Dec
29

Fannie Mae Servicing Guide Announcement SVC-2011-22 | Documentation Requirements for Foreclosure and Bankruptcy Referral Packages

Effective for foreclosure referrals on and after March 1, 2012: In all circumstances in which an assignment of mortgage to the party in whose name the foreclosure will be conducted is required, servicers must ensure that, no later than the time of the foreclosure referral to an attorney (or trustee), the mortgage has been validly … Read more Related posts:
  1. Fannie Mae Announcement SVC-2010-10 Miscellaneous Servicing Policy Changes
  2. Jennifer Brunner Ohio Secretary of State Referral Letter to U.S. District Attorney Steven Dettelbach RE Foreclosure Fraud
  3. Fannie Mae Update – MERS must NOT be Named as a Plaintiff in ANY Foreclosure Action Ever Again
Dec
29

Fannie Mae Servicing Guide Announcement SVC-2011-22 | Documentation Requirements for Foreclosure and Bankruptcy Referral Packages

Effective for foreclosure referrals on and after March 1, 2012: In all circumstances in which an assignment of mortgage to the party in whose name the foreclosure will be conducted is required, servicers must ensure that, no later than the time of the foreclosure referral to an attorney (or trustee), the mortgage has been validly … Read more Related posts:
  1. Fannie Mae Announcement SVC-2010-10 Miscellaneous Servicing Policy Changes
  2. Jennifer Brunner Ohio Secretary of State Referral Letter to U.S. District Attorney Steven Dettelbach RE Foreclosure Fraud
  3. Fannie Mae Update – MERS must NOT be Named as a Plaintiff in ANY Foreclosure Action Ever Again
Dec
27

How Does the New Federal Venue Law Affect Corporate Bankruptcy?

On December 7, 2011, President Obama signed the Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011, H.R. 394, P.L. 112-63. The bill does not amend 28 U.S.C. 1408, the primary venue provision for bankruptcy cases in the U.S. Nonetheless, the changes should make us think again about the propriety of place of incorporation as a basis for chapter 11 venue (hat tip to Elizabeth Gibson, who figured this one out right away).

H.R. 394 substantially rewrote 28 U.S.C. 1391, the basic venue provision for federal actions. Section 1391(c) guides where parties "reside" for purposes of interpreting all venue provisions. For corporate (and equivalent) parties, new section 1391(c) divides the residence determination into the party as defendant and the party as plaintiff. If the applicable venue statute permits venue based on the residence of the plaintiff, the residence for a corporation is limited to the "judicial district in which it maintains its principal place of business." It does not extend to other locations in which the corporation would be subject to personal jurisdiction - such as place of incorporation.  

Not too many venue statutes permit venue on the basis of the location of the plaintiff/the party initiating the action (one reason why bankruptcy case venue is such an anomaly). But H.R. 394 carries a message: place of incorporation is not a substantively meaningful location to constitute a corporation's residence when the corporation is the initiator of the federal action.    

As noted, this does not apply directly to section 1408, which does not speak of a plaintiff, and also refers to "domicile" as well as residence. Nonethless, the amendment adds to the case against a debtor's place of incorporation (coupled with affiliate venue) as a theoretically sound basis for administering a business bankruptcy case. For other thoughts on that issue, see my commentary that I have just posted here

 

Dec
21

DOJ Arrests Attorney Mitchell Stein at LAX – A Mass Clusterf#@k

This is a story for the ages… you want crazy, I’ve got crazy.

Remember attorney Mitchell J. Stein?  His law office was shut down along with the the law offices of Kramer & Kaslow.  Stein filed the first lawsuit against Bank of America that came to be know as a “mass joinder,” or multi-plaintiff suit… Ronald v. Bank of America.

When I first called Mitchell Stein to find out what he was up to, I discovered that coincidentally, he went to my high school.  He was two years older than me, so he didn’t remember me, but I did remember him.  And he seemed like a smart trial lawyer who certainly talked like he was dedicated to fighting for the rights of homeowners against the banks.  He said that many of his clients were pro bono and contingency cases, where the homeowners were paying nothing.  I never listed him on my “Trusted Attorneys” tab… because I just didn’t know him long enough… but I did try to keep tabs on him.

Then this past September, I believe, both he and Kramer got shut down by the State Bar and AG, the allegations being that they were “running and capping,” essentially meaning that they were paying non-lawyers sales commissions.  Kramer continues to deny that happened, and I suppose we’ll have to wait to see what evidence is presented at trial to be sure one way or the other.  Stein, on the other hand, not only denied any involvement with Kramer’s marketing, but further said that he had never received any funds from that marketing… and to-date, I haven’t seen any evidence that he did.  So, I was waiting to see how all that came out, as well.

But… never mind all that… in fact, as far as Stein is concerned, it’s pretty much mass-smash… joinder-schmoinder.

Okay, ready for this?  I wasn’t.

Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division announced today that attorney Mitchell J. Stein was arrested on Sunday, December 18, 2011, at Los Angeles International Airport on charges related to his alleged role in a multi-million dollar market manipulation stock fraud scheme.  Stein was arrested for his role as attorney for a South Carolina health care device company, Signalife… now known as Heart Tronics.

Huh?  Say what?

Apparently, an indictment was unsealed yesterday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida charging attorney Mitchell J. Stein, 53, of Hidden Hills, Calif., and Boca Raton, Fla., with one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, three counts of mail fraud, three counts of wire fraud, three counts of securities fraud, three counts of money laundering and one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice.   The indictment also seeks forfeiture of the proceeds of the offenses.

Huh?  Say what?

The indictment alleges that Stein has been engaged in a scheme to pump up the stock price of Signalife Inc. by lying about the company’s sales activity.   Signalife is now known as Heart Tronics.  It was a publicly traded company that purported to sell electronic heart monitoring devices, and according to the indictment, Stein’s wife owned approximately 85 percent of the shares.

According to the indictment Stein and co-conspirators faked purchase orders from fictitious customers and then issued press releases and filed documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that reported the fictitious sales.   They also created the false appearance of sales activity, by shipping products to an individual who would store them even though they had not purchased any products.

The indictment also says that Stein and co-conspirators sold shares of Signalife at inflated prices, hiding the fact that they were doing so by placing shares in purportedly blind trusts.  And not only that but Stein and co-conspirators also allegedly issued additional shares to third parties so that those third parties could sell the shares and remit the proceeds of those sales to Stein and his co-conspirators.

Stein also conspired to obstruct an SEC investigation into Heart Tronics by testifying falsely and directing others to do the same.

If Stein is convicted, he could face up to 20 years in prison on each count of mail fraud, wire fraud, securities fraud, and conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, and up to 10 years on each count of money laundering, and up to five years on the conspiracy to obstruct justice count.  And the SEC announced its filing of a civil enforcement action against Stein and others, the result of their conducting a parallel investigation.

And according to Thompson Reuters, Stein had help… and look who the help was:

“Willie Gault, a former Chicago Bears wide receiver, faces a civil lawsuit by U.S. securities regulators accusing the American football player and several others of engaging in an alleged scheme to inflate the price of stock in a heart-monitoring device company.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said in a complaint filed on Tuesday in federal court in California that the company, known as Heart Tronics, installed both Gault and a former Hollywood executive named J. Rowland Perkins as figureheads of the company to help fuel publicity and pump up investor confidence.”

Okay, so what the heck has been going on here.  I thought Stein was suing banks, but apparently he was actually a lot closer to robbing them?  It’s like finding out that you went to high school with Charles Keating.  Like… OMG.  I mean… OMG!

It’s more than strange to come to such a realization about someone who grew up in your neighborhood, someone in your age group.  Like, what the heck could have led him down the path on which he’s been traveling?  What possesses someone to do such things?

I mean… he seemed like a successful attorney… he’s been practicing law for something like 25 years and hadn’t committed any sort of crimes before… I even met his wife at  California Attorney General’s press conference on mortgage fraud, held maybe six monts ago and she seemed like a lovely woman.  Was it the money?  That would be the easy answer… he did what he did for the money.

But, the thing is… his wife is quite wealthy in her own right.  Her father was a very successful songwriter and music industry executive… I mean, very, very successful.  And Mitch, I’m sure, made a very good living for many years… someone gave me their home address and I looked at it on Google Earth and it looked like the largest home I’ve ever seen… 28,000 square feet.  And Mitch drove a Mercedes the one time I saw him in his car, but it wasn’t a new one, in fact it was maybe 10 years old.  He’s accused of illegally receiving something like $8 million.  Was that enough money to get him to be willing to break all the rules and put his freedom at risk.

Before you answer that, let me give you one more fact… Mitch has a daughter… who I’m told is 6-7 years old.  And he was arrested on Sunday, and Christmas is only days away.  Now, I understand that he was able to post bail… $300,000… so he’ll be home with her for the holidays, but what about next year?  Is he that certain that he’ll prevail?  Is he innocent of all charges, or does he believe he’s innocent of all charges?

I don’t know about about everyone in the world, it should go without saying, but I think most fathers wouldn’t risk leaving their daughters for $8 million… or $800 million, for that matter.  I wouldn’t even want to be kept away from my daughter for a week, let alone face decades in prison.  Not a chance in the world.  The only way I’d risk my life would be to save hers.  No amount of money would be in the running.

Is Mitch that much different than me?  It’s not like we’re from different planets… we grew up in the same neighborhood, for heaven’s sake.

Now, for some inside scoop…

Okay, so although I haven’t been able to reach Mitchell Stein in months, he simply stopped taking my calls after his firm was shut down… I received a call last night from someone who had been in contact with Mitchell Stein since his arrest.  And what he said, especially when combined with other facts, was alarming.

The person said that Mitch seemed to think everything was just fine.  Yes, he had been in jail, but only for one night, and he was none the worse for wear.  Not only that, but he started talking about how the U.N. had “bought” or somehow “approved” of his Heart Tronic device.  He said he had just returned from Ireland when he was arrested, but that everything was otherwise just fine… in fact, the prospects for his Heart Tronics business were quite exciting even.

Here’s a copy of the criminal indictment related to Mitchell Stein’s stock fraud allegations.  Take a look, and you tell me what you think, because I’d say things were a long way from being “fine.”  In fact, I’d say it looks like things have never been worse, and even though I understand that if the allegations are true or even close to true, then a lot of people were hurt financially… it still breaks my heart to think of any father of a 6-7 year-old daughter going away for a long time.

Mitchell Stein Criminal Indictment

But, the person who interacted with Mitch since he bailed out of jail little more than a day ago said that Mitch just kept talking about the U.N. having bought his Heart Tronics device, that according to the Department of Justice, for the most part was always pretty much a complete fraud.

Below you’ll find three links to Heart Tronics documents… press releases, for the most part… sent out recently by Heart Tronics executives… with names that don’t appear anywhere in the indictment.  There’s even one that proudly proclaims that “Heart Tronics to Participate in United Nations Health Initiative,” just as Mitch told my confidential source.

And when my source asked Mitch about being arrested and being in jail, Mitch just said, “oh yes.” How long he was asked… to which Mitch just said, “one day.”  And then he went back to talking about either Heart Tronics or the charges being brought as we speak by the California Attorney General for his alleged participation in Kramer’s alleged marketing scheme.

And, by the way, Phil Kramer is a 30 year, Martindale Hubble ‘A’ rated lawyer with a perfect State Bar record… and teenage boys at home, as well.  If you were to read Kramer’s and Stein’s resumes back to back, you’d have to come away quite impressed.  So, what the heck is going on that these two edned up where they are today.  At least Kramer is scared to death, I’m told.  From what I was told, Stein seems to be barely aware of what’s happening.

I’d be throwing up around the clock were I even in his shoes for a nano-second.  He’s still talking about Heart Tronics.  And he thinks he’s going to defeat the AG’s charges as well.  In fact, I’m told, he’s sure of it.  He’s even connected the two, telling my source that it’s because he sued Bank of America that the DOJ has come after his Heart Tronics company.  Even his wife is accused of being unduly enriched, or something like that.

And in light of all of that, he seems disconnected with reality. I have to tell you, I’ve only known him for maybe six months and only saw him in person on maybe three occasions, but for whatever reason, I’m worried about him.

And here’s another fact that gave me pause… according to published reports, Stein’s most recent message on Twitter, which was posted on the day of his arrest read:

“As long as the roots are not severed, all is well … and all will be well … In the garden.”

Well, okay then.  It’s not in my nature, but as far as this story goes,  all I can say is that I’m at a loss for words…

Mandelman out.

HeartTronics

HeartTronics to Participate in United Nations Health Initiative

HeartTronics Corporate Update

Dec
16

FORECLOSURE FRAUD MUST STOP NOW! TELL WELLS FARGO TO DO THE RIGHT THING AND REVERSE THE BIEN-AIMÉ’S FORECLOSURE

FORECLOSURE FRAUD MUST STOP NOW! The Bien-Aimé’s built their dream house 10 years ago… …BUT IT MAY BE STOLEN ANY DAY BY BANK-ROBBERS! NOT MASKED MEN WHO ROB BANKS, NO! UNDER FORECLOSURES… …THE BANKS ROB US!!! The Bien-Aimé’s were paying their mortgage on time; they’d fallen behind a few years ago but had gotten a … Read more Related posts:
  1. “Ghetto Loans” City accuses Wells Fargo of engaging in illegal “Reverse Redlining”
  2. Wells Fargo Loses Bid to Dismiss Fraud Claims | GUSTAVO REYES, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant
  3. Judge Slaps Wells Fargo in Foreclosure | KENG HEE PAIK, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Dec
15

Action Alert | SOS For Danielle Sterling Endorsements & Signatures For American Home Mortgage Entities

SOS For Danielle Sterling Endorsements & Signatures For American Home Mortgage Entities Friends & Colleagues: We have a BIG case that will turn industry on its head. We are now going after “robo-endorsers” which is similar to robo-signing, but with the actual endorsements placed on alleged wet-ink promissory notes and allonges. We have evidence and … Read more Related posts:
  1. Bank of America Attempts Another Theft of an American Home with PAID OFF MORTGAGE! Maria and Jose Perez v. Bac Home Loans Servicing Lp, ReconTrust, Na
  2. Ohio Attorney General vs AHMSI American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc
  3. KABOOOOM | Plaintiff’s Petition – American Home Mortgage Servicing vs Lender Processing Services (LPS)
Dec
14

Matt Weidner | RE US Bank Verification of Foreclosure Complaint – Compliance with the Court’s Order Would Require the Petitioner to Perjure Itself

Complying With This Court’s Order Would Require The Plaintiff To Perjure Itself… That’s not my statement, that comes from a Plaintiff in an appeal that just came across my fax machine as I was walking out of the office today. The whole appeal is quite interesting, but the statement that really blew me completely out … Read more Related posts:
  1. Gmac’s Notice of Compliance With Court Order for Sanctions RE Fraud on the Court for False Affidavits
  2. Matt Weidner | BOMBSHELL! – Banks Not Authorized To Collect Fees in Cases!
  3. Notice of Appeal Filed – Stay of Court Order to Vacate Injunction Stopping Bank of America Foreclosures in Utah Requested
Dec
14

Brooklyn Beatdown | Schack Attack – U.S. Bank N.A. v. Wayne Ramjit: ‘Conflicted Robosigner’ Equals No Foreclosure

‘Conflicted robosigner’ equals no foreclosure: NY state judge NEW YORK, Dec 13 (Reuters) – On Monday, a Brooklyn judge dismissed a mortgage-foreclosure case over a major New York firm’s failure to vouch for the veracity of its court filings amid questions over whether it used a “conflicted robosigner” to support its case. On July 28, … Read more Related posts:
  1. Another Brooklyn Beatdown – Hon. Arthur M. Schack – Plaintiff U.S. BANK Never had Standing to Prosecute this Action Because of an Ineffective Assignment
  2. Brooklyn Beatdown – Hon. Arthur M. Schack – Foreclosure Judgement and Sale Vacated, Case Dismissed WITH Prejudice
  3. Brooklyn Beatdown | Judge Schack Dismissal w/ Prejudice “Counsel for plaintiff is directed never to place such a foolish statement in a cover letter to this Court”
Dec
14

Dylan Ratigan | Exposing the inner workings of Wall Street

~ 4closureFraud.org Tweet Related posts: Response to the Lenders Objections PHH Mortgage Full Deposition of the Infamous Erica Johnson Seck RE: Indymac Federal Bank Fsb, Plaintiff, Vs. Israel a. Machado – 50 2008 CA 037322xxxx Mb PMI Ocwen Anderson Report – Sue First Ask Questions Later Related posts:
  1. Response to the Lenders Objections PHH Mortgage
  2. Full Deposition of the Infamous Erica Johnson Seck RE: Indymac Federal Bank Fsb, Plaintiff, Vs. Israel a. Machado – 50 2008 CA 037322xxxx Mb
  3. PMI Ocwen Anderson Report – Sue First Ask Questions Later
Dec
14

Julie L. Williams | OCC Chief Counsel Testifies on Efforts to Correct Foreclosure Deficiencies

OCC Chief Counsel Testifies on Efforts to Correct Foreclosure Deficiencies WASHINGTON — The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s Chief Counsel Julie L. Williams provided an update on efforts to correct unsafe and unsound mortgage servicing and foreclosure practices during her testimony today before the Subcommittee on Housing, Transportation, and Community Development of the … Read more Related posts:
  1. Response to the Lenders Objections PHH Mortgage
  2. Full Deposition of the Infamous Erica Johnson Seck RE: Indymac Federal Bank Fsb, Plaintiff, Vs. Israel a. Machado – 50 2008 CA 037322xxxx Mb
  3. Freddie Mac Comments on the Final Report and Recommendations on Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Cases Florida Supreme Court
Dec
13

Merry Fraudclosure | 40 Year Community Holiday Tradition Saved as Home is Lost to Fraudclosure

By all means, save the sparkly holiday lights, but let the homes fall into fraudclosure. ~ Snoopy Christmas display saved from foreclosure Jim Jordan created a heart-warming Christmas display of Charles Schulz’s “Peanuts” characters more than 40 years ago at his Southern California home, and it became a holiday tradition as tens of thousands of … Read more Related posts:
  1. Response to the Lenders Objections PHH Mortgage
  2. Full Deposition of the Infamous Erica Johnson Seck RE: Indymac Federal Bank Fsb, Plaintiff, Vs. Israel a. Machado – 50 2008 CA 037322xxxx Mb
  3. PMI Ocwen Anderson Report – Sue First Ask Questions Later
Dec
05

New York Legal | Foreclosures – (In)validity and (in)admissibility of out-of-state documents and affidavits: the CPLR 3212/2309(c) – RPL 299-a

(In)validity and (in)admissibility of out-of-state documents and affidavits: the CPLR 3212/2309(c) – RPL 299-a You represent the plaintiff-assignee on motion for summary judgment under Civil Practice Law and Rule 3212 in a commercial mortgage foreclosure action. Your “affirmation of regularity” is supported by a complaint verified in New Jersey. The assignment was effected and acknowledged, … Read more Related posts:
  1. WAMU Appraisal Fraud – The People of the State of New York by Andrew Cuomo, Attorney General of the State of New York, Plaintiff-Respondent, v First American Corporation, et al., Defendants
  2. Why New York Foreclosures Are Grinding to a Halt
  3. GMAC v Visicaro – Judge Rondolino – I really honestly don’t have any confidence that any of the documents the Courts are receiving on these mass foreclosures are valid…
Nov
21

Credit Union? Fuhgeddaboudit | Credit Union Repo’s Teachers Car in Response to Falling Behind on Home Mtg, Despite Car Payments Being Current

“They even demanded that she reapply for a car loan, disclose financials and sign off on a new loan before they would give it back,” Gallagher recounted. “When we refused given that there was no legal entitlement to the same, they gave it back.”  ~ Member Sues Suncoast Over Mortgage Mess Tampa Bay Teacher Says … Read more Related posts:
  1. Massive Union | The New York Transit Workers Union (TWU) To Side With #OccupyWallStreet Protesters Today at 4pm EDT
  2. Fair Game – How C.D.O.’s Helped Bring Down a Credit Union – NYTimes
  3. Fannie Mae Refuses to Return $42 Million Worth of “Stolen” Mortgages – SUFFOLK FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff, vs. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION Defendant.
Nov
01

United States of America v Allied Home Mortgage | Feds File Massive Fraud Case Against Allied Home Mortgage

Feds File Massive Fraud Case Against Allied Home Mortgage by Tracy Weber and Charles Ornstein ProPublica, Federal prosecutors sued Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corp. and two top executives Tuesday, accusing them of running a massive fraud scheme that cost the government at least $834 million in insurance claims on defaulted home loans. Houston-based Allied and … Read more Related posts:
  1. MFS | Mortgage Fraud Syndrome – A New Disease Brought on by the United States Government
  2. United States vs Deutsche Bank | Deutsche Bank Faces US Mortgage Fraud Lawsuit
  3. PAUL L. MUCKLE, Plaintiff Vs. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al.
Oct
24

Nevada Supreme Court Orders Wells Fargo, First American Loanstar, MERS be Sanctioned for NOT Following Foreclosure Mediation Laws

State Supreme Court orders banks be sanctioned for not following foreclosure mediation While the constitutionality of the state’s foreclosure mediation law is being challenged, the Nevada Supreme Court has ruled that penalties should be imposed on two lending companies that failed to follow those rules. The court said Washoe District Judge Patrick Flanagan should determine the … Read more Related posts:
  1. Wells Fargo Sues Wells Fargo? You can’t Expect a Bank that is Dumb Enough to Sue Itself to know why it is Suing Itself…
  2. Judge Slaps Wells Fargo in Foreclosure | KENG HEE PAIK, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
  3. Cease and Desist Order In the Matter of: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, INC.
Oct
19

$725,000 Judgment Against Wells Fargo for Misapplying $2,212 Mortgage Payment

725,000 judgment against Wells Fargo for Misapplying $2,212 Mortgage Payment Below is a story of an attorney that has been battling the banks on behalf of many Northern Nevada homeowners for several years.  His first experience with the banksters’ egregious conduct towards borrowers began in September 2004 and resulted in a $725K judgment against Wells … Read more Related posts:
  1. Judge Schack Does it Again! Wells Fargo Motion for Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale for the Premises is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE Complaint is Dismissed
  2. Judge Slaps Wells Fargo in Foreclosure | KENG HEE PAIK, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
  3. Cease and Desist Order In the Matter of: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, INC.
Oct
19

Complaint | Ohio v. MERSCORP, Inc | Recording FAIL – Prosecuting Attorney for Geauga County, Ohio Files Class Action against MERS and Its Members

Bernstein Liebhard LLP Announces Filing of a Class Action against MERS and Its Members NEW YORK, Oct 13, 2011 (BUSINESS WIRE) — Bernstein Liebhard LLP, with David P. Joyce, Prosecuting Attorney for Geauga County, Ohio, announced today that a lawsuit has been filed in the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas by Plaintiff Geauga County, … Read more Related posts:
  1. Ohio v. MERSCORP, Inc | Recording FAIL – Prosecuting Attorney for Geauga County, Ohio Files Class Action against MERS and Its Members
  2. Class Action Complaint – Connie Campbell against Steven Baum, MERSCORP, Inc, et al., Case #10CV3800
  3. WHOA!!! Another CLASS ACTION FILED Against DJSP & MERS – Figueroa v. Law Offices Of David J. Stern, P.A. and MERSCORP, Inc.
Oct
13

Ohio v. MERSCORP, Inc | Recording FAIL – Prosecuting Attorney for Geauga County, Ohio Files Class Action against MERS and Its Members

Bernstein Liebhard LLP Announces Filing of a Class Action against MERS and Its Members NEW YORK, Oct 13, 2011 (BUSINESS WIRE) — Bernstein Liebhard LLP, with David P. Joyce, Prosecuting Attorney for Geauga County, Ohio, announced today that a lawsuit has been filed in the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas by Plaintiff Geauga County, … Read more Related posts:
  1. WHOA!!! Another CLASS ACTION FILED Against DJSP & MERS – Figueroa v. Law Offices Of David J. Stern, P.A. and MERSCORP, Inc.
  2. MERS Responds to Essex Co., Mass. Announcement | Company in (NON) Compliance with Purpose and Intent of State Recording Acts
  3. Dallas County v. Merscorp Inc | Merscorp Sued in Dallas With Bank of America Over Mortgage-Tracking System
Oct
11

Whitney Cook Chase Home Finance | A Mortgage Dispute with a Twist

In 2010, the mortgage was transferred to Chase by Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, acting for Fleet. Chase both owns and services the mortgage. MERS tracks loan ownership and servicing. The transfer was signed by Whitney Cook, a MERS vice president. Various websites show that her name appears on other mortgage assignments where she holds titles for … Read more Related posts:
  1. Dianna Montez v Chase Home Finance and JPMorgan Chase | Keller Rohrback L.L.P. Announces Class Action Complaint
  2. California Love – Nguyen et.al. v. Chase Bank USA, NA; Chase Home Finance LLC. et.al.
  3. Fraudclosure Fight | The Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A. Plaintiff, v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, Defendant
Oct
11

#OccupyBoston | Man Yells “We are Veterans of The United States of America” as Boston Police Attack (VIDEO)

Pay close attention at the 1:50 min mark and beyond. It appears to me that a man is yelling “We are Veterans of The United States of America” and then gets thrown down to the ground by police… Is this what these men fought for? I think not. ~ 4closureFraud.org Tweet Related posts:Unsealed Complaint | … Read more Related posts:
  1. Unsealed Complaint | Wells Fargo, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan Chase and GMAC Mortgage, Engaged in “A Brazen Scheme to Defraud Our Nation’s Veterans”
  2. $750,000 in Annual Activity | Fort Lauderdale Police Union Withdrawing from Bank of America
  3. PAUL L. MUCKLE, Plaintiff Vs. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al.
Aug
25

KABOOOOM | Plaintiff’s Petition – American Home Mortgage Servicing vs Lender Processing Services (LPS)

Looks like AHSMI just opened Pandora’s box. From Naked Capitalism… The lawsuit rather matter of factly makes a stunning admission (note that PSA here means Professional Services Agreement, and it was the contract between AHSI and LPS, click to enlarge): Did you get it? They said that these procedures were standard between the two companies, … Read more
Aug
24

In re: SIMA SCHWARTZ | MERS beat down in MA. Opens Floodgate of Wrongful Foreclosure Cases, due to MERS as “MOM”

 IN RE SCHWARTZ In re: SIMA SCHWARTZ, Chapter 7, Debtor.SIMA SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff,v.HOMEQ SERVICING, AGENT FOR DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE and DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE, Defendants.  Case No. 06-42476-MSH, Adversary Proceeding No. 07-04098.  United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts, Central Division.  August 22, 2011.    The Defendants’ Case It is undisputed … Read more
Aug
21

Ohio FRAUDclosure Blogger Brief to Supreme Court of Ohio

OHIO FRAUDclosure, an Internet ”Blog Site,” has submitted an Amicus Curiae (Brief) on behalf of ALL OHIO Homeowners in a landmark case US BANK NA v. DUVALL This case and decision currently in front of the Supreme Court of Ohio – turn on the Question:  To have STANDING, as a plaintiff, in a mortgage foreclosure action, must a party show that … Read more
Aug
17

Knights of Columbus File Amended Complaint | “It is apparent that the defendant knowingly failed in its obligation to receive, process, maintain, and hold all or part of the mortgage files”

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ——————————————————- KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS,  Plaintiff,  v.  THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,  Defendant.  ——————————————————- AMENDED COMPLAINT SUMMARY 1. This action originally requested the Court to order an immediate accounting of two trusts known as CWALT 2005-6CB and CWALT 2006-6CB. These trusts hold residential … Read more
Aug
15

BIG WIN IN GA | Morgan v Ocwen, MERS – ONLY A “SECURED CREDITOR” May Conduct A Non-Judicial Foreclosure In Georgia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION MICHAEL L. MORGAN, Plaintiff, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., and MERSCORP, INC. Defendants. ~ Wrongful Foreclosure Although the separation of the note and the security deed does not render either instrument void, it does create a … Read more
May
29

Kingman Holdings, Big MERS Dustup in Texas…

Ultra Viresis

a Latin phrase meaning literally “beyond the powers”, although its standard legal translation and substitute is “beyond power”. If an act requires legal authority and it is done with such authority, it is characterised in law as intra vires (literally “within the powers”; standard legal translation and substitute, “within power”). If it is done without such authority, it is ultra vires. Acts that are intra vires may equivalently be termed “valid” and those that are ultra vires “invalid”.

Just because you have an assignment or a deed or any other document purportedly executed on behalf of a corporation, does not mean that it is valid.  If the person executing does not have the authority or if the act itself is not authorized by the corporation, the act is not valid.  Here’s a clear example. Two clients come in my office, the President of a corporation “sells” a property to my client and the client writes a check for $500,000.  Problem is I didn’t examine the corporate records and I didn’t see the corporate books so I didn’t catch that the President was not authorized by the Board of Directors to sell the property….the deed is invalid and I’m in big trouble.  Many across the country have been making the argument that the MERS signing officers system is similarly flawed because the corporate procedures are not followed.  Such is the case in a case filed in Texas.  The text of the Order released by a federal judge spells all this out…

Defendants argue that Plaintiff alleges that MERS’ corporate secretary appointed Blackstun as a MERS assistant secretary, and the appointment was not valid because Blackstun’s appointment was not also approved by MERS’ board of directors, as allegedly required by MERS’ by-laws. Defendants argue that this is negligence at best, and not fraud. Defendants also assert that the party that would be the defrauded party would be MERS, not Plaintiff, and that Plaintiff’s interest in the Property is wholly unaffected by the assignment.

Plaintiff argues that the Assignment filed in the property records is a fraudulent lien claim. Plaintiff alleges that the assignment is void because it was executed by a person neither employed nor authorized by MERS to execute a conveyance. Plaintiff alleges that MERS intended that the document be given the same effect as a lawfully executed instrument, and the execution and filing of the documents were done for the purpose of harming Plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges that there was a scheme on the part of a MERS officer to bypass the Board of Directors and cloak others with authority only allowed by the Board of Directors. Plaintiff argues that this is not an inadvertent failure to comply with a duty, but rather an intentional act, done knowingly with the specific intent that the consequences of his action be brought to fruition.

In this case it is alleged that MERS did not properly appoint Blackstun as an officer of MERS and that Blackstun did not have authority to bind MERS, and when Blackstun executed the assignment, it caused MERS to file a fraudulent document in the deed records. The Court finds that Plaintiff has stated a plausible claim, in part, because Defendants fail to address the issue of the legal effect of Blackstun not being authorized to execute the assignment. If he had no such authority, MERS would know that fact. It appears to be more than mere negligence by MERS. Discovery should be allowed, and after discovery is completed, the issue of whether there is a valid claim under ß12.002 can be determined by a motion for summary judgment.

Read all the pleadings for much more on this most interesting discussion, also read the deposition of MERS officer Hultman below.

kingmancomplaint

kingmandefense

kingmanreply

kingmanresponse

But there was another post I did yesterday which really had me thinking.  It’s the Reveredo case which is cited in a recently published article in the esteemed Cardozo Law Review Journal.  What is most astonishing about all of this dustup is (as expressed by Judge Walt Logan in Azize) the fact that MERS just came out of nowhere, no legislation, no court order and spread all across this country.  Another key opinion acknowledges this point but the court just shrugs its collective shoulders and says, “hey we know all this MERS stuff ain’t exactly legal, but what the heck, what can possibly go wrong?”…..

“To the extent that courts have encountered difficulties with the question, and have even ruled to the contrary of our conclusion,” the court opined, “the problem arises from the difficulty of attempting to shoehorn a modern innovative instrument of commerce into nomenclature and legal categories which stem essentially from the medieval English land law.” (suggesting that a formalistic application of foreclosure law might lead to the conclusion that MERS lacks standing to foreclose in some circumstances, but “no substantive rights, obligations or defenses are affected by the use of the MERS device, [so] there is no reason why mere form should overcome the salutary substance of permitting the use of this commercially effective means of business”).

Cardozo Law Review Post

Tweet this!Tweet this! Share and Enjoy: Print Digg del.icio.us Facebook Google Bookmarks email FriendFeed Identi.ca LinkedIn Live MySpace PDF Ping.fm RSS StumbleUpon Technorati Tumblr Yahoo! Buzz Posterous Twitter Yahoo! Bookmarks

Scridb filter
May
22

BOMBSHELL- According to Federal Judge MERS Assignment May Be INVALID

By now we all know the dangerous and absurd fiction that the MERS menace has wrought across the property records and courts across this land.  The MERS menace is predicated on the fiction that tens of thousands of  so-called limited signing officers spread all around the world can execute documents that purport to bind corporations when the very procedures of the corporation may not have been followed expressly.

In this particular case, the homeowner defendant claimed the foreclosure case was fraudulent and invalid because of a fatal flaw in the MERs procedures….procedures that exist all across this country.  Now if a federal judge in one state has now issued a Final Order that puts a major crack in the foundation of the entire MERS foundation….what happens in all the other states?

Defendants assert that Plaintiff’s section 12.002 claim lacks plausibility because it rests on legal conclusions instead of facts and that Plaintiff has failed to allege facts to show that MERS made, presented or used the assignment with knowledge that it was a fraudulent court record or a fraudulent lien or claim against the Property, that MERS intended the assignment be given the same legal effect as a court record evidencing a valid lien against the Property, and that MERS intended to cause another person to suffer financial injury.

Defendants argue that Plaintiff alleges that MERS’ corporate secretary appointed Blackstun as a MERS assistant secretary, and the appointment was not valid because Blackstun’s appointment was not also approved by MERS’ board of directors, as allegedly required by MERS’ by-laws. Defendants argue that this is negligence at best, and not fraud. Defendants also assert that the party that would be the defrauded party would be MERS, not Plaintiff, and that Plaintiff’s interest in the Property is wholly unaffected by the assignment.

Plaintiff argues that the Assignment filed in the property records is a fraudulent lien claim. Plaintiff alleges that the assignment is void because it was executed by a person neither employed nor authorized by MERS to execute a conveyance. Plaintiff alleges that MERS intended that the document be given the same effect as a lawfully executed instrument, and the execution and filing of the documents were done for the purpose of harming Plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges that there was a scheme on the part of a MERS officer to bypass the Board of Directors and cloak others with authority only allowed by the Board of Directors. Plaintiff argues that this is not an inadvertent failure to comply with a duty, but rather an intentional act, done knowingly with the specific intent that the consequences of his action be brought to fruition.

In this case it is alleged that MERS did not properly appoint Blackstun as an officer of MERS and that Blackstun did not have authority to bind MERS, and when Blackstun executed the assignment, it caused MERS to file a fraudulent document in the deed records. The Court finds that Plaintiff has stated a plausible claim, in part, because Defendants fail to address the issue of the legal effect of Blackstun not being authorized to execute the assignment. If he had no such authority, MERS would know that fact. It appears to be more than mere negligence by MERS. Discovery should be allowed, and after discovery is completed, the issue of whether there is a valid claim under ß12.002 can be determined by a motion for summary judgment.

Kingman+Holdings+V.+CitiMortgage+&+MERS.2011+US+Dist.+LEXIS+52770.D..Ct.+ED+Tex.+April.21.2011

Tweet this!Tweet this! Share and Enjoy: Print Digg del.icio.us Facebook Google Bookmarks email FriendFeed Identi.ca LinkedIn Live MySpace PDF Ping.fm RSS StumbleUpon Technorati Tumblr Yahoo! Buzz Posterous Twitter Yahoo! Bookmarks

Scridb filter
Apr
26

Defendants in Foreclosure Get Attorney Appointed For Them (An Attorney Recommended and Paid For By The Bank)

foreclosure-lawyer-flTAMPA – When a lender fails to find a homeowner to notify them of a foreclosure lawsuit, a judge often appoints a guardian ad litem. That attorney is supposed to represent the property owner’s interests.

But guess who typically picks the guardian? The lender’s attorney.

Foreclosure is the only court proceeding in Florida where the plaintiff routinely chooses the attorney ad litem to represent the defendant, according to court records and interviews.

GOT THAT?  ONE MORE TIME….

TAMPA – When a lender fails to find a homeowner to notify them of a foreclosure lawsuit, a judge often appoints a guardian ad litem. That attorney is supposed to represent the property owner’s interests.

But guess who typically picks the guardian? The lender’s attorney.

Foreclosure is the only court proceeding in Florida where the plaintiff routinely chooses the attorney ad litem to represent the defendant, according to court records and interviews.

(Before you log on to read the rest of the story, please make sure you leave comments in the story which share your thoughts on the foreclosure process.  Remember, we all have an obligation to make sure truth about what is happening in our courtrooms is being told.)

TAMPA TRIBUNE

Tweet this!Tweet this! Share and Enjoy: Print Digg del.icio.us Facebook Google Bookmarks email FriendFeed Identi.ca LinkedIn Live MySpace PDF Ping.fm RSS StumbleUpon Technorati Tumblr Yahoo! Buzz Posterous Twitter Yahoo! Bookmarks

Scridb filter
Apr
22

In Re Harris- Massive Class Action Lawsuit Names Ben Ezra and LPS

The street fighters that are out there fighting these battles every day are making headway, but things are only going to change now that the real prize fighting, hard-charging, sword wielding super lawyers have joined the fight.

Take some time to read what a great, well-researched piece of legal masterpiece looks like.  Allegations from this complaint include:

As alleged in further detail herein, all the Defendants acted in
concert and conspired to unlawfully and secretly violate and avoid the
bankruptcy rules, the bankruptcy code, and the federal and the state common
law in their roles as attorneys and vendors to creditors to the detriment of
Plaintiff.

Each of the Defendants reached an agreement to illegally split
attorneys’ fees (“Illegal Agreement”), acted in concert and conspired in
furtherance of the Illegal Agreement, enjoyed a significant benefit from the
Illegal Agreement, which caused harm to the Plaintiff, and the Court. The
Plaintiff’s class representative and the Class members consist of those
persons other than the Court who have been harmed by the conduct set out
herein. Each of the Defendants was a necessary party to the conspiracy.

Please read the full complaint here:

In-re-Harris—Northern-District-of-Florida-Bankruptcy-Court-Filing-v-LPS-LPS-Default-Solutions-and-Ben-Ezra-Katz

Tweet this!Tweet this! Share and Enjoy: Print Digg del.icio.us Facebook Google Bookmarks email FriendFeed Identi.ca LinkedIn Live MySpace PDF Ping.fm RSS StumbleUpon Technorati Tumblr Yahoo! Buzz Posterous Twitter Yahoo! Bookmarks

Scridb filter
Apr
18

I Won My Motion to Dismiss Today–AND I’M FURIOUS…..

scales-of-justiceAll in all it’s been a great couple weeks.  With the notable exception of a gut wrenching appellate loss (Not Final Until Rehearing!), we’ve had a good string of trial court opinions that support our clients and the rule of law.

Today’s motion was an exhausting hearing on the Plaintiff’s failure to verify the complaint.  I say exhausting because over and over I’m arguing the same thing…JUST FOLLOW THE RULES OF THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT!

But we all know the deal…the foreclosure mills made a business decision that they would just ignore the rules of the Supreme Court.  The decision has largely paid off for them…who knows how many tens of thousands of foreclosure complaints they did not bother to verify and how much money they saved as a result of willful non compliance with the RULES OF THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT.

I was all fired up and ready to start screaming at the top of my lungs if this particular law firm was going to argue that they could ignore their professional responsibilities because Pam Bondi, Florida’s Attorney General got the rule wrong when she inked a sweetheart settlement deal.  If I ever hear this argument in court (and if anyone ever hears this argument) the only proper response is:

JUST BECAUSE THE FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL GOT THE RULE WRONG, THAT DOES NOT MEAN THIS COURT HAS TO FOLLOW AN ABSURD AND PATENTLY INCORRECT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

But anywhoo, I was going to talk about why I’m still furious even though I “won” my motion.  The problem is my client should not be forced to spend her money so that I can argue a motion that is just a waste of the court’s time and a waste of her money.  And what did the other side lose?  Nothing, they just have to amend the complaint….not loss, but a big loss of time and money for my client and yet another example of two sets of rules for the big shots and the little guy.

My day got worse and I got angrier when I got an Order denying a Motion to Dismiss in another case.  Don’t know which Motion to Dismiss was Denied in this particular case, you see I had filed several and the judge didn’t bother to have a hearing on any one of them…just sent an Order with DENIED stamped on it.  Which brings me back to my Motion on the foreclosure mill’s failure to verify their complaint.

If judges will just deny motions without hearing…even if those motions are long and detailed and case specific….why won’t judges across this state review complaints, determine whether they are verified and if they are not verified, DISMISS THE CASES WITHOUT PREJUDICE!

Now we’re back to the fact that there really are two sets of rules and laws in this country….one set for the big shots, and one for everyone else…..

Tweet this!Tweet this! Share and Enjoy: Print Digg del.icio.us Facebook Google Bookmarks email FriendFeed Identi.ca LinkedIn Live MySpace PDF Ping.fm RSS StumbleUpon Technorati Tumblr Yahoo! Buzz Posterous Twitter Yahoo! Bookmarks

Scridb filter
Website Designed and Developed by Tampa Web Designer