a third of respondents would do the same — walk away — under similar circumstances.

And some experts wonder why strategic default rates aren’t even higher. In October, University of Arizona law professor Brent White published a provocative paper (.pdf file) saying that homeowners are letting fears of wrecked credit and reputations cloud decisions about their financial best interests.

So we put some questions to five homeowners who did walk away. Was getting out from under the mortgage worth the hit to their credit ratings? What about the guilt and disgrace we’ve been warned about? Are the lives they have today better or worse than the lives they left behind?

The answer: It depends — on both their individual financial situations and their personal values. Few expressed regret, though it’s worth pointing out that all but one asked that their last names not be used.

Kathy: ‘We’re incredibly happy’

Kathy, 34, was single when she bought her 600-square-foot San Diego condo for $235,000 at the height of the real-estate frenzy. After she married Darren, 42, she and her new husband decided that the condo was too small. By then the market had collapsed, and the condo was worth less than she’d paid for it.

Kathy continued to make payments while foreclosures piled up in her building. In the end, her condo’s reduced value was not why she decided to walk.

The mortgage double standard?

<!–

//

//

“The people in the building changed,” she says. “It went from young homeowners to squatters. Genuinely, squatters and drug dealers. It was this horrible situation.”

Still, the couple stuck it out for two years before strategically defaulting in 2009. Kathy was scared to call the bank to cancel the automatic mortgage payments. However, she says: “They were lovely. There wasn’t any of the drama that I was afraid of.”

The financial relief was immediate.

Kathy and Darren didn’t have much trouble renting. Their 20-pound dog was a bigger problem than their default record. In San Diego, she points out, landlords are used to foreclosures.

The rent on the more spacious two-bedroom condo unit, which includes a garage, is the same as the mortgage on their tiny former home. “It’s got birds; it’s got grass and no drug dealers,” Kathy says. “We’re incredibly happy.”

Because California is a nonrecourse state, Kathy does not face a deficiency judgment, the biggest threat to defaulters. In recourse states, a lender can come after a former homeowner for the difference between what was owed and what the lender was able to get for selling the home.

Some people had asked Kathy whether she felt she had a moral obligation to the bank, but she said she didn’t feel they were being judgmental. Several of her friends have also walked away, and others have told her they wished they had the courage to do so.

“In California, everybody gets it,” she says. “People have been incredibly supportive.”

Kathy hasn’t checked her credit scores and doesn’t intend to. She and her husband plan to avoid using credit as much as possible. (Foreclosure can lop off as much as 160 points from a top-notch 780 credit score, according to Fair Isaac, the creator of the FICO score.)

“After the debacle with the condo, the concept of homeownership is meaningless to me,” she says. “It’s about happiness.”

Patty: One stress lifted, but life’s still hard

New Yorker Patty Sayles, 66, was doing fine until her husband began suffering from Alzheimer’s disease. She had to choose between paying for his nursing-home care and paying her mortgage.

With the help of an attorney, Sayles might have held on to the house for another year. But the constant phone calls from creditors, debt resolution specialists and foreclosure prevention companies wore her down.

“I couldn’t take the phone calls,” she says. “Every day I got phone calls from lawyers saying, ‘I can take care of it.’ It’s all fraud stuff.”

Sayles walked away from her house in October. She also filed for bankruptcy.

Sayles moved in with her daughter, which has been difficult on both of them, but she doesn’t feel she had any other choice. Otherwise, “I’d be in the park,” Sayles says.

Her husband’s nursing home gets paid first, and that takes his entire pension. Sayles’ other debts were discharged in the bankruptcy, but she doesn’t have the income or savings to rent a place of her own.

New York allows deficiency judgments, but filing for bankruptcy protects Sayles from facing one. Such judgments are considered the most significant hazard of walking away from a mortgage.

“If you didn’t do a bankruptcy and you don’t do a deal with the bank, you will definitely get hit with a deficiency,” says Sayles’ attorney, Edward Nieger. “It may take a year or two because they are so backed up, but they will get you.”

Like Kathy, Sayles hasn’t looked at her credit score. As long as her husband is in the nursing home, she won’t be buying or renting a home or doing anything else that would require a good credit score.

Kristen: A smaller life, but the worst is over

A high-end interior designer in Santa Barbara, Calif., Kristen, 33, bought a luxury condo near the beach for $877,000 in 2005. She used $200,000 in savings to add improvements. Then her business slowed, and she could no longer make her payments.

She tried to sell for $1 million. By the time she called on Jeffrey J. Fritz, a Coldwell Banker real-estate agent in Green City, Calif., the market was falling drastically. She got an offer for around $700,000, but the bank declined it.

Kristen had become depressed during her attempt to sell the house, says Fritz. But “once we knew the ax was going to fall, she switched from being stressed to being relieved,” he says. “The worst had happened.”

Kristen lost her down payment and the savings she’d put into upgrades when she walked away. But because she hadn’t been living on credit cards or running up additional debt, her immediate financial crisis was over.

Life post-default, however, hasn’t been entirely smooth. She rented an apartment, but a year later her landlord couldn’t make his own mortgage payments. The bank foreclosed on the property, and Kristen had to move again. “That was traumatic because she had already gone through it,” Fritz says.

The apartment Kristen rents now, though nearby, isn’t glamorous like the condo she’d owned when money flowed so freely in California. But her living expenses are a fraction of what they were, so she feels it’s the right place for now.

With a foreclosure on her credit report, Kristen may have trouble buying property for seven years under current lending conditions. But Fritz says there are ways around that restriction. If Kristen were to marry, her spouse could get a loan in his name. Or she could buy a house with a nonrelative as a business partnership. People with good cash reserves who can’t get a loan often team up with people who can.

Getting a loan to buy a car would be a challenge. However, Fritz knows “walk-aways” who were able to buy cars by getting co-signers. “The auto industry wants to sell cars,” he says, “and a large segment of the population now have foreclosures on their credit.”

When foreclosure was imminent, Kristen’s biggest fear was what the neighbors would think. Her clients were high earners, and she projected a successful image to attract and keep them. But, as Fritz says, “It’s not like they put a big red sign on your door” after you default. Kristina now seems comfortable letting others know her story. “Once the worst happened, there was nothing else to be scared of,” Fritz says.

Jennifer and Andrew: Quick relief, continuing guilt

In their late 30s and the parents of two children, Jennifer and Andrew had second thoughts after walking away from their Phoenix home. As conservative, religious people, they felt guilty about reneging on their financial obligations. So they contacted Jeremy Brandt, the CEO of 1-800-CashOffer, but it was too late — the house was too far along in the foreclosure process.

Jennifer and Andrew paid $350,000 for the house in 2005. By the end of 2009, it was worth $270,000. But they loved their home and say they would still be there if Andrew hadn’t lost his job.

Friends advised the couple to walk away. At first, Jennifer and Andrew resisted the idea. They tried to make it on Jennifer’s income as long as they could.

“They could afford to pay it if they cut every expense,” Brandt says. “But that wasn’t realistic — they couldn’t live like that.”

In January, Jennifer and Andrew put their keys in an envelope along with a letter telling the bank it could have the house back. They didn’t have any trouble getting into an apartment because they signed a lease before they missed payments and damaged their credit.

Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

Andrew is still looking for a job, but walking away did help the family’s immediate cash flow. The apartment isn’t nearly as nice, but the rent payment is about half their old mortgage payment. And, like California, Arizona is a nonrecourse state, so they don’t have to worry about the bank coming after their other assets.

With the foreclosure process continuing, the couple won’t know the full effect on their credit for some time. Foreclosures are among the worst things that can happen to a person’s credit scores; only bankruptcy is worse. If Jennifer and Andrew want to buy another house, they will probably have to wait at least a few years.

“No law says you couldn’t buy a house tomorrow,” Brandt says. “But the banks would have to be crazy to give you a loan because you’ve shown a propensity to walk away.”

Brandt says it remains to be seen how banks will view loan applicants with foreclosures on their records in the next few years, now that so many people have gone through them.

Published May 26, 2010


Filed under: foreclosure
May
25

Home prices under renewed pressure: S&P

In this photo taken Monday, May 24, 2010, a sold home is shown in Palo Alto, Calif. Home prices fell in March from the previous month, signaling that temporary tax credits for buyers weren't enough to buoy the housing market.The housing slump isn’t over. Tax credits and historically low mortgage rates have failed to lift home prices so far this year.










Real estate pricingSingle-family detached homeBusinessSubsidyReal estate

May
24

Tax credit fuels surge in April home sales

A sold sign is posted outside a home April 27 in Mariemont, Ohio. Home prices rose in nearly 60 percent of U.S. cities in the first quarter of this year, thanks in part to a government tax credit.A now-expired homebuyer tax credit and low mortgage rates helped boost sales of previously occupied homes in April. The improvements aren’t likely to last.







May
24

Tax credit fuels surge in April home sales

A sold sign is posted outside a home April 27 in Mariemont, Ohio. Home prices rose in nearly 60 percent of U.S. cities in the first quarter of this year, thanks in part to a government tax credit.Homebuyers rushed to take advantage of government incentives and record-low mortgage rates in April, giving the housing market its biggest boost in five months.







May
24

Tax credit fuels surge in April home sales

A sold sign is posted outside a home April 27 in Mariemont, Ohio. Home prices rose in nearly 60 percent of U.S. cities in the first quarter of this year, thanks in part to a government tax credit.Homebuyers rushed to take advantage of government incentives and record-low mortgage rates in April, giving the housing market its biggest boost in five months.










Real estate economicsBusinessGovernmentReal estateConstruction and Maintenance

Apr
29

Mortgage rates sink to six-week low

Rates for 30-year fixed mortgages have fallen to their lowest level in six weeks, Freddie Mac said Thursday.







Apr
07

Homebuyers scramble as mortgage rates rise

Joann Weber of Midtown Realty changes the sign from "Sale Pending" to "Sold" on Monday at a home in Palo Alto, Calif. As mortgages get more expensive, more would-be homeowners are priced out of the market — a threat to the fragile recovery in the housing market.










MortgageU.S. Housing MarketBusinessUnited StatesFinancial Services

Mar
25

Mortgage rates rise, hover below 5 percent

Mortgage rates moved slightly higher but remained just below 5 percent this week, as a Federal Reserve program that has maintained rates near record lows prepares to end.










MortgageFederal Reserve SystemBusinessFinancial ServicesFederal Reserve

Mar
24

Do NOT Prepay Your Mortgage

As pointed out in the article below there are many good reasons for prepaying your mortgage on a monthly basis. But if you are in a securitized mortgage and you are either underwater or facing payments that are resetting, be aware that any prepayments will take you far out of the running for any modification. Yours will be a super-performing mortgage that doesn’t “qualify” for even a first look at modification. In addition, if there is a new mortgage, or elimination of the mortgage, note or obligation in store for you, you will have sent the money down a rabbit hole.

March 19, 2010

When Not to Pay Down a Mortgage

By RON LIEBER

New York Times

This week, the Federal Reserve reaffirmed its intention to stop buying mortgage-backed securities, signaling the likelihood that the mortgage rates you can get today are as good as they’re going to be for a long while. Once the Fed stops buying, after all, rates are likely to go up.

And current rates are quite good. At about 5 percent, in fact, they’re so good that they’ve helped change the age-old debate over whether homeowners should make extra mortgage payments to pay off their debt well before their loan periods are up.

Back when rates ran at 7 or 8 percent, making extra payments offered what amounted to a guaranteed return on your money. When you’re ridding yourself of debt that costs you much less, however, it’s easier to imagine a future when you could more easily earn a higher return by investing those potential extra mortgage payments someplace else.

Meanwhile, at a time when just about everyone knows someone who is unemployed or who owes more on a home loan than the house is worth, keeping extra cash someplace more liquid than a mortgage seems like a safer approach.

So is the case against extra payments closed for good, given that so many people have locked in rock-bottom mortgage rates for the long haul?

The answer depends on two things: how likely you are to leave the extra money in savings and how good it would feel to wipe your debt out years earlier than your mortgage requires.

THE BASICS First, let’s dispense with the standard boilerplate. Don’t even think about making extra mortgage payments unless you’ve paid off higher-interest debt. Credit card debt is the easiest win here.

Also, if you’re not saving enough to get the full match from your employer in a 401(k) or similar account, increase your savings there first. And don’t make extra mortgage payments if you don’t already have a decent emergency fund set aside.

YOUR REAL INTEREST RATE Now, take a look at the interest rate on your mortgage. That 5 percent? It’s not your real rate if you get some of the interest back each year in the form of a tax deduction.

Let’s say you have a household income of $175,000 and are paying 35 percent of that in total to the state and federal tax collectors. If you pay $20,000 in mortgage interest each year on a loan that charges 5 percent, the deduction effectively brings your taxable income down to $155,000.

As a result, you’re paying $7,500 (35 percent of $20,000) less in taxes than you would have without the deduction. So ultimately, you’re not really paying $20,000 in interest at all; your net cost is $12,500 after you subtract the $7,500 tax savings.

And that makes your effective, after-tax interest rate on your loan just 3.25 percent, which is simply 35 percent (your tax rate) less than the original 5 percent.

BETTER RETURNS? So any money you set aside in lieu of making extra mortgage payments would need to earn more than 3.25 percent annually. That seems like a reasonable possibility in the future.

In fact, you could have done that well during the supposedly lost decade we just finished. Vanguard Wellington, for instance, a popular low-cost mutual fund that holds about 65 percent stocks and 35 percent bonds and other short-term securities, earned an average annual return of 6.15 percent in the 10 years ended Dec. 31, 2009.

The Vanguard Balanced Index Fund would not have outperformed our 3.25 percent benchmark, however, as it only returned 2.64 percent over the same 10-year period.

STORING THE SAVINGS Wouldn’t taxes eat into the returns from the money you’d save instead of making extra mortgage payments? Not if you place it into an account shielded from taxes. A Roth individual retirement account would fit the bill here, as would a 529 college savings account or health savings account.

Bruce Primeau, whose note to his financial planning clients at Wide Financial Group in Minneapolis on this topic inspired me to re-examine it, adds that this isn’t simply about keeping more assets under his watch so he can earn a better living. “I’m not telling them that the money has to come to me,” he said. “A 401(k) match beats the return on paying a mortgage off automatically. There’s real estate and buying employer stock through a purchase plan at a 15 percent discount and all kinds of things.”

Then you need to preserve those savings. When extra money goes toward a mortgage, it’s hard to get at it when the urge strikes to flee to an Asian beach for a few weeks of playtime. If the money is not locked up in retirement or college savings, however, you may be tempted to spend it.

THE LIQUIDITY PROBLEM Capital-gains taxes might eventually come due with some of these investments, and the rate could well rise above the current 15 percent long-term rate before too long. Still, having some of your savings in a taxable account makes sense for several reasons.

If you hit a stretch of long-term unemployment after having plowed most of your extra cash into paying down your mortgage, your bank probably won’t pat you on the back for being a good saver and give the money back to you. Nor is it likely to let you borrow it through a home equity loan if you have no income with which to repay it.

Elaine Scoggins, who had the mortgage department chief reporting to her at a bank before she became a financial planner, suggests imagining a situation where you need to move quickly but can’t sell your home or extract equity to use as a down payment in your new town. Given that possibility, why create more home equity through extra mortgage payments than you have to?

“The whole housing debacle has reminded us all, including me, that real estate is not liquid,” said Ms. Scoggins, who is the client experience director for Merriman, a planning firm in Seattle. “And it takes cash to support it.”

Those who have used their cash in an attempt to be conscientious have learned some tough lessons, meanwhile. Imagine people who scraped together a 5 percent down payment and bought a home in Florida or Arizona in 2005 and then made extra mortgage payments the first two years to try to increase their equity. Now, post-collapse, they owe, say, 30 percent more than their homes are worth and need to seriously consider walking away from the loan — and all of those extra payments.

REASON AND EMOTION So the reasoned case for making no extra payments is very strong. But there’s one counterpoint that almost always carries the day, even when there’s only a mild risk with the financial strategy of putting extra money elsewhere.

And it’s this: I need to be able to sleep at night.

Even Mr. Primeau concedes here. “Emotionally, you’re right, and financially I’m right, and emotionally, you win,” he said. “If emotionally, people want to pay down their debt, than that’s what I help them to do.”

If you’ve just started paying down your mortgage, any extra payments should go toward principal (make sure your mortgage company is applying it properly). That will have the effect of shortening the term of your loan from, say, 30 to 25 years, depending on how many extra payments you make. The extra payments won’t lower your monthly payment, but they will reduce your balance.

Many people who are years into their mortgages — and perhaps paying less in interest and getting less of a tax break as a result — tend to develop stronger feelings about making extra payments. Those feelings are often even more acute as retirement approaches and homeowners become determined to quit work with no debt to their names.

Those who do retire their debt rarely regret it or wring their hands over the big gains they might have scored by investing the money elsewhere. Tim Maurer, a financial planner and co-author of “The Financial Crossroads,” describes the feeling that washes over people who have paid their last mortgage bill as “beholden to no one.”

So he doesn’t feel as if it’s his business to separate people from their emotions if they feel strongly about working toward a debt-free existence. “The whole point of planning is to make life better,” he said. “It’s not to have more dollars at the end of the day.”


Filed under: bubble, CDO, CORRUPTION, currency, GTC | Honor, Investor, Mortgage, securities fraud Tagged: modification, Mortgage, New York Times, note, Obligation, prepayment, reset, Ron Lieber, securitized mortgage
Dec
24

Mortgage rates hit highest level in 2 months

The average fixed-rate for a 30-year mortgage climbed above 5 percent for the first time in two months, leading to a decline in mortgage applications.







MortgageBusinessFinancial ServicesBatting averageUnited States

Oct
08

Some things to consider before you refinance

Don’t look now but mortgage rates are really, really low — practically at record low levels.




Sep
09

Mortgage applications surge as rates tumble

Aug
19

U.S. mortgage applications rise as rates plunge

U.S. mortgage applications rose last week, largely reflecting a jump in demand for home refinancing loans as interest rates slid to a five-week low.




Aug
12

Mortgage demand drops as loan rates rise

U.S. mortgage applications fell last week, reflecting a drop in demand for home refinancing loans as interest rates soared to their highest levels since June.




Aug
08

Mortgage Bonds Rise Rates Could Follow

“Fannie and Freddie are on soaring. For five days in a row Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage securities have rose. Interesting the rise in mortgage bonds is not due to an increase in the mortgage refinancing and modifying but in a reduction in refinancing, well below the forecasted levels.”

Website Designed and Developed by Tampa Web Designer