Apr
29

ID THEFT: Example of one person’s response

Editors’ Note: In response to my post on ID THEFT I received a number of comments and ideas. Here is one example of how someone stuck to the message and forced the issue using ID theft as a defensive tactic as well as preparing for an offensive response.

Are you reading my mind?
Out of the blue in Oct. Got a letter with my mortgage company letterhead stating “welcome to new mortgage company”. Said they changed their name. Separate letter said on Nov 6. stop making payments to them by their name and Nov. 7 start making payments to them by new name.
I know about contracts so I attempted to not contract with new name. It’s been a disaster.

1. No assignment 5 months out, in the Official Real Estate Records.
2. Real Trustee still holds title. I contacted him, but he only represents the beneficiary ‘who has the note and an interest secured in the home”.
3. Checked all three credit reports, 5 months out. Two show old name one show new name all have the same info. I disputed new name in the credit report that had it – stating I didn’t know them.
4. I disputed old name in another credit report since they are no longer exist to force identification of who is updating that report. Got copies of all.
4. Checked SEC filings. Investors bought the first name corporation in 2008. Then on Nov. 6, 2009 they merged the bank into their business. That explains why they said to stop paying one name.
5. Foreclosures under old name on file in Deed of Trust has been without assignment or transfer filings. Using Substitute Trustee. Three problems. Original Trustee still holds title. I already wrote him and know this. Deed of Trust on file has no provision for Substituting the Trustee. By virtue of the ‘merger’ they should have the original documents.
6. Spent 5 months asking them to validate their claim. They send a copy of the Certified copy of my Deed of Trust on file in the public (that does not name them), and a copy of a Certified copy of the Promissory note (that does not name them). Two problems They can’t attach to the Deed of Trust without assignment..name change or not…their name is ‘not’ the named Lender nor beneficiary in the Deed of Trust. And the Promissory Note was made out to a specific entity. You can’t possibly assume that I have to know that when you sell it, they can come up and say ‘pay me’ when the promissory note is supposed to be held by the person you promised to pay. If they sell it, that’s a different agreement between them and the other buyer, but I can’t be forced into their third party agreement as long as I agree to pay you..you stay right there and let me pay you..but don’t force me to pay someone I did not ‘promise to pay’.
7. They’ve hired a law firm (setting up for a substitute trustee situation). I contacted the firm. (not pro bono, not pro se, no attorney..just me and told them I don’t recognize the other company and I have asked them to validate and they respond with stronger demand for money.) Maybe that’s why I got the ‘copies’ I did get from the mortgage company that does not support their claim.
8. Informed the attorney of their violation of FDCPA by forwarding information to another party and by not disclosing the amount attempted to collect is in dispute.
9. I wouldn’t trust an attorney at this time. The United States is in Bankruptcy, China filed a lien for 45 Million dollars in December 2009.
10. Have a copy of a Substitute Trustee sale by this company. They never released the lien on the debtor they foreclosed on after the sale. If they had the papers they could have released the lien.
11. Once you admit there is a contract you can’t use Statue of Frauds which helps me because I have refused to contract and have refused to pay and requested validation of their claim of a debt owed to them.
Thinking seriously about filing SEC complaint and sending the ‘Communications, Notice and Order’ to the named person listed in their SEC filing and a copy of that to the law firm listed with the words “With a copy to” – in their SEC filing
My identity has been stolen by the company. When I establish an account with one firm, that does not give a right to another firm to step up and say I have the account, change the name, change the terms of your initial agreement and start paying me now because I have a ‘new name’. How can you have an account demanding payment when there is no agreement and you are really a new entity, not just a new name?
I’m learning about Statute of Frauds. It would also appear that Deceptive Trade Practices can be proven in this mess. A company who has no contract attaches to your credit report as if you’ve established business agreement with them? They have no definition in your Deed of Trust, yet they can get an attorney to represent their interest in your document and start nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings. If they have the papers it takes to change the name on the credit report, they should have the papers it takes to file an assignment/transfer and change the name on the Deed of Trust.
I’ve not paid them any money, but I have filed FTC and Attorney General complaints. Not sure if I have to pay the 5 months in arrears as Threat, Duress, and Coercion to get some action done by these public resources I’m using to filing the compliant.


Filed under: bubble, CASES, CDO, CORRUPTION, Eviction, expert witness, foreclosure, foreclosure mill, Forensic Analysis Workshop, GTC | Honor, HERS, investment banking, MODIFICATION, Mortgage, Motion Practice and Discovery, securities fraud, Securitization Survey, Servicer, STATUTES, trustee, workshop Tagged: assignment, beneficiary, credit reports, DEED OF TRUST, disclosure, discovery, dispute credit report, FDCPA, foreclosure, foreclosure defense, foreclosure offense, fraud, FTC Complaint, HERS, ID Theft, identity theft, lender, SEC Complaint, SEC filings, securitization, Substitute Trustee, transfer, trustee
Apr
17

Discovery: references to SEC filings and Edgar should refer to this Final Order

Editor’s Note: This is the securities equivalent of MERS or HERS.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 232
[Release Nos. 33-9077; 34-60875; 39-2468; IC-28984]
Adoption of Updated EDGAR Filer Manual
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) is adopting revisions to the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval System (EDGAR) Filer Manual to reflect updates to the EDGAR system made in EDGAR Release 9.17. The revisions were made primarily to enforce additional XBRL validation requirements to improve the quality of XBRL exhibits; to allow filers to electronically submit the withdrawal of application for exemptive or other relief from the Investment Companies Act as submission types APP WD and APP WD/A; and, to allow filers to add Subject Company related information for the submission types F-6, F-6/A, F-6EF, and F-6POS. The revisions to the Filer Manual reflect changes within Volume I entitled EDGAR Filer Manual, Volume I: “General Information,” Version 8 (September 2009) and Volume II entitled EDGAR Filer Manual, Volume II: “EDGAR Filing,” Version 13 (September 2009). The updated manual will be incorporated by reference into the Code of Federal Regulations.
DATES: October 30, 2009. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of October 30, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: In the Office of Interactive Disclosure for questions concerning additional XBRL validation requirements contact Jeffrey Naumann, Assistant Director of the Office of Interactive Disclosure, at (202) 551-5352; in the Division of
2
Corporation Finance, for questions concerning Subject Company related information for the Forms F-6, F-6/A, F-6EF, and F-6POS and Form D contact Cecile Peters, Chief, Office of Information Technology, at (202) 551-3600; in the Division of Investment Management for questions on the electronic filing of submission types APP WD and APP WD/A contact Ruth Armfield Sanders, Senior Special Counsel, Office of Legal and Disclosure, at (202) 551-6989; and in the Office of Information Technology, contact Rick Heroux, at (202) 551-8800.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are adopting an updated EDGAR Filer Manual, Volume I and Volume II. The Filer Manual describes the technical formatting requirements for the preparation and submission of electronic filings through the EDGAR system.1 It also describes the requirements for filing using EDGARLink2 and the Online Forms/XML Web site.
The Filer Manual contains all the technical specifications for filers to submit filings using the EDGAR system. Filers must comply with the applicable provisions of the Filer Manual in order to assure the timely acceptance and processing of filings made in electronic format.3 Filers may consult the Filer Manual in conjunction with our rules governing mandated electronic filing when preparing documents for electronic submission.4
The EDGAR system will be upgraded to Release 9.17 on September 28, 2009 and will introduce the following changes: EDGAR will be upgraded to enforce additional XBRL validation requirements to improve the quality of XBRL exhibits. This change will enhance the validation process the EDGAR system uses to confirm compliance with the requirements in Chapter 6 of the
1 We originally adopted the Filer Manual on April 1, 1993, with an effective date of April 26, 1993. Release No. 33-6986 (April 1, 1993) [58 FR 18638]. We implemented the most recent update to the Filer Manual on August 4, 2009. See Release No. 33–9058 (July 28, 2009) [74 FR 38523].
2 This is the filer assistance software we provide filers filing on the EDGAR system.
3 See Rule 301 of Regulation S-T (17 CFR 232.301).
4 See Release No. 33–9058 (July 28, 2009) [74 FR 38523] in which we implemented EDGAR Release 9.16.
3
EDGAR Filer Manual, Volume II: “EDGAR Filing”. Minor clarifications were made to the instructions on XBRL/Interactive Data tagging.
EDGAR will allow filers, who previously submitted on EDGAR or in paper an application for exemptive or other relief from the Investment Company Act, to electronically submit the withdrawal of such application as new submission types APP WD or APP WD/A on the EDGARLink Submission Template 3.
EDGAR will allow filers to add Subject Company related information to the submission types F-6, F-6/A, F-6EF, and F-6POS. These submission types are available on EDGARLink Submission Template 1.
A minor change will be made to the online Form D to update the OMB expiration date. Minor backend processing changes are being made to ensure that online and third party Form D filings are validated consistently.
Along with adoption of the Filer Manual, we are amending Rule 301 of Regulation S-T to provide for the incorporation by reference into the Code of Federal Regulations of today’s revisions. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51.
You may obtain paper copies of the updated Filer Manual at the following address: Public Reference Room, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Room 1520, Washington DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 am and 3:00 pm. We will post electronic format copies on the Commission’s Web site; the address for the Filer Manual is http://www.sec.gov/info/edgar.shtml.
4
Since the Filer Manual relates solely to agency procedures or practice, publication for notice and comment is not required under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)5. It follows that the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act6 do not apply.
The effective date for the updated Filer Manual and the rule amendments is [Insert date of publication in the Federal Register]. In accordance with the APA7, we find that there is good cause to establish an effective date less than 30 days after publication of these rules. The EDGAR system upgrade to Release 9.17 is scheduled to be available on September 28, 2009. The Commission believes that establishing an effective date less than 30 days after publication of these rules is necessary to coordinate the effectiveness of the updated Filer Manual with the system upgrade.
Statutory Basis
We are adopting the amendments to Regulation S-T under Sections 6, 7, 8, 10, and 19(a) of the Securities Act of 1933,8 Sections 3, 12, 13, 14, 15, 23, and 35A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,9 Section 319 of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939,10 and Sections 8, 30, 31, and 38 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.11
5 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
6 5 U.S.C. 601- 612.
7 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
8 15 U.S.C. 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, and 77s(a).
9 15 U.S.C. 78c, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o, 78w, and 78ll.
10 15 U.S.C. 77sss.
11 15 U.S.C. 80a-8, 80a-29, 80a-30, and 80a-37.
5
List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 232
Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.
TEXT OF THE AMENDMENT
In accordance with the foregoing, Title 17, Chapter II of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 232 – REGULATION S-T—GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC FILINGS
1. The authority citation for Part 232 continues to read in part as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, 77s(a), 77z–3, 77sss(a), 78c(b), 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o(d), 78w(a), 78ll, 80a–6(c), 80a–8, 80a–29, 80a–30, 80a–37, and 7201 et seq.; and 18 U.S.C. 1350
*****
2.
Section 232.301 is revised to read as follows:
§232.301 EDGAR Filer Manual.
Filers must prepare electronic filings in the manner prescribed by the EDGAR Filer Manual, promulgated by the Commission, which sets out the technical formatting requirements for electronic submissions. The requirements for becoming an EDGAR Filer and updating company data are set forth in the updated EDGAR Filer Manual, Volume I: “General Information,” Version 8 (September 2009). The requirements for filing on EDGAR are set forth in the updated EDGAR Filer Manual, Volume II: “EDGAR Filing,” Version 13(September 2009). Additional provisions applicable to Form N-SAR filers are set forth in the EDGAR Filer Manual, Volume III: “N-SAR Supplement,” Version 1 (September 2005). All of these provisions have been incorporated by reference into the Code of Federal Regulations, which action was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. You must
6
comply with these requirements in order for documents to be timely received and accepted. You can obtain paper copies of the EDGAR Filer Manual from the following address: Public Reference Room, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Room 1520, Washington, DC 20549, or call (202) 551-5850, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 am and 3:00 pm. Electronic copies are available on the Commission’s Web site. The address for the Filer Manual is http://www.sec.gov/info/edgar.shtml. You can also inspect the document at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to:

http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy
Secretary
October 26, 2009


Filed under: bubble, CDO, CORRUPTION, Eviction, expert witness, foreclosure, GTC | Honor, HERS, Investor, Mortgage, securities fraud Tagged: (202) 551-3600, (202) 551-5352, (202) 551-8800, 17 CFR Part 232, Adoption of Updated EDGAR Filer Manual, Analysis, and Retrieval System (EDGAR), Assistant Director of the Office of Interactive Disclosure, at (202) 551-6989, Cecile Peters, Chief, Code of Federal Regulations, Division of Investment Management, EDGAR Filer Manual, EDGAR Release 9.17, EDGARLink Submission Template 3, Electronic Data Gathering, HERS, Investment Companies Act, Jeffrey Naumann, MERS, Office of Information Technology, Office of Legal and Disclosure, Regulatory Flexibility Act, Rick Heroux, Ruth Armfield Sanders, Securities and Exchange Commission, Senior Special Counsel, XBRL/Interactive Data tagging, [Release Nos. 33-9077; 34-60875; 39-2468; IC-28984
Apr
14

DISCOVERY AND PRACTICE TIPS: SEC RULE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENTS Carrington Mortgage – Stanwich – EMC Mortgage Corporation – New Century Mortgage Corporation (“NCMC”

FROM drhDe.u5a.htm

This is both a HERS post and a general post for those seeking discovery of documentation. You can Google this information also. This is also what I am asking all of you to send in to me for posting. I’m backdating the HERS posts like this generally to February and March so as not to crowd out current articles but if you look at the search index and bring up “HERS or even the particular name of an institution or unfamiliar name of an individual company or institution it will come up with increasing frequency as we expand this aspect of the blog.

DISCOVERY: You ask for all SEC filings including but not limited to 8k filings and back-up documents, custodians of those records, and people with personal knowledge of the information contained in those filings, together with their names, addresses, phone numbers, title, scope of duties etc. Then you call them and ask them what they know where there are other documents. Note these are words of art and have a general meaning that cannot be disputed in the industry. CFR= Code of Federal Regulations

EMC Mortgage Corporation transferred the servicing of mortgage loans with respect to the Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-HE1, to Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC. Prior to November 1, 2007, the Mortgage Loans were serviced by EMC Mortgage Corporation pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, among Stanwich Asset Acceptance Company, L.L.C., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., EMC Mortgage Corporation, Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, a copy of which was filed as Exhibit 10.1 pursuant to Form 8-K on July 27, 2007 under the same Central Index Key (CIK) as this periodic report on Form 8-K (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”). On and after November 1, 2007, Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC will service the Mortgage Loans pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. These are the SEC entries of data relating to this event.

STANWICH ASSET ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, L.L.C., on behalf of Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2007-HE1 Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

SEC File 333-139507-02

Carrington Mortgage Loa..2007-HE1

8-K{6

Mayer Brown & Platt/FA

11/01/07

Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust/Series 2007-HE1

STANWICH ASSET ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, L.L.C.

STANWICH ASSET ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, L.L.C. (as depositor under a Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2007, providing for, inter alia, the issuance of Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2007-HE1 Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates)

(Commission File Number)333-139507-02

Delaware

(IRS Employer Identification No.) 20-2698835

Seven Greenwich Office Park
599 West Putnam Avenue

Greenwich, Connecticut

06830

(203) 661-6186

Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)
Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b)
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c)
Item 6.02.  Change in Servicer or Trustee

Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC (“CMS”) is a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Carrington Capital Management, LLC. CMS maintains its executive and principal offices at 1610 E. St. Andrews Place, Santa Ana, CA 92705. Its telephone number is (949) 517-7000.

On June 29, 2007, CMS acquired substantially all of the servicing assets of New Century Mortgage Corporation (“NCMC”), an indirect wholly-owned operating subsidiary of New Century Financial Corporation (“New Century”) as provided in the prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on July 11, 2007 under the same Central Index Key (CIK) as this periodic report on Form 8-K (the“Prospectus”)

DISCOVERY HINT. IN ORDER TO GET APPROVALS THEY HAD TO SUBMIT FORMS (APPLICATION ETC.). ASK FOR THOSE FORMS AND THE DISCLOSURES ON THOSE FORMS FROM BOTH THE COMPANY YOU ARE SEEKING INFORMATION ABOUT AND THE AGENCY UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. CMS has the approvals necessary to service mortgage loans in accordance with the related servicing agreements. CMS is qualified to service mortgage loans on behalf of Freddie Mac, a corporate instrumentality of the United States, and has received the approval of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to service mortgage loans. CMS has received approvals from the rating agencies with respect to the acquisition of the servicing platform. The residential mortgage servicing operations of CMS are currently rated -RPS4” by Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”). PRACTICE HINT: FILE AN ADMINISTRATIVE GRIEVANCE WITH THE AGENCY REGARDING THE VIOLATIONS YOU ARE ALLEGING. IN MANY CASES IT IS QUICKER AND THREATENS THE ABILITY OF THE SERVICER TO CONTINUE BUSINESS. DISCOVERY HINT: ASK FOR MATERIAL SUBMITTED FOR RATING FROM BOTH THE COMPANY (ISSUER) AND THE RATING AGENCY. SUBPOENA IF NECESSARY. DO DEPOSITIONS UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS ON RATING AGENCIES AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TO ESTABLISH POINTS THAT YOU FEEL WILL BE UNCONTROVERTIBLE ONCE ENTERED INTO THE RECORD. PRACTICE HINT: IN ORDER TO DO THAT YOU WILL PROBABLY NEED TO FILE A MOTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION IN LIEU OF LIVE TESTIMONY THUS GIVING THE OTHER SIDE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CROSS EXAMINE THE WITNESS EITHER LIVE OR IN PERSON. YOU COULD ALSO TAKE THE BETTER ROUTE OF GETTING THE DEPOSITION DONE BY TELEPHONE OR VIDEO BUT THESE CAN GET EXPENSIVE. EITHER WAY MAKE SURE EACH DOCUMENT IS SPECIFICALLY LABELED AS AN EXHIBIT AND EVENTUALLY BATES STAMPED. START CREATING AN INDEX OF EXHIBITS WITH SHORT SUMMARIES OF WHAT YOU WANT TO SUE THEM FOR IN WORD FORMAT OR SOME OTHER SPREADSHEET OR DATABASE FORMAT SO THAT YOU CAN DO EASY SEARCHES. PRACTICE HINT: THE LONGER YOU MAKE THE JUDGE WAIT FOR THE PRODUCTION OF THE DOCUMENT, THE LOWER YOUR CREDIBILITY. SHUFFLING PAPERS AROUND MAKES IT LOOK LIKE YOU MAY NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT AND THAT YOU ARE UNPREPARED.

Stanwich Asset Acceptance Company L.L.C.
By:
Name:  Bruce M. Rose
Title:  President




Filed under: foreclosure Tagged: (203) 661-6186, (949) 517-7000, (Commission File Number), (IRS Employer Identification No.) 20-2698835, 06830, 11/01/07, 1610 E. St. Andrews Place, 20-2698835, 333-139507-02, 599 West Putnam Avenue, 8-K{6, 92705, approvals from the rating agencies, Bruce M. Rose, CA, Carrington Capital Management, Carrington Mortgage Loa..2007-HE1, Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust/Series 2007-HE1, Carrington Mortgage Services, Central Index Key (CIK), Change in Servicer or Trustee., CMS, Connecticut, DELAWARE, EMC Mortgage Corporation, Freddie Mac, Greenwich, HERS, Item 6.02, L.L.C., LLC, LLC (“CMS”, Mayer Brown & Platt/FA, New Century Financial Corporation, New Century Mortgage Corporation (“NCMC”, periodic report, Pooling and Servicing Agreement, Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c), Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b), Prospectus, RPS4” by Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”)., Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)), Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12), Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)), Rule 424 of the Securities Act of 1933, Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425), Rules, Santa Ana, SEC File 333-139507-02, SEC Rules, servicing assets, Seven Greenwich Office Park, Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12, STANWICH ASSET ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, Wells Fargo Bank, Written communications pursuant to Rule 425
Apr
08

Goldman Sachs – Wells Fargo SEC Filings –DISCOVERY REQUESTS

GSAMP 8K INCLUDES SEVERAL SCHEDS AND SWAP INFO

FORM 10-D ASSET-BACKED ISSUER GSAMP DISTRIBUTION REPORT for January 29 2008

FORM 10-D ASSET-BACKED ISSUER DISTRIBUTION REPORT for January 29 2008

SEC INDEX OF FILING GSAMP

Wells Fargo-Thornburg reconstituted Pooling and Service Agreement

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Custodian has made no determination and makes no representations as to whether (i)
any endorsement is sufficient to transfer all right, title and interest of the party so endorsing, as Certificateholder or assignee thereof, in and
to that Mortgage Note or (ii) any assignment is in recordable form or sufficient to effect the assignment of and transfer to the assignee
thereof, under the Mortgage to which the assignment relates.

Exhibit 1 Underwriting Agreement, dated as of April 17, 2007, by and
between GS Mortgage Securities Corp., as depositor and
Goldman, Sachs & Co., as underwriter.
Exhibit 4 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2007, by
and among GS Mortgage Securities Corp., as depositor, Avelo
Mortgage, L.L.C., as servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
securities administrator and as master servicer, U.S. Bank
National Association, as a custodian, Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company, as a custodian and LaSalle Bank National
Association, as trustee.
Exhibit 10.1 Representations and Warranties Agreement, dated as of April
20, 2007, by and between Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company and GS
Mortgage Securities Corp. (included as Exhibit S to Exhibit
4).
Exhibit 10.2 ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2007, by and
between Goldman Sachs Mitsui Marine Derivatives Products,
L.P., as swap provider and as cap provider, and Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as securities administrator (included as part of
Exhibit X to Exhibit 4).
Exhibit 10.3 Schedule to the Master Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2007,
by and between Goldman Sachs Mitsui Marine Derivatives
Products, L.P., as swap provider and as cap provider, and
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as securities administrator (included
as part of Exhibit X to Exhibit 4).
Exhibit 10.4 Confirmation, dated March 30, 2007, by and among Goldman Sachs
Capital Markets, L.P., Goldman Sachs Mitsui Marine Derivatives
Products, L.P., as swap provider, Goldman Sachs Mortgage
Company, L.P. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as securities
administrator (included as part of Exhibit X to Exhibit 4).
Exhibit 10.5 Confirmation, dated March 30, 2007, by and among Goldman Sachs
Capital Markets, L.P., Goldman Sachs Mitsui Marine Derivatives
Products, L.P., as cap provider, Goldman Sachs Mortgage
Company, L.P. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as securities
administrator (included as part of Exhibit X to Exhibit 4).
GSAMP Trust 2007-HE2 (Form: 8-K, Received: 05/24/2007 06:01:20) Page 3 of 274
http://


Filed under: bubble, CDO, CORRUPTION, expert witness, foreclosure, GTC | Honor, HERS, Investor, Mortgage, securities fraud Tagged: 8-K, as a custodian, as depositor, as securities administrator and as master servicer, as swap provider, as trustee, as underwriter, ASSET-BACKED ISSUER DISTRIBUTION REPORT, cap provider, Confirmation, custodian, Depositor, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Goldman, Goldman Sachs, Goldman Sachs Mitsui Marine Derivatives Products, Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, GS Mortgage Securities Corp, GSAMP, GSAMP Trust 2007-HE2, HERS, ISDA Master Agreement, L.P., LaSalle Bank National Association, Master Agreement, N.A, Pooling and Servicing Agreement, Representations and Warranties Agreement, Sachs & Co., SEC filings, SEC INDEX OF FILING GSAMP, securities administrator, swap, swap provider, U.S. Bank National Association, Underwriting Agreement, Wells Fargo, Wells Fargo Bank
Mar
14

Arming Attorneys with the Ammo to Win

Forensic Mortgage Analysis Workshop

Hosted By Brad Keiser Of Foreclosure Defense Group

CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION

Winning Strategies Require Attorneys Have:

  • Leverage of a credible threat
  • Issues of fact that shift or heighten the burden of proof to the foreclosing party
  • Evidence vs Allegations
  • Understanding of your Opponent – Right hand isn’t often talking to the Left hand
  • Guns with only one bullet (e.g. produce the note) are for Russian Roulette
  • You need a full magazine in case you misfire a couple rounds
  • KISS – Keep it Simple Stupid…so the Judge can Understand

Difference between a “Loan Audit” and Mortgage Analysis

Assessing Lender Compliance at Origination

It’s all about Disclosure Requirements

How to Analyze and Identify Material TILA RESPA HOEPA Violations Yourself

Rescission: What it is and what it isn’t

Right ways and Wrong ways to apply TILA and other Loan Compliance Findings

Evidence or Characteristics of “Predatory” Lending

Using the Qualified Written Request (QWR)

Requirement to Disclose the True Owner

What Forensic Mortgage Analysis uncovers that the “canned TILA audit” doesn’t

Securitization for Dummies

Public Domain Evidence – SEC filings and What They Can Reveal

Important Questions SEC Filings Don’t Reveal That Should be Answered

What a periodic distribution report to the Certificate holders can determine

Chain of Title – Perfected Interest or Clouded Toxic Title?

APPRAISAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT


Filed under: foreclosure