The Top Twelve Reasons Why You Should Hate the Mortgage Settlement
Rasmussen: Majority opposes Obama contraception mandate on religious organizations
65% of Catholics.
Some in the media have expressed puzzlement over the controversy generated by new HHS mandate imposed by the Obama administration that would force religious organizations to pay for contraception even if it goes against their religious doctrine. The New York Times and the Washington Post took pains to point out that Catholics are in favor [...]
David Dayen | CA AG Harris Could Enter Foreclosure Fraud Settlement Late
NY Times | Nye Lavalle – A Mortgage Tornado Warning, Unheeded
The media’s silence on the March for Life
Predictable.
My hopes for a Time magazine spread about the March for Life protesters are fading fast. For the fifth year in a row, The New York Times ignored the March for Life, which drew at least a hundred thousand participants in D.C. alone. NewsBusters reports: For the fifth year in a row, there was no story in [...]
Race and Chapter 13
As Adam noted in his kind post, the New York Times today featured our study, "Race, Attorney Influence, and Bankruptcy Chapter Choice." My co-authors are Credit Slips blogger Jean Braucher, a law professor at the University of Arizona, and Dov Cohen, a professor at the University of Illinois who holds a cross appointment in psychology and law. And, we all express many thanks to the NYT reporter, Tara Siegel Bernard, who spent a lot of time slogging through the statistics and legal intricacies in our study.
In a nutshell, the study reports real-world data from the Consumer Bankruptcy Project showing that, among bankrupcy filers, blacks file chapter 13 at higher rates than all other races. The effect is large -- for example, blacks even had a higher chapter 13 rate (54.6%) than homeowners (47.1%). The second part of the study showed that, in a random sample, bankruptcy attorneys were more likely to recommend chapter 13 for a hypothetical couple named "Reggie & Latisha" who went to the African Methodist Episcopal Church as compared to "Todd & Allison" who went to the United Methodist Church. Also, attorneys were more likely to see "Reggie & Latisha" as having good values and being more competent when they expressed a preference for chapter 13.
As I said in the NYT article, "I don’t think there is any overt conspiracy, but when you have a complex system, these biases can play out and the people within the system don’t see the pattern because nobody is in charge of looking at these big issues.” This is an important point. We have no data suggesting that some persons sat down and decided this is the way the system should be. One of the things that always impresses me whenever I attend conferences with bankruptcy attorneys is their dedication to making bankruptcy work better for their clients. I always come back energized from these conferences with ideas about how to make my research better. SImilarly, it is my hope that our article will result in a professional dialogue about when chapter 7 or chapter 13 is appropriate for a client. And, that can only be a good thing for anyone who finds themselves in need of bankruptcy.The full study is forthcoming in the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. The working paper version is available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN). And, a shorter version of the study reporting the real-world data appears as a chapter in the book, Broke: How Debt Bankrupts the Middle Class, which was edited by Credit Slips blogger Katie Porter.
In the coming days, I'll try to put up a few posts talking about the study in more detail. If anyone has any questions about the study, please post them in the comments (preferably after reading the study), and I'll do my best to answer them.
Race and Chapter 13
As Adam noted in his kind post, the New York Times today featured our study, "Race, Attorney Influence, and Bankruptcy Chapter Choice." My co-authors are Credit Slips blogger Jean Braucher, a law professor at the University of Arizona, and Dov Cohen, a professor at the University of Illinois who holds a cross appointment in psychology and law. And, we all express many thanks to the NYT reporter, Tara Siegel Bernard, who spent a lot of time slogging through the statistics and legal intricacies in our study.
In a nutshell, the study reports real-world data from the Consumer Bankruptcy Project showing that, among bankrupcy filers, blacks file chapter 13 at higher rates than all other races. The effect is large -- for example, blacks even had a higher chapter 13 rate (54.6%) than homeowners (47.1%). The second part of the study showed that, in a random sample, bankruptcy attorneys were more likely to recommend chapter 13 for a hypothetical couple named "Reggie & Latisha" who went to the African Methodist Episcopal Church as compared to "Todd & Allison" who went to the United Methodist Church. Also, attorneys were more likely to see "Reggie & Latisha" as having good values and being more competent when they expressed a preference for chapter 13.
As I said in the NYT article, "I don’t think there is any overt conspiracy, but when you have a complex system, these biases can play out and the people within the system don’t see the pattern because nobody is in charge of looking at these big issues.” This is an important point. We have no data suggesting that some persons sat down and decided this is the way the system should be. One of the things that always impresses me whenever I attend conferences with bankruptcy attorneys is their dedication to making bankruptcy work better for their clients. I always come back energized from these conferences with ideas about how to make my research better. SImilarly, it is my hope that our article will result in a professional dialogue about when chapter 7 or chapter 13 is appropriate for a client. And, that can only be a good thing for anyone who finds themselves in need of bankruptcy.The full study is forthcoming in the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. The working paper version is available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN). And, a shorter version of the study reporting the real-world data appears as a chapter in the book, Broke: How Debt Bankrupts the Middle Class, which was edited by Credit Slips blogger Katie Porter.
In the coming days, I'll try to put up a few posts talking about the study in more detail. If anyone has any questions about the study, please post them in the comments (preferably after reading the study), and I'll do my best to answer them.
Kudos to Jean Braucher and Bob Lawless!
A new study by Credit Slips own Jean Braucher and Bob Lawless (with Dov Cohen) on race and bankruptcy filings received very prominent and well-deserved page A1 coverage in the New York Times. It's a fabulous study, and it's wonderful to see it getting such great media attention.
The Young Turks | Media Watch: Telling the Truth isn’t ‘Vigilante’ Reporting
A bigger problem than Bain?
Caught off guard.
The New York Times picks up where I left off, reporting on Team Romney’s reaction to the attacks from Mitt’s rivals on his tenure at Bain Capital. The news is not particularly reassuring: Although the advisers had always expected that Democrats would malign Mr. Romney’s work of buying and selling companies, they were largely unprepared [...]
Bringing UP the REAR – U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder
Click to buy from someone on Zazzle.com!
Republicans have spent the last three years attacking U.S Attorney General Eric Holder about issues related to national security and civil rights. Lately, it’s a screwed up gun-trafficking investigation known as “Operation Fast and Furious.” Many in the GOP are now saying he should resign.
This past week, something like 75 members of Congress co-sponsored a House resolution that said there was “no confidence” in Holder as AG, and according to the New York Times, no member of the Obama Administration has drawn more partisan criticism than Holder.
The Fast and Furious controversy involves agents for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, who were investigating an arms-trafficking network working for a Mexican drug cartel. Apparently, these agents didn’t move quickly to seize the guns of some low-level suspects. They say they were trying to build a larger case. They misplaced a few hundred weapons and next thing you know, two guns linked to a suspect in the case were found near a Border Patrol agent that had been killed. When Holder was asked about how this happened, he basically replied by saying, “Huh?”
Now, I don’t know whether Holder should resign over “Operation Fast and Furious,” but if he did it would be irony at it’s best, because if there are two words that don’t come to mind when I think of Eric Holder they’re “fast” and “furious.”
Insiders say that Holder has a “low-key demeanor.” Apparently, he allows lawmakers to talk over him during hearings. Other colleagues say he can be similarly mild in internal administration debates, which causes them to wonder if he’s capable of being tough enough for take-no-prisoners bureaucratic or political fights. And Dick Thornburgh, who was AG under the first President George Bush, has said he’s concerned that Holder gets steamrolled by adversaries.
The New York Times recently quoted Thornburgh as saying: “I have worried from time to time about Eric’s being seemingly rolled by the administration and his political opponents.” Add to that his background working for a firm that represents MERS and numerous other banking industry players, and everything starts to clear up.
I don’t know about you, but for me… that explains a lot.
You see, I’ve been sitting at my desk reading and writing about the financial and foreclosure crises for the last three years, and while I do understand why everyone didn’t see what was going on when our economic meltdown began, today anyone who doesn’t see this country as a giant crime scene, just doesn’t want to look.
Our current financial crisis has more than doubled the unemployment rate in this country. It has destroyed roughly $11 trillion in consumer wealth so far, pretty much decimating the middle class, throwing more people into poverty than ever before, and increasing the number of Americans on food stamps from 11 million in 2005 to closing in on 50 million today. And yet, not only have none of the Wall Street executives been criminally prosecuted or gone to jail, but I question whether any have even gotten a stern talking to. Best I can tell, they all got bonuses and a Federal Reserve credit card with no limit, and close to no interest rate.
Quite a few people don’t even blame the bankers for the crisis… in their eyes, believe it or not, the bankers were somehow victims. The poor bankers, sniff, sniff. I miss Lehman Bros. and Bear Stearns, don’t you? Perfectly good investment banks… and now their gone. I’m overcome with… oh, I don’t know… what’s the word I’m looking for… oh yeah, I’ve got it… well, ambivalence fits. Or, I suppose I could use… JOY!
In order to believe that the bankers didn’t cause this crisis, I’d have to believe that they made hundreds of billions of dollars… BY ACCIDENT? Like, Lloyd Blankfein at Goldman Sachs and Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase called each other when the meltdown happened and said:
Blankfein: ”Jamie… it’s Lloyd… you’re not going to believe this, but we just found out that we made a hundred billion last year that we had no idea was coming in. It’s like Christmas in July over here!”
Dimon: ”You’re kidding me… Lloyd we just had the same thing happen over here! I’m taking a bath in Crystal champagne over here.”
Blankfein: ”How the heck did this happen? When they showed me the numbers, I was stunned. And not only that, but going forward, Bernanke and Paulson just offered me as much money as I wanted… I mean, we’re talking trillions.”Dimon: ”Lloyd, I have no idea. One minute we were being taken advantage of left and right by borrowers who could barely speak English, and the next minute we’re making more than a hundred billion in cash. It’s sweet, I’ll tell you that. It’s like I always say, never look a gift-house in the mouth.”
It’s weird too, because after the Savings & Loan crisis of the early 1990s, there were 800+ financial executives that went to jail. This crisis is global. If the S&L crisis was a backyard swimming pool, then the current crisis is the Pacific Ocean… but it’s apparently no one’s fault? The triple A-rated bonds weren’t even close to triple A, and investors including Fannie Mae are suing all over the place, but I suppose the whole thing was just an accident? Ooopsie!
Goldman Sachs settled their Abacus suit for something like $550 million… of course, without admitting any guilt for doing anything wrong, but is it even possible that anyone would ever pay out more than half a billion dollars after doing nothing wrong?
Basically, the fraudclosure crisis has created millions of crime scenes in this country. Literally, millions of crime scenes from coast to coast. Jeff Thigpen, who is the Register of Deeds in Guilford County, North Carolina, has recently gone through the recorded documents in his office and so far found roughly 5,000 filed documents that are fraudulent or forgeries. His counterpart in Massachusetts, John O’Brian, has had a similar outcome from an audit of his office. If you or I did that a couple of times, we’d be in jail. If we did it thousands of times, we’d never get out.
Bankers, however, get to call the practice, “robo-signing,” which sounds nothing like fraud or forgery. I guarantee you that if you went to prison for that, and someone asked you why you were there, there’s no way you’re going to answer: “Robo-signing.” No way… you’ll get your butt kicked for sure. You’re going to say: “Me? Oh, I’m here on fraud and forgery charges.”
Now, I have to believe that Eric Holder is reading the lawsuits that have been filed by various attorneys general, and if you haven’t yet read one, then you should. I realize that they’re just allegations at this point, but they read like something out of a John Grisham novel. Is Holder just thinking that maybe the whole thing will just blow over and go away? And we’re only at the beginning of this crisis… yes, the beginning. Sure as shootin’, we’re still going to be talking about the crimes bankers committed that caused our country’s downfall a decade from now.
Just consider the residential real estate market five years from now. For prices to rise, demand would have to rise… right? You need demand to make prices rise. So, forget about the fact that there’s no securitization market, so the only lender is the federal government… from where would the demand come?
Roughly half the mortgages today are underwater, so we can assume those people aren’t buyers because if you can’t sell, you can’t buy. Then there’s quite a few who won’t be able to come up with 20 percent down or satisfy the 700+ credit score requirement. College grads coming out of school with tens of thousands in student loans will delay the formation of families and certainly reduce the number of first time buyers. Aging baby boomers will just naturally move less. And then there are those that will find it hard to buy as prices are still falling.
Now, I suppose there will be some investors buying, and some population growth and immigrant buyers, but no matter how you slice it, the size of the future pool of buyers is going to be a whole heck of a lot smaller than in the past, and that means… prices in the aggregate cannot rise. Unless, I suppose, we’re expecting aliens to land here carrying suitcases filled with dollars and in search of residential real estate. Or, maybe we’ll start advertising in other countries that if you’re a doctor or lawyer and you move here, we’ll send your kids to college for free… that might help, although I don’t think it’ll solve the problem en total.
So, if you haven’t realized it yet, this crisis is going to be dinner conversation for a long, long time. The biggest difference between this one and the Great Depression is that during the 1930s people robbed banks and this time around, banks rob people. Two additional differences come to mind… this one isn’t being filmed in black & white, and instead of soup lines, we’ve got food stamps.
It’s also interesting that in every country that has meltdown thus far, they fired their bank CEOs, replacing them with… oh, I don’t know… more honest people, one would hope. But, here in the good ole’ USA, we haven’t changed a thing. So, what’s up with Attorney General Holder? Is he simply flaccid? Is he afraid to file charges against anyone worth more than ten million? Is he corrupt? Is his boyfriend a banking industry lobbyist?
Come on… what’s the deal here? We’re all at least starting to see what’s happened, aren’t we? I mean, I know we can’t expect our regulatory agencies to do anything… after all, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which regulates the national banks, refers to those it regulates as “clients.” The Office of Thrift Supervision hasn’t referred a single case of fraud to the Justice Department since… well, since forever. And the SEC… well, fuggetaboutit. Bernie Madoff stole $60 billion and then turned himself in, remember? We don’t even have regulators
So, since it all comes to down to our intrepid Attorney General, Eric Holder, we’re doing nothing about the crimes of the century. The GOP refers to him as Mr. Fast and Furious. Me? I just call him this month’s giant rear end.
Mandelman out.
Obamateurism of the Day
Non-signing statements.
It’s not the crime, it’s the … costume cover-up. A new book by New York Times reporter Jodi Kantor revealed that the Obama administration tried a little misdirection to keep the press from reporting on a lavish Halloween bash in 2009 as unemployment continued to soar: It was the tea party the Obamas just couldn’t [...]
Occupy the New York Times
The one percent.
Income inequality at the Progressive Death Star: Janet Robinson, who will step down as chief executive of the New York Times Co on December 31, will receive an exit package in excess of $15 million, according to people familiar with the situation. In addition to a $4.5 million consulting fee, the Times Co will pay [...]
DOJ: Actually, Holder didn’t play the race card
Oh, really, now?
In a statement to Greta Van Susteren, a Department of Justice spokesperson said that, actually, Holder didn’t invoke his race as a reason the “more extreme segment” of his critics oppose him. The DOJ statement reads: That is a complete distortion of the attorney general’s comment. His comments both in the article and elsewhere made clear [...]
Video: The card of last resort
When it doubt, smear.
Yesterday, the Attorney General of the United States offered an interesting defense against criticism of Operation Fast and Furious and the hundreds of deaths committed by weapons that the ATF allowed to “walk” across the border. Speaking to the New York Times, Holder posited that the only reason critics have of pressing the matter is [...]
And the MRC award for the Quote of the Year goes to …
This guy.
The New York Times’ one-and-only Paul Krugman. The Media Research Center today released its official list of the “Notable Quotables” of 2011 — and Paul Krugman took the top spot. What garnered him the great honor of “Quote of the Year”? This glittering gem, from Krugman’s NYTimes.com blog on the morning of Sept. 11, 2011: [...]
West to Holder: It’s not about your color, it’s about your competence
Is Holder getting desperate?
Attorney General Eric Holder told The New York Times this weekend that “the more extreme segment” of his Fast and Furious critics are motivated by — you guessed it — racism. But Florida Rep. Allen West will have none of it. In remarks to The Daily Caller, West interpreted Holder’s shameless rhetorical tactic as a sign [...]
Foreclosure Statistics for New Mexico: These Just Out
Foreclosure statistics obviously vary from local jurisdiction to jurisdiction, as well as from one time period to the next. For example, sometime back in 2008, New Mexico was 36th in the nation in the number of foreclosures, obviously lower than average. Now it is 11th in the nation. Right now, one in every 452 Santa Fe homes and one in every 550 Albuquerque homes is in foreclosure, and about 15,000 cases are filed each year, about half in Albuquerque. The lack of lawyers reported by the New York Times in February of 2011 is still palpable. Attorney Angelica Anaya-Allen, from the United South Broadway Corporation, which defends foreclosures in New Mexico, did an analysis of the reported decisions in all foreclosure cases in Santa Fe over a two year period. She found that of the 828 reported decisions that favored lenders during the one-year period in which she looked, 600 were default judgments. Ms. Anaya-Allen reports that out of the 15,000 cases filed per year, she’d be surprised if more than 500 borrowers, or roughly 3%, were represented.
NYT silent on shocking Hollywood pedophilia charges
Depressing.
Apparently, pedophilia is an entrenched part of Hollywood culture — but you wouldn’t know that if you only consulted The New York Times for news. Check out this Fox News account of just some of the muck that underlies Hollywood’s glamorous gilding: If a spate of recent allegations proves true, Hollywood may have a hideous epidemic on [...]
NYT silent on shocking Hollywood pedophilia charges
Depressing.
Apparently, pedophilia is an entrenched part of Hollywood culture — but you wouldn’t know that if you only consulted The New York Times for news. Check out this Fox News account of just some of the muck that underlies Hollywood’s glamorous gilding: If a spate of recent allegations proves true, Hollywood may have a hideous epidemic on [...]
NLRB drops case against Boeing Update: Issa still to investigate NLRB
Mixed blessing.
An official with the National Labor Relations Board announced today that the Board will drop its controversial case against Boeing, The New York Times reports. The N.L.R.B.’s acting general counsel, Lafe Solomon, said the labor board had decided to end the case after the machinists’ union — which originally asked for the case to be [...]
NYT: Wanting smaller government is kinda racist, or something
Of course!
When Republicans want to shrink the size of federal government, argues the New York Times, it’s not about reducing the explosive growth in federal budgets seen even in just the last three years. It’s not about scaling back the regulatory adventurism that will eventually require 230,000 more inspectors at the EPA alone [see Update II]. [...]
DEA laundering money for drug cartels?
Cashwalking?
In order to dismantle international criminal and terrorist organizations, some infiltration into their operations has to take place. The trick is to infiltrate enough to track down the bad guys without becoming one of them. The ATF missed the mark by a mile in Operation Fast & Furious, and now the New York Times wonders [...]
Consumers Beware of Gas Well Leases, Especially Around the Holidays
For those contracts professors who teach Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 (Okla. 1962), there is a modern version this 1962 case going on right now in the gas drilling context. In the venerable Peevyhouse case, Willie and Lucille Peevyhouse owned a farm that contained coal deposits, and entered into a contract with Garland Coal & Mining Co. allowing Garland to strip mine the coal, in return for a royalty. In the contract, Garland promise that the land would be restored once they were done. The court refused to enforce the clean-up provision, however, finding it incidental to the main purpose of the contract. The land was left a hot mess.
Yesterday’s New York Times reported on the perils of modern gas well leases. It reported that many homeowners in Pennsylvania, Colorado, and West Virginia have seen their water sources contaminated as a result of such drilling and that based upon a review of the New York Times of over 3,000 lease and other documents, fewer than half of the landowners had any recourse under the contracts for the contamination or for the waste pits being left on the land after the fact.There are significant parallels between these gas leases and the Peevyhouse contract. Both are one-sided to say the least. Gas leases are peddled in Texas, Maryland, New York State, Ohio and the other states mentioned above by people called landsman, who have their own trade association and who frequently hawk the leases in rural poor areas, especially around the holidays when people need extra cash. The drilling companies often leave dangerous waste on the land and the leases do to require then to clean up. If they do clean up, the costs are frequently deducted from the revenues the landowner receives. The risks of land and water contamination are not pointed out to the landowners. The leases last 3-5 years but can be extended indefinitely by the drilling companies, making it hard for consumers to ever get out of the arrangements. The article says eight states have state laws requiring drilling companies to clean up their messes but the others do not. Another example of consumer beware.
Where Are The Handcuffs (Hank Paulson)
Insider Trading | How Paulson Gave Hedge Funds Advance Word on Fannie and Freddie
Bringing UP the Rear – Neil Lipschutz, Managing Editor, Dow Jones Newswire
I used to read the Wall Street Journal all the time, maybe even every day for a few years, back in the days when Yuppies were king, BMWs reigned supreme, and I was still stupid enough to pay $300 a year to carry around a grey piece of plastic from America Express that I idiotically referred to as being “platinum.”
These past three years, well… not so much. It’s not just because a gaggle of insensitive and insufferable cheerleaders for the banks write the newspaper, although that certainly is a big part of it. It’s mostly because the paper’s views are entirely predictable, and unreservedly smug… no they’re smug2. We’re not even having a recession in the Wall Street Journal, its positively surreal.
So, I’m clicking around through my news alerts yesterday, and I see this headline: “We Can’t Ignore Housing Anymore.” Huh? Can’t ignore it… anymore? Well, why the heck not? It’s been going swimmingly, thus far. Why quit on a winner?
Neal Lipschutz, who first joined the company in 1982, is today senior vice president and managing editor of Dow Jones Newswires, wrote the article, and according to his bio, he “directly supervised the news staffs in the Americas and served as chief arbiter of and spokesman for news policies, coverage and standards on a global basis.”
And today, Neal has “global responsibility for Dow Jones Newswires editorial.” So, Neal is a man with “global responsibility,” and I’m almost positive that I’ve never even met a man with global responsibility. Apparently, Neal has written articles that have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, The New York Times, and The Baltimore Sun among others.
So, at first I thought… Neal is Journalism Man, but then I started reading what he had to say and I quickly realized… nope, he’s just another Lipschutz. Here’s how he kicked off his article on how we can’t ignore housing…
“In the end, we can’t dodge housing.
The U.S. recession and financial crisis of the late aughts began with housing and the scourge of subprime mortgages, which were so messily dispensed. It spread to Europe and its banks.
For a few years we tried to work around the paralyzed housing sector – the drip, drip of steadily lower home prices, the unresolved status of the wounded Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — and it seemed to be working.”
Obviously, either Neal has the cognitive abilities of a fruit loop soaked in milk, or he’s just disturbed. What do you suppose he thinks “spread” to Europe and its banks? I mean, I don’t think loans can spread… loans are not germs or viruses… they don’t just spread. Someone has to spread them, right Neal? And let’s assume you’re right and within the mortgage-backed securities and CDOs that were sold to Eurobanks, there were a few loans leveraged to the hilt. So, who do you suppose might have taken them to Europe, Neal? Because it wasn’t me Neal.
And then he writes:
“Now that worries mount about an ever more likely return to recession amid a significant equities markets decline, we are hearing again about housing.”
Hearing “again” about housing? Who’s hearing again about housing?
I wouldn’t worry too much about you hearing anything, Neal. I just don’t think you’ve heard anything in maybe twenty years. I think you should consider donating your head to the particle physicists at CERN’s laboratories as they’re studying the beginnings of the universe and are apparently trying to find the densest matter on earth.
And Neal continues to offend…
“There’s the foreclosure mess, the underwater mortgage mess, the tight mortgage lending standards and all the rest. There’s displaced construction workers. There’s consumers unwilling to spend as their perceived real estate wealth evaporates.
There’s housing, traditionally the leader out of recession, still generally in decline, and harder to ignore.”
It’s only my perceived wealth that’s been evaporating? Well, that’s certainly a relief. Only my perceived wealth. Well, thank goodness for that. Hey, here’s an idea, since it was only perceived wealth, how about you write an article telling the bankers to give everyone perceived principle reductions? You’d be in favor of that right, Neal?
You want to know what I’m thinking about right now. I’m thinking about how much fun it would be to watch you perceive my size 12 boot kick your hard to ignore mass.
Neal’s also got some answers to our housing market problems. Here’s what he says we should consider in order to fix the housing mess he’s having a hard time ignoring…
“… more people who are current on their mortgage payments have to be able to refinance their mortgages to take advantage of rates near 4%.
That savings for many would go into additional spending, a stimulative measure, and would boost their economic psychology, which is important. Even if they used the savings to pay down their own debt it would do long-term good.”
What kind of a word is “stimulative,” Neal? Let me guess… were you a triple-digit SAT score kind of guy? You know, math and verbal combined, what… about 770? And then straight to the local community college to get your Associates in North American Egotistical Studies or possibly Recumbent Illiteracy?
How did you ever get a job as an editor at Dow Jones Newswires using words like “stimulative?” Either the bar’s just not that high, or… hang on… I know how you must have done it… maybe I should be calling you Kneel?
Okay, I’m done. There’s no point in going on about Kneel anyway. If I’m not going to get to kick his callous, insensitive and entirely ignorant behind around a parking lot, then what’s the point? I suppose I could challenge him to a battle of wits, but that wouldn’t be right either because he’s unarmed.
And Neal closes by saying…
“Given political realities, it’s hard to imagine much of a fiscal push, in housing or elsewhere.”
You know, Neal’s right about those “political realities.” The reason we’re not solving the foreclosure crisis isn’t because of economic or fiscal realities… what has doomed us to suffer the economic pain of a deflationary spiral are only “political realities,” or in other words… what people think… just thoughts.
At least half the country doesn’t understand that it is a crisis. They think that irresponsible people bought homes they couldn’t afford. They do not think it right or fair to bail out those that made irresponsible decisions. But thinking something doesn’t make it true. Ours is not a housing crisis, it is a credit crisis. And the credit markets froze in 2007, not because of borrowers, but because of bankers.
Those that oppose saving their neighbor from foreclosure are costing the rest of us, and themselves, trillions of dollars in aggregate losses. But the people in foreclosure have already lost. And by forcing those losses, everyone else loses too. Only by saving them from further loss do we save the rest of us.
And as we fiddle… Rome burns.
Are you listening, Neal?
Mandelman out.
MF Global loss may be double the initial estimate
Now up to $1.2 billion.
Earlier, investigators probing the records of MF Global expressed some optimism that they could locate some of the $600 million that appeared lost from customer accounts. Their job just got twice as difficult, the New York Times reports, as the amount missing may have doubled to $1.2 billion: The amount of customer money missing from [...]
Ironies of the Legal Profession?
Funny to see the juxtaposition in the New York Times of a piece berating law schools for the irrelevance of their curriculum and then a piece about our former co-blogger Elizabeth Warren, a law professor whose work can be called anything but irrelevant (unless you think conceiving and standing up a new government agency that some think is the Leviathan itself is irrelevant).
There's lots to say about what's right and what's wrong in the NYT piece on law schools--maybe for a future post--but for now let's just say that it paints with too broad of a brush. There are certainly real problems with the law school curriculum and legal scholarship, but the NYT didn't quite capture them. The bigger problem with the piece, I think was that it accepted the idea that law schools should be preparing students with practice knowledge like where to file a certificate of merger. Baked into this critique is an acceptance of the beleagured economics of the legal profession, where billing is usually by the hour, rather than by the service, so clients often pay premium rates for non-premium services (that frankly don't require a legal education). This is what clients are increasingly pushing against--why pay laywers for work that doesn't really involve much training or knowledge? If law schools aren't succeeding in training their graduates to perform the non-premium services, is that really a failing? Or are law schools actually training students in the critical thinking skills-- statutory interpretation skills and policy argument skills--that can sustain premium billing rates?





















